Ontology and the study of social reality: emergence, organisation, community, power, social relations, corporations, artefacts and money
The conception of social reality I have previously defended (and here extend), positing features such as social relations, positions and powers, is thoroughly naturalistic and even consistent with modern interpretations of quantum field theory. It also serves to ground a social science that can be s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cambridge journal of economics 2012-03, Vol.36 (2), p.345-385 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 385 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 345 |
| container_title | Cambridge journal of economics |
| container_volume | 36 |
| creator | Lawson, Tony |
| description | The conception of social reality I have previously defended (and here extend), positing features such as social relations, positions and powers, is thoroughly naturalistic and even consistent with modern interpretations of quantum field theory. It also serves to ground a social science that can be scientific in the sense of natural science. This is the thesis defended here. Central to the argument is an emphasis on a 'strong' form of emergence and the category of 'organisation-in-process'. To bring out various salient features of the position defended, I take the opportunity to compare aspects of it with relevant components of the contribution of John Searle, whose ontological conception appears at once to be both very similar yet also very different. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/cje/ber050 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1151042050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24232451</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24232451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-8319c062aaa5d3158d69c3ad9c90084f92cf65f77b4448aa2b0e116bd26a54a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctq3DAUBmBRUugk7ab7gsgqlHGju63uSugNAtlk0Z05Ix9PPNjSRJIJfoM-djWZpoVu0pUQfPoPOj8hbzn7wJmVl26HlxuMTLMXZMWVUZXUSp-QFZPMVtyYH6_IaUo7xpiq63pFft74HMawXSj4juY7pCnP3UJDT1NwA4w0IoxDXj5SnDBu0Ttc0xC34IcEeQh-TV2YptkXs6b78IBx_ffp-EjSwcR9iE83iBl7cDk9Tp2Cx-U1ednDmPDN7_OM3H75fHv1rbq--fr96tN15ZSSuWokt44ZAQC6k1w3nbFOQmedZaxRvRWuN7qv641SqgEQG4acm00nDGgF8oxcHGP3MdzPmHI7DcnhOILHMKeWc82ZEmWB_0GFFqLQ-nnKJBd1w40t9Pwfugtz9OXLrRV1iTTsgN4fkYshpYh9u4_DBHEpSe2h6LYU3R6LLvjdEe9SDvGPFEpIoTSXvwBnw6ab</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>927125609</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ontology and the study of social reality: emergence, organisation, community, power, social relations, corporations, artefacts and money</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Lawson, Tony</creator><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Tony</creatorcontrib><description>The conception of social reality I have previously defended (and here extend), positing features such as social relations, positions and powers, is thoroughly naturalistic and even consistent with modern interpretations of quantum field theory. It also serves to ground a social science that can be scientific in the sense of natural science. This is the thesis defended here. Central to the argument is an emphasis on a 'strong' form of emergence and the category of 'organisation-in-process'. To bring out various salient features of the position defended, I take the opportunity to compare aspects of it with relevant components of the contribution of John Searle, whose ontological conception appears at once to be both very similar yet also very different.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-166X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cje/ber050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</publisher><subject>Bonds ; Cash ; Communities ; Community ; Community Power ; Corporations ; Credit ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Emergence ; Enterprises ; Humans ; Money ; Natural Sciences ; Ontology ; Organization ; Phenomena ; Philosophy of science ; Power ; Quantum field theory ; Rights ; Science ; Searle, John Rogers ; Social interaction ; Social Reality ; Social relations ; Social responsibility ; Social sciences ; Social structure ; Social structures ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Cambridge journal of economics, 2012-03, Vol.36 (2), p.345-385</ispartof><rights>Cambridge Political Economy Society 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Mar 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-8319c062aaa5d3158d69c3ad9c90084f92cf65f77b4448aa2b0e116bd26a54a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-8319c062aaa5d3158d69c3ad9c90084f92cf65f77b4448aa2b0e116bd26a54a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24232451$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24232451$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27842,27901,27902,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Tony</creatorcontrib><title>Ontology and the study of social reality: emergence, organisation, community, power, social relations, corporations, artefacts and money</title><title>Cambridge journal of economics</title><description>The conception of social reality I have previously defended (and here extend), positing features such as social relations, positions and powers, is thoroughly naturalistic and even consistent with modern interpretations of quantum field theory. It also serves to ground a social science that can be scientific in the sense of natural science. This is the thesis defended here. Central to the argument is an emphasis on a 'strong' form of emergence and the category of 'organisation-in-process'. To bring out various salient features of the position defended, I take the opportunity to compare aspects of it with relevant components of the contribution of John Searle, whose ontological conception appears at once to be both very similar yet also very different.</description><subject>Bonds</subject><subject>Cash</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community Power</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Credit</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Emergence</subject><subject>Enterprises</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Natural Sciences</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Phenomena</subject><subject>Philosophy of science</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Quantum field theory</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Searle, John Rogers</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Reality</subject><subject>Social relations</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><subject>Social structures</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0309-166X</issn><issn>1464-3545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ctq3DAUBmBRUugk7ab7gsgqlHGju63uSugNAtlk0Z05Ix9PPNjSRJIJfoM-djWZpoVu0pUQfPoPOj8hbzn7wJmVl26HlxuMTLMXZMWVUZXUSp-QFZPMVtyYH6_IaUo7xpiq63pFft74HMawXSj4juY7pCnP3UJDT1NwA4w0IoxDXj5SnDBu0Ttc0xC34IcEeQh-TV2YptkXs6b78IBx_ffp-EjSwcR9iE83iBl7cDk9Tp2Cx-U1ednDmPDN7_OM3H75fHv1rbq--fr96tN15ZSSuWokt44ZAQC6k1w3nbFOQmedZaxRvRWuN7qv641SqgEQG4acm00nDGgF8oxcHGP3MdzPmHI7DcnhOILHMKeWc82ZEmWB_0GFFqLQ-nnKJBd1w40t9Pwfugtz9OXLrRV1iTTsgN4fkYshpYh9u4_DBHEpSe2h6LYU3R6LLvjdEe9SDvGPFEpIoTSXvwBnw6ab</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Lawson, Tony</creator><general>OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Ontology and the study of social reality: emergence, organisation, community, power, social relations, corporations, artefacts and money</title><author>Lawson, Tony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-8319c062aaa5d3158d69c3ad9c90084f92cf65f77b4448aa2b0e116bd26a54a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Bonds</topic><topic>Cash</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community Power</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Credit</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Emergence</topic><topic>Enterprises</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Natural Sciences</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Phenomena</topic><topic>Philosophy of science</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Quantum field theory</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Searle, John Rogers</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Reality</topic><topic>Social relations</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><topic>Social structures</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Tony</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Cambridge journal of economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lawson, Tony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ontology and the study of social reality: emergence, organisation, community, power, social relations, corporations, artefacts and money</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge journal of economics</jtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>385</epage><pages>345-385</pages><issn>0309-166X</issn><eissn>1464-3545</eissn><abstract>The conception of social reality I have previously defended (and here extend), positing features such as social relations, positions and powers, is thoroughly naturalistic and even consistent with modern interpretations of quantum field theory. It also serves to ground a social science that can be scientific in the sense of natural science. This is the thesis defended here. Central to the argument is an emphasis on a 'strong' form of emergence and the category of 'organisation-in-process'. To bring out various salient features of the position defended, I take the opportunity to compare aspects of it with relevant components of the contribution of John Searle, whose ontological conception appears at once to be both very similar yet also very different.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</pub><doi>10.1093/cje/ber050</doi><tpages>41</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0309-166X |
| ispartof | Cambridge journal of economics, 2012-03, Vol.36 (2), p.345-385 |
| issn | 0309-166X 1464-3545 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1151042050 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Bonds Cash Communities Community Community Power Corporations Credit Economic theory Economics Emergence Enterprises Humans Money Natural Sciences Ontology Organization Phenomena Philosophy of science Power Quantum field theory Rights Science Searle, John Rogers Social interaction Social Reality Social relations Social responsibility Social sciences Social structure Social structures Studies |
| title | Ontology and the study of social reality: emergence, organisation, community, power, social relations, corporations, artefacts and money |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T20%3A16%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ontology%20and%20the%20study%20of%20social%20reality:%20emergence,%20organisation,%20community,%20power,%20social%20relations,%20corporations,%20artefacts%20and%20money&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20journal%20of%20economics&rft.au=Lawson,%20Tony&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=385&rft.pages=345-385&rft.issn=0309-166X&rft.eissn=1464-3545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cje/ber050&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24232451%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=927125609&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24232451&rfr_iscdi=true |