Metabolic Response of Different High-Intensity Aerobic Interval Exercise Protocols

ABSTRACTGosselin, LE, Kozlowski, KF, DeVinney-Boymel, L, and Hambridge, C. Metabolic response of different high-intensity aerobic interval exercise protocols. J Strength Cond Res 26(10)2866–2871, 2012—Although high-intensity sprint interval training (SIT) employing the Wingate protocol results in si...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2012-10, Vol.26 (10), p.2866-2871
Hauptverfasser: Gosselin, Luc E., Kozlowski, Karl F., DeVinney-Boymel, Lee, Hambridge, Caitlin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2871
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2866
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 26
creator Gosselin, Luc E.
Kozlowski, Karl F.
DeVinney-Boymel, Lee
Hambridge, Caitlin
description ABSTRACTGosselin, LE, Kozlowski, KF, DeVinney-Boymel, L, and Hambridge, C. Metabolic response of different high-intensity aerobic interval exercise protocols. J Strength Cond Res 26(10)2866–2871, 2012—Although high-intensity sprint interval training (SIT) employing the Wingate protocol results in significant physiological adaptations, it is conducted at supramaximal intensity and is potentially unsafe for sedentary middle-aged adults. We therefore evaluated the metabolic and cardiovascular response in healthy young individuals performing 4 high-intensity (∼90% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max) aerobic interval training (HIT) protocols with similar total work output but different work-to-rest ratio. Eight young physically active subjects participated in 5 different bouts of exercise over a 3-week period. Protocol 1 consisted of 20-minute continuous exercise at approximately 70% of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, whereas protocols 2–5 were interval based with a work-active rest duration (in seconds) of 30/30, 60/30, 90/30, and 60/60, respectively. Each interval protocol resulted in approximately 10 minutes of exercise at a workload corresponding to approximately 90% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, but differed in the total rest duration. The 90/30 HIT protocol resulted in the highest V[Combining Dot Above]O2, HR, rating of perceived exertion, and blood lactate, whereas the 30/30 protocol resulted in the lowest of these parameters. The total caloric energy expenditure was lowest in the 90/30 and 60/30 protocols (∼150 kcal), whereas the other 3 protocols did not differ (∼195 kcal) from one another. The immediate postexercise blood pressure response was similar across all the protocols. These finding indicate that HIT performed at approximately 90% of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max is no more physiologically taxing than is steady-state exercise conducted at 70% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, but the response during HIT is influenced by the work-to-rest ratio. This interval protocol may be used as an alternative approach to steady-state exercise training but with less time commitment.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318241e13d
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171900097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1171900097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444d-65c4f374791535c1e260a4557c1fbbfc18b93384cf6e80d7b1668b405d0c7813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctO3DAUBmCralUu7RtUKBKbbkLPie3YWaIp5SKqVpR9FDvHTKgnntpJgbfHo6EsWNCVLev7j2z_jH1COEKJzZeLX4sjMICcOOpKICHv37BdlJyXotLqbd5DLUoNiDtsL6VbgEpKyd-znarCSnApd9nVd5o6E_xgiytK6zAmKoIrvg7OUaRxKs6Gm2V5Pk40pmF6KI4pBpPx5iT-7Xxxck_RDjn1M4Yp2ODTB_bOdT7Rx6d1n11_O7lenJWXP07PF8eXpRVC9GUtrXBcCdXkK0uLVNXQCSmVRWeMs6hNw7kW1tWkoVcG61obAbIHqzTyffZ5O3Ydw5-Z0tSuhmTJ-26kMKcWUWEDAI36P4W6qRABN_TwBb0NcxzzO7LSqCBTkZXYKhtDSpFcu47DqosPGbWbdtrcTvuynRw7eBo-mxX1z6F_dWSgt-Au-Py_6bef7yi2S-r8tHx99iOys5uj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1081700694</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Metabolic Response of Different High-Intensity Aerobic Interval Exercise Protocols</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Gosselin, Luc E. ; Kozlowski, Karl F. ; DeVinney-Boymel, Lee ; Hambridge, Caitlin</creator><creatorcontrib>Gosselin, Luc E. ; Kozlowski, Karl F. ; DeVinney-Boymel, Lee ; Hambridge, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTGosselin, LE, Kozlowski, KF, DeVinney-Boymel, L, and Hambridge, C. Metabolic response of different high-intensity aerobic interval exercise protocols. J Strength Cond Res 26(10)2866–2871, 2012—Although high-intensity sprint interval training (SIT) employing the Wingate protocol results in significant physiological adaptations, it is conducted at supramaximal intensity and is potentially unsafe for sedentary middle-aged adults. We therefore evaluated the metabolic and cardiovascular response in healthy young individuals performing 4 high-intensity (∼90% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max) aerobic interval training (HIT) protocols with similar total work output but different work-to-rest ratio. Eight young physically active subjects participated in 5 different bouts of exercise over a 3-week period. Protocol 1 consisted of 20-minute continuous exercise at approximately 70% of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, whereas protocols 2–5 were interval based with a work-active rest duration (in seconds) of 30/30, 60/30, 90/30, and 60/60, respectively. Each interval protocol resulted in approximately 10 minutes of exercise at a workload corresponding to approximately 90% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, but differed in the total rest duration. The 90/30 HIT protocol resulted in the highest V[Combining Dot Above]O2, HR, rating of perceived exertion, and blood lactate, whereas the 30/30 protocol resulted in the lowest of these parameters. The total caloric energy expenditure was lowest in the 90/30 and 60/30 protocols (∼150 kcal), whereas the other 3 protocols did not differ (∼195 kcal) from one another. The immediate postexercise blood pressure response was similar across all the protocols. These finding indicate that HIT performed at approximately 90% of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max is no more physiologically taxing than is steady-state exercise conducted at 70% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, but the response during HIT is influenced by the work-to-rest ratio. This interval protocol may be used as an alternative approach to steady-state exercise training but with less time commitment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318241e13d</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22124355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Strength and Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological ; Adult ; Aerobics ; Bioenergetics ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; Exercise ; Exercise (duration) ; Exercise (intensity) ; Female ; Heart Rate - physiology ; Human performance ; Humans ; Interval training ; Lactic Acid - blood ; Male ; Maximum oxygen consumption ; Metabolism ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Oxygen Consumption - physiology ; Physical Endurance - physiology ; Physical Exertion - physiology ; Physiology ; Rest ; Rest - physiology ; Running - physiology ; Sports training ; Work load ; Young Adult ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2012-10, Vol.26 (10), p.2866-2871</ispartof><rights>2012 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Oct 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444d-65c4f374791535c1e260a4557c1fbbfc18b93384cf6e80d7b1668b405d0c7813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444d-65c4f374791535c1e260a4557c1fbbfc18b93384cf6e80d7b1668b405d0c7813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22124355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gosselin, Luc E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlowski, Karl F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeVinney-Boymel, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hambridge, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><title>Metabolic Response of Different High-Intensity Aerobic Interval Exercise Protocols</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTGosselin, LE, Kozlowski, KF, DeVinney-Boymel, L, and Hambridge, C. Metabolic response of different high-intensity aerobic interval exercise protocols. J Strength Cond Res 26(10)2866–2871, 2012—Although high-intensity sprint interval training (SIT) employing the Wingate protocol results in significant physiological adaptations, it is conducted at supramaximal intensity and is potentially unsafe for sedentary middle-aged adults. We therefore evaluated the metabolic and cardiovascular response in healthy young individuals performing 4 high-intensity (∼90% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max) aerobic interval training (HIT) protocols with similar total work output but different work-to-rest ratio. Eight young physically active subjects participated in 5 different bouts of exercise over a 3-week period. Protocol 1 consisted of 20-minute continuous exercise at approximately 70% of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, whereas protocols 2–5 were interval based with a work-active rest duration (in seconds) of 30/30, 60/30, 90/30, and 60/60, respectively. Each interval protocol resulted in approximately 10 minutes of exercise at a workload corresponding to approximately 90% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, but differed in the total rest duration. The 90/30 HIT protocol resulted in the highest V[Combining Dot Above]O2, HR, rating of perceived exertion, and blood lactate, whereas the 30/30 protocol resulted in the lowest of these parameters. The total caloric energy expenditure was lowest in the 90/30 and 60/30 protocols (∼150 kcal), whereas the other 3 protocols did not differ (∼195 kcal) from one another. The immediate postexercise blood pressure response was similar across all the protocols. These finding indicate that HIT performed at approximately 90% of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max is no more physiologically taxing than is steady-state exercise conducted at 70% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, but the response during HIT is influenced by the work-to-rest ratio. This interval protocol may be used as an alternative approach to steady-state exercise training but with less time commitment.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aerobics</subject><subject>Bioenergetics</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise (duration)</subject><subject>Exercise (intensity)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Human performance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interval training</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - blood</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maximum oxygen consumption</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Endurance - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Exertion - physiology</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Rest</subject><subject>Rest - physiology</subject><subject>Running - physiology</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Work load</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctO3DAUBmCralUu7RtUKBKbbkLPie3YWaIp5SKqVpR9FDvHTKgnntpJgbfHo6EsWNCVLev7j2z_jH1COEKJzZeLX4sjMICcOOpKICHv37BdlJyXotLqbd5DLUoNiDtsL6VbgEpKyd-znarCSnApd9nVd5o6E_xgiytK6zAmKoIrvg7OUaRxKs6Gm2V5Pk40pmF6KI4pBpPx5iT-7Xxxck_RDjn1M4Yp2ODTB_bOdT7Rx6d1n11_O7lenJWXP07PF8eXpRVC9GUtrXBcCdXkK0uLVNXQCSmVRWeMs6hNw7kW1tWkoVcG61obAbIHqzTyffZ5O3Ydw5-Z0tSuhmTJ-26kMKcWUWEDAI36P4W6qRABN_TwBb0NcxzzO7LSqCBTkZXYKhtDSpFcu47DqosPGbWbdtrcTvuynRw7eBo-mxX1z6F_dWSgt-Au-Py_6bef7yi2S-r8tHx99iOys5uj</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Gosselin, Luc E.</creator><creator>Kozlowski, Karl F.</creator><creator>DeVinney-Boymel, Lee</creator><creator>Hambridge, Caitlin</creator><general>National Strength and Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Metabolic Response of Different High-Intensity Aerobic Interval Exercise Protocols</title><author>Gosselin, Luc E. ; Kozlowski, Karl F. ; DeVinney-Boymel, Lee ; Hambridge, Caitlin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444d-65c4f374791535c1e260a4557c1fbbfc18b93384cf6e80d7b1668b405d0c7813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aerobics</topic><topic>Bioenergetics</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise (duration)</topic><topic>Exercise (intensity)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Human performance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interval training</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - blood</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maximum oxygen consumption</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Endurance - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Exertion - physiology</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Rest</topic><topic>Rest - physiology</topic><topic>Running - physiology</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Work load</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gosselin, Luc E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozlowski, Karl F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeVinney-Boymel, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hambridge, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gosselin, Luc E.</au><au>Kozlowski, Karl F.</au><au>DeVinney-Boymel, Lee</au><au>Hambridge, Caitlin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Metabolic Response of Different High-Intensity Aerobic Interval Exercise Protocols</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2866</spage><epage>2871</epage><pages>2866-2871</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTGosselin, LE, Kozlowski, KF, DeVinney-Boymel, L, and Hambridge, C. Metabolic response of different high-intensity aerobic interval exercise protocols. J Strength Cond Res 26(10)2866–2871, 2012—Although high-intensity sprint interval training (SIT) employing the Wingate protocol results in significant physiological adaptations, it is conducted at supramaximal intensity and is potentially unsafe for sedentary middle-aged adults. We therefore evaluated the metabolic and cardiovascular response in healthy young individuals performing 4 high-intensity (∼90% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max) aerobic interval training (HIT) protocols with similar total work output but different work-to-rest ratio. Eight young physically active subjects participated in 5 different bouts of exercise over a 3-week period. Protocol 1 consisted of 20-minute continuous exercise at approximately 70% of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, whereas protocols 2–5 were interval based with a work-active rest duration (in seconds) of 30/30, 60/30, 90/30, and 60/60, respectively. Each interval protocol resulted in approximately 10 minutes of exercise at a workload corresponding to approximately 90% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, but differed in the total rest duration. The 90/30 HIT protocol resulted in the highest V[Combining Dot Above]O2, HR, rating of perceived exertion, and blood lactate, whereas the 30/30 protocol resulted in the lowest of these parameters. The total caloric energy expenditure was lowest in the 90/30 and 60/30 protocols (∼150 kcal), whereas the other 3 protocols did not differ (∼195 kcal) from one another. The immediate postexercise blood pressure response was similar across all the protocols. These finding indicate that HIT performed at approximately 90% of V[Combining Dot Above]O2max is no more physiologically taxing than is steady-state exercise conducted at 70% V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, but the response during HIT is influenced by the work-to-rest ratio. This interval protocol may be used as an alternative approach to steady-state exercise training but with less time commitment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Strength and Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>22124355</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0b013e318241e13d</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2012-10, Vol.26 (10), p.2866-2871
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171900097
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adaptation, Physiological
Adult
Aerobics
Bioenergetics
Energy Metabolism - physiology
Exercise
Exercise (duration)
Exercise (intensity)
Female
Heart Rate - physiology
Human performance
Humans
Interval training
Lactic Acid - blood
Male
Maximum oxygen consumption
Metabolism
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Oxygen Consumption - physiology
Physical Endurance - physiology
Physical Exertion - physiology
Physiology
Rest
Rest - physiology
Running - physiology
Sports training
Work load
Young Adult
Youth
title Metabolic Response of Different High-Intensity Aerobic Interval Exercise Protocols
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A20%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Metabolic%20Response%20of%20Different%20High-Intensity%20Aerobic%20Interval%20Exercise%20Protocols&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Gosselin,%20Luc%20E.&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2866&rft.epage=2871&rft.pages=2866-2871&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0b013e318241e13d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1171900097%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1081700694&rft_id=info:pmid/22124355&rfr_iscdi=true