Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities
In general, Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) are considered nonpests of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], but changes in soil conservation practices have shifted the pest status of this organism from an opportunistic to a perennial, early-season pest in parts of central Kansas. As a result, soybe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic entomology 2012-10, Vol.105 (5), p.1629-1639 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1639 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1629 |
container_title | Journal of economic entomology |
container_volume | 105 |
creator | Johnson, W. A Alfaress, S Whitworth, R. J McCornack, B. P |
description | In general, Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) are considered nonpests of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], but changes in soil conservation practices have shifted the pest status of this organism from an opportunistic to a perennial, early-season pest in parts of central Kansas. As a result, soybean producers that rotate with corn (Zea mays L.) under conservation tillage practices have resorted to removing excess corn residue by using controlled burns. In a 2-yr field study (2009–2010), we demonstrated that residue removal in burned compared with unburned plots (measured as previous crop residue weights) had minimal impact on numbers of live and dead A. vulgare, soybean seedling emergence, and isopod feeding damage over time. Specifically, removal of residue by burning did not result in higher emergence rates for soybean stands or less feeding damage by A. vulgare. In a separate study, we found that number of live A. vulgare and residue weights had no consistent relationship with seedling emergence or feeding damage. Furthermore, seedling emergence was not impacted by higher numbers of A. vulgare in unburned plots, indicating that emergence in this study may have been influenced by factors other than A. vulgare densities. These studies demonstrate that removing residue through controlled burning did not impact seedling emergence in presence of A. vulgare and that residue and feeding damage to seedlings did not consistently relate to A. vulgare densities. Other factors that may have influenced a relationship between residue and live isopod numbers, such as variable moisture levels, are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1603/EC12040 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1178704073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1171896798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b431t-d7ad82d55998bbd4a54df83efbf0ff8f9bd562351c70d6b7c68180b5225c7b653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0d2K1DAYBuAgijuu4h1oT8T1oJqf5s-zZRx1YUVxXPCsfGmSIdImNWmFvQJv244z7noieJSEPLz5yIvQY4JfEoHZq82aUNzgO2hFNFM11eTrXbTCmNIaN5qdoAelfMOYCErwfXRCGeGCcL1CP9c5jdVnV4KdXQXR3uw_QISdG1ycqo33rptKlWJ1ngewoe-DDfNQ_Zj7HWRXnV2UNCYLr_--Dxbci-pTGuceppBi-R2_TdfGQay20_70xsUSpuDKQ3TPQ1_co-N6iq7ebr6s39eXH99drM8va9MwMtVWglXUcq61MsY2wBvrFXPeeOy98tpYLijjpJPYCiM7oYjChlPKO2kEZ6fo7JA75vR9dmVqh1A61_cQXZpLS4hUcvlJyf6HEqWF1Gqhzw-0y6mU7Hw75jBAvm4JbvcFtceCFvnkGDqbwdkb96eRBTw7Aigd9D5D7EK5daLhhLD9k08PzkNqYZcXc7WlS8MYYyYZVbdJJqQU3T9H-gX1kazk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1171896798</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Johnson, W. A ; Alfaress, S ; Whitworth, R. J ; McCornack, B. P</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, W. A ; Alfaress, S ; Whitworth, R. J ; McCornack, B. P</creatorcontrib><description>In general, Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) are considered nonpests of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], but changes in soil conservation practices have shifted the pest status of this organism from an opportunistic to a perennial, early-season pest in parts of central Kansas. As a result, soybean producers that rotate with corn (Zea mays L.) under conservation tillage practices have resorted to removing excess corn residue by using controlled burns. In a 2-yr field study (2009–2010), we demonstrated that residue removal in burned compared with unburned plots (measured as previous crop residue weights) had minimal impact on numbers of live and dead A. vulgare, soybean seedling emergence, and isopod feeding damage over time. Specifically, removal of residue by burning did not result in higher emergence rates for soybean stands or less feeding damage by A. vulgare. In a separate study, we found that number of live A. vulgare and residue weights had no consistent relationship with seedling emergence or feeding damage. Furthermore, seedling emergence was not impacted by higher numbers of A. vulgare in unburned plots, indicating that emergence in this study may have been influenced by factors other than A. vulgare densities. These studies demonstrate that removing residue through controlled burning did not impact seedling emergence in presence of A. vulgare and that residue and feeding damage to seedlings did not consistently relate to A. vulgare densities. Other factors that may have influenced a relationship between residue and live isopod numbers, such as variable moisture levels, are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1603/EC12040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23156159</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEENAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Agriculture - methods ; Animals ; Armadillidiidae ; Armadillidium vulgare ; Biological and medical sciences ; Burning ; Burns ; Conservation ; conservation practices ; conservation tillage ; Control ; corn ; Crop residues ; Crustacea ; Feeding ; FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS ; Fires ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Generalities ; Glycine max ; Glycine max - growth & development ; Invertebrates ; isopod ; Isopoda ; Isopoda - physiology ; Kansas ; Pest Control ; Pest status ; Pests ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; population ; Population Dynamics ; prescribed burning ; Protozoa. Invertebrates ; residue management ; Seasons ; seedling emergence ; Seedlings ; Seedlings - growth & development ; Soil conservation ; soybean ; Soybeans ; Tillage ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2012-10, Vol.105 (5), p.1629-1639</ispartof><rights>2012 Entomological Society of America</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b431t-d7ad82d55998bbd4a54df83efbf0ff8f9bd562351c70d6b7c68180b5225c7b653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b431t-d7ad82d55998bbd4a54df83efbf0ff8f9bd562351c70d6b7c68180b5225c7b653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26451138$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23156159$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, W. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfaress, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitworth, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCornack, B. P</creatorcontrib><title>Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>In general, Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) are considered nonpests of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], but changes in soil conservation practices have shifted the pest status of this organism from an opportunistic to a perennial, early-season pest in parts of central Kansas. As a result, soybean producers that rotate with corn (Zea mays L.) under conservation tillage practices have resorted to removing excess corn residue by using controlled burns. In a 2-yr field study (2009–2010), we demonstrated that residue removal in burned compared with unburned plots (measured as previous crop residue weights) had minimal impact on numbers of live and dead A. vulgare, soybean seedling emergence, and isopod feeding damage over time. Specifically, removal of residue by burning did not result in higher emergence rates for soybean stands or less feeding damage by A. vulgare. In a separate study, we found that number of live A. vulgare and residue weights had no consistent relationship with seedling emergence or feeding damage. Furthermore, seedling emergence was not impacted by higher numbers of A. vulgare in unburned plots, indicating that emergence in this study may have been influenced by factors other than A. vulgare densities. These studies demonstrate that removing residue through controlled burning did not impact seedling emergence in presence of A. vulgare and that residue and feeding damage to seedlings did not consistently relate to A. vulgare densities. Other factors that may have influenced a relationship between residue and live isopod numbers, such as variable moisture levels, are discussed.</description><subject>Agriculture - methods</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Armadillidiidae</subject><subject>Armadillidium vulgare</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burning</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>conservation practices</subject><subject>conservation tillage</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>corn</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crustacea</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Generalities</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Glycine max - growth & development</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>isopod</subject><subject>Isopoda</subject><subject>Isopoda - physiology</subject><subject>Kansas</subject><subject>Pest Control</subject><subject>Pest status</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>population</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>prescribed burning</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrates</subject><subject>residue management</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>seedling emergence</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Seedlings - growth & development</subject><subject>Soil conservation</subject><subject>soybean</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><issn>0022-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0d2K1DAYBuAgijuu4h1oT8T1oJqf5s-zZRx1YUVxXPCsfGmSIdImNWmFvQJv244z7noieJSEPLz5yIvQY4JfEoHZq82aUNzgO2hFNFM11eTrXbTCmNIaN5qdoAelfMOYCErwfXRCGeGCcL1CP9c5jdVnV4KdXQXR3uw_QISdG1ycqo33rptKlWJ1ngewoe-DDfNQ_Zj7HWRXnV2UNCYLr_--Dxbci-pTGuceppBi-R2_TdfGQay20_70xsUSpuDKQ3TPQ1_co-N6iq7ebr6s39eXH99drM8va9MwMtVWglXUcq61MsY2wBvrFXPeeOy98tpYLijjpJPYCiM7oYjChlPKO2kEZ6fo7JA75vR9dmVqh1A61_cQXZpLS4hUcvlJyf6HEqWF1Gqhzw-0y6mU7Hw75jBAvm4JbvcFtceCFvnkGDqbwdkb96eRBTw7Aigd9D5D7EK5daLhhLD9k08PzkNqYZcXc7WlS8MYYyYZVbdJJqQU3T9H-gX1kazk</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Johnson, W. A</creator><creator>Alfaress, S</creator><creator>Whitworth, R. J</creator><creator>McCornack, B. P</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities</title><author>Johnson, W. A ; Alfaress, S ; Whitworth, R. J ; McCornack, B. P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b431t-d7ad82d55998bbd4a54df83efbf0ff8f9bd562351c70d6b7c68180b5225c7b653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Agriculture - methods</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Armadillidiidae</topic><topic>Armadillidium vulgare</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burning</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>conservation practices</topic><topic>conservation tillage</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>corn</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crustacea</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Generalities</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Glycine max - growth & development</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>isopod</topic><topic>Isopoda</topic><topic>Isopoda - physiology</topic><topic>Kansas</topic><topic>Pest Control</topic><topic>Pest status</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>population</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>prescribed burning</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrates</topic><topic>residue management</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>seedling emergence</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Seedlings - growth & development</topic><topic>Soil conservation</topic><topic>soybean</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, W. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfaress, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitworth, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCornack, B. P</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, W. A</au><au>Alfaress, S</au><au>Whitworth, R. J</au><au>McCornack, B. P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1629</spage><epage>1639</epage><pages>1629-1639</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><eissn>0022-0493</eissn><coden>JEENAI</coden><abstract>In general, Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille) are considered nonpests of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill], but changes in soil conservation practices have shifted the pest status of this organism from an opportunistic to a perennial, early-season pest in parts of central Kansas. As a result, soybean producers that rotate with corn (Zea mays L.) under conservation tillage practices have resorted to removing excess corn residue by using controlled burns. In a 2-yr field study (2009–2010), we demonstrated that residue removal in burned compared with unburned plots (measured as previous crop residue weights) had minimal impact on numbers of live and dead A. vulgare, soybean seedling emergence, and isopod feeding damage over time. Specifically, removal of residue by burning did not result in higher emergence rates for soybean stands or less feeding damage by A. vulgare. In a separate study, we found that number of live A. vulgare and residue weights had no consistent relationship with seedling emergence or feeding damage. Furthermore, seedling emergence was not impacted by higher numbers of A. vulgare in unburned plots, indicating that emergence in this study may have been influenced by factors other than A. vulgare densities. These studies demonstrate that removing residue through controlled burning did not impact seedling emergence in presence of A. vulgare and that residue and feeding damage to seedlings did not consistently relate to A. vulgare densities. Other factors that may have influenced a relationship between residue and live isopod numbers, such as variable moisture levels, are discussed.</abstract><cop>Lanham, MD</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>23156159</pmid><doi>10.1603/EC12040</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0493 |
ispartof | Journal of economic entomology, 2012-10, Vol.105 (5), p.1629-1639 |
issn | 0022-0493 1938-291X 0022-0493 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1178704073 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE |
subjects | Agriculture - methods Animals Armadillidiidae Armadillidium vulgare Biological and medical sciences Burning Burns Conservation conservation practices conservation tillage Control corn Crop residues Crustacea Feeding FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS Fires Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Generalities Glycine max Glycine max - growth & development Invertebrates isopod Isopoda Isopoda - physiology Kansas Pest Control Pest status Pests Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection population Population Dynamics prescribed burning Protozoa. Invertebrates residue management Seasons seedling emergence Seedlings Seedlings - growth & development Soil conservation soybean Soybeans Tillage Zea mays |
title | Crop Residue and Residue Management Effects on Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Armadillidiidae) Populations and Soybean Stand Densities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A24%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crop%20Residue%20and%20Residue%20Management%20Effects%20on%20Armadillidium%20vulgare%20(Isopoda:%20Armadillidiidae)%20Populations%20and%20Soybean%20Stand%20Densities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Johnson,%20W.%20A&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1629&rft.epage=1639&rft.pages=1629-1639&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft.coden=JEENAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1603/EC12040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1171896798%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1171896798&rft_id=info:pmid/23156159&rfr_iscdi=true |