The effectiveness of a new, coping flexibility intervention as compared with a cognitive-behavioural intervention in managing work stress

In typical stress management programmes, working adults acquire various coping skills for managing work stress. In addition to building coping skills, we propose the inclusion of a "meta skill" of coping flexibility, which helps individuals to recognize the distinctions among the coping re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Work and stress 2012-07, Vol.26 (3), p.272-288
Hauptverfasser: Cheng, Cecilia, Kogan, Aleksandr, Chio, Jasmine Hin-man
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 288
container_issue 3
container_start_page 272
container_title Work and stress
container_volume 26
creator Cheng, Cecilia
Kogan, Aleksandr
Chio, Jasmine Hin-man
description In typical stress management programmes, working adults acquire various coping skills for managing work stress. In addition to building coping skills, we propose the inclusion of a "meta skill" of coping flexibility, which helps individuals to recognize the distinctions among the coping requirements of diverse stressful events and to facilitate employment of appropriate skills for handling the specific demands of those events. Our study tested this proposal by comparing the efficacy of a new coping flexibility intervention with that of a commonly adopted cognitive-behavioural intervention in reducing depression. We randomly assigned 161 healthy Chinese working adults (55 men, 106 women, M age =32 years) to (1) attend a coping flexibility intervention for acquiring both coping skills and coping flexibility, (2) attend a cognitive-behavioural intervention for acquiring coping skills only, or (3) a waiting list to receive an intervention after the study had been completed. Participants were followed up four months later. Those who had attended the coping flexibility intervention reported the largest increase in levels of coping flexibility, and such an increase corresponded to a reduction in depression immediately and four months after the intervention. These results indicate the value of teaching individuals to adapt their coping strategies to specific requirements of stressful situations.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/02678373.2012.710369
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1113218233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1113218233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e0d1abf9f3e59535b58035a1b1054594d1fc8f2dca590ab2538614211e0d32bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1qGzEUhYfSQt00b9CFoBS66Dj6HY9WpYT-QSCbZC3uaCRbqUZyJTmOHyFvHQ1OCu2iZKXN953D1WmadwQvCe7xGabdqmcrtqSY0OWKYNbJF82C8I63gjHxslnMSDszr5s3Od9gjDmXZNHcX20MMtYaXdytCSZnFC0CFMz-E9Jx68IaWW_u3OC8KwfkQjGpgsXFgCBXZNpCMiPau7Kpno7r4OaodjAbuHVxl8D_bbmAJgiwnqP3Mf1CuaTa-7Z5ZcFnc_r4njTX375enf9oLy6__zz_ctHqek5pDR4JDFZaZoQUTAyix0wAGQgWXEg-Eqt7S0cNQmIYqGB9RzglpIqMDpadNB-PudsUf-9MLmpyWRvvIZi4y4rQrgqC0tUzUIZFL6R8BkoIo6SnjFX0_T_oTf2lUG9Wdbme1WpBK8WPlE4x52Ss2iY3QTpUSM2rq6fV1by6Oq5etQ-P4ZA1eJsgaJf_uLRjAkvMK_f5yLlgY5qgDuFHVeDgY3qS2H-bHgBJXMD5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038352252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effectiveness of a new, coping flexibility intervention as compared with a cognitive-behavioural intervention in managing work stress</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Cheng, Cecilia ; Kogan, Aleksandr ; Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Cecilia ; Kogan, Aleksandr ; Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</creatorcontrib><description>In typical stress management programmes, working adults acquire various coping skills for managing work stress. In addition to building coping skills, we propose the inclusion of a "meta skill" of coping flexibility, which helps individuals to recognize the distinctions among the coping requirements of diverse stressful events and to facilitate employment of appropriate skills for handling the specific demands of those events. Our study tested this proposal by comparing the efficacy of a new coping flexibility intervention with that of a commonly adopted cognitive-behavioural intervention in reducing depression. We randomly assigned 161 healthy Chinese working adults (55 men, 106 women, M age =32 years) to (1) attend a coping flexibility intervention for acquiring both coping skills and coping flexibility, (2) attend a cognitive-behavioural intervention for acquiring coping skills only, or (3) a waiting list to receive an intervention after the study had been completed. Participants were followed up four months later. Those who had attended the coping flexibility intervention reported the largest increase in levels of coping flexibility, and such an increase corresponded to a reduction in depression immediately and four months after the intervention. These results indicate the value of teaching individuals to adapt their coping strategies to specific requirements of stressful situations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-8373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5335</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2012.710369</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WOSTEH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Adjustment ; Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy ; Behavioural psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; China ; Cognitive psychology ; Cognitive therapy ; cognitive-behavioural ; Comparative analysis ; Coping ; Coping flexibility ; Depression ; Depression (Psychology) ; Employment ; Flexibility ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Intervention ; Interventionism ; Management ; Medical sciences ; Mental stress ; Occupational health ; Occupational psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Skills ; Stress ; Stress management ; Survival strategy ; Treatments ; Values ; Work condition. Job performance. Stress ; Work environment ; Work Skills ; work-related stress ; Working conditions ; Working Women</subject><ispartof>Work and stress, 2012-07, Vol.26 (3), p.272-288</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e0d1abf9f3e59535b58035a1b1054594d1fc8f2dca590ab2538614211e0d32bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e0d1abf9f3e59535b58035a1b1054594d1fc8f2dca590ab2538614211e0d32bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26350904$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogan, Aleksandr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</creatorcontrib><title>The effectiveness of a new, coping flexibility intervention as compared with a cognitive-behavioural intervention in managing work stress</title><title>Work and stress</title><description>In typical stress management programmes, working adults acquire various coping skills for managing work stress. In addition to building coping skills, we propose the inclusion of a "meta skill" of coping flexibility, which helps individuals to recognize the distinctions among the coping requirements of diverse stressful events and to facilitate employment of appropriate skills for handling the specific demands of those events. Our study tested this proposal by comparing the efficacy of a new coping flexibility intervention with that of a commonly adopted cognitive-behavioural intervention in reducing depression. We randomly assigned 161 healthy Chinese working adults (55 men, 106 women, M age =32 years) to (1) attend a coping flexibility intervention for acquiring both coping skills and coping flexibility, (2) attend a cognitive-behavioural intervention for acquiring coping skills only, or (3) a waiting list to receive an intervention after the study had been completed. Participants were followed up four months later. Those who had attended the coping flexibility intervention reported the largest increase in levels of coping flexibility, and such an increase corresponded to a reduction in depression immediately and four months after the intervention. These results indicate the value of teaching individuals to adapt their coping strategies to specific requirements of stressful situations.</description><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>Behavioural psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>cognitive-behavioural</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Coping flexibility</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depression (Psychology)</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interventionism</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental stress</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress management</subject><subject>Survival strategy</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Work condition. Job performance. Stress</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Work Skills</subject><subject>work-related stress</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><subject>Working Women</subject><issn>0267-8373</issn><issn>1464-5335</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1qGzEUhYfSQt00b9CFoBS66Dj6HY9WpYT-QSCbZC3uaCRbqUZyJTmOHyFvHQ1OCu2iZKXN953D1WmadwQvCe7xGabdqmcrtqSY0OWKYNbJF82C8I63gjHxslnMSDszr5s3Od9gjDmXZNHcX20MMtYaXdytCSZnFC0CFMz-E9Jx68IaWW_u3OC8KwfkQjGpgsXFgCBXZNpCMiPau7Kpno7r4OaodjAbuHVxl8D_bbmAJgiwnqP3Mf1CuaTa-7Z5ZcFnc_r4njTX375enf9oLy6__zz_ctHqek5pDR4JDFZaZoQUTAyix0wAGQgWXEg-Eqt7S0cNQmIYqGB9RzglpIqMDpadNB-PudsUf-9MLmpyWRvvIZi4y4rQrgqC0tUzUIZFL6R8BkoIo6SnjFX0_T_oTf2lUG9Wdbme1WpBK8WPlE4x52Ss2iY3QTpUSM2rq6fV1by6Oq5etQ-P4ZA1eJsgaJf_uLRjAkvMK_f5yLlgY5qgDuFHVeDgY3qS2H-bHgBJXMD5</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Cheng, Cecilia</creator><creator>Kogan, Aleksandr</creator><creator>Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>The effectiveness of a new, coping flexibility intervention as compared with a cognitive-behavioural intervention in managing work stress</title><author>Cheng, Cecilia ; Kogan, Aleksandr ; Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e0d1abf9f3e59535b58035a1b1054594d1fc8f2dca590ab2538614211e0d32bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>Behavioural psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>cognitive-behavioural</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Coping flexibility</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depression (Psychology)</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interventionism</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental stress</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress management</topic><topic>Survival strategy</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Work condition. Job performance. Stress</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Work Skills</topic><topic>work-related stress</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><topic>Working Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogan, Aleksandr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Work and stress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Cecilia</au><au>Kogan, Aleksandr</au><au>Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effectiveness of a new, coping flexibility intervention as compared with a cognitive-behavioural intervention in managing work stress</atitle><jtitle>Work and stress</jtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>272</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>272-288</pages><issn>0267-8373</issn><eissn>1464-5335</eissn><coden>WOSTEH</coden><abstract>In typical stress management programmes, working adults acquire various coping skills for managing work stress. In addition to building coping skills, we propose the inclusion of a "meta skill" of coping flexibility, which helps individuals to recognize the distinctions among the coping requirements of diverse stressful events and to facilitate employment of appropriate skills for handling the specific demands of those events. Our study tested this proposal by comparing the efficacy of a new coping flexibility intervention with that of a commonly adopted cognitive-behavioural intervention in reducing depression. We randomly assigned 161 healthy Chinese working adults (55 men, 106 women, M age =32 years) to (1) attend a coping flexibility intervention for acquiring both coping skills and coping flexibility, (2) attend a cognitive-behavioural intervention for acquiring coping skills only, or (3) a waiting list to receive an intervention after the study had been completed. Participants were followed up four months later. Those who had attended the coping flexibility intervention reported the largest increase in levels of coping flexibility, and such an increase corresponded to a reduction in depression immediately and four months after the intervention. These results indicate the value of teaching individuals to adapt their coping strategies to specific requirements of stressful situations.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/02678373.2012.710369</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0267-8373
ispartof Work and stress, 2012-07, Vol.26 (3), p.272-288
issn 0267-8373
1464-5335
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1113218233
source Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adjustment
Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy
Behavioural psychology
Biological and medical sciences
China
Cognitive psychology
Cognitive therapy
cognitive-behavioural
Comparative analysis
Coping
Coping flexibility
Depression
Depression (Psychology)
Employment
Flexibility
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Intervention
Interventionism
Management
Medical sciences
Mental stress
Occupational health
Occupational psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Skills
Stress
Stress management
Survival strategy
Treatments
Values
Work condition. Job performance. Stress
Work environment
Work Skills
work-related stress
Working conditions
Working Women
title The effectiveness of a new, coping flexibility intervention as compared with a cognitive-behavioural intervention in managing work stress
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A20%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effectiveness%20of%20a%20new,%20coping%20flexibility%20intervention%20as%20compared%20with%20a%20cognitive-behavioural%20intervention%20in%20managing%20work%20stress&rft.jtitle=Work%20and%20stress&rft.au=Cheng,%20Cecilia&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=272&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=272-288&rft.issn=0267-8373&rft.eissn=1464-5335&rft.coden=WOSTEH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02678373.2012.710369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1113218233%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038352252&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true