Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Postamputation Pain-A Case Report
Many amputees suffer from postamputation pain, which can be extremely debilitating, decrease quality of life, increase the risk of depression, and negatively affect interpersonal relationships and the ability to work. Present methods of treatment, including medications, are often unsatisfactory in r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pain practice 2012-11, Vol.12 (8), p.649-655 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 655 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 649 |
container_title | Pain practice |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Rauck, Richard L. Kapural, Leonardo Cohen, Steven P. North, James M. Gilmore, Christopher A. Zang, Rosemary H. Boggs, Joseph W. |
description | Many amputees suffer from postamputation pain, which can be extremely debilitating, decrease quality of life, increase the risk of depression, and negatively affect interpersonal relationships and the ability to work. Present methods of treatment, including medications, are often unsatisfactory in reducing postamputation pain. Electrical stimulation of the nerve innervating the painful area could reduce the pain, but peripheral nerve stimulation is rarely used to treat postamputation pain because present methods require invasive surgical access and precise placement of the leads in close proximity (≤ 2 mm) with the nerve. The present study investigated a novel approach to peripheral nerve stimulation in which a lead was placed percutaneously a remote distance (> 1 cm) away from the femoral nerve in a patient with severe residual limb pain (RLP) 33 years following a below‐knee amputation. Electrical stimulation generated ≥ 75% paresthesia coverage, reduced RLP by > 60%, and improved quality of life outcomes as measured by the pain interference scale of the Brief Pain Inventory‐Short Form (100% reduction in pain interference), Pain Disability Index (74% reduction in disability), and the Patient Global Impression of Change (very much improved) during a 2‐week home trial. There were no adverse events. The ability to generate significant paresthesia coverage and pain relief with a single lead inserted percutaneously and remotely from the target nerve holds promise for providing relief of postamputation pain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00552.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1139615615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1139615615</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4572-75a2b78dbb5210d6684215988ea2d309a5049cb700857693a7dc63c65e532e5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtP4zAURq0RaIAyfwF5ySbBj_qRBYuqogwSlPCYmaXlJDciJWmC7TDl35MS6BrLkq_k892rexDClMR0OGermArOIyYIiRmhLCZECBZvfqDD3cfeR00iRbQ4QEferwihKuH8JzpgTEy11PIQPaTgqu4JnK3xEtwr4IdQNX1tQ9Wucdk6HJ4APzqwoYF1wG2J09YH23R9GJnUVutohufWA76HrnXhGO2Xtvbw6_OdoD-Li8f57-j69vJqPruO8qlQLFLCskzpIssEo6SQUk8ZFYnWYFnBSWIFmSZ5psiwgJIJt6rIJc-lAMEZiJJP0OnYt3PtSw8-mKbyOdS1XUPbe0MpTyQVwx1QPaK5a713UJrOVY11b4YSs1VqVmZrzmzNma1S86HUbIboyeeUPmug2AW_HA7A-Qj8r2p4-3Zjk87S-6Ea8tGYr3yAzS5v3bORiith_i0vjU5vFnTx98bc8XfvHZKb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1139615615</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Postamputation Pain-A Case Report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Rauck, Richard L. ; Kapural, Leonardo ; Cohen, Steven P. ; North, James M. ; Gilmore, Christopher A. ; Zang, Rosemary H. ; Boggs, Joseph W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rauck, Richard L. ; Kapural, Leonardo ; Cohen, Steven P. ; North, James M. ; Gilmore, Christopher A. ; Zang, Rosemary H. ; Boggs, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><description>Many amputees suffer from postamputation pain, which can be extremely debilitating, decrease quality of life, increase the risk of depression, and negatively affect interpersonal relationships and the ability to work. Present methods of treatment, including medications, are often unsatisfactory in reducing postamputation pain. Electrical stimulation of the nerve innervating the painful area could reduce the pain, but peripheral nerve stimulation is rarely used to treat postamputation pain because present methods require invasive surgical access and precise placement of the leads in close proximity (≤ 2 mm) with the nerve. The present study investigated a novel approach to peripheral nerve stimulation in which a lead was placed percutaneously a remote distance (> 1 cm) away from the femoral nerve in a patient with severe residual limb pain (RLP) 33 years following a below‐knee amputation. Electrical stimulation generated ≥ 75% paresthesia coverage, reduced RLP by > 60%, and improved quality of life outcomes as measured by the pain interference scale of the Brief Pain Inventory‐Short Form (100% reduction in pain interference), Pain Disability Index (74% reduction in disability), and the Patient Global Impression of Change (very much improved) during a 2‐week home trial. There were no adverse events. The ability to generate significant paresthesia coverage and pain relief with a single lead inserted percutaneously and remotely from the target nerve holds promise for providing relief of postamputation pain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-7085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-2500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00552.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22548686</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Amputation - adverse effects ; amputee ; electrical stimulation ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; peripheral nerve stimulation ; Phantom Limb - therapy ; phantom limb pain ; residual limb pain ; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods</subject><ispartof>Pain practice, 2012-11, Vol.12 (8), p.649-655</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors. Pain Practice © 2012 World Institute of Pain</rights><rights>2012 The Authors. Pain Practice © 2012 World Institute of Pain.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4572-75a2b78dbb5210d6684215988ea2d309a5049cb700857693a7dc63c65e532e5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4572-75a2b78dbb5210d6684215988ea2d309a5049cb700857693a7dc63c65e532e5f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1533-2500.2012.00552.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1533-2500.2012.00552.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22548686$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rauck, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapural, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Steven P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>North, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zang, Rosemary H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggs, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><title>Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Postamputation Pain-A Case Report</title><title>Pain practice</title><addtitle>Pain Pract</addtitle><description>Many amputees suffer from postamputation pain, which can be extremely debilitating, decrease quality of life, increase the risk of depression, and negatively affect interpersonal relationships and the ability to work. Present methods of treatment, including medications, are often unsatisfactory in reducing postamputation pain. Electrical stimulation of the nerve innervating the painful area could reduce the pain, but peripheral nerve stimulation is rarely used to treat postamputation pain because present methods require invasive surgical access and precise placement of the leads in close proximity (≤ 2 mm) with the nerve. The present study investigated a novel approach to peripheral nerve stimulation in which a lead was placed percutaneously a remote distance (> 1 cm) away from the femoral nerve in a patient with severe residual limb pain (RLP) 33 years following a below‐knee amputation. Electrical stimulation generated ≥ 75% paresthesia coverage, reduced RLP by > 60%, and improved quality of life outcomes as measured by the pain interference scale of the Brief Pain Inventory‐Short Form (100% reduction in pain interference), Pain Disability Index (74% reduction in disability), and the Patient Global Impression of Change (very much improved) during a 2‐week home trial. There were no adverse events. The ability to generate significant paresthesia coverage and pain relief with a single lead inserted percutaneously and remotely from the target nerve holds promise for providing relief of postamputation pain.</description><subject>Amputation - adverse effects</subject><subject>amputee</subject><subject>electrical stimulation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>peripheral nerve stimulation</subject><subject>Phantom Limb - therapy</subject><subject>phantom limb pain</subject><subject>residual limb pain</subject><subject>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods</subject><issn>1530-7085</issn><issn>1533-2500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtP4zAURq0RaIAyfwF5ySbBj_qRBYuqogwSlPCYmaXlJDciJWmC7TDl35MS6BrLkq_k892rexDClMR0OGermArOIyYIiRmhLCZECBZvfqDD3cfeR00iRbQ4QEferwihKuH8JzpgTEy11PIQPaTgqu4JnK3xEtwr4IdQNX1tQ9Wucdk6HJ4APzqwoYF1wG2J09YH23R9GJnUVutohufWA76HrnXhGO2Xtvbw6_OdoD-Li8f57-j69vJqPruO8qlQLFLCskzpIssEo6SQUk8ZFYnWYFnBSWIFmSZ5psiwgJIJt6rIJc-lAMEZiJJP0OnYt3PtSw8-mKbyOdS1XUPbe0MpTyQVwx1QPaK5a713UJrOVY11b4YSs1VqVmZrzmzNma1S86HUbIboyeeUPmug2AW_HA7A-Qj8r2p4-3Zjk87S-6Ea8tGYr3yAzS5v3bORiith_i0vjU5vFnTx98bc8XfvHZKb</recordid><startdate>201211</startdate><enddate>201211</enddate><creator>Rauck, Richard L.</creator><creator>Kapural, Leonardo</creator><creator>Cohen, Steven P.</creator><creator>North, James M.</creator><creator>Gilmore, Christopher A.</creator><creator>Zang, Rosemary H.</creator><creator>Boggs, Joseph W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201211</creationdate><title>Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Postamputation Pain-A Case Report</title><author>Rauck, Richard L. ; Kapural, Leonardo ; Cohen, Steven P. ; North, James M. ; Gilmore, Christopher A. ; Zang, Rosemary H. ; Boggs, Joseph W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4572-75a2b78dbb5210d6684215988ea2d309a5049cb700857693a7dc63c65e532e5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Amputation - adverse effects</topic><topic>amputee</topic><topic>electrical stimulation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>peripheral nerve stimulation</topic><topic>Phantom Limb - therapy</topic><topic>phantom limb pain</topic><topic>residual limb pain</topic><topic>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rauck, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapural, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Steven P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>North, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilmore, Christopher A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zang, Rosemary H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggs, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rauck, Richard L.</au><au>Kapural, Leonardo</au><au>Cohen, Steven P.</au><au>North, James M.</au><au>Gilmore, Christopher A.</au><au>Zang, Rosemary H.</au><au>Boggs, Joseph W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Postamputation Pain-A Case Report</atitle><jtitle>Pain practice</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Pract</addtitle><date>2012-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>655</epage><pages>649-655</pages><issn>1530-7085</issn><eissn>1533-2500</eissn><abstract>Many amputees suffer from postamputation pain, which can be extremely debilitating, decrease quality of life, increase the risk of depression, and negatively affect interpersonal relationships and the ability to work. Present methods of treatment, including medications, are often unsatisfactory in reducing postamputation pain. Electrical stimulation of the nerve innervating the painful area could reduce the pain, but peripheral nerve stimulation is rarely used to treat postamputation pain because present methods require invasive surgical access and precise placement of the leads in close proximity (≤ 2 mm) with the nerve. The present study investigated a novel approach to peripheral nerve stimulation in which a lead was placed percutaneously a remote distance (> 1 cm) away from the femoral nerve in a patient with severe residual limb pain (RLP) 33 years following a below‐knee amputation. Electrical stimulation generated ≥ 75% paresthesia coverage, reduced RLP by > 60%, and improved quality of life outcomes as measured by the pain interference scale of the Brief Pain Inventory‐Short Form (100% reduction in pain interference), Pain Disability Index (74% reduction in disability), and the Patient Global Impression of Change (very much improved) during a 2‐week home trial. There were no adverse events. The ability to generate significant paresthesia coverage and pain relief with a single lead inserted percutaneously and remotely from the target nerve holds promise for providing relief of postamputation pain.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22548686</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00552.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1530-7085 |
ispartof | Pain practice, 2012-11, Vol.12 (8), p.649-655 |
issn | 1530-7085 1533-2500 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1139615615 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Amputation - adverse effects amputee electrical stimulation Humans Male Middle Aged peripheral nerve stimulation Phantom Limb - therapy phantom limb pain residual limb pain Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods |
title | Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Postamputation Pain-A Case Report |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A23%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peripheral%20Nerve%20Stimulation%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Postamputation%20Pain-A%20Case%20Report&rft.jtitle=Pain%20practice&rft.au=Rauck,%20Richard%20L.&rft.date=2012-11&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=655&rft.pages=649-655&rft.issn=1530-7085&rft.eissn=1533-2500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00552.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1139615615%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1139615615&rft_id=info:pmid/22548686&rfr_iscdi=true |