Effect of Feeding Rate and Pond Primary Productivity on Growth of Litopenaeus vannamei Reared in Inland Saline Waters of West Alabama

Feeding costs have skyrocketed worldwide in the past several years, negatively impacting shrimp farmers. Typically, 50–60% of the production costs of shrimp farm operations are attributed to feed inputs. The increasing cost of feed combined with declining market prices for shrimp makes it difficult...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:North American journal of aquaculture 2012-01, Vol.74 (1), p.20-26
Hauptverfasser: Roy, Luke A., Davis, D. Allen, Whitis, Gregory N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title North American journal of aquaculture
container_volume 74
creator Roy, Luke A.
Davis, D. Allen
Whitis, Gregory N.
description Feeding costs have skyrocketed worldwide in the past several years, negatively impacting shrimp farmers. Typically, 50–60% of the production costs of shrimp farm operations are attributed to feed inputs. The increasing cost of feed combined with declining market prices for shrimp makes it difficult to maintain adequate profit margins. In west Alabama, shrimp farmers are located long distances from feed mills and pay high shipping fees in addition to high feed prices. These low‐salinity waters are quite productive, providing natural food items throughout the production cycle. To determine the possibility of reducing feed rates by relying more on pond primary productivity to contribute to shrimp growth, four growth trials were conducted with juvenile Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (formerly known as Penaeus vannamei). Juvenile shrimp were offered different feed rates ranging from 0% (no feed) to 110% of a normal daily ration by means of static, flow‐through, or partial daily water exchange with water from a production pond. The results revealed no differences in growth among shrimp reared in a flow‐through system and offered feed inputs ranging from 60% to 110% of a daily ration, indicating a contribution of pond primary productivity in the treatments receiving less feed. Static and flow‐through systems were utilized to culture two different size‐classes of shrimp fed at 0, 60, 80, and 100% of a daily ration. The results revealed that shrimp reared in the flow‐through system had better growth and food conversion ratios than those in the static system; however, shrimp in the 0% treatment in the flow‐through system had only slightly inferior performance in terms of growth than those in the 60, 80, and 100% treatments. The results from this study confirm that L. vannamei are capable of obtaining a large percentage of their nutritional needs from pond primary productivity, and farmers should be encouraged to reduce feed inputs, which may enhance profitability.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/15222055.2011.638416
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1125239053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1125239053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3350-bad73755deb4bf8a992ea1b2240aee392387d835f970691b5a55920db086928f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRSMEEuXxByy8ZJMytuPWYVdVbUGqeBQQS2uSTMAotUucFvUD-G8SBfZsZmZxz9XoRNEFhyEHDVdcCSFAqaEAzocjqRM-OogGXCU61olKDrtbiLjLHEcnIXwA8IRzMYi-Z2VJecN8yeZEhXVvbIUNMXQFe_DdqO0a6327fbHNG7uzzZ55xxa1_2reO25pG78hh7QNbIfO4ZosWxHWVDDr2K2rurInrKwj9tqW16HDXik0bFJhhms8i45KrAKd_-7T6GU-e57exMv7xe10soxzKRXEGRZjOVaqoCzJSo1pKgh5JkQCSCRTIfW40FKV6RhGKc8UKpUKKDLQo1ToUp5Gl33vpvaf2_YBs7Yhp6r9kPw2mFaJEjIFJdto0kfz2odQU2k2vQnDwXTWzZ9101k3vfUWu-6xL1vR_l-MuZtMHgEEyB9yeYVO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1125239053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Feeding Rate and Pond Primary Productivity on Growth of Litopenaeus vannamei Reared in Inland Saline Waters of West Alabama</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Roy, Luke A. ; Davis, D. Allen ; Whitis, Gregory N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Roy, Luke A. ; Davis, D. Allen ; Whitis, Gregory N.</creatorcontrib><description>Feeding costs have skyrocketed worldwide in the past several years, negatively impacting shrimp farmers. Typically, 50–60% of the production costs of shrimp farm operations are attributed to feed inputs. The increasing cost of feed combined with declining market prices for shrimp makes it difficult to maintain adequate profit margins. In west Alabama, shrimp farmers are located long distances from feed mills and pay high shipping fees in addition to high feed prices. These low‐salinity waters are quite productive, providing natural food items throughout the production cycle. To determine the possibility of reducing feed rates by relying more on pond primary productivity to contribute to shrimp growth, four growth trials were conducted with juvenile Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (formerly known as Penaeus vannamei). Juvenile shrimp were offered different feed rates ranging from 0% (no feed) to 110% of a normal daily ration by means of static, flow‐through, or partial daily water exchange with water from a production pond. The results revealed no differences in growth among shrimp reared in a flow‐through system and offered feed inputs ranging from 60% to 110% of a daily ration, indicating a contribution of pond primary productivity in the treatments receiving less feed. Static and flow‐through systems were utilized to culture two different size‐classes of shrimp fed at 0, 60, 80, and 100% of a daily ration. The results revealed that shrimp reared in the flow‐through system had better growth and food conversion ratios than those in the static system; however, shrimp in the 0% treatment in the flow‐through system had only slightly inferior performance in terms of growth than those in the 60, 80, and 100% treatments. The results from this study confirm that L. vannamei are capable of obtaining a large percentage of their nutritional needs from pond primary productivity, and farmers should be encouraged to reduce feed inputs, which may enhance profitability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-2055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15222055.2011.638416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Litopenaeus vannamei</subject><ispartof>North American journal of aquaculture, 2012-01, Vol.74 (1), p.20-26</ispartof><rights>2012 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3350-bad73755deb4bf8a992ea1b2240aee392387d835f970691b5a55920db086928f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3350-bad73755deb4bf8a992ea1b2240aee392387d835f970691b5a55920db086928f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1080%2F15222055.2011.638416$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1080%2F15222055.2011.638416$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roy, Luke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, D. Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitis, Gregory N.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Feeding Rate and Pond Primary Productivity on Growth of Litopenaeus vannamei Reared in Inland Saline Waters of West Alabama</title><title>North American journal of aquaculture</title><description>Feeding costs have skyrocketed worldwide in the past several years, negatively impacting shrimp farmers. Typically, 50–60% of the production costs of shrimp farm operations are attributed to feed inputs. The increasing cost of feed combined with declining market prices for shrimp makes it difficult to maintain adequate profit margins. In west Alabama, shrimp farmers are located long distances from feed mills and pay high shipping fees in addition to high feed prices. These low‐salinity waters are quite productive, providing natural food items throughout the production cycle. To determine the possibility of reducing feed rates by relying more on pond primary productivity to contribute to shrimp growth, four growth trials were conducted with juvenile Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (formerly known as Penaeus vannamei). Juvenile shrimp were offered different feed rates ranging from 0% (no feed) to 110% of a normal daily ration by means of static, flow‐through, or partial daily water exchange with water from a production pond. The results revealed no differences in growth among shrimp reared in a flow‐through system and offered feed inputs ranging from 60% to 110% of a daily ration, indicating a contribution of pond primary productivity in the treatments receiving less feed. Static and flow‐through systems were utilized to culture two different size‐classes of shrimp fed at 0, 60, 80, and 100% of a daily ration. The results revealed that shrimp reared in the flow‐through system had better growth and food conversion ratios than those in the static system; however, shrimp in the 0% treatment in the flow‐through system had only slightly inferior performance in terms of growth than those in the 60, 80, and 100% treatments. The results from this study confirm that L. vannamei are capable of obtaining a large percentage of their nutritional needs from pond primary productivity, and farmers should be encouraged to reduce feed inputs, which may enhance profitability.</description><subject>Litopenaeus vannamei</subject><issn>1522-2055</issn><issn>1548-8454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRSMEEuXxByy8ZJMytuPWYVdVbUGqeBQQS2uSTMAotUucFvUD-G8SBfZsZmZxz9XoRNEFhyEHDVdcCSFAqaEAzocjqRM-OogGXCU61olKDrtbiLjLHEcnIXwA8IRzMYi-Z2VJecN8yeZEhXVvbIUNMXQFe_DdqO0a6327fbHNG7uzzZ55xxa1_2reO25pG78hh7QNbIfO4ZosWxHWVDDr2K2rurInrKwj9tqW16HDXik0bFJhhms8i45KrAKd_-7T6GU-e57exMv7xe10soxzKRXEGRZjOVaqoCzJSo1pKgh5JkQCSCRTIfW40FKV6RhGKc8UKpUKKDLQo1ToUp5Gl33vpvaf2_YBs7Yhp6r9kPw2mFaJEjIFJdto0kfz2odQU2k2vQnDwXTWzZ9101k3vfUWu-6xL1vR_l-MuZtMHgEEyB9yeYVO</recordid><startdate>201201</startdate><enddate>201201</enddate><creator>Roy, Luke A.</creator><creator>Davis, D. Allen</creator><creator>Whitis, Gregory N.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201201</creationdate><title>Effect of Feeding Rate and Pond Primary Productivity on Growth of Litopenaeus vannamei Reared in Inland Saline Waters of West Alabama</title><author>Roy, Luke A. ; Davis, D. Allen ; Whitis, Gregory N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3350-bad73755deb4bf8a992ea1b2240aee392387d835f970691b5a55920db086928f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Litopenaeus vannamei</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roy, Luke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, D. Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitis, Gregory N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>North American journal of aquaculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roy, Luke A.</au><au>Davis, D. Allen</au><au>Whitis, Gregory N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Feeding Rate and Pond Primary Productivity on Growth of Litopenaeus vannamei Reared in Inland Saline Waters of West Alabama</atitle><jtitle>North American journal of aquaculture</jtitle><date>2012-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>20-26</pages><issn>1522-2055</issn><eissn>1548-8454</eissn><abstract>Feeding costs have skyrocketed worldwide in the past several years, negatively impacting shrimp farmers. Typically, 50–60% of the production costs of shrimp farm operations are attributed to feed inputs. The increasing cost of feed combined with declining market prices for shrimp makes it difficult to maintain adequate profit margins. In west Alabama, shrimp farmers are located long distances from feed mills and pay high shipping fees in addition to high feed prices. These low‐salinity waters are quite productive, providing natural food items throughout the production cycle. To determine the possibility of reducing feed rates by relying more on pond primary productivity to contribute to shrimp growth, four growth trials were conducted with juvenile Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (formerly known as Penaeus vannamei). Juvenile shrimp were offered different feed rates ranging from 0% (no feed) to 110% of a normal daily ration by means of static, flow‐through, or partial daily water exchange with water from a production pond. The results revealed no differences in growth among shrimp reared in a flow‐through system and offered feed inputs ranging from 60% to 110% of a daily ration, indicating a contribution of pond primary productivity in the treatments receiving less feed. Static and flow‐through systems were utilized to culture two different size‐classes of shrimp fed at 0, 60, 80, and 100% of a daily ration. The results revealed that shrimp reared in the flow‐through system had better growth and food conversion ratios than those in the static system; however, shrimp in the 0% treatment in the flow‐through system had only slightly inferior performance in terms of growth than those in the 60, 80, and 100% treatments. The results from this study confirm that L. vannamei are capable of obtaining a large percentage of their nutritional needs from pond primary productivity, and farmers should be encouraged to reduce feed inputs, which may enhance profitability.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/15222055.2011.638416</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-2055
ispartof North American journal of aquaculture, 2012-01, Vol.74 (1), p.20-26
issn 1522-2055
1548-8454
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1125239053
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Litopenaeus vannamei
title Effect of Feeding Rate and Pond Primary Productivity on Growth of Litopenaeus vannamei Reared in Inland Saline Waters of West Alabama
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A14%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Feeding%20Rate%20and%20Pond%20Primary%20Productivity%20on%20Growth%20of%20Litopenaeus%20vannamei%20Reared%20in%20Inland%20Saline%20Waters%20of%20West%20Alabama&rft.jtitle=North%20American%20journal%20of%20aquaculture&rft.au=Roy,%20Luke%20A.&rft.date=2012-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=20-26&rft.issn=1522-2055&rft.eissn=1548-8454&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15222055.2011.638416&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1125239053%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1125239053&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true