Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems

Gatekeeping and provider choice have become central in health policymaking within the last two decades. This article contributes to the debates in two ways: first, it provides an extended review of evidence on the impact of gatekeeping and provider choice on efficiency, costs, quality, equality and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current sociology 2012-07, Vol.60 (4), p.489-505
Hauptverfasser: Reibling, Nadine, Wendt, Claus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 505
container_issue 4
container_start_page 489
container_title Current sociology
container_volume 60
creator Reibling, Nadine
Wendt, Claus
description Gatekeeping and provider choice have become central in health policymaking within the last two decades. This article contributes to the debates in two ways: first, it provides an extended review of evidence on the impact of gatekeeping and provider choice on efficiency, costs, quality, equality and patient empowerment; and second, it empirically analyses regulations and identifies common trends in healthcare reforms in OECD countries since 1990. More than half of the countries analysed have established gatekeeping systems, while a smaller number provides free access to secondary care. The study discovers a trend towards strengthening gatekeeping regulations within free access countries. Free choice of provider is the standard in the OECD, where only a small number of countries restrict provider choice. The article identifies a diverging trend of reforms, with some traditionally restrictive countries offering more provider choice and other countries limiting the choice of providers as a result of managed care reforms.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0011392112438333
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1125219079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0011392112438333</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1026675160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30418face558d3a60094cddc6177af1ed23df6ccc4cc99b39b6b3a02c0bb39223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLw0AQhRdRsFbvHgNevER3dpNN15vUWoVCL3oOm9lJm5omcTcV-u_dUA9SEE_DY755vDeMXQO_A8iye84BpBYAIpETKeUJG0GiIM64Sk7ZaFjHw_6cXXi_CVJo0CP2MDc9fRB1VbOKTGOjzrVflSUX4bqtkKKqiZaz6VO0JlP3azSOIr_3PW39JTsrTe3p6meO2fvz7G36Ei-W89fp4yJGmaV9LHkCk9IgpenESqM41wlaiyqkNiWQFdKWChETRK0LqQtVSMMF8iIIIeSY3R58Q7TPHfk-31Yeqa5NQ-3O56FyKkDzTP-PcqFUloLiAb05QjftzjWhyEAJBUKINFD8QKFrvXdU5p2rtsbtA5QPf8-P_x5O4sOJNyv6bfoH_w1Cwn9-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1022612225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Reibling, Nadine ; Wendt, Claus</creator><contributor>Annandale, Ellen ; Kuhlmann, Ellen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Reibling, Nadine ; Wendt, Claus ; Annandale, Ellen ; Kuhlmann, Ellen</creatorcontrib><description>Gatekeeping and provider choice have become central in health policymaking within the last two decades. This article contributes to the debates in two ways: first, it provides an extended review of evidence on the impact of gatekeeping and provider choice on efficiency, costs, quality, equality and patient empowerment; and second, it empirically analyses regulations and identifies common trends in healthcare reforms in OECD countries since 1990. More than half of the countries analysed have established gatekeeping systems, while a smaller number provides free access to secondary care. The study discovers a trend towards strengthening gatekeeping regulations within free access countries. Free choice of provider is the standard in the OECD, where only a small number of countries restrict provider choice. The article identifies a diverging trend of reforms, with some traditionally restrictive countries offering more provider choice and other countries limiting the choice of providers as a result of managed care reforms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0011392112438333</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CUSOAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Access ; Access to health care ; Choices ; Empowerment ; Equality ; Health Behavior ; Health care ; Health care policy ; Health Care Services ; Health expenditure ; Health services ; Industrialized nations ; Managed Care Services ; OECD ; Policy Making ; Quality control ; Reform ; Regulation ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Current sociology, 2012-07, Vol.60 (4), p.489-505</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Jul 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30418face558d3a60094cddc6177af1ed23df6ccc4cc99b39b6b3a02c0bb39223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30418face558d3a60094cddc6177af1ed23df6ccc4cc99b39b6b3a02c0bb39223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0011392112438333$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0011392112438333$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,33752,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Annandale, Ellen</contributor><contributor>Kuhlmann, Ellen</contributor><creatorcontrib>Reibling, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Claus</creatorcontrib><title>Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems</title><title>Current sociology</title><description>Gatekeeping and provider choice have become central in health policymaking within the last two decades. This article contributes to the debates in two ways: first, it provides an extended review of evidence on the impact of gatekeeping and provider choice on efficiency, costs, quality, equality and patient empowerment; and second, it empirically analyses regulations and identifies common trends in healthcare reforms in OECD countries since 1990. More than half of the countries analysed have established gatekeeping systems, while a smaller number provides free access to secondary care. The study discovers a trend towards strengthening gatekeeping regulations within free access countries. Free choice of provider is the standard in the OECD, where only a small number of countries restrict provider choice. The article identifies a diverging trend of reforms, with some traditionally restrictive countries offering more provider choice and other countries limiting the choice of providers as a result of managed care reforms.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Access to health care</subject><subject>Choices</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Health expenditure</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Managed Care Services</subject><subject>OECD</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Reform</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0011-3921</issn><issn>1461-7064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLw0AQhRdRsFbvHgNevER3dpNN15vUWoVCL3oOm9lJm5omcTcV-u_dUA9SEE_DY755vDeMXQO_A8iye84BpBYAIpETKeUJG0GiIM64Sk7ZaFjHw_6cXXi_CVJo0CP2MDc9fRB1VbOKTGOjzrVflSUX4bqtkKKqiZaz6VO0JlP3azSOIr_3PW39JTsrTe3p6meO2fvz7G36Ei-W89fp4yJGmaV9LHkCk9IgpenESqM41wlaiyqkNiWQFdKWChETRK0LqQtVSMMF8iIIIeSY3R58Q7TPHfk-31Yeqa5NQ-3O56FyKkDzTP-PcqFUloLiAb05QjftzjWhyEAJBUKINFD8QKFrvXdU5p2rtsbtA5QPf8-P_x5O4sOJNyv6bfoH_w1Cwn9-</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Reibling, Nadine</creator><creator>Wendt, Claus</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems</title><author>Reibling, Nadine ; Wendt, Claus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-30418face558d3a60094cddc6177af1ed23df6ccc4cc99b39b6b3a02c0bb39223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Access to health care</topic><topic>Choices</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Health expenditure</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Managed Care Services</topic><topic>OECD</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Reform</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reibling, Nadine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendt, Claus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Current sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reibling, Nadine</au><au>Wendt, Claus</au><au>Annandale, Ellen</au><au>Kuhlmann, Ellen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems</atitle><jtitle>Current sociology</jtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>489</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>489-505</pages><issn>0011-3921</issn><eissn>1461-7064</eissn><coden>CUSOAO</coden><abstract>Gatekeeping and provider choice have become central in health policymaking within the last two decades. This article contributes to the debates in two ways: first, it provides an extended review of evidence on the impact of gatekeeping and provider choice on efficiency, costs, quality, equality and patient empowerment; and second, it empirically analyses regulations and identifies common trends in healthcare reforms in OECD countries since 1990. More than half of the countries analysed have established gatekeeping systems, while a smaller number provides free access to secondary care. The study discovers a trend towards strengthening gatekeeping regulations within free access countries. Free choice of provider is the standard in the OECD, where only a small number of countries restrict provider choice. The article identifies a diverging trend of reforms, with some traditionally restrictive countries offering more provider choice and other countries limiting the choice of providers as a result of managed care reforms.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0011392112438333</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-3921
ispartof Current sociology, 2012-07, Vol.60 (4), p.489-505
issn 0011-3921
1461-7064
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1125219079
source SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Access
Access to health care
Choices
Empowerment
Equality
Health Behavior
Health care
Health care policy
Health Care Services
Health expenditure
Health services
Industrialized nations
Managed Care Services
OECD
Policy Making
Quality control
Reform
Regulation
Studies
title Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A56%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gatekeeping%20and%20provider%20choice%20in%20OECD%20healthcare%20systems&rft.jtitle=Current%20sociology&rft.au=Reibling,%20Nadine&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=489&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=489-505&rft.issn=0011-3921&rft.eissn=1461-7064&rft.coden=CUSOAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0011392112438333&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1026675160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1022612225&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0011392112438333&rfr_iscdi=true