Day light quality affects the night-break response in the short-day plant chrysanthemum, suggesting differential phytochrome-mediated regulation of flowering
Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) is a short-day plant, which flowers when the night length is longer than a critical minimum. Flowering is effectively inhibited when the required long-night phase is interrupted by a short period of exposure to red light (night break; NB). The reversal of thi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of plant physiology 2012-12, Vol.169 (18), p.1789-1796 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1796 |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 1789 |
container_title | Journal of plant physiology |
container_volume | 169 |
creator | Higuchi, Yohei Sumitomo, Katsuhiko Oda, Atsushi Shimizu, Hiroshi Hisamatsu, Tamotsu |
description | Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) is a short-day plant, which flowers when the night length is longer than a critical minimum. Flowering is effectively inhibited when the required long-night phase is interrupted by a short period of exposure to red light (night break; NB). The reversal of this inhibition by subsequent exposure to far-red (FR) light indicates the involvement of phytochromes in the flowering response. Here, we elucidated the role of light quality in photoperiodic regulation of chrysanthemum flowering, by applying a range of different conditions. Flowering was consistently observed under short days with white light (W-SD), SD with monochromatic red light (R-SD), or SD with monochromatic blue light (B-SD). For W-SD, NB with monochromatic red light (NB-R) was most effective in inhibiting flowering, while NB with monochromatic blue light (NB-B) and NB with far-red light (NB-FR) caused little inhibition. In contrast, for B-SD, flowering was strongly inhibited by NB-B and NB-FR. However, when B-SD was supplemented with monochromatic red light (B+R-SD), no inhibition by NB-B and NB-FR was observed. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of NB-B following B-SD was partially reversed by subsequent exposure to a FR light pulse. The conditions B-SD/NB-B (no flowering) and B+R-SD/NB-B (flowering) similarly affected the expression of circadian clock-related genes. However, only the former combination suppressed expression of the chrysanthemum orthologue of FLOWERING LOCUS T (CmFTL3). Our results suggest the involvement of at least 2 distinct phytochrome responses in the flowering response of chrysanthemum. Furthermore, it appears that the light quality supplied during the daily photoperiod affects the light quality required for effective NB. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.07.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1151706258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S017616171200288X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1151706258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-6d7c0f225454b1707c109ffe4672c9687b41b38d3f4e46ff2eeb755808f7630c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuO1DAQRS0EYpqGL0ACb5BYkMZ2EjuzYIGGpzQSC5i15TjlxE0SZ2wH1B_Dv1I93cCOle3yqVuPS8hTznaccfl6v9sv4zLsBONix9SOsfIe2XDJm4KXorlPNowrWWBAXZBHKe0ZvuumfEguhGgqVopqQ369Mwc6-n7I9HY1o88HapwDmxPNA9D5-FO0Ecx3GiEtYU5A_Xz3l4YQc9Fh_jKaOVM7xEPCywDTOr2iae17SNnPPe08SkaYszcjXYZDDsiGCYoJOm8ydKjdr6PJPsw0OOrG8BMiZj4mD5wZEzw5n1ty8-H9t6tPxfWXj5-v3l4XtlKXuZCdsswJUVd11XLFlOXsEktWUgl7KRvVVrwtm650FcacEwCtquuGNU7JktlyS16edJcYblfsWk8-WRhxLghr0pzXKCsFbm9LyhNqY0gpgtNL9JOJB82ZPvqi9_rOF330RTOl0RfMenYusLY49N-cP0Yg8OIMmGTN6KKZrU__OClxNsmQe37inAna9BGZm69YqWaM1QodRuLNiQBc2A8PUSfrYba46oi-6i74_7b6G2TTuV0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1151706258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Day light quality affects the night-break response in the short-day plant chrysanthemum, suggesting differential phytochrome-mediated regulation of flowering</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Higuchi, Yohei ; Sumitomo, Katsuhiko ; Oda, Atsushi ; Shimizu, Hiroshi ; Hisamatsu, Tamotsu</creator><creatorcontrib>Higuchi, Yohei ; Sumitomo, Katsuhiko ; Oda, Atsushi ; Shimizu, Hiroshi ; Hisamatsu, Tamotsu</creatorcontrib><description>Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) is a short-day plant, which flowers when the night length is longer than a critical minimum. Flowering is effectively inhibited when the required long-night phase is interrupted by a short period of exposure to red light (night break; NB). The reversal of this inhibition by subsequent exposure to far-red (FR) light indicates the involvement of phytochromes in the flowering response. Here, we elucidated the role of light quality in photoperiodic regulation of chrysanthemum flowering, by applying a range of different conditions. Flowering was consistently observed under short days with white light (W-SD), SD with monochromatic red light (R-SD), or SD with monochromatic blue light (B-SD). For W-SD, NB with monochromatic red light (NB-R) was most effective in inhibiting flowering, while NB with monochromatic blue light (NB-B) and NB with far-red light (NB-FR) caused little inhibition. In contrast, for B-SD, flowering was strongly inhibited by NB-B and NB-FR. However, when B-SD was supplemented with monochromatic red light (B+R-SD), no inhibition by NB-B and NB-FR was observed. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of NB-B following B-SD was partially reversed by subsequent exposure to a FR light pulse. The conditions B-SD/NB-B (no flowering) and B+R-SD/NB-B (flowering) similarly affected the expression of circadian clock-related genes. However, only the former combination suppressed expression of the chrysanthemum orthologue of FLOWERING LOCUS T (CmFTL3). Our results suggest the involvement of at least 2 distinct phytochrome responses in the flowering response of chrysanthemum. Furthermore, it appears that the light quality supplied during the daily photoperiod affects the light quality required for effective NB.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0176-1617</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1328</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.07.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22840324</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPPHEY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Munich: Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; blue light ; Chrysanthemum ; Chrysanthemum - genetics ; Chrysanthemum - physiology ; Chrysanthemum - radiation effects ; Chrysanthemum morifolium ; Circadian Clocks ; Darkness ; DNA, Complementary ; far-red light ; Flowering ; flowers ; Flowers - genetics ; Flowers - physiology ; Flowers - radiation effects ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gene Expression Regulation, Plant ; genes ; Light ; Light quality ; loci ; Night break ; Photoperiod ; Phytochrome ; Phytochrome - metabolism ; Plant Leaves - genetics ; Plant Leaves - physiology ; Plant Leaves - radiation effects ; Plant physiology and development ; Plant Proteins - genetics ; Plant Proteins - metabolism ; Plants, Genetically Modified ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ; red light ; Signal Transduction ; white light</subject><ispartof>Journal of plant physiology, 2012-12, Vol.169 (18), p.1789-1796</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier GmbH</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-6d7c0f225454b1707c109ffe4672c9687b41b38d3f4e46ff2eeb755808f7630c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-6d7c0f225454b1707c109ffe4672c9687b41b38d3f4e46ff2eeb755808f7630c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S017616171200288X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26645460$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22840324$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Higuchi, Yohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumitomo, Katsuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oda, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hisamatsu, Tamotsu</creatorcontrib><title>Day light quality affects the night-break response in the short-day plant chrysanthemum, suggesting differential phytochrome-mediated regulation of flowering</title><title>Journal of plant physiology</title><addtitle>J Plant Physiol</addtitle><description>Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) is a short-day plant, which flowers when the night length is longer than a critical minimum. Flowering is effectively inhibited when the required long-night phase is interrupted by a short period of exposure to red light (night break; NB). The reversal of this inhibition by subsequent exposure to far-red (FR) light indicates the involvement of phytochromes in the flowering response. Here, we elucidated the role of light quality in photoperiodic regulation of chrysanthemum flowering, by applying a range of different conditions. Flowering was consistently observed under short days with white light (W-SD), SD with monochromatic red light (R-SD), or SD with monochromatic blue light (B-SD). For W-SD, NB with monochromatic red light (NB-R) was most effective in inhibiting flowering, while NB with monochromatic blue light (NB-B) and NB with far-red light (NB-FR) caused little inhibition. In contrast, for B-SD, flowering was strongly inhibited by NB-B and NB-FR. However, when B-SD was supplemented with monochromatic red light (B+R-SD), no inhibition by NB-B and NB-FR was observed. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of NB-B following B-SD was partially reversed by subsequent exposure to a FR light pulse. The conditions B-SD/NB-B (no flowering) and B+R-SD/NB-B (flowering) similarly affected the expression of circadian clock-related genes. However, only the former combination suppressed expression of the chrysanthemum orthologue of FLOWERING LOCUS T (CmFTL3). Our results suggest the involvement of at least 2 distinct phytochrome responses in the flowering response of chrysanthemum. Furthermore, it appears that the light quality supplied during the daily photoperiod affects the light quality required for effective NB.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>blue light</subject><subject>Chrysanthemum</subject><subject>Chrysanthemum - genetics</subject><subject>Chrysanthemum - physiology</subject><subject>Chrysanthemum - radiation effects</subject><subject>Chrysanthemum morifolium</subject><subject>Circadian Clocks</subject><subject>Darkness</subject><subject>DNA, Complementary</subject><subject>far-red light</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>flowers</subject><subject>Flowers - genetics</subject><subject>Flowers - physiology</subject><subject>Flowers - radiation effects</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</subject><subject>genes</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Light quality</subject><subject>loci</subject><subject>Night break</subject><subject>Photoperiod</subject><subject>Phytochrome</subject><subject>Phytochrome - metabolism</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - genetics</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - physiology</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - radiation effects</subject><subject>Plant physiology and development</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Plants, Genetically Modified</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>red light</subject><subject>Signal Transduction</subject><subject>white light</subject><issn>0176-1617</issn><issn>1618-1328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuO1DAQRS0EYpqGL0ACb5BYkMZ2EjuzYIGGpzQSC5i15TjlxE0SZ2wH1B_Dv1I93cCOle3yqVuPS8hTznaccfl6v9sv4zLsBONix9SOsfIe2XDJm4KXorlPNowrWWBAXZBHKe0ZvuumfEguhGgqVopqQ369Mwc6-n7I9HY1o88HapwDmxPNA9D5-FO0Ecx3GiEtYU5A_Xz3l4YQc9Fh_jKaOVM7xEPCywDTOr2iae17SNnPPe08SkaYszcjXYZDDsiGCYoJOm8ydKjdr6PJPsw0OOrG8BMiZj4mD5wZEzw5n1ty8-H9t6tPxfWXj5-v3l4XtlKXuZCdsswJUVd11XLFlOXsEktWUgl7KRvVVrwtm650FcacEwCtquuGNU7JktlyS16edJcYblfsWk8-WRhxLghr0pzXKCsFbm9LyhNqY0gpgtNL9JOJB82ZPvqi9_rOF330RTOl0RfMenYusLY49N-cP0Yg8OIMmGTN6KKZrU__OClxNsmQe37inAna9BGZm69YqWaM1QodRuLNiQBc2A8PUSfrYba46oi-6i74_7b6G2TTuV0</recordid><startdate>20121215</startdate><enddate>20121215</enddate><creator>Higuchi, Yohei</creator><creator>Sumitomo, Katsuhiko</creator><creator>Oda, Atsushi</creator><creator>Shimizu, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Hisamatsu, Tamotsu</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121215</creationdate><title>Day light quality affects the night-break response in the short-day plant chrysanthemum, suggesting differential phytochrome-mediated regulation of flowering</title><author>Higuchi, Yohei ; Sumitomo, Katsuhiko ; Oda, Atsushi ; Shimizu, Hiroshi ; Hisamatsu, Tamotsu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-6d7c0f225454b1707c109ffe4672c9687b41b38d3f4e46ff2eeb755808f7630c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>blue light</topic><topic>Chrysanthemum</topic><topic>Chrysanthemum - genetics</topic><topic>Chrysanthemum - physiology</topic><topic>Chrysanthemum - radiation effects</topic><topic>Chrysanthemum morifolium</topic><topic>Circadian Clocks</topic><topic>Darkness</topic><topic>DNA, Complementary</topic><topic>far-red light</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>flowers</topic><topic>Flowers - genetics</topic><topic>Flowers - physiology</topic><topic>Flowers - radiation effects</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gene Expression Regulation, Plant</topic><topic>genes</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Light quality</topic><topic>loci</topic><topic>Night break</topic><topic>Photoperiod</topic><topic>Phytochrome</topic><topic>Phytochrome - metabolism</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - genetics</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - physiology</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - radiation effects</topic><topic>Plant physiology and development</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Plants, Genetically Modified</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>red light</topic><topic>Signal Transduction</topic><topic>white light</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Higuchi, Yohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumitomo, Katsuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oda, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hisamatsu, Tamotsu</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plant physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Higuchi, Yohei</au><au>Sumitomo, Katsuhiko</au><au>Oda, Atsushi</au><au>Shimizu, Hiroshi</au><au>Hisamatsu, Tamotsu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Day light quality affects the night-break response in the short-day plant chrysanthemum, suggesting differential phytochrome-mediated regulation of flowering</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plant physiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Plant Physiol</addtitle><date>2012-12-15</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>169</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>1789</spage><epage>1796</epage><pages>1789-1796</pages><issn>0176-1617</issn><eissn>1618-1328</eissn><coden>JPPHEY</coden><abstract>Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) is a short-day plant, which flowers when the night length is longer than a critical minimum. Flowering is effectively inhibited when the required long-night phase is interrupted by a short period of exposure to red light (night break; NB). The reversal of this inhibition by subsequent exposure to far-red (FR) light indicates the involvement of phytochromes in the flowering response. Here, we elucidated the role of light quality in photoperiodic regulation of chrysanthemum flowering, by applying a range of different conditions. Flowering was consistently observed under short days with white light (W-SD), SD with monochromatic red light (R-SD), or SD with monochromatic blue light (B-SD). For W-SD, NB with monochromatic red light (NB-R) was most effective in inhibiting flowering, while NB with monochromatic blue light (NB-B) and NB with far-red light (NB-FR) caused little inhibition. In contrast, for B-SD, flowering was strongly inhibited by NB-B and NB-FR. However, when B-SD was supplemented with monochromatic red light (B+R-SD), no inhibition by NB-B and NB-FR was observed. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of NB-B following B-SD was partially reversed by subsequent exposure to a FR light pulse. The conditions B-SD/NB-B (no flowering) and B+R-SD/NB-B (flowering) similarly affected the expression of circadian clock-related genes. However, only the former combination suppressed expression of the chrysanthemum orthologue of FLOWERING LOCUS T (CmFTL3). Our results suggest the involvement of at least 2 distinct phytochrome responses in the flowering response of chrysanthemum. Furthermore, it appears that the light quality supplied during the daily photoperiod affects the light quality required for effective NB.</abstract><cop>Munich</cop><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><pmid>22840324</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jplph.2012.07.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0176-1617 |
ispartof | Journal of plant physiology, 2012-12, Vol.169 (18), p.1789-1796 |
issn | 0176-1617 1618-1328 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1151706258 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences blue light Chrysanthemum Chrysanthemum - genetics Chrysanthemum - physiology Chrysanthemum - radiation effects Chrysanthemum morifolium Circadian Clocks Darkness DNA, Complementary far-red light Flowering flowers Flowers - genetics Flowers - physiology Flowers - radiation effects Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gene Expression Regulation, Plant genes Light Light quality loci Night break Photoperiod Phytochrome Phytochrome - metabolism Plant Leaves - genetics Plant Leaves - physiology Plant Leaves - radiation effects Plant physiology and development Plant Proteins - genetics Plant Proteins - metabolism Plants, Genetically Modified Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction red light Signal Transduction white light |
title | Day light quality affects the night-break response in the short-day plant chrysanthemum, suggesting differential phytochrome-mediated regulation of flowering |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T00%3A26%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Day%20light%20quality%20affects%20the%20night-break%20response%20in%20the%20short-day%20plant%20chrysanthemum,%20suggesting%20differential%20phytochrome-mediated%20regulation%20of%20flowering&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plant%20physiology&rft.au=Higuchi,%20Yohei&rft.date=2012-12-15&rft.volume=169&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=1789&rft.epage=1796&rft.pages=1789-1796&rft.issn=0176-1617&rft.eissn=1618-1328&rft.coden=JPPHEY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jplph.2012.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1151706258%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1151706258&rft_id=info:pmid/22840324&rft_els_id=S017616171200288X&rfr_iscdi=true |