What is the worth of values in guiding residential preferences and choices?
The demographic, socio-economic and socio-cultural shifts that have taken place in Western economies in recent decades have generated a broader variety in housing behavior. For this reason, some researchers argue that socio-demographic characteristics alone no longer suffice to predict the housing d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of housing and the built environment 2012-09, Vol.27 (3), p.273-300 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 300 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 273 |
container_title | Journal of housing and the built environment |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Jansen, Sylvia J. T. |
description | The demographic, socio-economic and socio-cultural shifts that have taken place in Western economies in recent decades have generated a broader variety in housing behavior. For this reason, some researchers argue that socio-demographic characteristics alone no longer suffice to predict the housing demand. They should be supplemented with 'lifestyle' variables. However, the worth of lifestyle for the prediction of the housing demand is a highly debated topic. The purpose of the current study, therefore, is to explore the worth of lifestyle (operationalized as values) in the prediction of residential preferences and choices. Data were collected through telephone interviews in January and February 2010. Respondents were asked to indicate the importance of 29 values as a guiding principle in housing. Furthermore, respondents who had indicated that they were willing to move (n = 930) were asked about their preferences for a number of dwelling characteristics, such as tenure and dwelling type. Respondents who had indicated that they were not willing to move (n = 667) provided their residential choices. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between values and residential preferences and choices, after correction for socio-demographic characteristics. The results showed that values might have some additional worth for predicting residential preferences and choices, but the relationship seems to be rather limited. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10901-012-9270-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1136367134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>41653598</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41653598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-b60eef1308124d98e02c62a3ad954f8f3fbb2c1bef339b2a6e7cf166020477233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9LxDAQxYsouK5-AA9CwIuX6EzSJu1JZPEfLnhRPJa0TbZZuu2atIrf3pSKiCCeZg6_NzNvXhQdI5wjgLzwCBkgBWQ0YxIo7EQzTCSnUkq2O_ZC0DhD2I8OvF8DMOQynUUPL7XqifWkrzV571xfk86QN9UM2hPbktVgK9uuiNPeVrrtrWrI1mmjnW7LgKi2ImXd2dBfHkZ7RjVeH33VefR8c_20uKPLx9v7xdWSlgnynhYCtDbIIUUWV1mqgZWCKa6qLIlNargpClZioQ3nWcGU0LI0KAQwiIMZzufR2TR367rXcGefb6wvddOoVneDzxG54EIij_9HIXwhZZwlAT39ha67wbXByEhlLJEQjxROVOk678Mj8q2zG-U-ApSPSeRTEnlIIh-TyCFo2KTxgW1X2v2c_LfoZBKtfd-57y0xioQnWco_AWKZkvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1039257045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is the worth of values in guiding residential preferences and choices?</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Jansen, Sylvia J. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Sylvia J. T.</creatorcontrib><description>The demographic, socio-economic and socio-cultural shifts that have taken place in Western economies in recent decades have generated a broader variety in housing behavior. For this reason, some researchers argue that socio-demographic characteristics alone no longer suffice to predict the housing demand. They should be supplemented with 'lifestyle' variables. However, the worth of lifestyle for the prediction of the housing demand is a highly debated topic. The purpose of the current study, therefore, is to explore the worth of lifestyle (operationalized as values) in the prediction of residential preferences and choices. Data were collected through telephone interviews in January and February 2010. Respondents were asked to indicate the importance of 29 values as a guiding principle in housing. Furthermore, respondents who had indicated that they were willing to move (n = 930) were asked about their preferences for a number of dwelling characteristics, such as tenure and dwelling type. Respondents who had indicated that they were not willing to move (n = 667) provided their residential choices. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between values and residential preferences and choices, after correction for socio-demographic characteristics. The results showed that values might have some additional worth for predicting residential preferences and choices, but the relationship seems to be rather limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1566-4910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10901-012-9270-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Built environment ; Built environments ; Cities ; Demand ; Demographics ; Dwellings ; Economic behaviour ; Economic choice ; Economics ; Geography ; Households ; Housing ; Housing demand ; Human Geography ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Life styles ; Lifestyle ; Lifestyles ; Logistics ; Marketing ; Multiple dwellings ; Regression analysis ; Residential ; Single family housing ; Social Sciences ; Sociodemographics ; Socioeconomic status ; Statistical significance ; Values</subject><ispartof>Journal of housing and the built environment, 2012-09, Vol.27 (3), p.273-300</ispartof><rights>2012 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-b60eef1308124d98e02c62a3ad954f8f3fbb2c1bef339b2a6e7cf166020477233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-b60eef1308124d98e02c62a3ad954f8f3fbb2c1bef339b2a6e7cf166020477233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41653598$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41653598$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Sylvia J. T.</creatorcontrib><title>What is the worth of values in guiding residential preferences and choices?</title><title>Journal of housing and the built environment</title><addtitle>J Hous and the Built Environ</addtitle><description>The demographic, socio-economic and socio-cultural shifts that have taken place in Western economies in recent decades have generated a broader variety in housing behavior. For this reason, some researchers argue that socio-demographic characteristics alone no longer suffice to predict the housing demand. They should be supplemented with 'lifestyle' variables. However, the worth of lifestyle for the prediction of the housing demand is a highly debated topic. The purpose of the current study, therefore, is to explore the worth of lifestyle (operationalized as values) in the prediction of residential preferences and choices. Data were collected through telephone interviews in January and February 2010. Respondents were asked to indicate the importance of 29 values as a guiding principle in housing. Furthermore, respondents who had indicated that they were willing to move (n = 930) were asked about their preferences for a number of dwelling characteristics, such as tenure and dwelling type. Respondents who had indicated that they were not willing to move (n = 667) provided their residential choices. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between values and residential preferences and choices, after correction for socio-demographic characteristics. The results showed that values might have some additional worth for predicting residential preferences and choices, but the relationship seems to be rather limited.</description><subject>Built environment</subject><subject>Built environments</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Dwellings</subject><subject>Economic behaviour</subject><subject>Economic choice</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing demand</subject><subject>Human Geography</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Life styles</subject><subject>Lifestyle</subject><subject>Lifestyles</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Multiple dwellings</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Residential</subject><subject>Single family housing</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1566-4910</issn><issn>1573-7772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9LxDAQxYsouK5-AA9CwIuX6EzSJu1JZPEfLnhRPJa0TbZZuu2atIrf3pSKiCCeZg6_NzNvXhQdI5wjgLzwCBkgBWQ0YxIo7EQzTCSnUkq2O_ZC0DhD2I8OvF8DMOQynUUPL7XqifWkrzV571xfk86QN9UM2hPbktVgK9uuiNPeVrrtrWrI1mmjnW7LgKi2ImXd2dBfHkZ7RjVeH33VefR8c_20uKPLx9v7xdWSlgnynhYCtDbIIUUWV1mqgZWCKa6qLIlNargpClZioQ3nWcGU0LI0KAQwiIMZzufR2TR367rXcGefb6wvddOoVneDzxG54EIij_9HIXwhZZwlAT39ha67wbXByEhlLJEQjxROVOk678Mj8q2zG-U-ApSPSeRTEnlIIh-TyCFo2KTxgW1X2v2c_LfoZBKtfd-57y0xioQnWco_AWKZkvw</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Jansen, Sylvia J. T.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>What is the worth of values in guiding residential preferences and choices?</title><author>Jansen, Sylvia J. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c513t-b60eef1308124d98e02c62a3ad954f8f3fbb2c1bef339b2a6e7cf166020477233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Built environment</topic><topic>Built environments</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Dwellings</topic><topic>Economic behaviour</topic><topic>Economic choice</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing demand</topic><topic>Human Geography</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Life styles</topic><topic>Lifestyle</topic><topic>Lifestyles</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Multiple dwellings</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Residential</topic><topic>Single family housing</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Sylvia J. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of housing and the built environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jansen, Sylvia J. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is the worth of values in guiding residential preferences and choices?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of housing and the built environment</jtitle><stitle>J Hous and the Built Environ</stitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>273</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>273-300</pages><issn>1566-4910</issn><eissn>1573-7772</eissn><abstract>The demographic, socio-economic and socio-cultural shifts that have taken place in Western economies in recent decades have generated a broader variety in housing behavior. For this reason, some researchers argue that socio-demographic characteristics alone no longer suffice to predict the housing demand. They should be supplemented with 'lifestyle' variables. However, the worth of lifestyle for the prediction of the housing demand is a highly debated topic. The purpose of the current study, therefore, is to explore the worth of lifestyle (operationalized as values) in the prediction of residential preferences and choices. Data were collected through telephone interviews in January and February 2010. Respondents were asked to indicate the importance of 29 values as a guiding principle in housing. Furthermore, respondents who had indicated that they were willing to move (n = 930) were asked about their preferences for a number of dwelling characteristics, such as tenure and dwelling type. Respondents who had indicated that they were not willing to move (n = 667) provided their residential choices. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between values and residential preferences and choices, after correction for socio-demographic characteristics. The results showed that values might have some additional worth for predicting residential preferences and choices, but the relationship seems to be rather limited.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10901-012-9270-0</doi><tpages>28</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1566-4910 |
ispartof | Journal of housing and the built environment, 2012-09, Vol.27 (3), p.273-300 |
issn | 1566-4910 1573-7772 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1136367134 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Built environment Built environments Cities Demand Demographics Dwellings Economic behaviour Economic choice Economics Geography Households Housing Housing demand Human Geography Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning Life styles Lifestyle Lifestyles Logistics Marketing Multiple dwellings Regression analysis Residential Single family housing Social Sciences Sociodemographics Socioeconomic status Statistical significance Values |
title | What is the worth of values in guiding residential preferences and choices? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A50%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20the%20worth%20of%20values%20in%20guiding%20residential%20preferences%20and%20choices?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20housing%20and%20the%20built%20environment&rft.au=Jansen,%20Sylvia%20J.%20T.&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=273&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=273-300&rft.issn=1566-4910&rft.eissn=1573-7772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10901-012-9270-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41653598%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1039257045&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=41653598&rfr_iscdi=true |