Linking discrete choice to continuous demand within the framework of a computable general equilibrium model

► A methodology for integrating discrete choice (DC) models with continuous demand (CD) models in a CGE framework. ► DC models are used to determine the heterogeneous preferences of consumers for quality-differentiated product. ► CD models are used to link the aggregate demand for different groups o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research. Part B: methodological 2012-11, Vol.46 (9), p.1177-1201
Hauptverfasser: Truong, Truong P., Hensher, David A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1201
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1177
container_title Transportation research. Part B: methodological
container_volume 46
creator Truong, Truong P.
Hensher, David A.
description ► A methodology for integrating discrete choice (DC) models with continuous demand (CD) models in a CGE framework. ► DC models are used to determine the heterogeneous preferences of consumers for quality-differentiated product. ► CD models are used to link the aggregate demand for different groups of commodities together in the CGE model. ► Integrated models are used to estimate conventional users benefits and wider economic impacts. Discrete choice (DC) models are commonly used as basic building blocks in ‘bottom-up’ models which seek to describe consumer and producer behaviour at a disaggregate level, in contrast to continuous demand (CD) models which are used to describe behaviour at a more aggregate level. At a disaggregate level, choice behaviour is defined in terms of commodities differentiated by qualities or attributes. In contrast, aggregate demand behaviour is defined in terms of broadly defined and generically different commodities. In a DC model, the main focus of analysis is not the total quantity of demand, but rather the relative shares or substitution between the choice alternatives, in contrast to a continuous demand model where the focus is on the aggregate substitution between groups of commodities as well as on the income effects. Seen in this way, there is scope for complementary usage of DC and CD models within the framework of a CGE model where DC models are used to describe the preferences for a narrowly defined set of commodities belonging to a particular sector of an economy, and CD models are used to describe the interactions between these sectors. In this paper, we describe how DC and CD models can be used in such an integrated fashion in a spatial computable general equilibrium model to inquire into the wider economic impacts of a transport investment project in the Sydney Metropolitan Area.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.trb.2012.06.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1125227773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0191261512000859</els_id><sourcerecordid>1125227773</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-d7eeec2d04d40f878e0a303f809b02a203567a98ae0c4f345e8b6ac0034be2453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD2P1DAURS0EEsPCD6Bzg0ST7LPj2Imo0IqPlUaigdpy7JcdzyT2rO2w4t_j0awoqV5z7n26h5D3DFoGTN4e25KmlgPjLcgWgL0gOzaoseGdVC_JDtjIGi5Z_5q8yfkIAJ0AtiOnvQ8nHx6o89kmLEjtIXqLtERqYyg-bHHL1OFqgqNPvhx8oOWAdE5mxaeYTjTO1FR2PW_FTAvSBwyYzELxcfOLn5LfVrpGh8tb8mo2S8Z3z_eG_Pr65efd92b_49v93ed9Y8WgSuMUIlruQDgB86AGBNNBNw8wTsANh66XyoyDQbBi7kSPwySNvSyakIu-uyEfr73nFB83zEWvdRwuiwlYx2jGeM-5UqqrKLuiNsWcE876nPxq0h_NQF_E6qOuYvVFrAapq9ia-fBcb7I1SxURrM__glwKKdg4VO7TlcO69bfHpLP1GCw6n9AW7aL_z5e_HDmPNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1125227773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linking discrete choice to continuous demand within the framework of a computable general equilibrium model</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Truong, Truong P. ; Hensher, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Truong, Truong P. ; Hensher, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>► A methodology for integrating discrete choice (DC) models with continuous demand (CD) models in a CGE framework. ► DC models are used to determine the heterogeneous preferences of consumers for quality-differentiated product. ► CD models are used to link the aggregate demand for different groups of commodities together in the CGE model. ► Integrated models are used to estimate conventional users benefits and wider economic impacts. Discrete choice (DC) models are commonly used as basic building blocks in ‘bottom-up’ models which seek to describe consumer and producer behaviour at a disaggregate level, in contrast to continuous demand (CD) models which are used to describe behaviour at a more aggregate level. At a disaggregate level, choice behaviour is defined in terms of commodities differentiated by qualities or attributes. In contrast, aggregate demand behaviour is defined in terms of broadly defined and generically different commodities. In a DC model, the main focus of analysis is not the total quantity of demand, but rather the relative shares or substitution between the choice alternatives, in contrast to a continuous demand model where the focus is on the aggregate substitution between groups of commodities as well as on the income effects. Seen in this way, there is scope for complementary usage of DC and CD models within the framework of a CGE model where DC models are used to describe the preferences for a narrowly defined set of commodities belonging to a particular sector of an economy, and CD models are used to describe the interactions between these sectors. In this paper, we describe how DC and CD models can be used in such an integrated fashion in a spatial computable general equilibrium model to inquire into the wider economic impacts of a transport investment project in the Sydney Metropolitan Area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2367</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2012.06.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRBMDY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Bottom-up ; Buildings. Public works ; Computable general equilibrium (CGE) models ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Continuous demand ; Differentiated products ; Discrete choice ; Exact sciences and technology ; Structural analysis. Stresses ; Top-down</subject><ispartof>Transportation research. Part B: methodological, 2012-11, Vol.46 (9), p.1177-1201</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-d7eeec2d04d40f878e0a303f809b02a203567a98ae0c4f345e8b6ac0034be2453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-d7eeec2d04d40f878e0a303f809b02a203567a98ae0c4f345e8b6ac0034be2453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.06.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26464198$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Truong, Truong P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hensher, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>Linking discrete choice to continuous demand within the framework of a computable general equilibrium model</title><title>Transportation research. Part B: methodological</title><description>► A methodology for integrating discrete choice (DC) models with continuous demand (CD) models in a CGE framework. ► DC models are used to determine the heterogeneous preferences of consumers for quality-differentiated product. ► CD models are used to link the aggregate demand for different groups of commodities together in the CGE model. ► Integrated models are used to estimate conventional users benefits and wider economic impacts. Discrete choice (DC) models are commonly used as basic building blocks in ‘bottom-up’ models which seek to describe consumer and producer behaviour at a disaggregate level, in contrast to continuous demand (CD) models which are used to describe behaviour at a more aggregate level. At a disaggregate level, choice behaviour is defined in terms of commodities differentiated by qualities or attributes. In contrast, aggregate demand behaviour is defined in terms of broadly defined and generically different commodities. In a DC model, the main focus of analysis is not the total quantity of demand, but rather the relative shares or substitution between the choice alternatives, in contrast to a continuous demand model where the focus is on the aggregate substitution between groups of commodities as well as on the income effects. Seen in this way, there is scope for complementary usage of DC and CD models within the framework of a CGE model where DC models are used to describe the preferences for a narrowly defined set of commodities belonging to a particular sector of an economy, and CD models are used to describe the interactions between these sectors. In this paper, we describe how DC and CD models can be used in such an integrated fashion in a spatial computable general equilibrium model to inquire into the wider economic impacts of a transport investment project in the Sydney Metropolitan Area.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bottom-up</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Computable general equilibrium (CGE) models</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Continuous demand</subject><subject>Differentiated products</subject><subject>Discrete choice</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><subject>Top-down</subject><issn>0191-2615</issn><issn>1879-2367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD2P1DAURS0EEsPCD6Bzg0ST7LPj2Imo0IqPlUaigdpy7JcdzyT2rO2w4t_j0awoqV5z7n26h5D3DFoGTN4e25KmlgPjLcgWgL0gOzaoseGdVC_JDtjIGi5Z_5q8yfkIAJ0AtiOnvQ8nHx6o89kmLEjtIXqLtERqYyg-bHHL1OFqgqNPvhx8oOWAdE5mxaeYTjTO1FR2PW_FTAvSBwyYzELxcfOLn5LfVrpGh8tb8mo2S8Z3z_eG_Pr65efd92b_49v93ed9Y8WgSuMUIlruQDgB86AGBNNBNw8wTsANh66XyoyDQbBi7kSPwySNvSyakIu-uyEfr73nFB83zEWvdRwuiwlYx2jGeM-5UqqrKLuiNsWcE876nPxq0h_NQF_E6qOuYvVFrAapq9ia-fBcb7I1SxURrM__glwKKdg4VO7TlcO69bfHpLP1GCw6n9AW7aL_z5e_HDmPNQ</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Truong, Truong P.</creator><creator>Hensher, David A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Linking discrete choice to continuous demand within the framework of a computable general equilibrium model</title><author>Truong, Truong P. ; Hensher, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-d7eeec2d04d40f878e0a303f809b02a203567a98ae0c4f345e8b6ac0034be2453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bottom-up</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Computable general equilibrium (CGE) models</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Continuous demand</topic><topic>Differentiated products</topic><topic>Discrete choice</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><topic>Top-down</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Truong, Truong P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hensher, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research. Part B: methodological</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Truong, Truong P.</au><au>Hensher, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Linking discrete choice to continuous demand within the framework of a computable general equilibrium model</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research. Part B: methodological</jtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1177</spage><epage>1201</epage><pages>1177-1201</pages><issn>0191-2615</issn><eissn>1879-2367</eissn><coden>TRBMDY</coden><abstract>► A methodology for integrating discrete choice (DC) models with continuous demand (CD) models in a CGE framework. ► DC models are used to determine the heterogeneous preferences of consumers for quality-differentiated product. ► CD models are used to link the aggregate demand for different groups of commodities together in the CGE model. ► Integrated models are used to estimate conventional users benefits and wider economic impacts. Discrete choice (DC) models are commonly used as basic building blocks in ‘bottom-up’ models which seek to describe consumer and producer behaviour at a disaggregate level, in contrast to continuous demand (CD) models which are used to describe behaviour at a more aggregate level. At a disaggregate level, choice behaviour is defined in terms of commodities differentiated by qualities or attributes. In contrast, aggregate demand behaviour is defined in terms of broadly defined and generically different commodities. In a DC model, the main focus of analysis is not the total quantity of demand, but rather the relative shares or substitution between the choice alternatives, in contrast to a continuous demand model where the focus is on the aggregate substitution between groups of commodities as well as on the income effects. Seen in this way, there is scope for complementary usage of DC and CD models within the framework of a CGE model where DC models are used to describe the preferences for a narrowly defined set of commodities belonging to a particular sector of an economy, and CD models are used to describe the interactions between these sectors. In this paper, we describe how DC and CD models can be used in such an integrated fashion in a spatial computable general equilibrium model to inquire into the wider economic impacts of a transport investment project in the Sydney Metropolitan Area.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.trb.2012.06.001</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-2615
ispartof Transportation research. Part B: methodological, 2012-11, Vol.46 (9), p.1177-1201
issn 0191-2615
1879-2367
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1125227773
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Applied sciences
Bottom-up
Buildings. Public works
Computable general equilibrium (CGE) models
Computation methods. Tables. Charts
Continuous demand
Differentiated products
Discrete choice
Exact sciences and technology
Structural analysis. Stresses
Top-down
title Linking discrete choice to continuous demand within the framework of a computable general equilibrium model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A55%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linking%20discrete%20choice%20to%20continuous%20demand%20within%20the%20framework%20of%20a%20computable%20general%20equilibrium%20model&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research.%20Part%20B:%20methodological&rft.au=Truong,%20Truong%20P.&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1177&rft.epage=1201&rft.pages=1177-1201&rft.issn=0191-2615&rft.eissn=1879-2367&rft.coden=TRBMDY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.trb.2012.06.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1125227773%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1125227773&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0191261512000859&rfr_iscdi=true