Innovation policy roadmapping as a systemic instrument for forward-looking policy design
The systemic characteristics of science, technology and innovation policies have been much discussed recently. This paper presents innovation policy roadmapping (IPRM) as a methodological framework for linking R&D results to systemic policy contexts and to forward-looking policy design. The pape...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Science & public policy 2012-03, Vol.39 (2), p.178-190 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 190 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 178 |
| container_title | Science & public policy |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Ahlqvist, Toni Valovirta, Ville Loikkanen, Torsti |
| description | The systemic characteristics of science, technology and innovation policies have been much discussed recently. This paper presents innovation policy roadmapping (IPRM) as a methodological framework for linking R&D results to systemic policy contexts and to forward-looking policy design. The paper explores the methodological background of the IPRM method and outlines its policy rationale. It also illustrates IPRM with two case studies from Australia and Finland. The case studies reflect on how the policy perspectives can be constructed in a dynamic context of societal drivers, solution and market development, and enabling technologies. The paper concludes by assessing the policy implications of the IPRM approach. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/scipol/scs016 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1151041931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/scipol/scs016</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1024210702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-7e471fe8a6e85045f306fa0c1fb261ac5f5848142ed03eed1e1d68637586b7f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1P5DAQxa0TSCxw5fUpacLN2M7HlghxwAmJBiQ6y-uM9wxJbOwsp_3vcRQEJcWb5-L3xqPH2C-Ec4S1-J2MC77PlgDrH2yFssGykgIO2AoE8FJI3hyx45SeAYC3slqxp9tx9G96cn4sctiZfRG97gYdghu3hU6FLtI-TTQ4U7gxTXE30DgV1sdZ_3Xsyt77lxn-yHeU3HY8ZYdW94l-fvgJe_xz9XB5U97dX99eXtyVRoKYyobykZZaXVNbgaysgNpqMGg3vEZtKlu1skXJqQNB1CFhV7e1aKq23jS2FifsbNkbon_dUZrU4JKhvtcj-V1SiBWCxLXA71HgkiM0wDNaLqiJPqVIVoXoBh33GVJz2WopWy1lZ_7vwkcKZD5hvwszF3r1poQW6zz2WRyQZ3PzMytkYdMqXIP6Nw1fd-b4N_--A3LknKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1024210702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Innovation policy roadmapping as a systemic instrument for forward-looking policy design</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>RePEc</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Ahlqvist, Toni ; Valovirta, Ville ; Loikkanen, Torsti</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahlqvist, Toni ; Valovirta, Ville ; Loikkanen, Torsti</creatorcontrib><description>The systemic characteristics of science, technology and innovation policies have been much discussed recently. This paper presents innovation policy roadmapping (IPRM) as a methodological framework for linking R&D results to systemic policy contexts and to forward-looking policy design. The paper explores the methodological background of the IPRM method and outlines its policy rationale. It also illustrates IPRM with two case studies from Australia and Finland. The case studies reflect on how the policy perspectives can be constructed in a dynamic context of societal drivers, solution and market development, and enabling technologies. The paper concludes by assessing the policy implications of the IPRM approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-3427</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scs016</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPUPEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Australia ; Comparative analysis ; Finland ; Innovation ; Markets ; Policy making ; Public policy ; Research and development ; Science ; Science policy ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Science & public policy, 2012-03, Vol.39 (2), p.178-190</ispartof><rights>The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-7e471fe8a6e85045f306fa0c1fb261ac5f5848142ed03eed1e1d68637586b7f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-7e471fe8a6e85045f306fa0c1fb261ac5f5848142ed03eed1e1d68637586b7f63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,3994,27842,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/oupscippl/v_3a39_3ay_3a2012_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a178-190.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahlqvist, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valovirta, Ville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loikkanen, Torsti</creatorcontrib><title>Innovation policy roadmapping as a systemic instrument for forward-looking policy design</title><title>Science & public policy</title><description>The systemic characteristics of science, technology and innovation policies have been much discussed recently. This paper presents innovation policy roadmapping (IPRM) as a methodological framework for linking R&D results to systemic policy contexts and to forward-looking policy design. The paper explores the methodological background of the IPRM method and outlines its policy rationale. It also illustrates IPRM with two case studies from Australia and Finland. The case studies reflect on how the policy perspectives can be constructed in a dynamic context of societal drivers, solution and market development, and enabling technologies. The paper concludes by assessing the policy implications of the IPRM approach.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science policy</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0302-3427</issn><issn>1471-5430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL1P5DAQxa0TSCxw5fUpacLN2M7HlghxwAmJBiQ6y-uM9wxJbOwsp_3vcRQEJcWb5-L3xqPH2C-Ec4S1-J2MC77PlgDrH2yFssGykgIO2AoE8FJI3hyx45SeAYC3slqxp9tx9G96cn4sctiZfRG97gYdghu3hU6FLtI-TTQ4U7gxTXE30DgV1sdZ_3Xsyt77lxn-yHeU3HY8ZYdW94l-fvgJe_xz9XB5U97dX99eXtyVRoKYyobykZZaXVNbgaysgNpqMGg3vEZtKlu1skXJqQNB1CFhV7e1aKq23jS2FifsbNkbon_dUZrU4JKhvtcj-V1SiBWCxLXA71HgkiM0wDNaLqiJPqVIVoXoBh33GVJz2WopWy1lZ_7vwkcKZD5hvwszF3r1poQW6zz2WRyQZ3PzMytkYdMqXIP6Nw1fd-b4N_--A3LknKw</recordid><startdate>20120301</startdate><enddate>20120301</enddate><creator>Ahlqvist, Toni</creator><creator>Valovirta, Ville</creator><creator>Loikkanen, Torsti</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120301</creationdate><title>Innovation policy roadmapping as a systemic instrument for forward-looking policy design</title><author>Ahlqvist, Toni ; Valovirta, Ville ; Loikkanen, Torsti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-7e471fe8a6e85045f306fa0c1fb261ac5f5848142ed03eed1e1d68637586b7f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science policy</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahlqvist, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valovirta, Ville</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loikkanen, Torsti</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Science & public policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahlqvist, Toni</au><au>Valovirta, Ville</au><au>Loikkanen, Torsti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Innovation policy roadmapping as a systemic instrument for forward-looking policy design</atitle><jtitle>Science & public policy</jtitle><date>2012-03-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>178-190</pages><issn>0302-3427</issn><eissn>1471-5430</eissn><coden>SPUPEC</coden><abstract>The systemic characteristics of science, technology and innovation policies have been much discussed recently. This paper presents innovation policy roadmapping (IPRM) as a methodological framework for linking R&D results to systemic policy contexts and to forward-looking policy design. The paper explores the methodological background of the IPRM method and outlines its policy rationale. It also illustrates IPRM with two case studies from Australia and Finland. The case studies reflect on how the policy perspectives can be constructed in a dynamic context of societal drivers, solution and market development, and enabling technologies. The paper concludes by assessing the policy implications of the IPRM approach.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/scipol/scs016</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0302-3427 |
| ispartof | Science & public policy, 2012-03, Vol.39 (2), p.178-190 |
| issn | 0302-3427 1471-5430 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1151041931 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); RePEc; PAIS Index |
| subjects | Australia Comparative analysis Finland Innovation Markets Policy making Public policy Research and development Science Science policy Technology |
| title | Innovation policy roadmapping as a systemic instrument for forward-looking policy design |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T07%3A26%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Innovation%20policy%20roadmapping%20as%20a%20systemic%20instrument%20for%20forward-looking%20policy%20design&rft.jtitle=Science%20&%20public%20policy&rft.au=Ahlqvist,%20Toni&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=178-190&rft.issn=0302-3427&rft.eissn=1471-5430&rft.coden=SPUPEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/scipol/scs016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1024210702%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1024210702&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/scipol/scs016&rfr_iscdi=true |