Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review
Abstract Patients with hip fractures are older and often present many co-morbidities, including dementia. These patients cannot answer quality of life questionnaires and are generally excluded from trials. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients are being excluded from these studies an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Injury 2012-12, Vol.43 (12), p.1978-1984 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1984 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1978 |
container_title | Injury |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Hebert-Davies, Jonah Laflamme, G-Yves Rouleau, Dominique |
description | Abstract Patients with hip fractures are older and often present many co-morbidities, including dementia. These patients cannot answer quality of life questionnaires and are generally excluded from trials. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients are being excluded from these studies and this may impact outcomes. This was a two part study; the first analyzing databases of two ongoing large-scale multi-centred hip fracture trials and the second being a systematic review. The FAITH and HEALTH studies were analyzed for exclusion incidence directly related to dementia. The second part consisted of a systematic search of all relevant studies within the last 20 years. In the FAITH study, a total of 1690 subjects were excluded, 375 (22.2%) of which were due to dementia or cognitive impairment. In the HEALTH study, 575 were excluded with dementia/cognitive impairment representing 207 patients (36%). Following the systematic review, 251 articles were identified 17 of which were retained. The overall prevalence of dementia was 27.9% (range 2–51%). Only two studies compared demented and non-demented groups. In these studies significant increases in both mortality and complications were found. In summary, when investigating hip fractures, choosing appropriate objective endpoints is essential to ensure results are also applicable to patients with dementia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.061 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1114952681</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020138312003725</els_id><sourcerecordid>1114952681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-3468ac3c5005820452acc19f93240a3674d650b7f1ed7d1892fe2ae969dbcf73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS0EIkPgDxDykk03VXa_zAI0RLykSCzI3vLY1eCmH4PtTui_x6MJLNiwssq6p0p1irHnCCUCNq-G0s_DGrZSAIoSuhIafMB22LWqANG0D9kOQECBspMX7EmMAwC2IOVjdiGEUgpA7Zh-503kabkzwUXuaKI5efOa7wPx7_7I-2BsWnORgjdj5PTLjqvz87fMLHwy88aPJvlMxbd8z-MWE035w_JAt57unrJHfebo2f17yW4-vL-5-lRcf_n4-Wp_XdhaqFTIqumMlbYGqDsBVS2Mtah6JUUFRjZt5ZoaDm2P5FqHnRI9CUOqUe5g-1Zespfntsew_FwpJj35aGkczUzLGjUiVqoWTYc5Wp2jNiwxBur1MfjJhE0j6JNZPeizWX0yq6HT2WzGXtxPWA8Tub_QH5U58OYcoLxmXj3oaLMXS84Hskm7xf9vwr8N7Ohnb834gzaKw7KGOSvUqGNm9NfTdU_HRQEgW1HL32eqoSk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1114952681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hebert-Davies, Jonah ; Laflamme, G-Yves ; Rouleau, Dominique</creator><creatorcontrib>Hebert-Davies, Jonah ; Laflamme, G-Yves ; Rouleau, Dominique ; HEALTH and FAITH investigators</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Patients with hip fractures are older and often present many co-morbidities, including dementia. These patients cannot answer quality of life questionnaires and are generally excluded from trials. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients are being excluded from these studies and this may impact outcomes. This was a two part study; the first analyzing databases of two ongoing large-scale multi-centred hip fracture trials and the second being a systematic review. The FAITH and HEALTH studies were analyzed for exclusion incidence directly related to dementia. The second part consisted of a systematic search of all relevant studies within the last 20 years. In the FAITH study, a total of 1690 subjects were excluded, 375 (22.2%) of which were due to dementia or cognitive impairment. In the HEALTH study, 575 were excluded with dementia/cognitive impairment representing 207 patients (36%). Following the systematic review, 251 articles were identified 17 of which were retained. The overall prevalence of dementia was 27.9% (range 2–51%). Only two studies compared demented and non-demented groups. In these studies significant increases in both mortality and complications were found. In summary, when investigating hip fractures, choosing appropriate objective endpoints is essential to ensure results are also applicable to patients with dementia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0267</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22999009</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroscopy - statistics & numerical data ; Australia - epidemiology ; Canada - epidemiology ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology ; Comorbidity ; Dementia ; Dementia - epidemiology ; Female ; Geriatric Assessment ; Geriatrics ; Hip fractures ; Hip Fractures - epidemiology ; Humans ; India - epidemiology ; Male ; Netherlands - epidemiology ; Norway - epidemiology ; Orthopedics ; Patient Selection ; Prejudice ; Quality of Life ; Selection Bias ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Injury, 2012-12, Vol.43 (12), p.1978-1984</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-3468ac3c5005820452acc19f93240a3674d650b7f1ed7d1892fe2ae969dbcf73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-3468ac3c5005820452acc19f93240a3674d650b7f1ed7d1892fe2ae969dbcf73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22999009$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hebert-Davies, Jonah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laflamme, G-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouleau, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEALTH and FAITH investigators</creatorcontrib><title>Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review</title><title>Injury</title><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><description>Abstract Patients with hip fractures are older and often present many co-morbidities, including dementia. These patients cannot answer quality of life questionnaires and are generally excluded from trials. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients are being excluded from these studies and this may impact outcomes. This was a two part study; the first analyzing databases of two ongoing large-scale multi-centred hip fracture trials and the second being a systematic review. The FAITH and HEALTH studies were analyzed for exclusion incidence directly related to dementia. The second part consisted of a systematic search of all relevant studies within the last 20 years. In the FAITH study, a total of 1690 subjects were excluded, 375 (22.2%) of which were due to dementia or cognitive impairment. In the HEALTH study, 575 were excluded with dementia/cognitive impairment representing 207 patients (36%). Following the systematic review, 251 articles were identified 17 of which were retained. The overall prevalence of dementia was 27.9% (range 2–51%). Only two studies compared demented and non-demented groups. In these studies significant increases in both mortality and complications were found. In summary, when investigating hip fractures, choosing appropriate objective endpoints is essential to ensure results are also applicable to patients with dementia.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Canada - epidemiology</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric Assessment</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Hip fractures</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Netherlands - epidemiology</subject><subject>Norway - epidemiology</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Selection Bias</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0020-1383</issn><issn>1879-0267</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS0EIkPgDxDykk03VXa_zAI0RLykSCzI3vLY1eCmH4PtTui_x6MJLNiwssq6p0p1irHnCCUCNq-G0s_DGrZSAIoSuhIafMB22LWqANG0D9kOQECBspMX7EmMAwC2IOVjdiGEUgpA7Zh-503kabkzwUXuaKI5efOa7wPx7_7I-2BsWnORgjdj5PTLjqvz87fMLHwy88aPJvlMxbd8z-MWE035w_JAt57unrJHfebo2f17yW4-vL-5-lRcf_n4-Wp_XdhaqFTIqumMlbYGqDsBVS2Mtah6JUUFRjZt5ZoaDm2P5FqHnRI9CUOqUe5g-1Zespfntsew_FwpJj35aGkczUzLGjUiVqoWTYc5Wp2jNiwxBur1MfjJhE0j6JNZPeizWX0yq6HT2WzGXtxPWA8Tub_QH5U58OYcoLxmXj3oaLMXS84Hskm7xf9vwr8N7Ohnb834gzaKw7KGOSvUqGNm9NfTdU_HRQEgW1HL32eqoSk</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Hebert-Davies, Jonah</creator><creator>Laflamme, G-Yves</creator><creator>Rouleau, Dominique</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review</title><author>Hebert-Davies, Jonah ; Laflamme, G-Yves ; Rouleau, Dominique</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-3468ac3c5005820452acc19f93240a3674d650b7f1ed7d1892fe2ae969dbcf73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Canada - epidemiology</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric Assessment</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Hip fractures</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Netherlands - epidemiology</topic><topic>Norway - epidemiology</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Selection Bias</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hebert-Davies, Jonah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laflamme, G-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouleau, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEALTH and FAITH investigators</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Injury</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hebert-Davies, Jonah</au><au>Laflamme, G-Yves</au><au>Rouleau, Dominique</au><aucorp>HEALTH and FAITH investigators</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Injury</jtitle><addtitle>Injury</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1978</spage><epage>1984</epage><pages>1978-1984</pages><issn>0020-1383</issn><eissn>1879-0267</eissn><abstract>Abstract Patients with hip fractures are older and often present many co-morbidities, including dementia. These patients cannot answer quality of life questionnaires and are generally excluded from trials. We hypothesized that a significant number of patients are being excluded from these studies and this may impact outcomes. This was a two part study; the first analyzing databases of two ongoing large-scale multi-centred hip fracture trials and the second being a systematic review. The FAITH and HEALTH studies were analyzed for exclusion incidence directly related to dementia. The second part consisted of a systematic search of all relevant studies within the last 20 years. In the FAITH study, a total of 1690 subjects were excluded, 375 (22.2%) of which were due to dementia or cognitive impairment. In the HEALTH study, 575 were excluded with dementia/cognitive impairment representing 207 patients (36%). Following the systematic review, 251 articles were identified 17 of which were retained. The overall prevalence of dementia was 27.9% (range 2–51%). Only two studies compared demented and non-demented groups. In these studies significant increases in both mortality and complications were found. In summary, when investigating hip fractures, choosing appropriate objective endpoints is essential to ensure results are also applicable to patients with dementia.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22999009</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.061</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-1383 |
ispartof | Injury, 2012-12, Vol.43 (12), p.1978-1984 |
issn | 0020-1383 1879-0267 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1114952681 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Arthroscopy - statistics & numerical data Australia - epidemiology Canada - epidemiology Clinical Trials as Topic Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology Comorbidity Dementia Dementia - epidemiology Female Geriatric Assessment Geriatrics Hip fractures Hip Fractures - epidemiology Humans India - epidemiology Male Netherlands - epidemiology Norway - epidemiology Orthopedics Patient Selection Prejudice Quality of Life Selection Bias Surveys and Questionnaires United States - epidemiology |
title | Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T02%3A19%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bias%20towards%20dementia:%20Are%20hip%20fracture%20trials%20excluding%20too%20many%20patients?%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Injury&rft.au=Hebert-Davies,%20Jonah&rft.aucorp=HEALTH%20and%20FAITH%20investigators&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1978&rft.epage=1984&rft.pages=1978-1984&rft.issn=0020-1383&rft.eissn=1879-0267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1114952681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1114952681&rft_id=info:pmid/22999009&rft_els_id=S0020138312003725&rfr_iscdi=true |