Predicting Emergency Department Inpatient Admissions to Improve Same-day Patient Flow

ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2012; 19:1045–1054 © 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Objectives:  The objectives were to evaluate three models that use information gathered during triage to predict, in real time, the number of emergency department (ED) patients who subsequently will...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic emergency medicine 2012-09, Vol.19 (9), p.E1045-E1054
Hauptverfasser: Peck, Jordan S., Benneyan, James C., Nightingale, Deborah J., Gaehde, Stephan A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2012; 19:1045–1054 © 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Objectives:  The objectives were to evaluate three models that use information gathered during triage to predict, in real time, the number of emergency department (ED) patients who subsequently will be admitted to a hospital inpatient unit (IU) and to introduce a new methodology for implementing these predictions in the hospital setting. Methods:  Three simple methods were compared for predicting hospital admission at ED triage: expert opinion, naïve Bayes conditional probability, and a generalized linear regression model with a logit link function (logit‐linear). Two months of data were gathered from the Boston VA Healthcare System‘s 13‐bed ED, which receives approximately 1,100 patients per month. Triage nurses were asked to estimate the likelihood that each of 767 triaged patients from that 2‐month period would be admitted after their ED treatment, by placing them into one of six categories ranging from low to high likelihood. Logit‐linear regression and naïve Bayes models also were developed using retrospective data and used to estimate admission probabilities for each patient who entered the ED within a 2‐month time frame, during triage hours (1,160 patients). Predictors considered included patient age, primary complaint, provider, designation (ED or fast track), arrival mode, and urgency level (emergency severity index assigned at triage). Results:  Of the three methods considered, logit‐linear regression performed the best in predicting total bed need, with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.887, an R2 of 0.58, an average estimation error of 0.19 beds per day, and on average roughly 3.5 hours before peak demand occurred. Significant predictors were patient age, primary complaint, bed type designation, and arrival mode (p 
ISSN:1069-6563
1553-2712
DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01435.x