Partial nephrectomy: Is there an advantage of the self-retaining barbed suture in the perioperative period? A matched case–control comparison
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) in renal defect repair during partial nephrectomy (PN), by assessing perioperative outcomes. Methods From June 2010 on we have been using the SRBS for superficial layer closure during open and laparoscopic PN in two Europe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of urology 2012-10, Vol.30 (5), p.659-664 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 664 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 659 |
container_title | World journal of urology |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Zondervan, Patricia J. Gozen, Ali S. Opondo, Dedan Rassweiler, Jens J. de la Rosette, Jean J. Laguna, M. Pilar |
description | Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of the self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) in renal defect repair during partial nephrectomy (PN), by assessing perioperative outcomes.
Methods
From June 2010 on we have been using the SRBS for superficial layer closure during open and laparoscopic PN in two European centers. These data were collected prospectively and matched with historical PN cases performed with conventional suture. Cases were matched for PADUA score, surgical approach (laparoscopic or open) and the center where surgery was performed. Comparisons were made in patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes including warm ischemia time (WIT), changes in hemoglobin (Hb), changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and perioperative complications between the SRBS and non-SRBS groups. Statistical tests of significance were performed using Student’s
t
test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Results
Thirty-one consecutive cases of PN under WIT were performed with SRBS. These cases were matched with cases from the historical database of PN performed with conventional suture. The rate of perioperative complications was statistically significantly lower in the SRBS cohort (6.5 vs. 22.6 %,
p
= 0.038). Mean ischemia time was 19.6 min (SD, 7.5) in the SRBS group versus 21.8 min (SD, 9.5) in the conventional suture group (
p
= 0.312). There were no significant differences between groups for postoperative changes in creatinine, eGFR and Hb. Limitations of this study include the absence of randomization and the relative small sample size.
Conclusions
SRBS can be safely used during partial nephrectomy. SRBS reduces significantly the number of perioperative complications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00345-012-0933-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1139624816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1139624816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-bf485b8240c31d9c9d822b6d79698c48c9069498d81f3c3e048d5b3c653e3f8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcuKFDEUhoMoTs_oA7iRgAizKc29EjfDMHgZGNCFrotU6lR3hqqkTVIDvfMNXPiGPolpu70guMn1-09O-BB6QskLSkj7MhPChWwIZQ0xnDe7e2hFRV3olqn7aEVaJhphND9BpznfEkJbReRDdMKYkYoItkJfP9hUvJ1wgO0mgStx3r3C1xmXDSTANmA73NlQ7BpwHPenOMM0NgmK9cGHNe5t6mHAeSlLDfjwk9lC8rEOtvi74264wJd4tsVtKu1shu9fvrkYSooTdnHe2uRzDI_Qg9FOGR4f5zP06c3rj1fvmpv3b6-vLm8aJwgrTT8KLXvNBHGcDsaZQTPWq6E1ymgntDNEmfrzQdOROw5E6EH23CnJgY_a8TN0fqi7TfHzArl0s88OpskGiEvuKOVGMaGpquizf9DbuKRQu6sUk5KaVraVogfKpZhzgrHbJj_btOso6fa2uoOtrtrq9ra6Xc08PVZe-hmG34lfeirw_AjY7Ow0Jhucz384JZXhRlSOHbhcr8Ia0l8t_vf1H9v1rxY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1125519757</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Partial nephrectomy: Is there an advantage of the self-retaining barbed suture in the perioperative period? A matched case–control comparison</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Zondervan, Patricia J. ; Gozen, Ali S. ; Opondo, Dedan ; Rassweiler, Jens J. ; de la Rosette, Jean J. ; Laguna, M. Pilar</creator><creatorcontrib>Zondervan, Patricia J. ; Gozen, Ali S. ; Opondo, Dedan ; Rassweiler, Jens J. ; de la Rosette, Jean J. ; Laguna, M. Pilar</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of the self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) in renal defect repair during partial nephrectomy (PN), by assessing perioperative outcomes.
Methods
From June 2010 on we have been using the SRBS for superficial layer closure during open and laparoscopic PN in two European centers. These data were collected prospectively and matched with historical PN cases performed with conventional suture. Cases were matched for PADUA score, surgical approach (laparoscopic or open) and the center where surgery was performed. Comparisons were made in patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes including warm ischemia time (WIT), changes in hemoglobin (Hb), changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and perioperative complications between the SRBS and non-SRBS groups. Statistical tests of significance were performed using Student’s
t
test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Results
Thirty-one consecutive cases of PN under WIT were performed with SRBS. These cases were matched with cases from the historical database of PN performed with conventional suture. The rate of perioperative complications was statistically significantly lower in the SRBS cohort (6.5 vs. 22.6 %,
p
= 0.038). Mean ischemia time was 19.6 min (SD, 7.5) in the SRBS group versus 21.8 min (SD, 9.5) in the conventional suture group (
p
= 0.312). There were no significant differences between groups for postoperative changes in creatinine, eGFR and Hb. Limitations of this study include the absence of randomization and the relative small sample size.
Conclusions
SRBS can be safely used during partial nephrectomy. SRBS reduces significantly the number of perioperative complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0724-4983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-0933-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22956042</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WJURDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Case-Control Studies ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Humans ; Intraoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy - methods ; Nephrology ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Prospective Studies ; Suture Techniques ; Urinary Fistula - prevention & control ; Urology ; Warm Ischemia</subject><ispartof>World journal of urology, 2012-10, Vol.30 (5), p.659-664</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-bf485b8240c31d9c9d822b6d79698c48c9069498d81f3c3e048d5b3c653e3f8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-bf485b8240c31d9c9d822b6d79698c48c9069498d81f3c3e048d5b3c653e3f8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00345-012-0933-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00345-012-0933-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26569394$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22956042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zondervan, Patricia J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gozen, Ali S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opondo, Dedan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rassweiler, Jens J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Rosette, Jean J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laguna, M. Pilar</creatorcontrib><title>Partial nephrectomy: Is there an advantage of the self-retaining barbed suture in the perioperative period? A matched case–control comparison</title><title>World journal of urology</title><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><description>Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of the self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) in renal defect repair during partial nephrectomy (PN), by assessing perioperative outcomes.
Methods
From June 2010 on we have been using the SRBS for superficial layer closure during open and laparoscopic PN in two European centers. These data were collected prospectively and matched with historical PN cases performed with conventional suture. Cases were matched for PADUA score, surgical approach (laparoscopic or open) and the center where surgery was performed. Comparisons were made in patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes including warm ischemia time (WIT), changes in hemoglobin (Hb), changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and perioperative complications between the SRBS and non-SRBS groups. Statistical tests of significance were performed using Student’s
t
test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Results
Thirty-one consecutive cases of PN under WIT were performed with SRBS. These cases were matched with cases from the historical database of PN performed with conventional suture. The rate of perioperative complications was statistically significantly lower in the SRBS cohort (6.5 vs. 22.6 %,
p
= 0.038). Mean ischemia time was 19.6 min (SD, 7.5) in the SRBS group versus 21.8 min (SD, 9.5) in the conventional suture group (
p
= 0.312). There were no significant differences between groups for postoperative changes in creatinine, eGFR and Hb. Limitations of this study include the absence of randomization and the relative small sample size.
Conclusions
SRBS can be safely used during partial nephrectomy. SRBS reduces significantly the number of perioperative complications.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - methods</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Urinary Fistula - prevention & control</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Warm Ischemia</subject><issn>0724-4983</issn><issn>1433-8726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcuKFDEUhoMoTs_oA7iRgAizKc29EjfDMHgZGNCFrotU6lR3hqqkTVIDvfMNXPiGPolpu70guMn1-09O-BB6QskLSkj7MhPChWwIZQ0xnDe7e2hFRV3olqn7aEVaJhphND9BpznfEkJbReRDdMKYkYoItkJfP9hUvJ1wgO0mgStx3r3C1xmXDSTANmA73NlQ7BpwHPenOMM0NgmK9cGHNe5t6mHAeSlLDfjwk9lC8rEOtvi74264wJd4tsVtKu1shu9fvrkYSooTdnHe2uRzDI_Qg9FOGR4f5zP06c3rj1fvmpv3b6-vLm8aJwgrTT8KLXvNBHGcDsaZQTPWq6E1ymgntDNEmfrzQdOROw5E6EH23CnJgY_a8TN0fqi7TfHzArl0s88OpskGiEvuKOVGMaGpquizf9DbuKRQu6sUk5KaVraVogfKpZhzgrHbJj_btOso6fa2uoOtrtrq9ra6Xc08PVZe-hmG34lfeirw_AjY7Ow0Jhucz384JZXhRlSOHbhcr8Ia0l8t_vf1H9v1rxY</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Zondervan, Patricia J.</creator><creator>Gozen, Ali S.</creator><creator>Opondo, Dedan</creator><creator>Rassweiler, Jens J.</creator><creator>de la Rosette, Jean J.</creator><creator>Laguna, M. Pilar</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Partial nephrectomy: Is there an advantage of the self-retaining barbed suture in the perioperative period? A matched case–control comparison</title><author>Zondervan, Patricia J. ; Gozen, Ali S. ; Opondo, Dedan ; Rassweiler, Jens J. ; de la Rosette, Jean J. ; Laguna, M. Pilar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-bf485b8240c31d9c9d822b6d79698c48c9069498d81f3c3e048d5b3c653e3f8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - methods</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Urinary Fistula - prevention & control</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Warm Ischemia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zondervan, Patricia J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gozen, Ali S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opondo, Dedan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rassweiler, Jens J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Rosette, Jean J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laguna, M. Pilar</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zondervan, Patricia J.</au><au>Gozen, Ali S.</au><au>Opondo, Dedan</au><au>Rassweiler, Jens J.</au><au>de la Rosette, Jean J.</au><au>Laguna, M. Pilar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Partial nephrectomy: Is there an advantage of the self-retaining barbed suture in the perioperative period? A matched case–control comparison</atitle><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle><stitle>World J Urol</stitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>659</spage><epage>664</epage><pages>659-664</pages><issn>0724-4983</issn><eissn>1433-8726</eissn><coden>WJURDJ</coden><abstract>Objective
To evaluate the efficacy of the self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) in renal defect repair during partial nephrectomy (PN), by assessing perioperative outcomes.
Methods
From June 2010 on we have been using the SRBS for superficial layer closure during open and laparoscopic PN in two European centers. These data were collected prospectively and matched with historical PN cases performed with conventional suture. Cases were matched for PADUA score, surgical approach (laparoscopic or open) and the center where surgery was performed. Comparisons were made in patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes including warm ischemia time (WIT), changes in hemoglobin (Hb), changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and perioperative complications between the SRBS and non-SRBS groups. Statistical tests of significance were performed using Student’s
t
test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Results
Thirty-one consecutive cases of PN under WIT were performed with SRBS. These cases were matched with cases from the historical database of PN performed with conventional suture. The rate of perioperative complications was statistically significantly lower in the SRBS cohort (6.5 vs. 22.6 %,
p
= 0.038). Mean ischemia time was 19.6 min (SD, 7.5) in the SRBS group versus 21.8 min (SD, 9.5) in the conventional suture group (
p
= 0.312). There were no significant differences between groups for postoperative changes in creatinine, eGFR and Hb. Limitations of this study include the absence of randomization and the relative small sample size.
Conclusions
SRBS can be safely used during partial nephrectomy. SRBS reduces significantly the number of perioperative complications.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22956042</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00345-012-0933-y</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0724-4983 |
ispartof | World journal of urology, 2012-10, Vol.30 (5), p.659-664 |
issn | 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1139624816 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Case-Control Studies Databases, Factual Female Humans Intraoperative Complications - prevention & control Kidney Neoplasms - surgery Laparoscopy - methods Male Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Nephrectomy - methods Nephrology Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Oncology Original Article Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Prospective Studies Suture Techniques Urinary Fistula - prevention & control Urology Warm Ischemia |
title | Partial nephrectomy: Is there an advantage of the self-retaining barbed suture in the perioperative period? A matched case–control comparison |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T19%3A03%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Partial%20nephrectomy:%20Is%20there%20an%20advantage%20of%20the%20self-retaining%20barbed%20suture%20in%20the%20perioperative%20period?%20A%20matched%20case%E2%80%93control%20comparison&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Zondervan,%20Patricia%20J.&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=659&rft.epage=664&rft.pages=659-664&rft.issn=0724-4983&rft.eissn=1433-8726&rft.coden=WJURDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00345-012-0933-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1139624816%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1125519757&rft_id=info:pmid/22956042&rfr_iscdi=true |