Stability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation: A model intercomparison

The evolution of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (MOC) in 30 models of varying complexity is examined under four distinct Representative Concentration Pathways. The models include 25 Atmosphere‐Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs) or Earth System Models (ESMs) that submitted sim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical research letters 2012-10, Vol.39 (20), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Weaver, Andrew J., Sedláček, Jan, Eby, Michael, Alexander, Kaitlin, Crespin, Elisabeth, Fichefet, Thierry, Philippon-Berthier, Gwenaëlle, Joos, Fortunat, Kawamiya, Michio, Matsumoto, Katsumi, Steinacher, Marco, Tachiiri, Kaoru, Tokos, Kathy, Yoshimori, Masakazu, Zickfeld, Kirsten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 20
container_start_page
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 39
creator Weaver, Andrew J.
Sedláček, Jan
Eby, Michael
Alexander, Kaitlin
Crespin, Elisabeth
Fichefet, Thierry
Philippon-Berthier, Gwenaëlle
Joos, Fortunat
Kawamiya, Michio
Matsumoto, Katsumi
Steinacher, Marco
Tachiiri, Kaoru
Tokos, Kathy
Yoshimori, Masakazu
Zickfeld, Kirsten
description The evolution of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (MOC) in 30 models of varying complexity is examined under four distinct Representative Concentration Pathways. The models include 25 Atmosphere‐Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs) or Earth System Models (ESMs) that submitted simulations in support of the 5th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and 5 Earth System Models of Intermediate Complexity (EMICs). While none of the models incorporated the additional effects of ice sheet melting, they all projected very similar behaviour during the 21st century. Over this period the strength of MOC reduced by a best estimate of 22% (18%–25%; 5%–95% confidence limits) for RCP2.6, 26% (23%–30%) for RCP4.5, 29% (23%–35%) for RCP6.0 and 40% (36%–44%) for RCP8.5. Two of the models eventually realized a slow shutdown of the MOC under RCP8.5, although no model exhibited an abrupt change of the MOC. Through analysis of the freshwater flux across 30°–32°S into the Atlantic, it was found that 56% of the CMIP5 models were in a bistable regime of the MOC for at least part of their RCP integrations. The results support previous assessments that it is very unlikely that the MOC will undergo an abrupt change to an off state as a consequence of global warming. Key Points All climate models project very similar behavior during the 21st century No model exhibits an abrupt change of the MOC More than 1/2 of the models are in the bistable regime ==> not overly stable
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2012GL053763
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171895090</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2801526451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5111-806c00d59a84879f5bab37d084610e958a1f201cb2688be260729a586c966a6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9rVDEUxYMoONbu_ACBUnDh6E0y-dfdMOgoDAp2iuAm5OXltWnzXsYko863N2VKEReu7oX7O4dzLkKvCLwlQPU7CoSuN8CZFOwJmhG9WMwVgHyKZgC67VSK5-hFKbcAwICRGbq6rLYLMdQDTgOuNx4va7RTDQ6PPoc-pMlGnH76XPd5CtM1diG7fbS1XS7wEo-p9xGHqfrs0rizOZQ0vUTPBhuLP32YJ-jqw_vt6uN882X9abXczB0nhLRswgH0XFu1UFIPvLMdkz2ohSDgNVeWDK2T66hQqvNUgKTaciWcFsKKnp2g10ffXU4_9r5UM4bifGwNfNoXQ4gkSnPQ0NCzf9Db1Bq1dI0iXPAW4Z56c6RcTqVkP5hdDqPNB0PA3P_Y_P3jhp8_mNribByynVwojxoqBOOS0sbRI_crRH_4r6dZf91QLSRpovlRFEr1vx9FNt8ZIZnk5tvntVltt0Rwrc139geU8ZeC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1115658480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation: A model intercomparison</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Weaver, Andrew J. ; Sedláček, Jan ; Eby, Michael ; Alexander, Kaitlin ; Crespin, Elisabeth ; Fichefet, Thierry ; Philippon-Berthier, Gwenaëlle ; Joos, Fortunat ; Kawamiya, Michio ; Matsumoto, Katsumi ; Steinacher, Marco ; Tachiiri, Kaoru ; Tokos, Kathy ; Yoshimori, Masakazu ; Zickfeld, Kirsten</creator><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Andrew J. ; Sedláček, Jan ; Eby, Michael ; Alexander, Kaitlin ; Crespin, Elisabeth ; Fichefet, Thierry ; Philippon-Berthier, Gwenaëlle ; Joos, Fortunat ; Kawamiya, Michio ; Matsumoto, Katsumi ; Steinacher, Marco ; Tachiiri, Kaoru ; Tokos, Kathy ; Yoshimori, Masakazu ; Zickfeld, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><description>The evolution of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (MOC) in 30 models of varying complexity is examined under four distinct Representative Concentration Pathways. The models include 25 Atmosphere‐Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs) or Earth System Models (ESMs) that submitted simulations in support of the 5th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and 5 Earth System Models of Intermediate Complexity (EMICs). While none of the models incorporated the additional effects of ice sheet melting, they all projected very similar behaviour during the 21st century. Over this period the strength of MOC reduced by a best estimate of 22% (18%–25%; 5%–95% confidence limits) for RCP2.6, 26% (23%–30%) for RCP4.5, 29% (23%–35%) for RCP6.0 and 40% (36%–44%) for RCP8.5. Two of the models eventually realized a slow shutdown of the MOC under RCP8.5, although no model exhibited an abrupt change of the MOC. Through analysis of the freshwater flux across 30°–32°S into the Atlantic, it was found that 56% of the CMIP5 models were in a bistable regime of the MOC for at least part of their RCP integrations. The results support previous assessments that it is very unlikely that the MOC will undergo an abrupt change to an off state as a consequence of global warming. Key Points All climate models project very similar behavior during the 21st century No model exhibits an abrupt change of the MOC More than 1/2 of the models are in the bistable regime ==&gt; not overly stable</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2012GL053763</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GPRLAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>abrupt change ; Assessments ; Circulation ; climate ; Climate change ; Complexity ; Earth ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Evolution ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flux ; Global warming ; Marine ; Melting ; meridional overturning circulation ; MOC ; ocean circulation ; Oceans ; Shutdowns</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2012-10, Vol.39 (20), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2012. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Geophysical Union 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5111-806c00d59a84879f5bab37d084610e958a1f201cb2688be260729a586c966a6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5111-806c00d59a84879f5bab37d084610e958a1f201cb2688be260729a586c966a6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2012GL053763$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2012GL053763$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26635722$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedláček, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eby, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crespin, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fichefet, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philippon-Berthier, Gwenaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joos, Fortunat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamiya, Michio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Katsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinacher, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachiiri, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokos, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshimori, Masakazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zickfeld, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><title>Stability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation: A model intercomparison</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><addtitle>Geophys. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>The evolution of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (MOC) in 30 models of varying complexity is examined under four distinct Representative Concentration Pathways. The models include 25 Atmosphere‐Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs) or Earth System Models (ESMs) that submitted simulations in support of the 5th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and 5 Earth System Models of Intermediate Complexity (EMICs). While none of the models incorporated the additional effects of ice sheet melting, they all projected very similar behaviour during the 21st century. Over this period the strength of MOC reduced by a best estimate of 22% (18%–25%; 5%–95% confidence limits) for RCP2.6, 26% (23%–30%) for RCP4.5, 29% (23%–35%) for RCP6.0 and 40% (36%–44%) for RCP8.5. Two of the models eventually realized a slow shutdown of the MOC under RCP8.5, although no model exhibited an abrupt change of the MOC. Through analysis of the freshwater flux across 30°–32°S into the Atlantic, it was found that 56% of the CMIP5 models were in a bistable regime of the MOC for at least part of their RCP integrations. The results support previous assessments that it is very unlikely that the MOC will undergo an abrupt change to an off state as a consequence of global warming. Key Points All climate models project very similar behavior during the 21st century No model exhibits an abrupt change of the MOC More than 1/2 of the models are in the bistable regime ==&gt; not overly stable</description><subject>abrupt change</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Circulation</subject><subject>climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flux</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Melting</subject><subject>meridional overturning circulation</subject><subject>MOC</subject><subject>ocean circulation</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Shutdowns</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9rVDEUxYMoONbu_ACBUnDh6E0y-dfdMOgoDAp2iuAm5OXltWnzXsYko863N2VKEReu7oX7O4dzLkKvCLwlQPU7CoSuN8CZFOwJmhG9WMwVgHyKZgC67VSK5-hFKbcAwICRGbq6rLYLMdQDTgOuNx4va7RTDQ6PPoc-pMlGnH76XPd5CtM1diG7fbS1XS7wEo-p9xGHqfrs0rizOZQ0vUTPBhuLP32YJ-jqw_vt6uN882X9abXczB0nhLRswgH0XFu1UFIPvLMdkz2ohSDgNVeWDK2T66hQqvNUgKTaciWcFsKKnp2g10ffXU4_9r5UM4bifGwNfNoXQ4gkSnPQ0NCzf9Db1Bq1dI0iXPAW4Z56c6RcTqVkP5hdDqPNB0PA3P_Y_P3jhp8_mNribByynVwojxoqBOOS0sbRI_crRH_4r6dZf91QLSRpovlRFEr1vx9FNt8ZIZnk5tvntVltt0Rwrc139geU8ZeC</recordid><startdate>20121028</startdate><enddate>20121028</enddate><creator>Weaver, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Sedláček, Jan</creator><creator>Eby, Michael</creator><creator>Alexander, Kaitlin</creator><creator>Crespin, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Fichefet, Thierry</creator><creator>Philippon-Berthier, Gwenaëlle</creator><creator>Joos, Fortunat</creator><creator>Kawamiya, Michio</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Katsumi</creator><creator>Steinacher, Marco</creator><creator>Tachiiri, Kaoru</creator><creator>Tokos, Kathy</creator><creator>Yoshimori, Masakazu</creator><creator>Zickfeld, Kirsten</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7SM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121028</creationdate><title>Stability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation: A model intercomparison</title><author>Weaver, Andrew J. ; Sedláček, Jan ; Eby, Michael ; Alexander, Kaitlin ; Crespin, Elisabeth ; Fichefet, Thierry ; Philippon-Berthier, Gwenaëlle ; Joos, Fortunat ; Kawamiya, Michio ; Matsumoto, Katsumi ; Steinacher, Marco ; Tachiiri, Kaoru ; Tokos, Kathy ; Yoshimori, Masakazu ; Zickfeld, Kirsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5111-806c00d59a84879f5bab37d084610e958a1f201cb2688be260729a586c966a6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>abrupt change</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Circulation</topic><topic>climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flux</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Melting</topic><topic>meridional overturning circulation</topic><topic>MOC</topic><topic>ocean circulation</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Shutdowns</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weaver, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedláček, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eby, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crespin, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fichefet, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philippon-Berthier, Gwenaëlle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joos, Fortunat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawamiya, Michio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Katsumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinacher, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachiiri, Kaoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokos, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshimori, Masakazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zickfeld, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weaver, Andrew J.</au><au>Sedláček, Jan</au><au>Eby, Michael</au><au>Alexander, Kaitlin</au><au>Crespin, Elisabeth</au><au>Fichefet, Thierry</au><au>Philippon-Berthier, Gwenaëlle</au><au>Joos, Fortunat</au><au>Kawamiya, Michio</au><au>Matsumoto, Katsumi</au><au>Steinacher, Marco</au><au>Tachiiri, Kaoru</au><au>Tokos, Kathy</au><au>Yoshimori, Masakazu</au><au>Zickfeld, Kirsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation: A model intercomparison</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><addtitle>Geophys. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2012-10-28</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>20</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><coden>GPRLAJ</coden><abstract>The evolution of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (MOC) in 30 models of varying complexity is examined under four distinct Representative Concentration Pathways. The models include 25 Atmosphere‐Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs) or Earth System Models (ESMs) that submitted simulations in support of the 5th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and 5 Earth System Models of Intermediate Complexity (EMICs). While none of the models incorporated the additional effects of ice sheet melting, they all projected very similar behaviour during the 21st century. Over this period the strength of MOC reduced by a best estimate of 22% (18%–25%; 5%–95% confidence limits) for RCP2.6, 26% (23%–30%) for RCP4.5, 29% (23%–35%) for RCP6.0 and 40% (36%–44%) for RCP8.5. Two of the models eventually realized a slow shutdown of the MOC under RCP8.5, although no model exhibited an abrupt change of the MOC. Through analysis of the freshwater flux across 30°–32°S into the Atlantic, it was found that 56% of the CMIP5 models were in a bistable regime of the MOC for at least part of their RCP integrations. The results support previous assessments that it is very unlikely that the MOC will undergo an abrupt change to an off state as a consequence of global warming. Key Points All climate models project very similar behavior during the 21st century No model exhibits an abrupt change of the MOC More than 1/2 of the models are in the bistable regime ==&gt; not overly stable</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2012GL053763</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2012-10, Vol.39 (20), p.n/a
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1171895090
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects abrupt change
Assessments
Circulation
climate
Climate change
Complexity
Earth
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Evolution
Exact sciences and technology
Flux
Global warming
Marine
Melting
meridional overturning circulation
MOC
ocean circulation
Oceans
Shutdowns
title Stability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation: A model intercomparison
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T22%3A27%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stability%20of%20the%20Atlantic%20meridional%20overturning%20circulation:%20A%20model%20intercomparison&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Weaver,%20Andrew%20J.&rft.date=2012-10-28&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=20&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft.coden=GPRLAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2012GL053763&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2801526451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1115658480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true