A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality to Enhance the Use of Remote Labs in Electrical Engineering Education

Lab practices are an essential part of teaching in Engineering. However, traditional laboratory lessons developed in classroom labs (CL) must be adapted to teaching and learning strategies that go far beyond the common concept of e-learning, in the sense that completely virtualized distance educatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of science education and technology 2012-10, Vol.21 (5), p.540-557
Hauptverfasser: Borrero, A. Mejías, Márquez, J. M. Andújar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 557
container_issue 5
container_start_page 540
container_title Journal of science education and technology
container_volume 21
creator Borrero, A. Mejías
Márquez, J. M. Andújar
description Lab practices are an essential part of teaching in Engineering. However, traditional laboratory lessons developed in classroom labs (CL) must be adapted to teaching and learning strategies that go far beyond the common concept of e-learning, in the sense that completely virtualized distance education disconnects teachers and students from the real world, which can generate specific problems in laboratory classes. Current proposals of virtual labs (VL) and remote labs (RL) do not either cover new needs properly or contribute remarkable improvement to traditional labs—except that they favor distance training. Therefore, online teaching and learning in lab practices demand a further step beyond current VL and RL. This paper poses a new reality and new teachingAearning concepts in the field of lab practices in engineering. The developed augmented reality-based lab system (augmented remote lab, ARL) enables teachers and students to work remotely (Internet/intranet) in current CL, including virtual elements which interact with real ones. An educational experience was conducted to assess the developed ARL with the participation of a group of 10 teachers and another group of 20 students. Both groups have completed lab practices of the contents in the subjects Digital Systems and Robotics and Industrial Automation, which belong to the second year of the new degree in Electronic Engineering (adapted to the European Space for Higher Education). The labs were carried out by means of three different possibilities: CL, VL and ARL. After completion, both groups were asked to fill in some questionnaires aimed at measuring the improvement contributed by ARL relative to CL and VL. Except in some specific questions, the opinion of teachers and students was rather similar and positive regarding the use and possibilities of ARL. Although the results are still preliminary and need further study, seems to conclude that ARL remarkably improves the possibilities of current VL and RL. Furthermore, ARL can be concluded to allow further possibilities when used online than traditional laboratory lessons completed in CL.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10956-011-9345-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1140140737</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A714982734</galeid><ericid>EJ980392</ericid><jstor_id>41674483</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A714982734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b69e42c5abd9217d5f475af1eece8a49e4532f28bb51f5161a9a53b51656cf2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUuL1TAULqLgOPoDBIWAGzcd82yb5WXo-OCCMjrrkKYnd3Jpk2uSCnfhfze1MoILySI553vkcL6qeknwFcG4fZcIlqKpMSG1ZFzU8lF1QUTLatIx-bi8sZAF5eJp9SylI8ZYdhJfVD936IubQkZf8zKeUbAo3wPqrQWT3Q_wkNLa3C2HGXyGEd2Cnlw-oxxQ7--1N_BbcZdg5d3CHDKgvR4Sch71U7GJzuipkA_OA0TnD6gfF6OzC_559cTqKcGLP_dldXfTf7v-UO8_v_94vdvXhjOS66GRwKkRehglJe0oLG-FtgTAQKd5AQWjlnbDIIgVpCFaasFK0YjGWGrZZfV28z3F8H2BlNXskoFp0h7CkhQhvOwGt6wt1Df_UI9hib5MpygVUnRCSllYVxvroCdQztuQozbljDA7EzxYV_q7lnDZ0ZbxIiCbwMSQUgSrTtHNOp4VwWpNUG0JqpKgWhNU6yevNk3Zmnng959kh5mkBaYbnE7rViH-nfR_nq830THlEB9MOWlazjvGfgH54rBX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259585999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality to Enhance the Use of Remote Labs in Electrical Engineering Education</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Borrero, A. Mejías ; Márquez, J. M. Andújar</creator><creatorcontrib>Borrero, A. Mejías ; Márquez, J. M. Andújar</creatorcontrib><description>Lab practices are an essential part of teaching in Engineering. However, traditional laboratory lessons developed in classroom labs (CL) must be adapted to teaching and learning strategies that go far beyond the common concept of e-learning, in the sense that completely virtualized distance education disconnects teachers and students from the real world, which can generate specific problems in laboratory classes. Current proposals of virtual labs (VL) and remote labs (RL) do not either cover new needs properly or contribute remarkable improvement to traditional labs—except that they favor distance training. Therefore, online teaching and learning in lab practices demand a further step beyond current VL and RL. This paper poses a new reality and new teachingAearning concepts in the field of lab practices in engineering. The developed augmented reality-based lab system (augmented remote lab, ARL) enables teachers and students to work remotely (Internet/intranet) in current CL, including virtual elements which interact with real ones. An educational experience was conducted to assess the developed ARL with the participation of a group of 10 teachers and another group of 20 students. Both groups have completed lab practices of the contents in the subjects Digital Systems and Robotics and Industrial Automation, which belong to the second year of the new degree in Electronic Engineering (adapted to the European Space for Higher Education). The labs were carried out by means of three different possibilities: CL, VL and ARL. After completion, both groups were asked to fill in some questionnaires aimed at measuring the improvement contributed by ARL relative to CL and VL. Except in some specific questions, the opinion of teachers and students was rather similar and positive regarding the use and possibilities of ARL. Although the results are still preliminary and need further study, seems to conclude that ARL remarkably improves the possibilities of current VL and RL. Furthermore, ARL can be concluded to allow further possibilities when used online than traditional laboratory lessons completed in CL.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-0145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1839</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10956-011-9345-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media</publisher><subject>Augmented Reality ; Automation ; CAI ; Computer assisted instruction ; Computer Simulation ; Concept learning ; Control engineering ; Control systems ; Control systems design ; Digital systems ; Distance Education ; Distance learning ; Education ; Educational Experience ; Educational Technology ; Electrical engineering ; Electronic engineering ; Engineering ; Engineering education ; Engineering schools ; Go/no-go discrimination learning ; Graphic design ; Higher Education ; Industrial design ; Internet ; Intranets ; Laboratories ; Laboratory equipment ; Learning Processes ; Learning Strategies ; Nontraditional Education ; Online education ; Questionnaires ; Robotics ; Robots ; Science Education ; Science Instruction ; Sensors ; Student Attitudes ; Students ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Virtual Classrooms ; Virtual worlds</subject><ispartof>Journal of science education and technology, 2012-10, Vol.21 (5), p.540-557</ispartof><rights>2012 Springer Science+Business Media</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Springer</rights><rights>Journal of Science Education and Technology is a copyright of Springer, (2011). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b69e42c5abd9217d5f475af1eece8a49e4532f28bb51f5161a9a53b51656cf2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b69e42c5abd9217d5f475af1eece8a49e4532f28bb51f5161a9a53b51656cf2f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41674483$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41674483$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ980392$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borrero, A. Mejías</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Márquez, J. M. Andújar</creatorcontrib><title>A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality to Enhance the Use of Remote Labs in Electrical Engineering Education</title><title>Journal of science education and technology</title><addtitle>J Sci Educ Technol</addtitle><description>Lab practices are an essential part of teaching in Engineering. However, traditional laboratory lessons developed in classroom labs (CL) must be adapted to teaching and learning strategies that go far beyond the common concept of e-learning, in the sense that completely virtualized distance education disconnects teachers and students from the real world, which can generate specific problems in laboratory classes. Current proposals of virtual labs (VL) and remote labs (RL) do not either cover new needs properly or contribute remarkable improvement to traditional labs—except that they favor distance training. Therefore, online teaching and learning in lab practices demand a further step beyond current VL and RL. This paper poses a new reality and new teachingAearning concepts in the field of lab practices in engineering. The developed augmented reality-based lab system (augmented remote lab, ARL) enables teachers and students to work remotely (Internet/intranet) in current CL, including virtual elements which interact with real ones. An educational experience was conducted to assess the developed ARL with the participation of a group of 10 teachers and another group of 20 students. Both groups have completed lab practices of the contents in the subjects Digital Systems and Robotics and Industrial Automation, which belong to the second year of the new degree in Electronic Engineering (adapted to the European Space for Higher Education). The labs were carried out by means of three different possibilities: CL, VL and ARL. After completion, both groups were asked to fill in some questionnaires aimed at measuring the improvement contributed by ARL relative to CL and VL. Except in some specific questions, the opinion of teachers and students was rather similar and positive regarding the use and possibilities of ARL. Although the results are still preliminary and need further study, seems to conclude that ARL remarkably improves the possibilities of current VL and RL. Furthermore, ARL can be concluded to allow further possibilities when used online than traditional laboratory lessons completed in CL.</description><subject>Augmented Reality</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>CAI</subject><subject>Computer assisted instruction</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Concept learning</subject><subject>Control engineering</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Control systems design</subject><subject>Digital systems</subject><subject>Distance Education</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Experience</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electrical engineering</subject><subject>Electronic engineering</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering education</subject><subject>Engineering schools</subject><subject>Go/no-go discrimination learning</subject><subject>Graphic design</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Industrial design</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Intranets</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratory equipment</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Nontraditional Education</subject><subject>Online education</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Virtual Classrooms</subject><subject>Virtual worlds</subject><issn>1059-0145</issn><issn>1573-1839</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UUuL1TAULqLgOPoDBIWAGzcd82yb5WXo-OCCMjrrkKYnd3Jpk2uSCnfhfze1MoILySI553vkcL6qeknwFcG4fZcIlqKpMSG1ZFzU8lF1QUTLatIx-bi8sZAF5eJp9SylI8ZYdhJfVD936IubQkZf8zKeUbAo3wPqrQWT3Q_wkNLa3C2HGXyGEd2Cnlw-oxxQ7--1N_BbcZdg5d3CHDKgvR4Sch71U7GJzuipkA_OA0TnD6gfF6OzC_559cTqKcGLP_dldXfTf7v-UO8_v_94vdvXhjOS66GRwKkRehglJe0oLG-FtgTAQKd5AQWjlnbDIIgVpCFaasFK0YjGWGrZZfV28z3F8H2BlNXskoFp0h7CkhQhvOwGt6wt1Df_UI9hib5MpygVUnRCSllYVxvroCdQztuQozbljDA7EzxYV_q7lnDZ0ZbxIiCbwMSQUgSrTtHNOp4VwWpNUG0JqpKgWhNU6yevNk3Zmnng959kh5mkBaYbnE7rViH-nfR_nq830THlEB9MOWlazjvGfgH54rBX</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Borrero, A. Mejías</creator><creator>Márquez, J. M. Andújar</creator><general>Springer Science+Business Media</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality to Enhance the Use of Remote Labs in Electrical Engineering Education</title><author>Borrero, A. Mejías ; Márquez, J. M. Andújar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-b69e42c5abd9217d5f475af1eece8a49e4532f28bb51f5161a9a53b51656cf2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Augmented Reality</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>CAI</topic><topic>Computer assisted instruction</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Concept learning</topic><topic>Control engineering</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Control systems design</topic><topic>Digital systems</topic><topic>Distance Education</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Experience</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electrical engineering</topic><topic>Electronic engineering</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering education</topic><topic>Engineering schools</topic><topic>Go/no-go discrimination learning</topic><topic>Graphic design</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Industrial design</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Intranets</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratory equipment</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Nontraditional Education</topic><topic>Online education</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Virtual Classrooms</topic><topic>Virtual worlds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borrero, A. Mejías</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Márquez, J. M. Andújar</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of science education and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borrero, A. Mejías</au><au>Márquez, J. M. Andújar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ980392</ericid><atitle>A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality to Enhance the Use of Remote Labs in Electrical Engineering Education</atitle><jtitle>Journal of science education and technology</jtitle><stitle>J Sci Educ Technol</stitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>540</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>540-557</pages><issn>1059-0145</issn><eissn>1573-1839</eissn><abstract>Lab practices are an essential part of teaching in Engineering. However, traditional laboratory lessons developed in classroom labs (CL) must be adapted to teaching and learning strategies that go far beyond the common concept of e-learning, in the sense that completely virtualized distance education disconnects teachers and students from the real world, which can generate specific problems in laboratory classes. Current proposals of virtual labs (VL) and remote labs (RL) do not either cover new needs properly or contribute remarkable improvement to traditional labs—except that they favor distance training. Therefore, online teaching and learning in lab practices demand a further step beyond current VL and RL. This paper poses a new reality and new teachingAearning concepts in the field of lab practices in engineering. The developed augmented reality-based lab system (augmented remote lab, ARL) enables teachers and students to work remotely (Internet/intranet) in current CL, including virtual elements which interact with real ones. An educational experience was conducted to assess the developed ARL with the participation of a group of 10 teachers and another group of 20 students. Both groups have completed lab practices of the contents in the subjects Digital Systems and Robotics and Industrial Automation, which belong to the second year of the new degree in Electronic Engineering (adapted to the European Space for Higher Education). The labs were carried out by means of three different possibilities: CL, VL and ARL. After completion, both groups were asked to fill in some questionnaires aimed at measuring the improvement contributed by ARL relative to CL and VL. Except in some specific questions, the opinion of teachers and students was rather similar and positive regarding the use and possibilities of ARL. Although the results are still preliminary and need further study, seems to conclude that ARL remarkably improves the possibilities of current VL and RL. Furthermore, ARL can be concluded to allow further possibilities when used online than traditional laboratory lessons completed in CL.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Science+Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s10956-011-9345-9</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-0145
ispartof Journal of science education and technology, 2012-10, Vol.21 (5), p.540-557
issn 1059-0145
1573-1839
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1140140737
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Augmented Reality
Automation
CAI
Computer assisted instruction
Computer Simulation
Concept learning
Control engineering
Control systems
Control systems design
Digital systems
Distance Education
Distance learning
Education
Educational Experience
Educational Technology
Electrical engineering
Electronic engineering
Engineering
Engineering education
Engineering schools
Go/no-go discrimination learning
Graphic design
Higher Education
Industrial design
Internet
Intranets
Laboratories
Laboratory equipment
Learning Processes
Learning Strategies
Nontraditional Education
Online education
Questionnaires
Robotics
Robots
Science Education
Science Instruction
Sensors
Student Attitudes
Students
Teacher Attitudes
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Virtual Classrooms
Virtual worlds
title A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality to Enhance the Use of Remote Labs in Electrical Engineering Education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A18%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Pilot%20Study%20of%20the%20Effectiveness%20of%20Augmented%20Reality%20to%20Enhance%20the%20Use%20of%20Remote%20Labs%20in%20Electrical%20Engineering%20Education&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20science%20education%20and%20technology&rft.au=Borrero,%20A.%20Mej%C3%ADas&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=540&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=540-557&rft.issn=1059-0145&rft.eissn=1573-1839&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10956-011-9345-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA714982734%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259585999&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A714982734&rft_ericid=EJ980392&rft_jstor_id=41674483&rfr_iscdi=true