An Australian perspective on the doctor-patient relationship: a comparative prelude to examining duties of disclosure in surgical innovation
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health law journal 2011, Vol.19, p.237-254 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 254 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 237 |
container_title | Health law journal |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Bending, Zara J Tomossy, George F |
description | |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1220795518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A291893060</galeid><sourcerecordid>A291893060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g364t-432ba703a9d440bcff5158676a8c17329768e9c2e2feaac7408bff37578c007d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0k9vFCEUAPA51Nha_QqG6EUPY_gzMzDeNpvaNtnYg3omLPNmSsMABaap38EPLbZr0k02TcPhEfi9F3hwVJ0Q0tNaMNYdV29SusGY4IbT19UxZUS0PRYn1Z-VQ6sl5aisUQ4FiCmAzuYOkHcoXwMavM4-1kFlAy6jCLbMvEvXJnxFCmk_BxXVQ0Yom8sAKHsE92o2zrgJDUtJTMiPaDBJW5-WCMg4VOJktLJl7vzdQ8231atR2QTvdvG0-vXt7Of6ot5cnV-uV5t6Yl2T64bRreKYqX5oGrzV49iSVnS8U0ITzmjPOwG9pkBHUErzBovtODLecqEx5gM7rT491g3R3y6QspzL0cBa5cAvSRJKMe_blohCPz7SSVmQxo2-tEr_43JFeyJ6hjtcVH1ATeCg9NU7GE1Z3vMfDngdzK18ir4cQGUMMBt9sOrnvYRiMtznSS0pycsf319sxfnmudvtrPbWwgSyPM36at-_37V32c4wyBDNrOJv-f_Xsb8W4c9o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1220795518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Australian perspective on the doctor-patient relationship: a comparative prelude to examining duties of disclosure in surgical innovation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Bending, Zara J ; Tomossy, George F</creator><creatorcontrib>Bending, Zara J ; Tomossy, George F</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 1192-8336</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23185908</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: University of Alberta - Health Law Institute</publisher><subject>Access control ; Australia ; Biomedical Technology - legislation & jurisprudence ; Comparative analysis ; Contracts - legislation & jurisprudence ; Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence ; Ethics, Clinical ; Fiduciary duties ; Government regulation ; Health administration ; Humans ; Informed consent ; Informed consent (Medical law) ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Medical records ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Surgical technology</subject><ispartof>Health law journal, 2011, Vol.19, p.237-254</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 University of Alberta - Health Law Institute</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23185908$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bending, Zara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomossy, George F</creatorcontrib><title>An Australian perspective on the doctor-patient relationship: a comparative prelude to examining duties of disclosure in surgical innovation</title><title>Health law journal</title><addtitle>Health Law J</addtitle><subject>Access control</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Biomedical Technology - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Contracts - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Ethics, Clinical</subject><subject>Fiduciary duties</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Informed consent (Medical law)</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Surgical technology</subject><issn>1192-8336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0k9vFCEUAPA51Nha_QqG6EUPY_gzMzDeNpvaNtnYg3omLPNmSsMABaap38EPLbZr0k02TcPhEfi9F3hwVJ0Q0tNaMNYdV29SusGY4IbT19UxZUS0PRYn1Z-VQ6sl5aisUQ4FiCmAzuYOkHcoXwMavM4-1kFlAy6jCLbMvEvXJnxFCmk_BxXVQ0Yom8sAKHsE92o2zrgJDUtJTMiPaDBJW5-WCMg4VOJktLJl7vzdQ8231atR2QTvdvG0-vXt7Of6ot5cnV-uV5t6Yl2T64bRreKYqX5oGrzV49iSVnS8U0ITzmjPOwG9pkBHUErzBovtODLecqEx5gM7rT491g3R3y6QspzL0cBa5cAvSRJKMe_blohCPz7SSVmQxo2-tEr_43JFeyJ6hjtcVH1ATeCg9NU7GE1Z3vMfDngdzK18ir4cQGUMMBt9sOrnvYRiMtznSS0pycsf319sxfnmudvtrPbWwgSyPM36at-_37V32c4wyBDNrOJv-f_Xsb8W4c9o</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>Bending, Zara J</creator><creator>Tomossy, George F</creator><general>University of Alberta - Health Law Institute</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>An Australian perspective on the doctor-patient relationship: a comparative prelude to examining duties of disclosure in surgical innovation</title><author>Bending, Zara J ; Tomossy, George F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g364t-432ba703a9d440bcff5158676a8c17329768e9c2e2feaac7408bff37578c007d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Access control</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Biomedical Technology - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Contracts - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Ethics, Clinical</topic><topic>Fiduciary duties</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Informed consent (Medical law)</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Surgical technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bending, Zara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomossy, George F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bending, Zara J</au><au>Tomossy, George F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Australian perspective on the doctor-patient relationship: a comparative prelude to examining duties of disclosure in surgical innovation</atitle><jtitle>Health law journal</jtitle><addtitle>Health Law J</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>19</volume><spage>237</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>237-254</pages><issn>1192-8336</issn><cop>Canada</cop><pub>University of Alberta - Health Law Institute</pub><pmid>23185908</pmid><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1192-8336 |
ispartof | Health law journal, 2011, Vol.19, p.237-254 |
issn | 1192-8336 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1220795518 |
source | MEDLINE; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Access control Australia Biomedical Technology - legislation & jurisprudence Comparative analysis Contracts - legislation & jurisprudence Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence Ethics, Clinical Fiduciary duties Government regulation Health administration Humans Informed consent Informed consent (Medical law) Laws, regulations and rules Medical records Physician-Patient Relations Surgical technology |
title | An Australian perspective on the doctor-patient relationship: a comparative prelude to examining duties of disclosure in surgical innovation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T03%3A25%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Australian%20perspective%20on%20the%20doctor-patient%20relationship:%20a%20comparative%20prelude%20to%20examining%20duties%20of%20disclosure%20in%20surgical%20innovation&rft.jtitle=Health%20law%20journal&rft.au=Bending,%20Zara%20J&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=19&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=237-254&rft.issn=1192-8336&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA291893060%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1220795518&rft_id=info:pmid/23185908&rft_galeid=A291893060&rfr_iscdi=true |