Percutaneous left ventricular assist device with TandemHeart for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The Mayo Clinic experience

Background In patients with poor left ventricular function and severe left main or multivessel coronary disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery has been the preferred therapy. However, a number of these patients are either inoperable or poor surgical candidates due to comorbid condit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2012-11, Vol.80 (5), p.728-734
Hauptverfasser: Alli, Oluseun O., Singh, Inder M., Holmes Jr, David R., Pulido, Juan N., Park, Soon J., Rihal, Charanjit S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 734
container_issue 5
container_start_page 728
container_title Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
container_volume 80
creator Alli, Oluseun O.
Singh, Inder M.
Holmes Jr, David R.
Pulido, Juan N.
Park, Soon J.
Rihal, Charanjit S.
description Background In patients with poor left ventricular function and severe left main or multivessel coronary disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery has been the preferred therapy. However, a number of these patients are either inoperable or poor surgical candidates due to comorbid conditions and previous cardiac surgical procedures. These patients are generally poor candidates for standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques. A hybrid PCI approach with hemodynamic support may be a viable strategy for these patients. We report our experience using the TandemHeart percutaneous left ventricular assist device during high‐risk PCI. Methods Retrospective cross‐sectional analysis of prospectively collected data in 54 patients undergoing high‐risk PCI using the TandemHeart device for support. Hemodynamic and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Results Baseline clinical characteristics were as follows: mean age 72 ± 1.7 years, males 78%, median ejection fraction 20%, mean serum creatinine 1.6 ± 0.3 2 mg/dL, recent myocardial infarction 52%, COPD 33%, previous CABG 50%, diabetes mellitus 41%, and hypertension 83%. The median SYNTAX score was 33, and the median Jeopardy score was 10. The predicted surgical revascularization mortality was 13% by the Society for Thoracic Surgery risk score and 33% by Euroscore. There was a significant decrease in right and left heart pressures (P < 0.05) with a concomitant increase in the cardiac output from 4.7 to 5.7 L/min (P = 0.03) during TandemHeart support. Left main and multivessel PCI was performed in 62% of patients, and rotablation was used in 48%. Procedural success rate was 97%, whereas 30‐day and 6 month survival were 90% and 87%, respectively. Major vascular complications occurred in 13% of cases. None of our patients developed contrast induced nephropathy or needed dialysis. Conclusions High‐risk PCI with percutaneous left ventricular support using TandemHeart is a viable therapeutic strategy for a select subset of patients at very high risk with standard percutaneous revascularization techniques. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ccd.23465
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1115527868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1115527868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3635-cdfe79b75bf022e306952ca07ed69624575f9094c3caae9d329f818541a115693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctO3DAUhq2qqNy66AsgL8si4Etsx-yqcKvEpUgDrbqxPM4JY8gkg50A8wi8dU0zoG66Ol58_6dzfiP0hZI9Sgjbd67aYzyX4gPaoIKxTDH56-PqTXUu19FmjHeEEC2Z_oTWGeOqyAuxgV5-QHBDb1vohogbqHv8CG0fvBsaG7CN0cceV_DoHeAn38_wxLYVzE_Bhh7XXcAzfzvLgo_3ePGvynWha21YYt_2EF6dvmsP8GQG-NwuO1w2vvUOw3NKeWgdbKO12jYRPq_mFro-PpqUp9nZ5cn38ttZ5rjkInNVDUpPlZjWhDHgRGrBnCUKKpmuy4UStSY6d9xZC7riTNcFLUROLaVCar6Fvo7eRegeBoi9mfvooGnGxQ1NmGCqkEVCd0fUhS7GALVZBD9PRxlKzGvzJjVv_jaf2J2VdpjOoXon36pOwP4IPPkGlv83mbI8fFNmYyJ9ATy_J2y4N1JxJczPixNzI8uyVFe_TcH_AO2SnsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1115527868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Percutaneous left ventricular assist device with TandemHeart for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The Mayo Clinic experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Alli, Oluseun O. ; Singh, Inder M. ; Holmes Jr, David R. ; Pulido, Juan N. ; Park, Soon J. ; Rihal, Charanjit S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alli, Oluseun O. ; Singh, Inder M. ; Holmes Jr, David R. ; Pulido, Juan N. ; Park, Soon J. ; Rihal, Charanjit S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background In patients with poor left ventricular function and severe left main or multivessel coronary disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery has been the preferred therapy. However, a number of these patients are either inoperable or poor surgical candidates due to comorbid conditions and previous cardiac surgical procedures. These patients are generally poor candidates for standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques. A hybrid PCI approach with hemodynamic support may be a viable strategy for these patients. We report our experience using the TandemHeart percutaneous left ventricular assist device during high‐risk PCI. Methods Retrospective cross‐sectional analysis of prospectively collected data in 54 patients undergoing high‐risk PCI using the TandemHeart device for support. Hemodynamic and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Results Baseline clinical characteristics were as follows: mean age 72 ± 1.7 years, males 78%, median ejection fraction 20%, mean serum creatinine 1.6 ± 0.3 2 mg/dL, recent myocardial infarction 52%, COPD 33%, previous CABG 50%, diabetes mellitus 41%, and hypertension 83%. The median SYNTAX score was 33, and the median Jeopardy score was 10. The predicted surgical revascularization mortality was 13% by the Society for Thoracic Surgery risk score and 33% by Euroscore. There was a significant decrease in right and left heart pressures (P &lt; 0.05) with a concomitant increase in the cardiac output from 4.7 to 5.7 L/min (P = 0.03) during TandemHeart support. Left main and multivessel PCI was performed in 62% of patients, and rotablation was used in 48%. Procedural success rate was 97%, whereas 30‐day and 6 month survival were 90% and 87%, respectively. Major vascular complications occurred in 13% of cases. None of our patients developed contrast induced nephropathy or needed dialysis. Conclusions High‐risk PCI with percutaneous left ventricular support using TandemHeart is a viable therapeutic strategy for a select subset of patients at very high risk with standard percutaneous revascularization techniques. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.23465</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22378485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Aged ; cardiogenic shock ; Clinical Competence ; coronary artery bypass graft ; Coronary Artery Disease - complications ; Coronary Artery Disease - mortality ; Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology ; Coronary Artery Disease - therapy ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Heart-Assist Devices - adverse effects ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Learning Curve ; left ventricular assist device ; Male ; Minnesota ; multivessel disease ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - mortality ; percutaneous coronary interventions ; Prosthesis Design ; Recovery of Function ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Stroke Volume ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - complications ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - mortality ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy ; Ventricular Function, Left</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2012-11, Vol.80 (5), p.728-734</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3635-cdfe79b75bf022e306952ca07ed69624575f9094c3caae9d329f818541a115693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3635-cdfe79b75bf022e306952ca07ed69624575f9094c3caae9d329f818541a115693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fccd.23465$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fccd.23465$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22378485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alli, Oluseun O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Inder M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes Jr, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulido, Juan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Soon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rihal, Charanjit S.</creatorcontrib><title>Percutaneous left ventricular assist device with TandemHeart for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The Mayo Clinic experience</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent</addtitle><description>Background In patients with poor left ventricular function and severe left main or multivessel coronary disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery has been the preferred therapy. However, a number of these patients are either inoperable or poor surgical candidates due to comorbid conditions and previous cardiac surgical procedures. These patients are generally poor candidates for standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques. A hybrid PCI approach with hemodynamic support may be a viable strategy for these patients. We report our experience using the TandemHeart percutaneous left ventricular assist device during high‐risk PCI. Methods Retrospective cross‐sectional analysis of prospectively collected data in 54 patients undergoing high‐risk PCI using the TandemHeart device for support. Hemodynamic and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Results Baseline clinical characteristics were as follows: mean age 72 ± 1.7 years, males 78%, median ejection fraction 20%, mean serum creatinine 1.6 ± 0.3 2 mg/dL, recent myocardial infarction 52%, COPD 33%, previous CABG 50%, diabetes mellitus 41%, and hypertension 83%. The median SYNTAX score was 33, and the median Jeopardy score was 10. The predicted surgical revascularization mortality was 13% by the Society for Thoracic Surgery risk score and 33% by Euroscore. There was a significant decrease in right and left heart pressures (P &lt; 0.05) with a concomitant increase in the cardiac output from 4.7 to 5.7 L/min (P = 0.03) during TandemHeart support. Left main and multivessel PCI was performed in 62% of patients, and rotablation was used in 48%. Procedural success rate was 97%, whereas 30‐day and 6 month survival were 90% and 87%, respectively. Major vascular complications occurred in 13% of cases. None of our patients developed contrast induced nephropathy or needed dialysis. Conclusions High‐risk PCI with percutaneous left ventricular support using TandemHeart is a viable therapeutic strategy for a select subset of patients at very high risk with standard percutaneous revascularization techniques. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals Inc.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>cardiogenic shock</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>coronary artery bypass graft</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - complications</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - mortality</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart-Assist Devices - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning Curve</subject><subject>left ventricular assist device</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>multivessel disease</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects</subject><subject>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - mortality</subject><subject>percutaneous coronary interventions</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - complications</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - mortality</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctO3DAUhq2qqNy66AsgL8si4Etsx-yqcKvEpUgDrbqxPM4JY8gkg50A8wi8dU0zoG66Ol58_6dzfiP0hZI9Sgjbd67aYzyX4gPaoIKxTDH56-PqTXUu19FmjHeEEC2Z_oTWGeOqyAuxgV5-QHBDb1vohogbqHv8CG0fvBsaG7CN0cceV_DoHeAn38_wxLYVzE_Bhh7XXcAzfzvLgo_3ePGvynWha21YYt_2EF6dvmsP8GQG-NwuO1w2vvUOw3NKeWgdbKO12jYRPq_mFro-PpqUp9nZ5cn38ttZ5rjkInNVDUpPlZjWhDHgRGrBnCUKKpmuy4UStSY6d9xZC7riTNcFLUROLaVCar6Fvo7eRegeBoi9mfvooGnGxQ1NmGCqkEVCd0fUhS7GALVZBD9PRxlKzGvzJjVv_jaf2J2VdpjOoXon36pOwP4IPPkGlv83mbI8fFNmYyJ9ATy_J2y4N1JxJczPixNzI8uyVFe_TcH_AO2SnsQ</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Alli, Oluseun O.</creator><creator>Singh, Inder M.</creator><creator>Holmes Jr, David R.</creator><creator>Pulido, Juan N.</creator><creator>Park, Soon J.</creator><creator>Rihal, Charanjit S.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Percutaneous left ventricular assist device with TandemHeart for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The Mayo Clinic experience</title><author>Alli, Oluseun O. ; Singh, Inder M. ; Holmes Jr, David R. ; Pulido, Juan N. ; Park, Soon J. ; Rihal, Charanjit S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3635-cdfe79b75bf022e306952ca07ed69624575f9094c3caae9d329f818541a115693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>cardiogenic shock</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>coronary artery bypass graft</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - complications</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - mortality</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart-Assist Devices - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning Curve</topic><topic>left ventricular assist device</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>multivessel disease</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects</topic><topic>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - mortality</topic><topic>percutaneous coronary interventions</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - complications</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - mortality</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alli, Oluseun O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Inder M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes Jr, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pulido, Juan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Soon J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rihal, Charanjit S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alli, Oluseun O.</au><au>Singh, Inder M.</au><au>Holmes Jr, David R.</au><au>Pulido, Juan N.</au><au>Park, Soon J.</au><au>Rihal, Charanjit S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Percutaneous left ventricular assist device with TandemHeart for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The Mayo Clinic experience</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>728</spage><epage>734</epage><pages>728-734</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><abstract>Background In patients with poor left ventricular function and severe left main or multivessel coronary disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery has been the preferred therapy. However, a number of these patients are either inoperable or poor surgical candidates due to comorbid conditions and previous cardiac surgical procedures. These patients are generally poor candidates for standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques. A hybrid PCI approach with hemodynamic support may be a viable strategy for these patients. We report our experience using the TandemHeart percutaneous left ventricular assist device during high‐risk PCI. Methods Retrospective cross‐sectional analysis of prospectively collected data in 54 patients undergoing high‐risk PCI using the TandemHeart device for support. Hemodynamic and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Results Baseline clinical characteristics were as follows: mean age 72 ± 1.7 years, males 78%, median ejection fraction 20%, mean serum creatinine 1.6 ± 0.3 2 mg/dL, recent myocardial infarction 52%, COPD 33%, previous CABG 50%, diabetes mellitus 41%, and hypertension 83%. The median SYNTAX score was 33, and the median Jeopardy score was 10. The predicted surgical revascularization mortality was 13% by the Society for Thoracic Surgery risk score and 33% by Euroscore. There was a significant decrease in right and left heart pressures (P &lt; 0.05) with a concomitant increase in the cardiac output from 4.7 to 5.7 L/min (P = 0.03) during TandemHeart support. Left main and multivessel PCI was performed in 62% of patients, and rotablation was used in 48%. Procedural success rate was 97%, whereas 30‐day and 6 month survival were 90% and 87%, respectively. Major vascular complications occurred in 13% of cases. None of our patients developed contrast induced nephropathy or needed dialysis. Conclusions High‐risk PCI with percutaneous left ventricular support using TandemHeart is a viable therapeutic strategy for a select subset of patients at very high risk with standard percutaneous revascularization techniques. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>22378485</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccd.23465</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-1946
ispartof Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2012-11, Vol.80 (5), p.728-734
issn 1522-1946
1522-726X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1115527868
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Aged
cardiogenic shock
Clinical Competence
coronary artery bypass graft
Coronary Artery Disease - complications
Coronary Artery Disease - mortality
Coronary Artery Disease - physiopathology
Coronary Artery Disease - therapy
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Heart-Assist Devices - adverse effects
Hemodynamics
Humans
Learning Curve
left ventricular assist device
Male
Minnesota
multivessel disease
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - adverse effects
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - mortality
percutaneous coronary interventions
Prosthesis Design
Recovery of Function
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Stroke Volume
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - complications
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - mortality
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - therapy
Ventricular Function, Left
title Percutaneous left ventricular assist device with TandemHeart for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: The Mayo Clinic experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A43%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Percutaneous%20left%20ventricular%20assist%20device%20with%20TandemHeart%20for%20high-risk%20percutaneous%20coronary%20intervention:%20The%20Mayo%20Clinic%20experience&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Alli,%20Oluseun%20O.&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=728&rft.epage=734&rft.pages=728-734&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.23465&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1115527868%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1115527868&rft_id=info:pmid/22378485&rfr_iscdi=true