Running Circular Suture Technique for Reduction Mammaplasty and Mastopexy

Background Many reports have described various technical aspects of reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy procedures. The authors present their technique, which combines a number of techniques already described in the literature regarding repositioning of the nipple–areola complex, reduction of the di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aesthetic plastic surgery 2012-12, Vol.36 (6), p.1320-1328
Hauptverfasser: de Camargo Bueno, Marco Antonio, Cavazana, William César, Baroudi, Ricardo, Nunes, Paulo Henrique Fachina, Psillakis, Jorge Miguel, de Fátima Santana Ferreira Boin, Ilka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1328
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1320
container_title Aesthetic plastic surgery
container_volume 36
creator de Camargo Bueno, Marco Antonio
Cavazana, William César
Baroudi, Ricardo
Nunes, Paulo Henrique Fachina
Psillakis, Jorge Miguel
de Fátima Santana Ferreira Boin, Ilka
description Background Many reports have described various technical aspects of reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy procedures. The authors present their technique, which combines a number of techniques already described in the literature regarding repositioning of the nipple–areola complex, reduction of the diameter of the base of the breast, and long-term retention of mammary cone projection. This study evaluated the results for patients of various ages and phenotypes in terms of scar dimensions, breast positioning, and patient satisfaction in the short, medium, and long terms. Methods Mammaplasty was performed using the inverted T technique. The preoperative skin markings differed from those described in the literature in that they did not use the future position of the nipple–areola complex as the main reference point. A running circular suture was used to fix the breast to the pectoralis major fascia and to reduce the diameter of the base of the breast, resulting in a reduced horizontal scar in the inframammary fold. The skin-marking technique allowed for better postoperative breast symmetry regardless of preoperative variations in shape and volume. Results The outcomes were considered satisfactory in the majority of cases by both the patient ( p  = 0.78) and the physician ( p  = 0.58). Adequate fullness of the upper pole was maintained in 94.7 % of the breasts. Conclusions The described technique results in a reduced diameter of the base of the breast, repair of ptosis, repositioning of the nipple–areola complex, and long-term upper pole fullness. Complications can occur with any technique, but it is important to choose a technique with good quality outcomes overall. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00266-012-9972-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221130367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2857165571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a6b9ff69b348764e79ed9d2143a9963f43ca013a3800f1966dec805330be580c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDdS8MabanKSps2lDD8GE2FO8C5kaTo72nQmDbh_b8amiOBVCHnOm_c8CJ0TfE0wzm88xsB5igmkQuSQsgM0JIxCmgEjh2iIKWcpEP42QCfer3AE85wdowGAyLKCwxBNZsHa2i6Tce10aJRLXkIfnEnmRr_b-iOYpOpcMjNl0H3d2eRJta1aN8r3m0TZMt59363N5-YUHVWq8eZsf47Q6_3dfPyYTp8fJuPbaappDn2q-EJUFRcLyoqcM5MLU4oSYm0lBKcVo1phQhUtMK6I4Lw0usAZpXhhsgJrOkJXu9y162I938u29to0jbKmC14SAEJoXD2P6OUfdNUFZ2O7SHFOBWCASJEdpV3nvTOVXLu6VW4jCZZbz3LnWUZ9cutZsjhzsU8Oi9aUPxPfYiMAO8DHJ7s07tfX_6Z-AUF2ht8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1266392022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Running Circular Suture Technique for Reduction Mammaplasty and Mastopexy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>de Camargo Bueno, Marco Antonio ; Cavazana, William César ; Baroudi, Ricardo ; Nunes, Paulo Henrique Fachina ; Psillakis, Jorge Miguel ; de Fátima Santana Ferreira Boin, Ilka</creator><creatorcontrib>de Camargo Bueno, Marco Antonio ; Cavazana, William César ; Baroudi, Ricardo ; Nunes, Paulo Henrique Fachina ; Psillakis, Jorge Miguel ; de Fátima Santana Ferreira Boin, Ilka</creatorcontrib><description>Background Many reports have described various technical aspects of reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy procedures. The authors present their technique, which combines a number of techniques already described in the literature regarding repositioning of the nipple–areola complex, reduction of the diameter of the base of the breast, and long-term retention of mammary cone projection. This study evaluated the results for patients of various ages and phenotypes in terms of scar dimensions, breast positioning, and patient satisfaction in the short, medium, and long terms. Methods Mammaplasty was performed using the inverted T technique. The preoperative skin markings differed from those described in the literature in that they did not use the future position of the nipple–areola complex as the main reference point. A running circular suture was used to fix the breast to the pectoralis major fascia and to reduce the diameter of the base of the breast, resulting in a reduced horizontal scar in the inframammary fold. The skin-marking technique allowed for better postoperative breast symmetry regardless of preoperative variations in shape and volume. Results The outcomes were considered satisfactory in the majority of cases by both the patient ( p  = 0.78) and the physician ( p  = 0.58). Adequate fullness of the upper pole was maintained in 94.7 % of the breasts. Conclusions The described technique results in a reduced diameter of the base of the breast, repair of ptosis, repositioning of the nipple–areola complex, and long-term upper pole fullness. Complications can occur with any technique, but it is important to choose a technique with good quality outcomes overall. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-216X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-5241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00266-012-9972-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22955862</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Article ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Plastic Surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Suture Techniques ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2012-12, Vol.36 (6), p.1320-1328</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2012</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a6b9ff69b348764e79ed9d2143a9963f43ca013a3800f1966dec805330be580c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a6b9ff69b348764e79ed9d2143a9963f43ca013a3800f1966dec805330be580c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00266-012-9972-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00266-012-9972-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22955862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Camargo Bueno, Marco Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavazana, William César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baroudi, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Paulo Henrique Fachina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Psillakis, Jorge Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Fátima Santana Ferreira Boin, Ilka</creatorcontrib><title>Running Circular Suture Technique for Reduction Mammaplasty and Mastopexy</title><title>Aesthetic plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Aesth Plast Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Background Many reports have described various technical aspects of reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy procedures. The authors present their technique, which combines a number of techniques already described in the literature regarding repositioning of the nipple–areola complex, reduction of the diameter of the base of the breast, and long-term retention of mammary cone projection. This study evaluated the results for patients of various ages and phenotypes in terms of scar dimensions, breast positioning, and patient satisfaction in the short, medium, and long terms. Methods Mammaplasty was performed using the inverted T technique. The preoperative skin markings differed from those described in the literature in that they did not use the future position of the nipple–areola complex as the main reference point. A running circular suture was used to fix the breast to the pectoralis major fascia and to reduce the diameter of the base of the breast, resulting in a reduced horizontal scar in the inframammary fold. The skin-marking technique allowed for better postoperative breast symmetry regardless of preoperative variations in shape and volume. Results The outcomes were considered satisfactory in the majority of cases by both the patient ( p  = 0.78) and the physician ( p  = 0.58). Adequate fullness of the upper pole was maintained in 94.7 % of the breasts. Conclusions The described technique results in a reduced diameter of the base of the breast, repair of ptosis, repositioning of the nipple–areola complex, and long-term upper pole fullness. Complications can occur with any technique, but it is important to choose a technique with good quality outcomes overall. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0364-216X</issn><issn>1432-5241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhoMobk5_gDdS8MabanKSps2lDD8GE2FO8C5kaTo72nQmDbh_b8amiOBVCHnOm_c8CJ0TfE0wzm88xsB5igmkQuSQsgM0JIxCmgEjh2iIKWcpEP42QCfer3AE85wdowGAyLKCwxBNZsHa2i6Tce10aJRLXkIfnEnmRr_b-iOYpOpcMjNl0H3d2eRJta1aN8r3m0TZMt59363N5-YUHVWq8eZsf47Q6_3dfPyYTp8fJuPbaappDn2q-EJUFRcLyoqcM5MLU4oSYm0lBKcVo1phQhUtMK6I4Lw0usAZpXhhsgJrOkJXu9y162I938u29to0jbKmC14SAEJoXD2P6OUfdNUFZ2O7SHFOBWCASJEdpV3nvTOVXLu6VW4jCZZbz3LnWUZ9cutZsjhzsU8Oi9aUPxPfYiMAO8DHJ7s07tfX_6Z-AUF2ht8</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>de Camargo Bueno, Marco Antonio</creator><creator>Cavazana, William César</creator><creator>Baroudi, Ricardo</creator><creator>Nunes, Paulo Henrique Fachina</creator><creator>Psillakis, Jorge Miguel</creator><creator>de Fátima Santana Ferreira Boin, Ilka</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Running Circular Suture Technique for Reduction Mammaplasty and Mastopexy</title><author>de Camargo Bueno, Marco Antonio ; Cavazana, William César ; Baroudi, Ricardo ; Nunes, Paulo Henrique Fachina ; Psillakis, Jorge Miguel ; de Fátima Santana Ferreira Boin, Ilka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-a6b9ff69b348764e79ed9d2143a9963f43ca013a3800f1966dec805330be580c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Camargo Bueno, Marco Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavazana, William César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baroudi, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Paulo Henrique Fachina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Psillakis, Jorge Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Fátima Santana Ferreira Boin, Ilka</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Camargo Bueno, Marco Antonio</au><au>Cavazana, William César</au><au>Baroudi, Ricardo</au><au>Nunes, Paulo Henrique Fachina</au><au>Psillakis, Jorge Miguel</au><au>de Fátima Santana Ferreira Boin, Ilka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Running Circular Suture Technique for Reduction Mammaplasty and Mastopexy</atitle><jtitle>Aesthetic plastic surgery</jtitle><stitle>Aesth Plast Surg</stitle><addtitle>Aesthetic Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1320</spage><epage>1328</epage><pages>1320-1328</pages><issn>0364-216X</issn><eissn>1432-5241</eissn><abstract>Background Many reports have described various technical aspects of reduction mammaplasty and mastopexy procedures. The authors present their technique, which combines a number of techniques already described in the literature regarding repositioning of the nipple–areola complex, reduction of the diameter of the base of the breast, and long-term retention of mammary cone projection. This study evaluated the results for patients of various ages and phenotypes in terms of scar dimensions, breast positioning, and patient satisfaction in the short, medium, and long terms. Methods Mammaplasty was performed using the inverted T technique. The preoperative skin markings differed from those described in the literature in that they did not use the future position of the nipple–areola complex as the main reference point. A running circular suture was used to fix the breast to the pectoralis major fascia and to reduce the diameter of the base of the breast, resulting in a reduced horizontal scar in the inframammary fold. The skin-marking technique allowed for better postoperative breast symmetry regardless of preoperative variations in shape and volume. Results The outcomes were considered satisfactory in the majority of cases by both the patient ( p  = 0.78) and the physician ( p  = 0.58). Adequate fullness of the upper pole was maintained in 94.7 % of the breasts. Conclusions The described technique results in a reduced diameter of the base of the breast, repair of ptosis, repositioning of the nipple–areola complex, and long-term upper pole fullness. Complications can occur with any technique, but it is important to choose a technique with good quality outcomes overall. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22955862</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00266-012-9972-4</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-216X
ispartof Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2012-12, Vol.36 (6), p.1320-1328
issn 0364-216X
1432-5241
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1221130367
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Female
Humans
Mammaplasty - methods
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Article
Otorhinolaryngology
Patient Satisfaction
Plastic Surgery
Retrospective Studies
Suture Techniques
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Running Circular Suture Technique for Reduction Mammaplasty and Mastopexy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A05%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Running%20Circular%20Suture%20Technique%20for%20Reduction%20Mammaplasty%20and%20Mastopexy&rft.jtitle=Aesthetic%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=de%20Camargo%20Bueno,%20Marco%20Antonio&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1320&rft.epage=1328&rft.pages=1320-1328&rft.issn=0364-216X&rft.eissn=1432-5241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00266-012-9972-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2857165571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1266392022&rft_id=info:pmid/22955862&rfr_iscdi=true