Functional outcomes and structural integrity after double-pulley suture bridge rotator cuff repair using serial ultrasonographic examination

Background We evaluated the integrity and functional outcomes of rotator cuff tear after performing the double-pulley suture bridge (DPSB) repair technique according to the tear size by using serial ultrasonographic examinations. Materials and methods The study included 41 consecutive arthroscopic r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2012-12, Vol.21 (12), p.1753-1763
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Chang-Hyuk, MD, PhD, Kim, Shin-Kun, MD, PhD, Cho, Myung-Rae, MD, PhD, Baek, Seung-Hoon, MD, Lee, Jae-Kun, MD, Kim, Se-Sik, MD, Park, Chang-Min, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1763
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1753
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 21
creator Choi, Chang-Hyuk, MD, PhD
Kim, Shin-Kun, MD, PhD
Cho, Myung-Rae, MD, PhD
Baek, Seung-Hoon, MD
Lee, Jae-Kun, MD
Kim, Se-Sik, MD
Park, Chang-Min, MD
description Background We evaluated the integrity and functional outcomes of rotator cuff tear after performing the double-pulley suture bridge (DPSB) repair technique according to the tear size by using serial ultrasonographic examinations. Materials and methods The study included 41 consecutive arthroscopic rotator repairs using the DPSB technique. The average follow-up was 28 months. We completed the serial ultrasonographic examinations and compared the results with the functional outcome using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Constant score, the Korean Shoulder Scoring (KSS) system, and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score. Results The overall retear rate was 19.5% (8 of 41), comprising 50% (2 of 4) for massive tears, 18% (2 of 11) for large tears, 17% (4 of 23) for medium tears, and no failures for small tears (0 of 3). The retear rate was 17.6% (6 of 34) after complete repair and 28.6% (2 of 7) after repair with gap formation. Seventy-five percent (6 of 8) of retears were identified within 6 months after operation and 25% (2 of 8) were identified more than 1 year after repair. The functional outcomes of the intact group and the retear group according to the ASES score, the Constant score, the KSS, and the UCLA score were 96, 93, 94, and 33, and 90, 82, 87, and 31, respectively ( P > .05). Conclusion The overall retear rate after DPSB repair was 19.5% with 2 time periods of retear. The outcome improved independent of the tear size and the cuff integrity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2011.12.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1178707758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1058274612000250</els_id><sourcerecordid>1178707758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-de4c4376b1d786a054dd98c665b9d7673e0ba5ed11b6c4fba87387fa5c22016d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksGKFDEQhhtR3HX1AbxILoKXHpN0J-lBEJbFVWHBg3oO6aR6TNuTjJVEnHfwoU0zo4IHTwnh-_9U1V9N85TRDaNMvpw3c4INp4xtGN9Qxu81l0x0vJWC0vv1TsXQctXLi-ZRSjOldNtT_rC54Fz0bJDqsvl5W4LNPgazkFiyjXtIxARHUsZic8H67kOGHfp8JGbKgMTFMi7QHsqywJGkUikgI3q3A4IxmxyR2DJNBOFgPJKSfNiRBOirWVkymhRD3KE5fPGWwA-z98GsNTxuHkxmSfDkfF41n2_ffLp51959ePv-5vqutaJTuXXQ275TcmRODdJQ0Tu3HayUYtw6JVUHdDQCHGOjtP00mkF1g5qMsLzOSrruqnlx8j1g_FYgZb33ycKymACxJM2YGhRVSgwVZSfUYkwJYdIH9HuDR82oXkPQs64h6DUEzbiuIVTNs7N9Gffg_ih-T70Cz8-ASdYsE5pgffrLScWo7FejVycO6jC-e0CdrIdgwXkEm7WL_r9lvP5HbRcffP3wKxwhzbFgTb12q1MV6I_rtqzLwnhdFC5o9wv5c72T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1178707758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional outcomes and structural integrity after double-pulley suture bridge rotator cuff repair using serial ultrasonographic examination</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Choi, Chang-Hyuk, MD, PhD ; Kim, Shin-Kun, MD, PhD ; Cho, Myung-Rae, MD, PhD ; Baek, Seung-Hoon, MD ; Lee, Jae-Kun, MD ; Kim, Se-Sik, MD ; Park, Chang-Min, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Chang-Hyuk, MD, PhD ; Kim, Shin-Kun, MD, PhD ; Cho, Myung-Rae, MD, PhD ; Baek, Seung-Hoon, MD ; Lee, Jae-Kun, MD ; Kim, Se-Sik, MD ; Park, Chang-Min, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background We evaluated the integrity and functional outcomes of rotator cuff tear after performing the double-pulley suture bridge (DPSB) repair technique according to the tear size by using serial ultrasonographic examinations. Materials and methods The study included 41 consecutive arthroscopic rotator repairs using the DPSB technique. The average follow-up was 28 months. We completed the serial ultrasonographic examinations and compared the results with the functional outcome using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Constant score, the Korean Shoulder Scoring (KSS) system, and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score. Results The overall retear rate was 19.5% (8 of 41), comprising 50% (2 of 4) for massive tears, 18% (2 of 11) for large tears, 17% (4 of 23) for medium tears, and no failures for small tears (0 of 3). The retear rate was 17.6% (6 of 34) after complete repair and 28.6% (2 of 7) after repair with gap formation. Seventy-five percent (6 of 8) of retears were identified within 6 months after operation and 25% (2 of 8) were identified more than 1 year after repair. The functional outcomes of the intact group and the retear group according to the ASES score, the Constant score, the KSS, and the UCLA score were 96, 93, 94, and 33, and 90, 82, 87, and 31, respectively ( P &gt; .05). Conclusion The overall retear rate after DPSB repair was 19.5% with 2 time periods of retear. The outcome improved independent of the tear size and the cuff integrity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.12.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22541867</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroscopy - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; double-pulley suture bridge repair ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Recovery of Function - physiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Rotator Cuff - diagnostic imaging ; Rotator Cuff - surgery ; Rotator Cuff Injuries ; Rotator cuff tear ; Rupture ; Shoulder Joint - injuries ; Shoulder Joint - physiopathology ; Shoulder Joint - surgery ; Suture Techniques ; Sutures ; Tendon Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; Tendon Injuries - physiopathology ; Tendon Injuries - surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; ultrasonographic examination ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2012-12, Vol.21 (12), p.1753-1763</ispartof><rights>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-de4c4376b1d786a054dd98c665b9d7673e0ba5ed11b6c4fba87387fa5c22016d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-de4c4376b1d786a054dd98c665b9d7673e0ba5ed11b6c4fba87387fa5c22016d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058274612000250$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26710642$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22541867$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Chang-Hyuk, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Shin-Kun, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Myung-Rae, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baek, Seung-Hoon, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jae-Kun, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Se-Sik, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chang-Min, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Functional outcomes and structural integrity after double-pulley suture bridge rotator cuff repair using serial ultrasonographic examination</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Background We evaluated the integrity and functional outcomes of rotator cuff tear after performing the double-pulley suture bridge (DPSB) repair technique according to the tear size by using serial ultrasonographic examinations. Materials and methods The study included 41 consecutive arthroscopic rotator repairs using the DPSB technique. The average follow-up was 28 months. We completed the serial ultrasonographic examinations and compared the results with the functional outcome using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Constant score, the Korean Shoulder Scoring (KSS) system, and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score. Results The overall retear rate was 19.5% (8 of 41), comprising 50% (2 of 4) for massive tears, 18% (2 of 11) for large tears, 17% (4 of 23) for medium tears, and no failures for small tears (0 of 3). The retear rate was 17.6% (6 of 34) after complete repair and 28.6% (2 of 7) after repair with gap formation. Seventy-five percent (6 of 8) of retears were identified within 6 months after operation and 25% (2 of 8) were identified more than 1 year after repair. The functional outcomes of the intact group and the retear group according to the ASES score, the Constant score, the KSS, and the UCLA score were 96, 93, 94, and 33, and 90, 82, 87, and 31, respectively ( P &gt; .05). Conclusion The overall retear rate after DPSB repair was 19.5% with 2 time periods of retear. The outcome improved independent of the tear size and the cuff integrity.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>double-pulley suture bridge repair</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Recovery of Function - physiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff - surgery</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff Injuries</subject><subject>Rotator cuff tear</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - injuries</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>ultrasonographic examination</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksGKFDEQhhtR3HX1AbxILoKXHpN0J-lBEJbFVWHBg3oO6aR6TNuTjJVEnHfwoU0zo4IHTwnh-_9U1V9N85TRDaNMvpw3c4INp4xtGN9Qxu81l0x0vJWC0vv1TsXQctXLi-ZRSjOldNtT_rC54Fz0bJDqsvl5W4LNPgazkFiyjXtIxARHUsZic8H67kOGHfp8JGbKgMTFMi7QHsqywJGkUikgI3q3A4IxmxyR2DJNBOFgPJKSfNiRBOirWVkymhRD3KE5fPGWwA-z98GsNTxuHkxmSfDkfF41n2_ffLp51959ePv-5vqutaJTuXXQ275TcmRODdJQ0Tu3HayUYtw6JVUHdDQCHGOjtP00mkF1g5qMsLzOSrruqnlx8j1g_FYgZb33ycKymACxJM2YGhRVSgwVZSfUYkwJYdIH9HuDR82oXkPQs64h6DUEzbiuIVTNs7N9Gffg_ih-T70Cz8-ASdYsE5pgffrLScWo7FejVycO6jC-e0CdrIdgwXkEm7WL_r9lvP5HbRcffP3wKxwhzbFgTb12q1MV6I_rtqzLwnhdFC5o9wv5c72T</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Choi, Chang-Hyuk, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Kim, Shin-Kun, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Cho, Myung-Rae, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Baek, Seung-Hoon, MD</creator><creator>Lee, Jae-Kun, MD</creator><creator>Kim, Se-Sik, MD</creator><creator>Park, Chang-Min, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Functional outcomes and structural integrity after double-pulley suture bridge rotator cuff repair using serial ultrasonographic examination</title><author>Choi, Chang-Hyuk, MD, PhD ; Kim, Shin-Kun, MD, PhD ; Cho, Myung-Rae, MD, PhD ; Baek, Seung-Hoon, MD ; Lee, Jae-Kun, MD ; Kim, Se-Sik, MD ; Park, Chang-Min, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-de4c4376b1d786a054dd98c665b9d7673e0ba5ed11b6c4fba87387fa5c22016d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>double-pulley suture bridge repair</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Recovery of Function - physiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff - surgery</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff Injuries</topic><topic>Rotator cuff tear</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - injuries</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>ultrasonographic examination</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Chang-Hyuk, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Shin-Kun, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Myung-Rae, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baek, Seung-Hoon, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jae-Kun, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Se-Sik, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Chang-Min, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Chang-Hyuk, MD, PhD</au><au>Kim, Shin-Kun, MD, PhD</au><au>Cho, Myung-Rae, MD, PhD</au><au>Baek, Seung-Hoon, MD</au><au>Lee, Jae-Kun, MD</au><au>Kim, Se-Sik, MD</au><au>Park, Chang-Min, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional outcomes and structural integrity after double-pulley suture bridge rotator cuff repair using serial ultrasonographic examination</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1753</spage><epage>1763</epage><pages>1753-1763</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Background We evaluated the integrity and functional outcomes of rotator cuff tear after performing the double-pulley suture bridge (DPSB) repair technique according to the tear size by using serial ultrasonographic examinations. Materials and methods The study included 41 consecutive arthroscopic rotator repairs using the DPSB technique. The average follow-up was 28 months. We completed the serial ultrasonographic examinations and compared the results with the functional outcome using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Constant score, the Korean Shoulder Scoring (KSS) system, and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score. Results The overall retear rate was 19.5% (8 of 41), comprising 50% (2 of 4) for massive tears, 18% (2 of 11) for large tears, 17% (4 of 23) for medium tears, and no failures for small tears (0 of 3). The retear rate was 17.6% (6 of 34) after complete repair and 28.6% (2 of 7) after repair with gap formation. Seventy-five percent (6 of 8) of retears were identified within 6 months after operation and 25% (2 of 8) were identified more than 1 year after repair. The functional outcomes of the intact group and the retear group according to the ASES score, the Constant score, the KSS, and the UCLA score were 96, 93, 94, and 33, and 90, 82, 87, and 31, respectively ( P &gt; .05). Conclusion The overall retear rate after DPSB repair was 19.5% with 2 time periods of retear. The outcome improved independent of the tear size and the cuff integrity.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22541867</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2011.12.012</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2012-12, Vol.21 (12), p.1753-1763
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1178707758
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Arthroscopy - methods
Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
double-pulley suture bridge repair
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Range of Motion, Articular
Recovery of Function - physiology
Retrospective Studies
Rotator Cuff - diagnostic imaging
Rotator Cuff - surgery
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Rotator cuff tear
Rupture
Shoulder Joint - injuries
Shoulder Joint - physiopathology
Shoulder Joint - surgery
Suture Techniques
Sutures
Tendon Injuries - diagnostic imaging
Tendon Injuries - physiopathology
Tendon Injuries - surgery
Treatment Outcome
ultrasonographic examination
Ultrasonography
title Functional outcomes and structural integrity after double-pulley suture bridge rotator cuff repair using serial ultrasonographic examination
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A54%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20outcomes%20and%20structural%20integrity%20after%20double-pulley%20suture%20bridge%20rotator%20cuff%20repair%20using%20serial%20ultrasonographic%20examination&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Choi,%20Chang-Hyuk,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1753&rft.epage=1763&rft.pages=1753-1763&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2011.12.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1178707758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1178707758&rft_id=info:pmid/22541867&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1058274612000250&rfr_iscdi=true