Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities

In general, Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) are considered nonpests of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], but changes in soil conservation practices have shifted the pest status of this organism from an opportunistic to a perennial, early-season pest in parts of central Kansas. As a result, soybe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of economic entomology 2012-10, Vol.105 (5), p.1629-1639
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, W. A, Alfaress, S, Whitworth, R. J, McCornack, B. P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1639
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1629
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 105
creator Johnson, W. A
Alfaress, S
Whitworth, R. J
McCornack, B. P
description In general, Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) are considered nonpests of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], but changes in soil conservation practices have shifted the pest status of this organism from an opportunistic to a perennial, early-season pest in parts of central Kansas. As a result, soybean producers that rotate with corn (Zea mays L.) under conservation tillage practices have resorted to removing excess corn residue by using controlled burns. In a 2-yr field study (2009–2010), we demonstrated that residue removal in burned compared with unburned plots (measured as previous crop residue weights) had minimal impact on numbers of live and dead A. vulgare, soybean seedling emergence, and isopod feeding damage over time. Specifically, removal of residue by burning did not result in higher emergence rates for soybean stands or less feeding damage by A. vulgare. In a separate study, we found that number of live A. vulgare and residue weights had no consistent relationship with seedling emergence or feeding damage. Furthermore, seedling emergence was not impacted by higher numbers of A. vulgare in unburned plots, indicating that emergence in this study may have been influenced by factors other than A. vulgare densities. These studies demonstrate that removing residue through controlled burning did not impact seedling emergence in presence of A. vulgare and that residue and feeding damage to seedlings did not consistently relate to A. vulgare densities. Other factors that may have influenced a relationship between residue and live isopod numbers, such as variable moisture levels, are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1603/EC12040
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1178704073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1171896798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b431t-d7ad82d55998bbd4a54df83efbf0ff8f9bd562351c70d6b7c68180b5225c7b653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0d2K1DAYBuAgijuu4h1oT8T1oJqf5s-zZRx1YUVxXPCsfGmSIdImNWmFvQJv244z7noieJSEPLz5yIvQY4JfEoHZq82aUNzgO2hFNFM11eTrXbTCmNIaN5qdoAelfMOYCErwfXRCGeGCcL1CP9c5jdVnV4KdXQXR3uw_QISdG1ycqo33rptKlWJ1ngewoe-DDfNQ_Zj7HWRXnV2UNCYLr_--Dxbci-pTGuceppBi-R2_TdfGQay20_70xsUSpuDKQ3TPQ1_co-N6iq7ebr6s39eXH99drM8va9MwMtVWglXUcq61MsY2wBvrFXPeeOy98tpYLijjpJPYCiM7oYjChlPKO2kEZ6fo7JA75vR9dmVqh1A61_cQXZpLS4hUcvlJyf6HEqWF1Gqhzw-0y6mU7Hw75jBAvm4JbvcFtceCFvnkGDqbwdkb96eRBTw7Aigd9D5D7EK5daLhhLD9k08PzkNqYZcXc7WlS8MYYyYZVbdJJqQU3T9H-gX1kazk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1171896798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Johnson, W. A ; Alfaress, S ; Whitworth, R. J ; McCornack, B. P</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, W. A ; Alfaress, S ; Whitworth, R. J ; McCornack, B. P</creatorcontrib><description>In general, Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) are considered nonpests of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], but changes in soil conservation practices have shifted the pest status of this organism from an opportunistic to a perennial, early-season pest in parts of central Kansas. As a result, soybean producers that rotate with corn (Zea mays L.) under conservation tillage practices have resorted to removing excess corn residue by using controlled burns. In a 2-yr field study (2009–2010), we demonstrated that residue removal in burned compared with unburned plots (measured as previous crop residue weights) had minimal impact on numbers of live and dead A. vulgare, soybean seedling emergence, and isopod feeding damage over time. Specifically, removal of residue by burning did not result in higher emergence rates for soybean stands or less feeding damage by A. vulgare. In a separate study, we found that number of live A. vulgare and residue weights had no consistent relationship with seedling emergence or feeding damage. Furthermore, seedling emergence was not impacted by higher numbers of A. vulgare in unburned plots, indicating that emergence in this study may have been influenced by factors other than A. vulgare densities. These studies demonstrate that removing residue through controlled burning did not impact seedling emergence in presence of A. vulgare and that residue and feeding damage to seedlings did not consistently relate to A. vulgare densities. Other factors that may have influenced a relationship between residue and live isopod numbers, such as variable moisture levels, are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/EC12040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23156159</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Agriculture - methods ; Animals ; Armadillidiidae ; Armadillidium vulgare ; Biological and medical sciences ; Burning ; Burns ; Conservation ; conservation practices ; conservation tillage ; Control ; corn ; Crop residues ; Crustacea ; Feeding ; FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS ; Fires ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities ; Glycine max ; Glycine max - growth &amp; development ; Invertebrates ; isopod ; Isopoda ; Isopoda - physiology ; Kansas ; Pest Control ; Pest status ; Pests ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; population ; Population Dynamics ; prescribed burning ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; residue management ; Seasons ; seedling emergence ; Seedlings ; Seedlings - growth &amp; development ; Soil conservation ; soybean ; Soybeans ; Tillage ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2012-10, Vol.105 (5), p.1629-1639</ispartof><rights>2012 Entomological Society of America</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b431t-d7ad82d55998bbd4a54df83efbf0ff8f9bd562351c70d6b7c68180b5225c7b653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b431t-d7ad82d55998bbd4a54df83efbf0ff8f9bd562351c70d6b7c68180b5225c7b653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26451138$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23156159$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, W. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfaress, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitworth, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCornack, B. P</creatorcontrib><title>Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>In general, Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) are considered nonpests of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], but changes in soil conservation practices have shifted the pest status of this organism from an opportunistic to a perennial, early-season pest in parts of central Kansas. As a result, soybean producers that rotate with corn (Zea mays L.) under conservation tillage practices have resorted to removing excess corn residue by using controlled burns. In a 2-yr field study (2009–2010), we demonstrated that residue removal in burned compared with unburned plots (measured as previous crop residue weights) had minimal impact on numbers of live and dead A. vulgare, soybean seedling emergence, and isopod feeding damage over time. Specifically, removal of residue by burning did not result in higher emergence rates for soybean stands or less feeding damage by A. vulgare. In a separate study, we found that number of live A. vulgare and residue weights had no consistent relationship with seedling emergence or feeding damage. Furthermore, seedling emergence was not impacted by higher numbers of A. vulgare in unburned plots, indicating that emergence in this study may have been influenced by factors other than A. vulgare densities. These studies demonstrate that removing residue through controlled burning did not impact seedling emergence in presence of A. vulgare and that residue and feeding damage to seedlings did not consistently relate to A. vulgare densities. Other factors that may have influenced a relationship between residue and live isopod numbers, such as variable moisture levels, are discussed.</description><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Armadillidiidae</subject><subject>Armadillidium vulgare</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burning</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>conservation practices</subject><subject>conservation tillage</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crustacea</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Glycine max - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>isopod</subject><subject>Isopoda</subject><subject>Isopoda - physiology</subject><subject>Kansas</subject><subject>Pest Control</subject><subject>Pest status</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>population</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>prescribed burning</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>residue management</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>seedling emergence</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Seedlings - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>soybean</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><issn>0022-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0d2K1DAYBuAgijuu4h1oT8T1oJqf5s-zZRx1YUVxXPCsfGmSIdImNWmFvQJv244z7noieJSEPLz5yIvQY4JfEoHZq82aUNzgO2hFNFM11eTrXbTCmNIaN5qdoAelfMOYCErwfXRCGeGCcL1CP9c5jdVnV4KdXQXR3uw_QISdG1ycqo33rptKlWJ1ngewoe-DDfNQ_Zj7HWRXnV2UNCYLr_--Dxbci-pTGuceppBi-R2_TdfGQay20_70xsUSpuDKQ3TPQ1_co-N6iq7ebr6s39eXH99drM8va9MwMtVWglXUcq61MsY2wBvrFXPeeOy98tpYLijjpJPYCiM7oYjChlPKO2kEZ6fo7JA75vR9dmVqh1A61_cQXZpLS4hUcvlJyf6HEqWF1Gqhzw-0y6mU7Hw75jBAvm4JbvcFtceCFvnkGDqbwdkb96eRBTw7Aigd9D5D7EK5daLhhLD9k08PzkNqYZcXc7WlS8MYYyYZVbdJJqQU3T9H-gX1kazk</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Johnson, W. A</creator><creator>Alfaress, S</creator><creator>Whitworth, R. J</creator><creator>McCornack, B. P</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities</title><author>Johnson, W. A ; Alfaress, S ; Whitworth, R. J ; McCornack, B. P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b431t-d7ad82d55998bbd4a54df83efbf0ff8f9bd562351c70d6b7c68180b5225c7b653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Armadillidiidae</topic><topic>Armadillidium vulgare</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burning</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>conservation practices</topic><topic>conservation tillage</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crustacea</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Glycine max - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>isopod</topic><topic>Isopoda</topic><topic>Isopoda - physiology</topic><topic>Kansas</topic><topic>Pest Control</topic><topic>Pest status</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>population</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>prescribed burning</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>residue management</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>seedling emergence</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Seedlings - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>soybean</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, W. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfaress, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitworth, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCornack, B. P</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, W. A</au><au>Alfaress, S</au><au>Whitworth, R. J</au><au>McCornack, B. P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1629</spage><epage>1639</epage><pages>1629-1639</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><eissn>0022-0493</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>In general, Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) are considered nonpests of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], but changes in soil conservation practices have shifted the pest status of this organism from an opportunistic to a perennial, early-season pest in parts of central Kansas. As a result, soybean producers that rotate with corn (Zea mays L.) under conservation tillage practices have resorted to removing excess corn residue by using controlled burns. In a 2-yr field study (2009–2010), we demonstrated that residue removal in burned compared with unburned plots (measured as previous crop residue weights) had minimal impact on numbers of live and dead A. vulgare, soybean seedling emergence, and isopod feeding damage over time. Specifically, removal of residue by burning did not result in higher emergence rates for soybean stands or less feeding damage by A. vulgare. In a separate study, we found that number of live A. vulgare and residue weights had no consistent relationship with seedling emergence or feeding damage. Furthermore, seedling emergence was not impacted by higher numbers of A. vulgare in unburned plots, indicating that emergence in this study may have been influenced by factors other than A. vulgare densities. These studies demonstrate that removing residue through controlled burning did not impact seedling emergence in presence of A. vulgare and that residue and feeding damage to seedlings did not consistently relate to A. vulgare densities. Other factors that may have influenced a relationship between residue and live isopod numbers, such as variable moisture levels, are discussed.</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>23156159</pmid><doi>10.1603/EC12040</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 2012-10, Vol.105 (5), p.1629-1639
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
0022-0493
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1178704073
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE
subjects Agriculture - methods
Animals
Armadillidiidae
Armadillidium vulgare
Biological and medical sciences
Burning
Burns
Conservation
conservation practices
conservation tillage
Control
corn
Crop residues
Crustacea
Feeding
FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS
Fires
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Generalities
Glycine max
Glycine max - growth & development
Invertebrates
isopod
Isopoda
Isopoda - physiology
Kansas
Pest Control
Pest status
Pests
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
population
Population Dynamics
prescribed burning
Protozoa. Invertebrates
residue management
Seasons
seedling emergence
Seedlings
Seedlings - growth & development
Soil conservation
soybean
Soybeans
Tillage
Zea mays
title Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A24%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crop%20Residue%20and%20Residue%20Management%20Effects%20on%20Armadillidium%20vulgare%20(Isopoda:%20Armadillidiidae)%20Populations%20and%20Soybean%20Stand%20Densities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Johnson,%20W.%20A&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1629&rft.epage=1639&rft.pages=1629-1639&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/EC12040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1171896798%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1171896798&rft_id=info:pmid/23156159&rfr_iscdi=true