The effects of arm elevation on the 3-dimensional acromiohumeral distance: a biplane fluoroscopy study with normative data

Hypothesis and background Narrowing of the subacromial space has been implicated in several shoulder pathologies. However, the location of the minimum distance points during clinical testing has not been defined. We sought to measure the in vivo minimum distance and location of the minimum distance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2012-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1593-1600
Hauptverfasser: Giphart, J. Erik, PhD, van der Meijden, Olivier A.J., MD, Millett, Peter J., MD, MSc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1600
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1593
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 21
creator Giphart, J. Erik, PhD
van der Meijden, Olivier A.J., MD
Millett, Peter J., MD, MSc
description Hypothesis and background Narrowing of the subacromial space has been implicated in several shoulder pathologies. However, the location of the minimum distance points during clinical testing has not been defined. We sought to measure the in vivo minimum distance and location of the minimum distance points on the acromion and proximal humerus during arm elevation. Methods Eight healthy male subjects (mean age, 30 years) underwent a dynamic in vivo biplane fluoroscopy assessment of scaption and forward elevation. For each frame, the 3-dimensional position and orientation of the humerus and scapula were determined, and the acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was measured as the shortest distance between the acromion and proximal humerus. Results The minimum AHD was 2.6 ± 0.8 mm during scaption and 1.8 ± 1.2 mm during forward flexion at elevation angles of 83° ± 13° and 97° ± 23°, respectively. The minimum distance point was located on the articular surface of the humeral head from the neutral arm position until 34° ± 8° for scaption and 36° ± 6° for forward flexion. Upon further elevation, the minimum distance point was located within the footprint of the supraspinatus muscle until 72° ± 12° for scaption and 65° ± 8° for forward flexion. At greater elevation angles, the minimum distance points were between the acromion and the proximal humeral shaft, distal from the greater tuberosity. Conclusions The shortest AHD was at approximately 90° of arm elevation. The AHD was no longer measured intra-articularly or within the supraspinatus footprint above approximately 70° of arm elevation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1114695867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274611005829</els_id><sourcerecordid>1114695867</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8f26240a20676211dc3039983e332ee6af63e7aa153aa3cf560ea4d13b3661ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Ul2r1DAQLaJ4P_QH-CJ5EXzpmo82bRUEuXhVuOCD1-cwm07Y1LZZk3Rl_fVO2VXBByGQSXLOycyZKYpngm8EF_rVsBkSbiQXYkOLS_WguBS1kqWuOX9IMa_bUjaVviiuUho4513F5ePiQkqlRSPay-Ln_Q4ZOoc2JxYcgzgxHPEA2YeZ0cr0rsreTzgnuoKRgY1h8mG3TBjp2PuUYbb4mgHb-v0IMzI3LiGGZMP-yFJe-iP74fOOzSFOJHxA1kOGJ8UjB2PCp-f9uvh6-_7-5mN59_nDp5t3d6WtVJvL1kktKw6S60ZLIXqruOq6VqFSElGD0wobACocQFlXa45Q9UJtldbCorouXp509zF8XzBlM_lkcVwzDUsyQohKd3WrG4KKE5RKTCmiM_voJ4hHI7hZLTeDIcvNajnxDFlOnOdn-WU7Yf-H8dtjArw4AyBZGF0kt3z6i9N112i9Cr054ZDMOHiMJlmP5GzvI7XH9MH_N423_7Dt6GdPH37DI6YhLJGaR9WaJA03X9bZWEdDCL5GnfoFAQe0Iw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1114695867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of arm elevation on the 3-dimensional acromiohumeral distance: a biplane fluoroscopy study with normative data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Giphart, J. Erik, PhD ; van der Meijden, Olivier A.J., MD ; Millett, Peter J., MD, MSc</creator><creatorcontrib>Giphart, J. Erik, PhD ; van der Meijden, Olivier A.J., MD ; Millett, Peter J., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><description>Hypothesis and background Narrowing of the subacromial space has been implicated in several shoulder pathologies. However, the location of the minimum distance points during clinical testing has not been defined. We sought to measure the in vivo minimum distance and location of the minimum distance points on the acromion and proximal humerus during arm elevation. Methods Eight healthy male subjects (mean age, 30 years) underwent a dynamic in vivo biplane fluoroscopy assessment of scaption and forward elevation. For each frame, the 3-dimensional position and orientation of the humerus and scapula were determined, and the acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was measured as the shortest distance between the acromion and proximal humerus. Results The minimum AHD was 2.6 ± 0.8 mm during scaption and 1.8 ± 1.2 mm during forward flexion at elevation angles of 83° ± 13° and 97° ± 23°, respectively. The minimum distance point was located on the articular surface of the humeral head from the neutral arm position until 34° ± 8° for scaption and 36° ± 6° for forward flexion. Upon further elevation, the minimum distance point was located within the footprint of the supraspinatus muscle until 72° ± 12° for scaption and 65° ± 8° for forward flexion. At greater elevation angles, the minimum distance points were between the acromion and the proximal humeral shaft, distal from the greater tuberosity. Conclusions The shortest AHD was at approximately 90° of arm elevation. The AHD was no longer measured intra-articularly or within the supraspinatus footprint above approximately 70° of arm elevation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22361718</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Acromion - diagnostic imaging ; Adult ; Arm - diagnostic imaging ; Arm - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; biplane fluoroscopy ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Fluoroscopy - methods ; Humans ; Humerus - diagnostic imaging ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; kinematics ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Orthopedics ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reference Values ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rotator Cuff - diagnostic imaging ; Rotator Cuff - physiopathology ; Shoulder ; Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - diagnostic imaging ; Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - physiopathology ; Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging ; subacromial space</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2012-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1593-1600</ispartof><rights>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8f26240a20676211dc3039983e332ee6af63e7aa153aa3cf560ea4d13b3661ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8f26240a20676211dc3039983e332ee6af63e7aa153aa3cf560ea4d13b3661ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26597663$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22361718$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giphart, J. Erik, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meijden, Olivier A.J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millett, Peter J., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of arm elevation on the 3-dimensional acromiohumeral distance: a biplane fluoroscopy study with normative data</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Hypothesis and background Narrowing of the subacromial space has been implicated in several shoulder pathologies. However, the location of the minimum distance points during clinical testing has not been defined. We sought to measure the in vivo minimum distance and location of the minimum distance points on the acromion and proximal humerus during arm elevation. Methods Eight healthy male subjects (mean age, 30 years) underwent a dynamic in vivo biplane fluoroscopy assessment of scaption and forward elevation. For each frame, the 3-dimensional position and orientation of the humerus and scapula were determined, and the acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was measured as the shortest distance between the acromion and proximal humerus. Results The minimum AHD was 2.6 ± 0.8 mm during scaption and 1.8 ± 1.2 mm during forward flexion at elevation angles of 83° ± 13° and 97° ± 23°, respectively. The minimum distance point was located on the articular surface of the humeral head from the neutral arm position until 34° ± 8° for scaption and 36° ± 6° for forward flexion. Upon further elevation, the minimum distance point was located within the footprint of the supraspinatus muscle until 72° ± 12° for scaption and 65° ± 8° for forward flexion. At greater elevation angles, the minimum distance points were between the acromion and the proximal humeral shaft, distal from the greater tuberosity. Conclusions The shortest AHD was at approximately 90° of arm elevation. The AHD was no longer measured intra-articularly or within the supraspinatus footprint above approximately 70° of arm elevation.</description><subject>Acromion - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Arm - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>biplane fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humerus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>kinematics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>subacromial space</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Ul2r1DAQLaJ4P_QH-CJ5EXzpmo82bRUEuXhVuOCD1-cwm07Y1LZZk3Rl_fVO2VXBByGQSXLOycyZKYpngm8EF_rVsBkSbiQXYkOLS_WguBS1kqWuOX9IMa_bUjaVviiuUho4513F5ePiQkqlRSPay-Ln_Q4ZOoc2JxYcgzgxHPEA2YeZ0cr0rsreTzgnuoKRgY1h8mG3TBjp2PuUYbb4mgHb-v0IMzI3LiGGZMP-yFJe-iP74fOOzSFOJHxA1kOGJ8UjB2PCp-f9uvh6-_7-5mN59_nDp5t3d6WtVJvL1kktKw6S60ZLIXqruOq6VqFSElGD0wobACocQFlXa45Q9UJtldbCorouXp509zF8XzBlM_lkcVwzDUsyQohKd3WrG4KKE5RKTCmiM_voJ4hHI7hZLTeDIcvNajnxDFlOnOdn-WU7Yf-H8dtjArw4AyBZGF0kt3z6i9N112i9Cr054ZDMOHiMJlmP5GzvI7XH9MH_N423_7Dt6GdPH37DI6YhLJGaR9WaJA03X9bZWEdDCL5GnfoFAQe0Iw</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Giphart, J. Erik, PhD</creator><creator>van der Meijden, Olivier A.J., MD</creator><creator>Millett, Peter J., MD, MSc</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>The effects of arm elevation on the 3-dimensional acromiohumeral distance: a biplane fluoroscopy study with normative data</title><author>Giphart, J. Erik, PhD ; van der Meijden, Olivier A.J., MD ; Millett, Peter J., MD, MSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-8f26240a20676211dc3039983e332ee6af63e7aa153aa3cf560ea4d13b3661ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Acromion - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Arm - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>biplane fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humerus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>kinematics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>subacromial space</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giphart, J. Erik, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Meijden, Olivier A.J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millett, Peter J., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giphart, J. Erik, PhD</au><au>van der Meijden, Olivier A.J., MD</au><au>Millett, Peter J., MD, MSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of arm elevation on the 3-dimensional acromiohumeral distance: a biplane fluoroscopy study with normative data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1593</spage><epage>1600</epage><pages>1593-1600</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Hypothesis and background Narrowing of the subacromial space has been implicated in several shoulder pathologies. However, the location of the minimum distance points during clinical testing has not been defined. We sought to measure the in vivo minimum distance and location of the minimum distance points on the acromion and proximal humerus during arm elevation. Methods Eight healthy male subjects (mean age, 30 years) underwent a dynamic in vivo biplane fluoroscopy assessment of scaption and forward elevation. For each frame, the 3-dimensional position and orientation of the humerus and scapula were determined, and the acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was measured as the shortest distance between the acromion and proximal humerus. Results The minimum AHD was 2.6 ± 0.8 mm during scaption and 1.8 ± 1.2 mm during forward flexion at elevation angles of 83° ± 13° and 97° ± 23°, respectively. The minimum distance point was located on the articular surface of the humeral head from the neutral arm position until 34° ± 8° for scaption and 36° ± 6° for forward flexion. Upon further elevation, the minimum distance point was located within the footprint of the supraspinatus muscle until 72° ± 12° for scaption and 65° ± 8° for forward flexion. At greater elevation angles, the minimum distance points were between the acromion and the proximal humeral shaft, distal from the greater tuberosity. Conclusions The shortest AHD was at approximately 90° of arm elevation. The AHD was no longer measured intra-articularly or within the supraspinatus footprint above approximately 70° of arm elevation.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22361718</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.023</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2012-11, Vol.21 (11), p.1593-1600
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1114695867
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Acromion - diagnostic imaging
Adult
Arm - diagnostic imaging
Arm - physiopathology
Biological and medical sciences
Biomechanical Phenomena
biplane fluoroscopy
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Fluoroscopy - methods
Humans
Humerus - diagnostic imaging
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
kinematics
Male
Medical sciences
Orthopedics
Range of Motion, Articular
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Rotator Cuff - diagnostic imaging
Rotator Cuff - physiopathology
Shoulder
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - diagnostic imaging
Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - physiopathology
Shoulder Joint - diagnostic imaging
subacromial space
title The effects of arm elevation on the 3-dimensional acromiohumeral distance: a biplane fluoroscopy study with normative data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A24%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20arm%20elevation%20on%20the%203-dimensional%20acromiohumeral%20distance:%20a%20biplane%20fluoroscopy%20study%20with%20normative%20data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Giphart,%20J.%20Erik,%20PhD&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1593&rft.epage=1600&rft.pages=1593-1600&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1114695867%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1114695867&rft_id=info:pmid/22361718&rft_els_id=S1058274611005829&rfr_iscdi=true