Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems
Gatekeeping and provider choice have become central in health policymaking within the last two decades. This article contributes to the debates in two ways: first, it provides an extended review of evidence on the impact of gatekeeping and provider choice on efficiency, costs, quality, equality and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current sociology 2012-07, Vol.60 (4), p.489-505 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 505 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 489 |
container_title | Current sociology |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Reibling, Nadine Wendt, Claus |
description | Gatekeeping and provider choice have become central in health policymaking within the last two decades. This article contributes to the debates in two ways: first, it provides an extended review of evidence on the impact of gatekeeping and provider choice on efficiency, costs, quality, equality and patient empowerment; and second, it empirically analyses regulations and identifies common trends in healthcare reforms in OECD countries since 1990. More than half of the countries analysed have established gatekeeping systems, while a smaller number provides free access to secondary care. The study discovers a trend towards strengthening gatekeeping regulations within free access countries. Free choice of provider is the standard in the OECD, where only a small number of countries restrict provider choice. The article identifies a diverging trend of reforms, with some traditionally restrictive countries offering more provider choice and other countries limiting the choice of providers as a result of managed care reforms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0011392112438333 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1125219079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0011392112438333</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1026675160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30418face558d3a60094cddc6177af1ed23df6ccc4cc99b39b6b3a02c0bb39223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLw0AQhRdRsFbvHgNevER3dpNN15vUWoVCL3oOm9lJm5omcTcV-u_dUA9SEE_DY755vDeMXQO_A8iye84BpBYAIpETKeUJG0GiIM64Sk7ZaFjHw_6cXXi_CVJo0CP2MDc9fRB1VbOKTGOjzrVflSUX4bqtkKKqiZaz6VO0JlP3azSOIr_3PW39JTsrTe3p6meO2fvz7G36Ei-W89fp4yJGmaV9LHkCk9IgpenESqM41wlaiyqkNiWQFdKWChETRK0LqQtVSMMF8iIIIeSY3R58Q7TPHfk-31Yeqa5NQ-3O56FyKkDzTP-PcqFUloLiAb05QjftzjWhyEAJBUKINFD8QKFrvXdU5p2rtsbtA5QPf8-P_x5O4sOJNyv6bfoH_w1Cwn9-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1022612225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Reibling, Nadine ; Wendt, Claus</creator><contributor>Annandale, Ellen ; Kuhlmann, Ellen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Reibling, Nadine ; Wendt, Claus ; Annandale, Ellen ; Kuhlmann, Ellen</creatorcontrib><description>Gatekeeping and provider choice have become central in health policymaking within the last two decades. This article contributes to the debates in two ways: first, it provides an extended review of evidence on the impact of gatekeeping and provider choice on efficiency, costs, quality, equality and patient empowerment; and second, it empirically analyses regulations and identifies common trends in healthcare reforms in OECD countries since 1990. More than half of the countries analysed have established gatekeeping systems, while a smaller number provides free access to secondary care. The study discovers a trend towards strengthening gatekeeping regulations within free access countries. Free choice of provider is the standard in the OECD, where only a small number of countries restrict provider choice. The article identifies a diverging trend of reforms, with some traditionally restrictive countries offering more provider choice and other countries limiting the choice of providers as a result of managed care reforms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0011392112438333</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CUSOAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Access ; Access to health care ; Choices ; Empowerment ; Equality ; Health Behavior ; Health care ; Health care policy ; Health Care Services ; Health expenditure ; Health services ; Industrialized nations ; Managed Care Services ; OECD ; Policy Making ; Quality control ; Reform ; Regulation ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Current sociology, 2012-07, Vol.60 (4), p.489-505</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Jul 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30418face558d3a60094cddc6177af1ed23df6ccc4cc99b39b6b3a02c0bb39223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30418face558d3a60094cddc6177af1ed23df6ccc4cc99b39b6b3a02c0bb39223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0011392112438333$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0011392112438333$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,33752,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Annandale, Ellen</contributor><contributor>Kuhlmann, Ellen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Reibling, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Claus</creatorcontrib><title>Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems</title><title>Current sociology</title><description>Gatekeeping and provider choice have become central in health policymaking within the last two decades. This article contributes to the debates in two ways: first, it provides an extended review of evidence on the impact of gatekeeping and provider choice on efficiency, costs, quality, equality and patient empowerment; and second, it empirically analyses regulations and identifies common trends in healthcare reforms in OECD countries since 1990. More than half of the countries analysed have established gatekeeping systems, while a smaller number provides free access to secondary care. The study discovers a trend towards strengthening gatekeeping regulations within free access countries. Free choice of provider is the standard in the OECD, where only a small number of countries restrict provider choice. The article identifies a diverging trend of reforms, with some traditionally restrictive countries offering more provider choice and other countries limiting the choice of providers as a result of managed care reforms.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Access to health care</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Health expenditure</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Managed Care Services</subject><subject>OECD</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0011-3921</issn><issn>1461-7064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLw0AQhRdRsFbvHgNevER3dpNN15vUWoVCL3oOm9lJm5omcTcV-u_dUA9SEE_DY755vDeMXQO_A8iye84BpBYAIpETKeUJG0GiIM64Sk7ZaFjHw_6cXXi_CVJo0CP2MDc9fRB1VbOKTGOjzrVflSUX4bqtkKKqiZaz6VO0JlP3azSOIr_3PW39JTsrTe3p6meO2fvz7G36Ei-W89fp4yJGmaV9LHkCk9IgpenESqM41wlaiyqkNiWQFdKWChETRK0LqQtVSMMF8iIIIeSY3R58Q7TPHfk-31Yeqa5NQ-3O56FyKkDzTP-PcqFUloLiAb05QjftzjWhyEAJBUKINFD8QKFrvXdU5p2rtsbtA5QPf8-P_x5O4sOJNyv6bfoH_w1Cwn9-</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Reibling, Nadine</creator><creator>Wendt, Claus</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems</title><author>Reibling, Nadine ; Wendt, Claus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30418face558d3a60094cddc6177af1ed23df6ccc4cc99b39b6b3a02c0bb39223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Access to health care</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Health expenditure</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Managed Care Services</topic><topic>OECD</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reibling, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Claus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Current sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reibling, Nadine</au><au>Wendt, Claus</au><au>Annandale, Ellen</au><au>Kuhlmann, Ellen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems</atitle><jtitle>Current sociology</jtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>489</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>489-505</pages><issn>0011-3921</issn><eissn>1461-7064</eissn><coden>CUSOAO</coden><abstract>Gatekeeping and provider choice have become central in health policymaking within the last two decades. This article contributes to the debates in two ways: first, it provides an extended review of evidence on the impact of gatekeeping and provider choice on efficiency, costs, quality, equality and patient empowerment; and second, it empirically analyses regulations and identifies common trends in healthcare reforms in OECD countries since 1990. More than half of the countries analysed have established gatekeeping systems, while a smaller number provides free access to secondary care. The study discovers a trend towards strengthening gatekeeping regulations within free access countries. Free choice of provider is the standard in the OECD, where only a small number of countries restrict provider choice. The article identifies a diverging trend of reforms, with some traditionally restrictive countries offering more provider choice and other countries limiting the choice of providers as a result of managed care reforms.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0011392112438333</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-3921 |
ispartof | Current sociology, 2012-07, Vol.60 (4), p.489-505 |
issn | 0011-3921 1461-7064 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1125219079 |
source | SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Access Access to health care Choices Empowerment Equality Health Behavior Health care Health care policy Health Care Services Health expenditure Health services Industrialized nations Managed Care Services OECD Policy Making Quality control Reform Regulation Studies |
title | Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A56%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gatekeeping%20and%20provider%20choice%20in%20OECD%20healthcare%20systems&rft.jtitle=Current%20sociology&rft.au=Reibling,%20Nadine&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=489-505&rft.issn=0011-3921&rft.eissn=1461-7064&rft.coden=CUSOAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0011392112438333&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1026675160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1022612225&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0011392112438333&rfr_iscdi=true |