Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review

Abstract Patients with hip fractures are older and often present many co-morbidities, including dementia. These patients cannot answer quality of life questionnaires and are generally excluded from trials. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients are being excluded from these studies an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Injury 2012-12, Vol.43 (12), p.1978-1984
Hauptverfasser: Hebert-Davies, Jonah, Laflamme, G-Yves, Rouleau, Dominique
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1984
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1978
container_title Injury
container_volume 43
creator Hebert-Davies, Jonah
Laflamme, G-Yves
Rouleau, Dominique
description Abstract Patients with hip fractures are older and often present many co-morbidities, including dementia. These patients cannot answer quality of life questionnaires and are generally excluded from trials. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients are being excluded from these studies and this may impact outcomes. This was a two part study; the first analyzing databases of two ongoing large-scale multi-centred hip fracture trials and the second being a systematic review. The FAITH and HEALTH studies were analyzed for exclusion incidence directly related to dementia. The second part consisted of a systematic search of all relevant studies within the last 20 years. In the FAITH study, a total of 1690 subjects were excluded, 375 (22.2%) of which were due to dementia or cognitive impairment. In the HEALTH study, 575 were excluded with dementia/cognitive impairment representing 207 patients (36%). Following the systematic review, 251 articles were identified 17 of which were retained. The overall prevalence of dementia was 27.9% (range 2–51%). Only two studies compared demented and non-demented groups. In these studies significant increases in both mortality and complications were found. In summary, when investigating hip fractures, choosing appropriate objective endpoints is essential to ensure results are also applicable to patients with dementia.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1114952681</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020138312003725</els_id><sourcerecordid>1114952681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-3468ac3c5005820452acc19f93240a3674d650b7f1ed7d1892fe2ae969dbcf73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS0EIkPgDxDykk03VXa_zAI0RLykSCzI3vLY1eCmH4PtTui_x6MJLNiwssq6p0p1irHnCCUCNq-G0s_DGrZSAIoSuhIafMB22LWqANG0D9kOQECBspMX7EmMAwC2IOVjdiGEUgpA7Zh-503kabkzwUXuaKI5efOa7wPx7_7I-2BsWnORgjdj5PTLjqvz87fMLHwy88aPJvlMxbd8z-MWE035w_JAt57unrJHfebo2f17yW4-vL-5-lRcf_n4-Wp_XdhaqFTIqumMlbYGqDsBVS2Mtah6JUUFRjZt5ZoaDm2P5FqHnRI9CUOqUe5g-1Zespfntsew_FwpJj35aGkczUzLGjUiVqoWTYc5Wp2jNiwxBur1MfjJhE0j6JNZPeizWX0yq6HT2WzGXtxPWA8Tub_QH5U58OYcoLxmXj3oaLMXS84Hskm7xf9vwr8N7Ohnb834gzaKw7KGOSvUqGNm9NfTdU_HRQEgW1HL32eqoSk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1114952681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hebert-Davies, Jonah ; Laflamme, G-Yves ; Rouleau, Dominique</creator><creatorcontrib>Hebert-Davies, Jonah ; Laflamme, G-Yves ; Rouleau, Dominique ; HEALTH and FAITH investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Patients with hip fractures are older and often present many co-morbidities, including dementia. These patients cannot answer quality of life questionnaires and are generally excluded from trials. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients are being excluded from these studies and this may impact outcomes. This was a two part study; the first analyzing databases of two ongoing large-scale multi-centred hip fracture trials and the second being a systematic review. The FAITH and HEALTH studies were analyzed for exclusion incidence directly related to dementia. The second part consisted of a systematic search of all relevant studies within the last 20 years. In the FAITH study, a total of 1690 subjects were excluded, 375 (22.2%) of which were due to dementia or cognitive impairment. In the HEALTH study, 575 were excluded with dementia/cognitive impairment representing 207 patients (36%). Following the systematic review, 251 articles were identified 17 of which were retained. The overall prevalence of dementia was 27.9% (range 2–51%). Only two studies compared demented and non-demented groups. In these studies significant increases in both mortality and complications were found. In summary, when investigating hip fractures, choosing appropriate objective endpoints is essential to ensure results are also applicable to patients with dementia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22999009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Australia - epidemiology ; Canada - epidemiology ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology ; Comorbidity ; Dementia ; Dementia - epidemiology ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment ; Geriatrics ; Hip fractures ; Hip Fractures - epidemiology ; Humans ; India - epidemiology ; Male ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Norway - epidemiology ; Orthopedics ; Patient Selection ; Prejudice ; Quality of Life ; Selection Bias ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2012-12, Vol.43 (12), p.1978-1984</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-3468ac3c5005820452acc19f93240a3674d650b7f1ed7d1892fe2ae969dbcf73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-3468ac3c5005820452acc19f93240a3674d650b7f1ed7d1892fe2ae969dbcf73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22999009$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hebert-Davies, Jonah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laflamme, G-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouleau, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEALTH and FAITH investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>Abstract Patients with hip fractures are older and often present many co-morbidities, including dementia. These patients cannot answer quality of life questionnaires and are generally excluded from trials. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients are being excluded from these studies and this may impact outcomes. This was a two part study; the first analyzing databases of two ongoing large-scale multi-centred hip fracture trials and the second being a systematic review. The FAITH and HEALTH studies were analyzed for exclusion incidence directly related to dementia. The second part consisted of a systematic search of all relevant studies within the last 20 years. In the FAITH study, a total of 1690 subjects were excluded, 375 (22.2%) of which were due to dementia or cognitive impairment. In the HEALTH study, 575 were excluded with dementia/cognitive impairment representing 207 patients (36%). Following the systematic review, 251 articles were identified 17 of which were retained. The overall prevalence of dementia was 27.9% (range 2–51%). Only two studies compared demented and non-demented groups. In these studies significant increases in both mortality and complications were found. In summary, when investigating hip fractures, choosing appropriate objective endpoints is essential to ensure results are also applicable to patients with dementia.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Canada - epidemiology</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Hip fractures</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Norway - epidemiology</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Selection Bias</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS0EIkPgDxDykk03VXa_zAI0RLykSCzI3vLY1eCmH4PtTui_x6MJLNiwssq6p0p1irHnCCUCNq-G0s_DGrZSAIoSuhIafMB22LWqANG0D9kOQECBspMX7EmMAwC2IOVjdiGEUgpA7Zh-503kabkzwUXuaKI5efOa7wPx7_7I-2BsWnORgjdj5PTLjqvz87fMLHwy88aPJvlMxbd8z-MWE035w_JAt57unrJHfebo2f17yW4-vL-5-lRcf_n4-Wp_XdhaqFTIqumMlbYGqDsBVS2Mtah6JUUFRjZt5ZoaDm2P5FqHnRI9CUOqUe5g-1Zespfntsew_FwpJj35aGkczUzLGjUiVqoWTYc5Wp2jNiwxBur1MfjJhE0j6JNZPeizWX0yq6HT2WzGXtxPWA8Tub_QH5U58OYcoLxmXj3oaLMXS84Hskm7xf9vwr8N7Ohnb834gzaKw7KGOSvUqGNm9NfTdU_HRQEgW1HL32eqoSk</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Hebert-Davies, Jonah</creator><creator>Laflamme, G-Yves</creator><creator>Rouleau, Dominique</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review</title><author>Hebert-Davies, Jonah ; Laflamme, G-Yves ; Rouleau, Dominique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-3468ac3c5005820452acc19f93240a3674d650b7f1ed7d1892fe2ae969dbcf73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Canada - epidemiology</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Hip fractures</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Norway - epidemiology</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Selection Bias</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hebert-Davies, Jonah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laflamme, G-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouleau, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEALTH and FAITH investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hebert-Davies, Jonah</au><au>Laflamme, G-Yves</au><au>Rouleau, Dominique</au><aucorp>HEALTH and FAITH investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1978</spage><epage>1984</epage><pages>1978-1984</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>Abstract Patients with hip fractures are older and often present many co-morbidities, including dementia. These patients cannot answer quality of life questionnaires and are generally excluded from trials. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients are being excluded from these studies and this may impact outcomes. This was a two part study; the first analyzing databases of two ongoing large-scale multi-centred hip fracture trials and the second being a systematic review. The FAITH and HEALTH studies were analyzed for exclusion incidence directly related to dementia. The second part consisted of a systematic search of all relevant studies within the last 20 years. In the FAITH study, a total of 1690 subjects were excluded, 375 (22.2%) of which were due to dementia or cognitive impairment. In the HEALTH study, 575 were excluded with dementia/cognitive impairment representing 207 patients (36%). Following the systematic review, 251 articles were identified 17 of which were retained. The overall prevalence of dementia was 27.9% (range 2–51%). Only two studies compared demented and non-demented groups. In these studies significant increases in both mortality and complications were found. In summary, when investigating hip fractures, choosing appropriate objective endpoints is essential to ensure results are also applicable to patients with dementia.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22999009</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.061</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1383
ispartof Injury, 2012-12, Vol.43 (12), p.1978-1984
issn 0020-1383
1879-0267
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1114952681
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroscopy - statistics & numerical data
Australia - epidemiology
Canada - epidemiology
Clinical Trials as Topic
Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology
Comorbidity
Dementia
Dementia - epidemiology
Female
Geriatric Assessment
Geriatrics
Hip fractures
Hip Fractures - epidemiology
Humans
India - epidemiology
Male
Netherlands - epidemiology
Norway - epidemiology
Orthopedics
Patient Selection
Prejudice
Quality of Life
Selection Bias
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States - epidemiology
title Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T02%3A19%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bias%20towards%20dementia:%20Are%20hip%20fracture%20trials%20excluding%20too%20many%20patients?%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Hebert-Davies,%20Jonah&rft.aucorp=HEALTH%20and%20FAITH%20investigators&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1978&rft.epage=1984&rft.pages=1978-1984&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1114952681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1114952681&rft_id=info:pmid/22999009&rft_els_id=S0020138312003725&rfr_iscdi=true