A methodological approach to estimate the lactation curve and net energy and protein requirements of beef cows using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling
The objective of this study was to evaluate methods to predict the secretion of milk and net energy and protein requirements of beef cows (Bos indicus and B. taurus) after approximately 1 mo postpartum using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NLME). Twenty Caracu × Nellore (CN) and 10 Nellore (NL) cow...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2012-11, Vol.90 (11), p.3867-3878 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3878 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3867 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Albertini, T Z Medeiros, S R Torres, Jr, R A A Zocchi, S S Oltjen, J W Strathe, A B Lanna, D P D |
description | The objective of this study was to evaluate methods to predict the secretion of milk and net energy and protein requirements of beef cows (Bos indicus and B. taurus) after approximately 1 mo postpartum using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NLME). Twenty Caracu × Nellore (CN) and 10 Nellore (NL) cows were inseminated to Red Angus bulls, and 10 Angus × Nellore (AN) were bred to Canchim bulls. Cows were evaluated from just after calving (25 ± 11 d) to weaning (220 d). Milk yield was estimated by weighing calves before and after suckling (WSW) and by machine milking (MM) methods at 25, 52, 80, 109, 136, 164, 193, and 220 ± 11 d of lactation. Brody and simple linear equations were consecutively fitted to the data and compared using information criteria. For the Brody equation, a NLME model was used to estimate all lactation profiles incorporating different sources of variation (calf sex and breed of cow, cow as a nested random effect, and within-cow auto-correlation). The CV for the MM method (29%) was less than WSW (45%). Consequently, the WSW method was responsible for reducing the variance about 1.5 times among individuals, which minimized the ability to detect differences among cows. As a result, only milk yield MM data were used in the NLME models. The Brody equation provided the best fit to this dataset, and inclusion of a continuous autoregressive process improved fit (P < 0.01). Milk, energy and protein yield at the beginning of lactation were affected by cow genotype and calf sex (P < 0.001). The exponential decay of the lactation curves was affected only by genotype (P < 0.001). Angus × Nellore cows produced 15 and 48% more milk than CN and NL during the trial, respectively (P < 0.05). Caracu × Nellore cows produced 29% more milk than NL (P < 0.05). The net energy and net protein requirements for milk yield followed a similar ranking. Male calves stimulated their dams to produce 11.7, 11.4, and 11.9% more milk, energy and protein, respectively (P < 0.05). The MM method is better than the WSW technique to detect genetic or environmental differences in milk yield among beef cows. The data obtained by the MM method and analyzed by NLME models allows the inclusion of fixed effects, random effects and an auto-regressive process in lactation equations to describe lactation curves and net energy and protein requirements. The NLME is a powerful tool to describe differences in the secretion of milk due to heterosis and cell mammary external stimulus in beef c |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas.2010-3540 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1151916965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1151916965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-bc0aba95db312a11d4df3aec7203493be5e92550d5bb100619b1edb19742382f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEtPwzAQhC0kREvhyBXtkUvAa9cpOVYVL6kSFzhXfmxaV4ndxg7QH8L_JYJyWo32m9XOMHaF_FYoMbvb6nQrOPJCqik_YWNUQhUSSzli5yltOUehKnXGRkKUpSqlGLPvObSUN9HFJq691Q3o3a6L2m4gR6CUfaszQd4QNNpmnX0MYPvug0AHB4EyUKBuffiVgzOTD9DRvvcdtRRygliDIarBxs8EffJhDSGGxgfSHbT-i1xBdU12QNvoaFisL9hprZtEl8c5Ye-PD2-L52L5-vSymC-LnUDMhbFcG10pZyQKjeimrpaa7ExwOa2kIUWVUIo7ZQxyXmJlkJzBajYV8l7UcsJu_u4Oj-_7Ie2q9clS0-hAsU8rRIUVllWpBvT6iPamJbfadUMz3WH1X6X8AdQNdxs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1151916965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A methodological approach to estimate the lactation curve and net energy and protein requirements of beef cows using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Academic Journals (OUP)</source><creator>Albertini, T Z ; Medeiros, S R ; Torres, Jr, R A A ; Zocchi, S S ; Oltjen, J W ; Strathe, A B ; Lanna, D P D</creator><creatorcontrib>Albertini, T Z ; Medeiros, S R ; Torres, Jr, R A A ; Zocchi, S S ; Oltjen, J W ; Strathe, A B ; Lanna, D P D</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The objective of this study was to evaluate methods to predict the secretion of milk and net energy and protein requirements of beef cows (Bos indicus and B. taurus) after approximately 1 mo postpartum using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NLME). Twenty Caracu × Nellore (CN) and 10 Nellore (NL) cows were inseminated to Red Angus bulls, and 10 Angus × Nellore (AN) were bred to Canchim bulls. Cows were evaluated from just after calving (25 ± 11 d) to weaning (220 d). Milk yield was estimated by weighing calves before and after suckling (WSW) and by machine milking (MM) methods at 25, 52, 80, 109, 136, 164, 193, and 220 ± 11 d of lactation. Brody and simple linear equations were consecutively fitted to the data and compared using information criteria. For the Brody equation, a NLME model was used to estimate all lactation profiles incorporating different sources of variation (calf sex and breed of cow, cow as a nested random effect, and within-cow auto-correlation). The CV for the MM method (29%) was less than WSW (45%). Consequently, the WSW method was responsible for reducing the variance about 1.5 times among individuals, which minimized the ability to detect differences among cows. As a result, only milk yield MM data were used in the NLME models. The Brody equation provided the best fit to this dataset, and inclusion of a continuous autoregressive process improved fit (P < 0.01). Milk, energy and protein yield at the beginning of lactation were affected by cow genotype and calf sex (P < 0.001). The exponential decay of the lactation curves was affected only by genotype (P < 0.001). Angus × Nellore cows produced 15 and 48% more milk than CN and NL during the trial, respectively (P < 0.05). Caracu × Nellore cows produced 29% more milk than NL (P < 0.05). The net energy and net protein requirements for milk yield followed a similar ranking. Male calves stimulated their dams to produce 11.7, 11.4, and 11.9% more milk, energy and protein, respectively (P < 0.05). The MM method is better than the WSW technique to detect genetic or environmental differences in milk yield among beef cows. The data obtained by the MM method and analyzed by NLME models allows the inclusion of fixed effects, random effects and an auto-regressive process in lactation equations to describe lactation curves and net energy and protein requirements. The NLME is a powerful tool to describe differences in the secretion of milk due to heterosis and cell mammary external stimulus in beef cows.]]></description><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-3540</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22665632</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animal Feed - analysis ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animals ; Animals, Suckling ; Cattle - physiology ; Diet - veterinary ; Dietary Proteins - metabolism ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; Female ; Lactation - physiology ; Male ; Milk ; Models, Biological ; Nonlinear Dynamics ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sex Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2012-11, Vol.90 (11), p.3867-3878</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22665632$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Albertini, T Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, S R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Jr, R A A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zocchi, S S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oltjen, J W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strathe, A B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanna, D P D</creatorcontrib><title>A methodological approach to estimate the lactation curve and net energy and protein requirements of beef cows using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The objective of this study was to evaluate methods to predict the secretion of milk and net energy and protein requirements of beef cows (Bos indicus and B. taurus) after approximately 1 mo postpartum using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NLME). Twenty Caracu × Nellore (CN) and 10 Nellore (NL) cows were inseminated to Red Angus bulls, and 10 Angus × Nellore (AN) were bred to Canchim bulls. Cows were evaluated from just after calving (25 ± 11 d) to weaning (220 d). Milk yield was estimated by weighing calves before and after suckling (WSW) and by machine milking (MM) methods at 25, 52, 80, 109, 136, 164, 193, and 220 ± 11 d of lactation. Brody and simple linear equations were consecutively fitted to the data and compared using information criteria. For the Brody equation, a NLME model was used to estimate all lactation profiles incorporating different sources of variation (calf sex and breed of cow, cow as a nested random effect, and within-cow auto-correlation). The CV for the MM method (29%) was less than WSW (45%). Consequently, the WSW method was responsible for reducing the variance about 1.5 times among individuals, which minimized the ability to detect differences among cows. As a result, only milk yield MM data were used in the NLME models. The Brody equation provided the best fit to this dataset, and inclusion of a continuous autoregressive process improved fit (P < 0.01). Milk, energy and protein yield at the beginning of lactation were affected by cow genotype and calf sex (P < 0.001). The exponential decay of the lactation curves was affected only by genotype (P < 0.001). Angus × Nellore cows produced 15 and 48% more milk than CN and NL during the trial, respectively (P < 0.05). Caracu × Nellore cows produced 29% more milk than NL (P < 0.05). The net energy and net protein requirements for milk yield followed a similar ranking. Male calves stimulated their dams to produce 11.7, 11.4, and 11.9% more milk, energy and protein, respectively (P < 0.05). The MM method is better than the WSW technique to detect genetic or environmental differences in milk yield among beef cows. The data obtained by the MM method and analyzed by NLME models allows the inclusion of fixed effects, random effects and an auto-regressive process in lactation equations to describe lactation curves and net energy and protein requirements. The NLME is a powerful tool to describe differences in the secretion of milk due to heterosis and cell mammary external stimulus in beef cows.]]></description><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Suckling</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Lactation - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Nonlinear Dynamics</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kEtPwzAQhC0kREvhyBXtkUvAa9cpOVYVL6kSFzhXfmxaV4ndxg7QH8L_JYJyWo32m9XOMHaF_FYoMbvb6nQrOPJCqik_YWNUQhUSSzli5yltOUehKnXGRkKUpSqlGLPvObSUN9HFJq691Q3o3a6L2m4gR6CUfaszQd4QNNpmnX0MYPvug0AHB4EyUKBuffiVgzOTD9DRvvcdtRRygliDIarBxs8EffJhDSGGxgfSHbT-i1xBdU12QNvoaFisL9hprZtEl8c5Ye-PD2-L52L5-vSymC-LnUDMhbFcG10pZyQKjeimrpaa7ExwOa2kIUWVUIo7ZQxyXmJlkJzBajYV8l7UcsJu_u4Oj-_7Ie2q9clS0-hAsU8rRIUVllWpBvT6iPamJbfadUMz3WH1X6X8AdQNdxs</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Albertini, T Z</creator><creator>Medeiros, S R</creator><creator>Torres, Jr, R A A</creator><creator>Zocchi, S S</creator><creator>Oltjen, J W</creator><creator>Strathe, A B</creator><creator>Lanna, D P D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>A methodological approach to estimate the lactation curve and net energy and protein requirements of beef cows using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling</title><author>Albertini, T Z ; Medeiros, S R ; Torres, Jr, R A A ; Zocchi, S S ; Oltjen, J W ; Strathe, A B ; Lanna, D P D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-bc0aba95db312a11d4df3aec7203493be5e92550d5bb100619b1edb19742382f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Suckling</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Lactation - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Nonlinear Dynamics</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Albertini, T Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, S R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Jr, R A A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zocchi, S S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oltjen, J W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strathe, A B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanna, D P D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Albertini, T Z</au><au>Medeiros, S R</au><au>Torres, Jr, R A A</au><au>Zocchi, S S</au><au>Oltjen, J W</au><au>Strathe, A B</au><au>Lanna, D P D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A methodological approach to estimate the lactation curve and net energy and protein requirements of beef cows using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3867</spage><epage>3878</epage><pages>3867-3878</pages><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The objective of this study was to evaluate methods to predict the secretion of milk and net energy and protein requirements of beef cows (Bos indicus and B. taurus) after approximately 1 mo postpartum using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NLME). Twenty Caracu × Nellore (CN) and 10 Nellore (NL) cows were inseminated to Red Angus bulls, and 10 Angus × Nellore (AN) were bred to Canchim bulls. Cows were evaluated from just after calving (25 ± 11 d) to weaning (220 d). Milk yield was estimated by weighing calves before and after suckling (WSW) and by machine milking (MM) methods at 25, 52, 80, 109, 136, 164, 193, and 220 ± 11 d of lactation. Brody and simple linear equations were consecutively fitted to the data and compared using information criteria. For the Brody equation, a NLME model was used to estimate all lactation profiles incorporating different sources of variation (calf sex and breed of cow, cow as a nested random effect, and within-cow auto-correlation). The CV for the MM method (29%) was less than WSW (45%). Consequently, the WSW method was responsible for reducing the variance about 1.5 times among individuals, which minimized the ability to detect differences among cows. As a result, only milk yield MM data were used in the NLME models. The Brody equation provided the best fit to this dataset, and inclusion of a continuous autoregressive process improved fit (P < 0.01). Milk, energy and protein yield at the beginning of lactation were affected by cow genotype and calf sex (P < 0.001). The exponential decay of the lactation curves was affected only by genotype (P < 0.001). Angus × Nellore cows produced 15 and 48% more milk than CN and NL during the trial, respectively (P < 0.05). Caracu × Nellore cows produced 29% more milk than NL (P < 0.05). The net energy and net protein requirements for milk yield followed a similar ranking. Male calves stimulated their dams to produce 11.7, 11.4, and 11.9% more milk, energy and protein, respectively (P < 0.05). The MM method is better than the WSW technique to detect genetic or environmental differences in milk yield among beef cows. The data obtained by the MM method and analyzed by NLME models allows the inclusion of fixed effects, random effects and an auto-regressive process in lactation equations to describe lactation curves and net energy and protein requirements. The NLME is a powerful tool to describe differences in the secretion of milk due to heterosis and cell mammary external stimulus in beef cows.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22665632</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas.2010-3540</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1525-3163 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2012-11, Vol.90 (11), p.3867-3878 |
issn | 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1151916965 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford Academic Journals (OUP) |
subjects | Animal Feed - analysis Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Animals Animals, Suckling Cattle - physiology Diet - veterinary Dietary Proteins - metabolism Energy Metabolism - physiology Female Lactation - physiology Male Milk Models, Biological Nonlinear Dynamics Reproducibility of Results Sex Factors |
title | A methodological approach to estimate the lactation curve and net energy and protein requirements of beef cows using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T21%3A23%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20methodological%20approach%20to%20estimate%20the%20lactation%20curve%20and%20net%20energy%20and%20protein%20requirements%20of%20beef%20cows%20using%20nonlinear%20mixed-effects%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Albertini,%20T%20Z&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3867&rft.epage=3878&rft.pages=3867-3878&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas.2010-3540&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1151916965%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1151916965&rft_id=info:pmid/22665632&rfr_iscdi=true |