Automatic quantification of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue from whole-body magnetic resonance images suitable for large cohort studies
Purpose: To develop an automated method with which to distinguish metabolically different adipose tissues in a large number of subjects using whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for improving the understanding of chronic disease risk predictions associated with distinct adipose tiss...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2012-12, Vol.36 (6), p.1421-1434 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1434 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1421 |
container_title | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Wald, Diana Teucher, Birgit Dinkel, Julien Kaaks, Rudolf Delorme, Stefan Boeing, Heiner Seidensaal, Katharina Meinzer, Hans-Peter Heimann, Tobias |
description | Purpose:
To develop an automated method with which to distinguish metabolically different adipose tissues in a large number of subjects using whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for improving the understanding of chronic disease risk predictions associated with distinct adipose tissue compartments.
Materials and Methods:
In all, 314 participants were scanned using a 1.5T MRI‐scanner with a 2‐point Dixon whole‐body sequence. Image segmentation was automated using standard image processing techniques and knowledge‐based methods. Abdominal adipose tissue was separated into subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) by statistical shape models. Bone marrow was removed to provide a more accurate measurement of adipose tissue. To assess segmentation accuracy, ground‐truth segmentations in 52 images were performed manually by one operator. Due to the high effort of manual delineation, manual segmentation was limited to seven slices per volume.
Results:
Volumetric differences were 3.30 ± 2.97% and 6.22 ± 5.28% for SAT and VAT, respectively. The systematic error shows an overestimation of 4.22 ± 7.01% for VAT and 0.37 ± 4.45% for SAT. Coefficients‐of‐variation from repeated measurements were: 3.50 ± 2.93% for VAT and 0.35 ± 0.26% for SAT. The approach of removing bone marrow worked well in most body regions. Only occasionally the method failed for knees and/or shinbone, which resulted in an overestimation of SAT by 3.14 ± 1.45%.
Conclusion:
We developed a fully automatic process to assess SAT and VAT in whole‐body MRI data. The method can support epidemiological studies investigating the relationship between excess body fat and chronic diseases. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012; 36:1421–1434. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmri.23775 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1179510118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2818998281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4315-5938a13204ca3c4141adbe541f730fcf35b141ff5a589bb6638a225efec670523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiMEoqWw4QGQJTYIKcXHjnNZViOYlrYgIRBLy3GOWw9JPPWFMm_BI-MwbRcsWNk--s4n__qL4iXQY6CUvdtM3h4z3jTiUXEIgrGSibZ-nO9U8BJa2hwUz0LYUEq7rhJPiwPGOoCOwWHx-yRFN6loNblJao7WWJ1fbibOkJB6naKa0aVA1DyQnzZo9GokarBbF5BEG0JCYrybyO21G7Hs3bAjk7qacXF6DG5Ws0Zi8wxDVtqo-jGvOE9G5a-QaHftfCQhpsFieF48MWoM-OLuPCq-fXj_dXVaXnxen61OLkpdcRCl6HirgDNaacV1BRWooUdRgWk4Ndpw0eeZMUKJtuv7us44YwIN6rqhgvGj4s3eu_XuJmGIclrCjeM-rgRoOgEUoM3o63_QjUt-zr9bKNrUVdNWmXq7p7R3IXg0cutzaL-TQOXSk1x6kn97yvCrO2XqJxwe0PtiMgB74NaOuPuPSn68_HJ2Ly33OzZE_PWwo_wPWTc8o98_reXlOZyu6BrkOf8DoGWvNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1170764784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic quantification of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue from whole-body magnetic resonance images suitable for large cohort studies</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><creator>Wald, Diana ; Teucher, Birgit ; Dinkel, Julien ; Kaaks, Rudolf ; Delorme, Stefan ; Boeing, Heiner ; Seidensaal, Katharina ; Meinzer, Hans-Peter ; Heimann, Tobias</creator><creatorcontrib>Wald, Diana ; Teucher, Birgit ; Dinkel, Julien ; Kaaks, Rudolf ; Delorme, Stefan ; Boeing, Heiner ; Seidensaal, Katharina ; Meinzer, Hans-Peter ; Heimann, Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
To develop an automated method with which to distinguish metabolically different adipose tissues in a large number of subjects using whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for improving the understanding of chronic disease risk predictions associated with distinct adipose tissue compartments.
Materials and Methods:
In all, 314 participants were scanned using a 1.5T MRI‐scanner with a 2‐point Dixon whole‐body sequence. Image segmentation was automated using standard image processing techniques and knowledge‐based methods. Abdominal adipose tissue was separated into subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) by statistical shape models. Bone marrow was removed to provide a more accurate measurement of adipose tissue. To assess segmentation accuracy, ground‐truth segmentations in 52 images were performed manually by one operator. Due to the high effort of manual delineation, manual segmentation was limited to seven slices per volume.
Results:
Volumetric differences were 3.30 ± 2.97% and 6.22 ± 5.28% for SAT and VAT, respectively. The systematic error shows an overestimation of 4.22 ± 7.01% for VAT and 0.37 ± 4.45% for SAT. Coefficients‐of‐variation from repeated measurements were: 3.50 ± 2.93% for VAT and 0.35 ± 0.26% for SAT. The approach of removing bone marrow worked well in most body regions. Only occasionally the method failed for knees and/or shinbone, which resulted in an overestimation of SAT by 3.14 ± 1.45%.
Conclusion:
We developed a fully automatic process to assess SAT and VAT in whole‐body MRI data. The method can support epidemiological studies investigating the relationship between excess body fat and chronic diseases. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012; 36:1421–1434. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23775</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22911921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>2-point Dixon sequence ; Algorithms ; automatic image segmentation ; chronic diseases ; Cohort Studies ; Europe - epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data ; Intra-Abdominal Fat - anatomy & histology ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Organ Size ; Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; subcutaneous adipose tissue ; Subcutaneous Fat - anatomy & histology ; visceral adipose tissue ; Whole Body Imaging - statistics & numerical data ; whole-body magnetic resonance imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2012-12, Vol.36 (6), p.1421-1434</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4315-5938a13204ca3c4141adbe541f730fcf35b141ff5a589bb6638a225efec670523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4315-5938a13204ca3c4141adbe541f730fcf35b141ff5a589bb6638a225efec670523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.23775$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.23775$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,1435,27933,27934,45583,45584,46418,46842</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22911921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wald, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teucher, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinkel, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaaks, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delorme, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boeing, Heiner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidensaal, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinzer, Hans-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heimann, Tobias</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic quantification of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue from whole-body magnetic resonance images suitable for large cohort studies</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose:
To develop an automated method with which to distinguish metabolically different adipose tissues in a large number of subjects using whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for improving the understanding of chronic disease risk predictions associated with distinct adipose tissue compartments.
Materials and Methods:
In all, 314 participants were scanned using a 1.5T MRI‐scanner with a 2‐point Dixon whole‐body sequence. Image segmentation was automated using standard image processing techniques and knowledge‐based methods. Abdominal adipose tissue was separated into subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) by statistical shape models. Bone marrow was removed to provide a more accurate measurement of adipose tissue. To assess segmentation accuracy, ground‐truth segmentations in 52 images were performed manually by one operator. Due to the high effort of manual delineation, manual segmentation was limited to seven slices per volume.
Results:
Volumetric differences were 3.30 ± 2.97% and 6.22 ± 5.28% for SAT and VAT, respectively. The systematic error shows an overestimation of 4.22 ± 7.01% for VAT and 0.37 ± 4.45% for SAT. Coefficients‐of‐variation from repeated measurements were: 3.50 ± 2.93% for VAT and 0.35 ± 0.26% for SAT. The approach of removing bone marrow worked well in most body regions. Only occasionally the method failed for knees and/or shinbone, which resulted in an overestimation of SAT by 3.14 ± 1.45%.
Conclusion:
We developed a fully automatic process to assess SAT and VAT in whole‐body MRI data. The method can support epidemiological studies investigating the relationship between excess body fat and chronic diseases. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012; 36:1421–1434. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>2-point Dixon sequence</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>automatic image segmentation</subject><subject>chronic diseases</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Europe - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Intra-Abdominal Fat - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Organ Size</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>subcutaneous adipose tissue</subject><subject>Subcutaneous Fat - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>visceral adipose tissue</subject><subject>Whole Body Imaging - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>whole-body magnetic resonance imaging</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiMEoqWw4QGQJTYIKcXHjnNZViOYlrYgIRBLy3GOWw9JPPWFMm_BI-MwbRcsWNk--s4n__qL4iXQY6CUvdtM3h4z3jTiUXEIgrGSibZ-nO9U8BJa2hwUz0LYUEq7rhJPiwPGOoCOwWHx-yRFN6loNblJao7WWJ1fbibOkJB6naKa0aVA1DyQnzZo9GokarBbF5BEG0JCYrybyO21G7Hs3bAjk7qacXF6DG5Ws0Zi8wxDVtqo-jGvOE9G5a-QaHftfCQhpsFieF48MWoM-OLuPCq-fXj_dXVaXnxen61OLkpdcRCl6HirgDNaacV1BRWooUdRgWk4Ndpw0eeZMUKJtuv7us44YwIN6rqhgvGj4s3eu_XuJmGIclrCjeM-rgRoOgEUoM3o63_QjUt-zr9bKNrUVdNWmXq7p7R3IXg0cutzaL-TQOXSk1x6kn97yvCrO2XqJxwe0PtiMgB74NaOuPuPSn68_HJ2Ly33OzZE_PWwo_wPWTc8o98_reXlOZyu6BrkOf8DoGWvNg</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Wald, Diana</creator><creator>Teucher, Birgit</creator><creator>Dinkel, Julien</creator><creator>Kaaks, Rudolf</creator><creator>Delorme, Stefan</creator><creator>Boeing, Heiner</creator><creator>Seidensaal, Katharina</creator><creator>Meinzer, Hans-Peter</creator><creator>Heimann, Tobias</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Automatic quantification of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue from whole-body magnetic resonance images suitable for large cohort studies</title><author>Wald, Diana ; Teucher, Birgit ; Dinkel, Julien ; Kaaks, Rudolf ; Delorme, Stefan ; Boeing, Heiner ; Seidensaal, Katharina ; Meinzer, Hans-Peter ; Heimann, Tobias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4315-5938a13204ca3c4141adbe541f730fcf35b141ff5a589bb6638a225efec670523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>2-point Dixon sequence</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>automatic image segmentation</topic><topic>chronic diseases</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Europe - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Intra-Abdominal Fat - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Organ Size</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>subcutaneous adipose tissue</topic><topic>Subcutaneous Fat - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>visceral adipose tissue</topic><topic>Whole Body Imaging - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>whole-body magnetic resonance imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wald, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teucher, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinkel, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaaks, Rudolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delorme, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boeing, Heiner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidensaal, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinzer, Hans-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heimann, Tobias</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wald, Diana</au><au>Teucher, Birgit</au><au>Dinkel, Julien</au><au>Kaaks, Rudolf</au><au>Delorme, Stefan</au><au>Boeing, Heiner</au><au>Seidensaal, Katharina</au><au>Meinzer, Hans-Peter</au><au>Heimann, Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automatic quantification of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue from whole-body magnetic resonance images suitable for large cohort studies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1421</spage><epage>1434</epage><pages>1421-1434</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Purpose:
To develop an automated method with which to distinguish metabolically different adipose tissues in a large number of subjects using whole‐body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for improving the understanding of chronic disease risk predictions associated with distinct adipose tissue compartments.
Materials and Methods:
In all, 314 participants were scanned using a 1.5T MRI‐scanner with a 2‐point Dixon whole‐body sequence. Image segmentation was automated using standard image processing techniques and knowledge‐based methods. Abdominal adipose tissue was separated into subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) by statistical shape models. Bone marrow was removed to provide a more accurate measurement of adipose tissue. To assess segmentation accuracy, ground‐truth segmentations in 52 images were performed manually by one operator. Due to the high effort of manual delineation, manual segmentation was limited to seven slices per volume.
Results:
Volumetric differences were 3.30 ± 2.97% and 6.22 ± 5.28% for SAT and VAT, respectively. The systematic error shows an overestimation of 4.22 ± 7.01% for VAT and 0.37 ± 4.45% for SAT. Coefficients‐of‐variation from repeated measurements were: 3.50 ± 2.93% for VAT and 0.35 ± 0.26% for SAT. The approach of removing bone marrow worked well in most body regions. Only occasionally the method failed for knees and/or shinbone, which resulted in an overestimation of SAT by 3.14 ± 1.45%.
Conclusion:
We developed a fully automatic process to assess SAT and VAT in whole‐body MRI data. The method can support epidemiological studies investigating the relationship between excess body fat and chronic diseases. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012; 36:1421–1434. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>22911921</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.23775</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1807 |
ispartof | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2012-12, Vol.36 (6), p.1421-1434 |
issn | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1179510118 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Free Content |
subjects | 2-point Dixon sequence Algorithms automatic image segmentation chronic diseases Cohort Studies Europe - epidemiology Female Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional - statistics & numerical data Intra-Abdominal Fat - anatomy & histology Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - statistics & numerical data Male Middle Aged Organ Size Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity subcutaneous adipose tissue Subcutaneous Fat - anatomy & histology visceral adipose tissue Whole Body Imaging - statistics & numerical data whole-body magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Automatic quantification of subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue from whole-body magnetic resonance images suitable for large cohort studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T17%3A13%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20quantification%20of%20subcutaneous%20and%20visceral%20adipose%20tissue%20from%20whole-body%20magnetic%20resonance%20images%20suitable%20for%20large%20cohort%20studies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Wald,%20Diana&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1421&rft.epage=1434&rft.pages=1421-1434&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.23775&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2818998281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1170764784&rft_id=info:pmid/22911921&rfr_iscdi=true |