Mental health-related risk factors for violence: using the evidence to guide mental health triage decision making

Accessible summary •  Reforms of mental health service delivery models have resulted in initial assessments being conducted by crisis and triage service clinicians in acutely time‐pressured environments such as emergency departments and non‐clinical settings. Under these circumstances the use of sta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing 2012-10, Vol.19 (8), p.690-701
Hauptverfasser: SANDS, N., ELSOM, S., GERDTZ, M., KHAW, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 701
container_issue 8
container_start_page 690
container_title Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing
container_volume 19
creator SANDS, N.
ELSOM, S.
GERDTZ, M.
KHAW, D.
description Accessible summary •  Reforms of mental health service delivery models have resulted in initial assessments being conducted by crisis and triage service clinicians in acutely time‐pressured environments such as emergency departments and non‐clinical settings. Under these circumstances the use of standardized violence risk assessment instruments is impractical. •  We conducted a systematic review to establish the best evidence for patient‐initiated violence risk assessment. •  The risk factors that achieved the highest evidence grading included hostility/anger, agitation, thought disturbance, positive symptoms of schizophrenia, suspiciousness and irritability. •  We found that the majority of risk factors supported by the highest level of evidence are observable patient characteristics, which clinicians should be trained to detect in the context of conducting initial assessments at point of entry to mental health services. Mental health clinicians working in emergency crisis assessment teams or mental health triage roles are required to make rapid and accurate risk assessments. The assessment of violence risk at triage is particularly pertinent to the early identification and prevention of patient violence, and to enhancing the safety of clinical staff and the general public. To date, the evidence base for mental health triage violence risk assessment has been minimal. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by identifying best available evidence for mental health‐related risk factors for patient‐initiated violence. We conducted a systematic review based on the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia's methodology for systematic reviews. A total of 6847 studies were retrieved, of which 326 studies met the study inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 277 met inclusion criteria but failed the quality appraisal process, thus a total of 49 studies were included in the final review. The risk factors that achieved the highest evidence grading were predominantly related to dynamic clinical factors immediately observable in the patient's general appearance, behaviour and speech. These factors included hostility/anger, agitation, thought disturbance, positive symptoms of schizophrenia, suspiciousness and irritability.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01839.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1151029446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1151029446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5679-fffc58a97a2c4db3c3be3c74954b810310c376fe3aeff4d0b65e5f388d4ea3f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhSMEoqXwF5AlNmwSfP1IHCQWqIICmvIQINhZjnM945lM0tpJmf57HKaMEKvxxke-3zlX1skyArSAdF6sC-ClzJmStGAUoKCgeF3s7mWnh8H9WUvIKbDyJHsU45pSKgSnD7MTxmktmFKn2fUl9qPpyApNN67ygJ0ZsSXBxw1xxo5DiMQNgdz4ocPe4ksyRd8vybhCgje-nd_IOJDllDTZ_htGxuDNEkmL1kc_9GRrNsn6OHvgTBfxyd19ln1_--bb-bt88eni_fnrRW5lWdW5c85KZerKMCvahlveILeVqKVoFFAO1PKqdMgNOida2pQSpeNKtQINd5SfZc_3uVdhuJ4wjnrro8WuMz0OU9QAEiirhSiPQEHSEhQcgdKaC8EE5wl99h-6HqbQpz9rSHOlRK1mSu0pG4YYAzp9FfzWhNsUNS8GvdZzp3ruVM9l6z9l612yPr1bMDVbbA_Gv-0m4NUe-OU7vD06WH_4fDmr5M_3fh9H3B38Jmx0WfFK6h8fLzSDxc8vrPqawn4D62bGzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1433884983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mental health-related risk factors for violence: using the evidence to guide mental health triage decision making</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>SANDS, N. ; ELSOM, S. ; GERDTZ, M. ; KHAW, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>SANDS, N. ; ELSOM, S. ; GERDTZ, M. ; KHAW, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Accessible summary •  Reforms of mental health service delivery models have resulted in initial assessments being conducted by crisis and triage service clinicians in acutely time‐pressured environments such as emergency departments and non‐clinical settings. Under these circumstances the use of standardized violence risk assessment instruments is impractical. •  We conducted a systematic review to establish the best evidence for patient‐initiated violence risk assessment. •  The risk factors that achieved the highest evidence grading included hostility/anger, agitation, thought disturbance, positive symptoms of schizophrenia, suspiciousness and irritability. •  We found that the majority of risk factors supported by the highest level of evidence are observable patient characteristics, which clinicians should be trained to detect in the context of conducting initial assessments at point of entry to mental health services. Mental health clinicians working in emergency crisis assessment teams or mental health triage roles are required to make rapid and accurate risk assessments. The assessment of violence risk at triage is particularly pertinent to the early identification and prevention of patient violence, and to enhancing the safety of clinical staff and the general public. To date, the evidence base for mental health triage violence risk assessment has been minimal. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by identifying best available evidence for mental health‐related risk factors for patient‐initiated violence. We conducted a systematic review based on the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia's methodology for systematic reviews. A total of 6847 studies were retrieved, of which 326 studies met the study inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 277 met inclusion criteria but failed the quality appraisal process, thus a total of 49 studies were included in the final review. The risk factors that achieved the highest evidence grading were predominantly related to dynamic clinical factors immediately observable in the patient's general appearance, behaviour and speech. These factors included hostility/anger, agitation, thought disturbance, positive symptoms of schizophrenia, suspiciousness and irritability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-0126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01839.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23094288</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPMNE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living - psychology ; Age of Onset ; Anger ; Antisocial Personality Disorder - complications ; Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology ; Australia ; Cognition Disorders - complications ; Cognition Disorders - psychology ; Crises ; crisis assessment ; Decision Making ; Emergency medical services ; emergency psychiatry ; Emergency Services, Psychiatric - methods ; Hostility ; Humans ; Irritable Mood ; Mental disorders ; Mental Disorders - complications ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Mental Health - statistics &amp; numerical data ; mental health triage ; Nursing ; Prevention ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychomotor Agitation - complications ; Psychomotor Agitation - psychology ; Reviews ; Risk assessment ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Risk Factors ; Schizophrenia - complications ; Schizophrenic Psychology ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sex Distribution ; Social Behavior ; systematic review ; Triage - methods ; Violence ; Violence - prevention &amp; control ; Violence - psychology ; Violence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; violence risk</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2012-10, Vol.19 (8), p.690-701</ispartof><rights>2011 Blackwell Publishing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5679-fffc58a97a2c4db3c3be3c74954b810310c376fe3aeff4d0b65e5f388d4ea3f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5679-fffc58a97a2c4db3c3be3c74954b810310c376fe3aeff4d0b65e5f388d4ea3f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2850.2011.01839.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2850.2011.01839.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23094288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SANDS, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELSOM, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GERDTZ, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KHAW, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Mental health-related risk factors for violence: using the evidence to guide mental health triage decision making</title><title>Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing</title><addtitle>J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs</addtitle><description>Accessible summary •  Reforms of mental health service delivery models have resulted in initial assessments being conducted by crisis and triage service clinicians in acutely time‐pressured environments such as emergency departments and non‐clinical settings. Under these circumstances the use of standardized violence risk assessment instruments is impractical. •  We conducted a systematic review to establish the best evidence for patient‐initiated violence risk assessment. •  The risk factors that achieved the highest evidence grading included hostility/anger, agitation, thought disturbance, positive symptoms of schizophrenia, suspiciousness and irritability. •  We found that the majority of risk factors supported by the highest level of evidence are observable patient characteristics, which clinicians should be trained to detect in the context of conducting initial assessments at point of entry to mental health services. Mental health clinicians working in emergency crisis assessment teams or mental health triage roles are required to make rapid and accurate risk assessments. The assessment of violence risk at triage is particularly pertinent to the early identification and prevention of patient violence, and to enhancing the safety of clinical staff and the general public. To date, the evidence base for mental health triage violence risk assessment has been minimal. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by identifying best available evidence for mental health‐related risk factors for patient‐initiated violence. We conducted a systematic review based on the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia's methodology for systematic reviews. A total of 6847 studies were retrieved, of which 326 studies met the study inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 277 met inclusion criteria but failed the quality appraisal process, thus a total of 49 studies were included in the final review. The risk factors that achieved the highest evidence grading were predominantly related to dynamic clinical factors immediately observable in the patient's general appearance, behaviour and speech. These factors included hostility/anger, agitation, thought disturbance, positive symptoms of schizophrenia, suspiciousness and irritability.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living - psychology</subject><subject>Age of Onset</subject><subject>Anger</subject><subject>Antisocial Personality Disorder - complications</subject><subject>Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>crisis assessment</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>emergency psychiatry</subject><subject>Emergency Services, Psychiatric - methods</subject><subject>Hostility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irritable Mood</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mental Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>mental health triage</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychomotor Agitation - complications</subject><subject>Psychomotor Agitation - psychology</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - complications</subject><subject>Schizophrenic Psychology</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sex Distribution</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>systematic review</subject><subject>Triage - methods</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violence - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Violence - psychology</subject><subject>Violence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>violence risk</subject><issn>1351-0126</issn><issn>1365-2850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhSMEoqXwF5AlNmwSfP1IHCQWqIICmvIQINhZjnM945lM0tpJmf57HKaMEKvxxke-3zlX1skyArSAdF6sC-ClzJmStGAUoKCgeF3s7mWnh8H9WUvIKbDyJHsU45pSKgSnD7MTxmktmFKn2fUl9qPpyApNN67ygJ0ZsSXBxw1xxo5DiMQNgdz4ocPe4ksyRd8vybhCgje-nd_IOJDllDTZ_htGxuDNEkmL1kc_9GRrNsn6OHvgTBfxyd19ln1_--bb-bt88eni_fnrRW5lWdW5c85KZerKMCvahlveILeVqKVoFFAO1PKqdMgNOida2pQSpeNKtQINd5SfZc_3uVdhuJ4wjnrro8WuMz0OU9QAEiirhSiPQEHSEhQcgdKaC8EE5wl99h-6HqbQpz9rSHOlRK1mSu0pG4YYAzp9FfzWhNsUNS8GvdZzp3ruVM9l6z9l612yPr1bMDVbbA_Gv-0m4NUe-OU7vD06WH_4fDmr5M_3fh9H3B38Jmx0WfFK6h8fLzSDxc8vrPqawn4D62bGzw</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>SANDS, N.</creator><creator>ELSOM, S.</creator><creator>GERDTZ, M.</creator><creator>KHAW, D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Mental health-related risk factors for violence: using the evidence to guide mental health triage decision making</title><author>SANDS, N. ; ELSOM, S. ; GERDTZ, M. ; KHAW, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5679-fffc58a97a2c4db3c3be3c74954b810310c376fe3aeff4d0b65e5f388d4ea3f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living - psychology</topic><topic>Age of Onset</topic><topic>Anger</topic><topic>Antisocial Personality Disorder - complications</topic><topic>Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>crisis assessment</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>emergency psychiatry</topic><topic>Emergency Services, Psychiatric - methods</topic><topic>Hostility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irritable Mood</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mental Health - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>mental health triage</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychomotor Agitation - complications</topic><topic>Psychomotor Agitation - psychology</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - complications</topic><topic>Schizophrenic Psychology</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sex Distribution</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>systematic review</topic><topic>Triage - methods</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violence - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Violence - psychology</topic><topic>Violence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>violence risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SANDS, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELSOM, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GERDTZ, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KHAW, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SANDS, N.</au><au>ELSOM, S.</au><au>GERDTZ, M.</au><au>KHAW, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mental health-related risk factors for violence: using the evidence to guide mental health triage decision making</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>690</spage><epage>701</epage><pages>690-701</pages><issn>1351-0126</issn><eissn>1365-2850</eissn><coden>JPMNE3</coden><abstract>Accessible summary •  Reforms of mental health service delivery models have resulted in initial assessments being conducted by crisis and triage service clinicians in acutely time‐pressured environments such as emergency departments and non‐clinical settings. Under these circumstances the use of standardized violence risk assessment instruments is impractical. •  We conducted a systematic review to establish the best evidence for patient‐initiated violence risk assessment. •  The risk factors that achieved the highest evidence grading included hostility/anger, agitation, thought disturbance, positive symptoms of schizophrenia, suspiciousness and irritability. •  We found that the majority of risk factors supported by the highest level of evidence are observable patient characteristics, which clinicians should be trained to detect in the context of conducting initial assessments at point of entry to mental health services. Mental health clinicians working in emergency crisis assessment teams or mental health triage roles are required to make rapid and accurate risk assessments. The assessment of violence risk at triage is particularly pertinent to the early identification and prevention of patient violence, and to enhancing the safety of clinical staff and the general public. To date, the evidence base for mental health triage violence risk assessment has been minimal. This study aimed to address this evidence gap by identifying best available evidence for mental health‐related risk factors for patient‐initiated violence. We conducted a systematic review based on the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia's methodology for systematic reviews. A total of 6847 studies were retrieved, of which 326 studies met the study inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 277 met inclusion criteria but failed the quality appraisal process, thus a total of 49 studies were included in the final review. The risk factors that achieved the highest evidence grading were predominantly related to dynamic clinical factors immediately observable in the patient's general appearance, behaviour and speech. These factors included hostility/anger, agitation, thought disturbance, positive symptoms of schizophrenia, suspiciousness and irritability.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23094288</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01839.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1351-0126
ispartof Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2012-10, Vol.19 (8), p.690-701
issn 1351-0126
1365-2850
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1151029446
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Activities of Daily Living - psychology
Age of Onset
Anger
Antisocial Personality Disorder - complications
Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology
Australia
Cognition Disorders - complications
Cognition Disorders - psychology
Crises
crisis assessment
Decision Making
Emergency medical services
emergency psychiatry
Emergency Services, Psychiatric - methods
Hostility
Humans
Irritable Mood
Mental disorders
Mental Disorders - complications
Mental Disorders - psychology
Mental Health - statistics & numerical data
mental health triage
Nursing
Prevention
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - statistics & numerical data
Psychomotor Agitation - complications
Psychomotor Agitation - psychology
Reviews
Risk assessment
Risk Assessment - methods
Risk Factors
Schizophrenia - complications
Schizophrenic Psychology
Severity of Illness Index
Sex Distribution
Social Behavior
systematic review
Triage - methods
Violence
Violence - prevention & control
Violence - psychology
Violence - statistics & numerical data
violence risk
title Mental health-related risk factors for violence: using the evidence to guide mental health triage decision making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A39%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mental%20health-related%20risk%20factors%20for%20violence:%20using%20the%20evidence%20to%20guide%20mental%20health%20triage%20decision%20making&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychiatric%20and%20mental%20health%20nursing&rft.au=SANDS,%20N.&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=690&rft.epage=701&rft.pages=690-701&rft.issn=1351-0126&rft.eissn=1365-2850&rft.coden=JPMNE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2011.01839.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1151029446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1433884983&rft_id=info:pmid/23094288&rfr_iscdi=true