The Value of Microbiological Screening in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery
Objective This study was performed to investigate whether nasal and oropharyngeal microbiological swabs taken prior to cleft lip and palate surgery correlated with the oronasal flora at the time of surgery and whether specific culture results affected surgical outcome. Methods Prospective audit set...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2012-11, Vol.49 (6), p.708-713 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 713 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 708 |
container_title | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Thomas, Gregory P.L. Sibley, Jane Goodacre, Timothy E.E. Cadier, Michael M. |
description | Objective
This study was performed to investigate whether nasal and oropharyngeal microbiological swabs taken prior to cleft lip and palate surgery correlated with the oronasal flora at the time of surgery and whether specific culture results affected surgical outcome.
Methods
Prospective audit set in two designated U.K. cleft centers each with a single surgeon. Nasal and oropharyngeal microbiological swabs were taken within 2 weeks prior to surgery and again on the operating table. Adverse outcome measures included postoperative pyrexia, wound dehiscence, or fistula formation.
Results
One hundred forty-four cases were recruited over 12 months. Nasal swabs cultured organisms significantly more often than oropharyngeal swabs (p < .0001). No significant difference was detected in the number of cases with a positive microbiology culture preoperatively compared with perioperative sampling (48% and 50%). The specific organisms cultured from preoperative swabs were the same as those cultured at surgery in only half of cases. Preoperative microbiology swabs were poorly predictive of the oronasal flora at surgery. Antibiotic treatment of patients with positive preoperative microbiology did not significantly reduce the incidence of bacterial colonization or significantly alter clinical outcome.
Conclusion
Preoperative microbiological investigation is not helpful in predicting the nasal and oropharyngeal flora at the time of surgery. Further, culture results did not correlate with postoperative outcome, regardless of whether pre- or perioperative antibiotic therapy was instigated. This evidence suggests that microbiology screening swabs are an unnecessary investigation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1597/11-063 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1151033188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1597_11-063</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2837394311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-649e5c519c781cd265a29f0086daae64e3551c22d7c297cb0c56690663a8018c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0F9PFDEUBfCGSPgnfATTxEh8Gext995pH81G1GSNJKCvk27nzloyO7O2Ow98e2pYQHhqH345PT1CnIG6AHT1J4BKkdkTR4AzrADJvSl3hVgRIR2K45xvldII2h6IQw12Zg25I3F584flb99PLMdO_oghjcs49uMqBt_L65CYhzisZBzkvOduKxdxI_3Qyivf-y3L6ymtON29Ffud7zOf7s4T8evyy838W7X4-fX7_POiCoZwW9HMMQYEF2oLodWEXrtOKUut90wzNogQtG7roF0dliogkVNExlsFNpgT8fEhd5PGvxPnbbOOOXDf-4HHKTcACMoYsLbQ96_o7TilobRrQBtwytWoizp_UOXjOSfumk2Ka5_uGlDNv2VLZFOWLfDdLm5arrl9Yo9TFvBhB3wu23XJDyHmZ0foDFnz3Cv7Ff_X6eVz90fehws</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1231909752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Value of Microbiological Screening in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Thomas, Gregory P.L. ; Sibley, Jane ; Goodacre, Timothy E.E. ; Cadier, Michael M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Gregory P.L. ; Sibley, Jane ; Goodacre, Timothy E.E. ; Cadier, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
This study was performed to investigate whether nasal and oropharyngeal microbiological swabs taken prior to cleft lip and palate surgery correlated with the oronasal flora at the time of surgery and whether specific culture results affected surgical outcome.
Methods
Prospective audit set in two designated U.K. cleft centers each with a single surgeon. Nasal and oropharyngeal microbiological swabs were taken within 2 weeks prior to surgery and again on the operating table. Adverse outcome measures included postoperative pyrexia, wound dehiscence, or fistula formation.
Results
One hundred forty-four cases were recruited over 12 months. Nasal swabs cultured organisms significantly more often than oropharyngeal swabs (p < .0001). No significant difference was detected in the number of cases with a positive microbiology culture preoperatively compared with perioperative sampling (48% and 50%). The specific organisms cultured from preoperative swabs were the same as those cultured at surgery in only half of cases. Preoperative microbiology swabs were poorly predictive of the oronasal flora at surgery. Antibiotic treatment of patients with positive preoperative microbiology did not significantly reduce the incidence of bacterial colonization or significantly alter clinical outcome.
Conclusion
Preoperative microbiological investigation is not helpful in predicting the nasal and oropharyngeal flora at the time of surgery. Further, culture results did not correlate with postoperative outcome, regardless of whether pre- or perioperative antibiotic therapy was instigated. This evidence suggests that microbiology screening swabs are an unnecessary investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-6656</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1597/11-063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21848369</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPJOEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis ; Bacterial diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child, Preschool ; Cleft Lip - microbiology ; Cleft Lip - surgery ; Cleft Palate - microbiology ; Cleft Palate - surgery ; Deformities ; Dentistry ; Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology ; Female ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infant ; Infectious diseases ; Male ; Maxillofacial surgery ; Medical sciences ; Medical screening ; Microbiology ; Non tumoral diseases ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections ; Studies ; Surgical outcomes ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - microbiology ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - prevention & control ; Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2012-11, Vol.49 (6), p.708-713</ispartof><rights>2012 American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association. All rights reserved</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Allen Press Publishing Services Nov 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-649e5c519c781cd265a29f0086daae64e3551c22d7c297cb0c56690663a8018c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-649e5c519c781cd265a29f0086daae64e3551c22d7c297cb0c56690663a8018c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1597/11-063$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1597/11-063$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26593683$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21848369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Gregory P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibley, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodacre, Timothy E.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadier, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Value of Microbiological Screening in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery</title><title>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</title><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><description>Objective
This study was performed to investigate whether nasal and oropharyngeal microbiological swabs taken prior to cleft lip and palate surgery correlated with the oronasal flora at the time of surgery and whether specific culture results affected surgical outcome.
Methods
Prospective audit set in two designated U.K. cleft centers each with a single surgeon. Nasal and oropharyngeal microbiological swabs were taken within 2 weeks prior to surgery and again on the operating table. Adverse outcome measures included postoperative pyrexia, wound dehiscence, or fistula formation.
Results
One hundred forty-four cases were recruited over 12 months. Nasal swabs cultured organisms significantly more often than oropharyngeal swabs (p < .0001). No significant difference was detected in the number of cases with a positive microbiology culture preoperatively compared with perioperative sampling (48% and 50%). The specific organisms cultured from preoperative swabs were the same as those cultured at surgery in only half of cases. Preoperative microbiology swabs were poorly predictive of the oronasal flora at surgery. Antibiotic treatment of patients with positive preoperative microbiology did not significantly reduce the incidence of bacterial colonization or significantly alter clinical outcome.
Conclusion
Preoperative microbiological investigation is not helpful in predicting the nasal and oropharyngeal flora at the time of surgery. Further, culture results did not correlate with postoperative outcome, regardless of whether pre- or perioperative antibiotic therapy was instigated. This evidence suggests that microbiology screening swabs are an unnecessary investigation.</description><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - microbiology</subject><subject>Cleft Lip - surgery</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - microbiology</subject><subject>Cleft Palate - surgery</subject><subject>Deformities</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxillofacial surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - microbiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - prevention & control</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1055-6656</issn><issn>1545-1569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0F9PFDEUBfCGSPgnfATTxEh8Gext995pH81G1GSNJKCvk27nzloyO7O2Ow98e2pYQHhqH345PT1CnIG6AHT1J4BKkdkTR4AzrADJvSl3hVgRIR2K45xvldII2h6IQw12Zg25I3F584flb99PLMdO_oghjcs49uMqBt_L65CYhzisZBzkvOduKxdxI_3Qyivf-y3L6ymtON29Ffud7zOf7s4T8evyy838W7X4-fX7_POiCoZwW9HMMQYEF2oLodWEXrtOKUut90wzNogQtG7roF0dliogkVNExlsFNpgT8fEhd5PGvxPnbbOOOXDf-4HHKTcACMoYsLbQ96_o7TilobRrQBtwytWoizp_UOXjOSfumk2Ka5_uGlDNv2VLZFOWLfDdLm5arrl9Yo9TFvBhB3wu23XJDyHmZ0foDFnz3Cv7Ff_X6eVz90fehws</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Thomas, Gregory P.L.</creator><creator>Sibley, Jane</creator><creator>Goodacre, Timothy E.E.</creator><creator>Cadier, Michael M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>The Value of Microbiological Screening in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery</title><author>Thomas, Gregory P.L. ; Sibley, Jane ; Goodacre, Timothy E.E. ; Cadier, Michael M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-649e5c519c781cd265a29f0086daae64e3551c22d7c297cb0c56690663a8018c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - microbiology</topic><topic>Cleft Lip - surgery</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - microbiology</topic><topic>Cleft Palate - surgery</topic><topic>Deformities</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxillofacial surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - microbiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - prevention & control</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Gregory P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibley, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodacre, Timothy E.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadier, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, Gregory P.L.</au><au>Sibley, Jane</au><au>Goodacre, Timothy E.E.</au><au>Cadier, Michael M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Value of Microbiological Screening in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery</atitle><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>708</spage><epage>713</epage><pages>708-713</pages><issn>1055-6656</issn><eissn>1545-1569</eissn><coden>CPJOEG</coden><abstract>Objective
This study was performed to investigate whether nasal and oropharyngeal microbiological swabs taken prior to cleft lip and palate surgery correlated with the oronasal flora at the time of surgery and whether specific culture results affected surgical outcome.
Methods
Prospective audit set in two designated U.K. cleft centers each with a single surgeon. Nasal and oropharyngeal microbiological swabs were taken within 2 weeks prior to surgery and again on the operating table. Adverse outcome measures included postoperative pyrexia, wound dehiscence, or fistula formation.
Results
One hundred forty-four cases were recruited over 12 months. Nasal swabs cultured organisms significantly more often than oropharyngeal swabs (p < .0001). No significant difference was detected in the number of cases with a positive microbiology culture preoperatively compared with perioperative sampling (48% and 50%). The specific organisms cultured from preoperative swabs were the same as those cultured at surgery in only half of cases. Preoperative microbiology swabs were poorly predictive of the oronasal flora at surgery. Antibiotic treatment of patients with positive preoperative microbiology did not significantly reduce the incidence of bacterial colonization or significantly alter clinical outcome.
Conclusion
Preoperative microbiological investigation is not helpful in predicting the nasal and oropharyngeal flora at the time of surgery. Further, culture results did not correlate with postoperative outcome, regardless of whether pre- or perioperative antibiotic therapy was instigated. This evidence suggests that microbiology screening swabs are an unnecessary investigation.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21848369</pmid><doi>10.1597/11-063</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-6656 |
ispartof | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2012-11, Vol.49 (6), p.708-713 |
issn | 1055-6656 1545-1569 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1151033188 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE |
subjects | Antibiotic Prophylaxis Bacterial diseases Biological and medical sciences Child, Preschool Cleft Lip - microbiology Cleft Lip - surgery Cleft Palate - microbiology Cleft Palate - surgery Deformities Dentistry Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology Female Human bacterial diseases Humans Infant Infectious diseases Male Maxillofacial surgery Medical sciences Medical screening Microbiology Non tumoral diseases Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Staphylococcal infections, streptococcal infections, pneumococcal infections Studies Surgical outcomes Surgical Wound Dehiscence - microbiology Surgical Wound Dehiscence - prevention & control Surgical Wound Infection - microbiology Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control United Kingdom |
title | The Value of Microbiological Screening in Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T18%3A20%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Value%20of%20Microbiological%20Screening%20in%20Cleft%20Lip%20and%20Palate%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=The%20Cleft%20palate-craniofacial%20journal&rft.au=Thomas,%20Gregory%20P.L.&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=708&rft.epage=713&rft.pages=708-713&rft.issn=1055-6656&rft.eissn=1545-1569&rft.coden=CPJOEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1597/11-063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2837394311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1231909752&rft_id=info:pmid/21848369&rft_sage_id=10.1597_11-063&rfr_iscdi=true |