The effectiveness of a new, coping flexibility intervention as compared with a cognitive-behavioural intervention in managing work stress
In typical stress management programmes, working adults acquire various coping skills for managing work stress. In addition to building coping skills, we propose the inclusion of a "meta skill" of coping flexibility, which helps individuals to recognize the distinctions among the coping re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Work and stress 2012-07, Vol.26 (3), p.272-288 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 288 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 272 |
container_title | Work and stress |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Cheng, Cecilia Kogan, Aleksandr Chio, Jasmine Hin-man |
description | In typical stress management programmes, working adults acquire various coping skills for managing work stress. In addition to building coping skills, we propose the inclusion of a "meta skill" of coping flexibility, which helps individuals to recognize the distinctions among the coping requirements of diverse stressful events and to facilitate employment of appropriate skills for handling the specific demands of those events. Our study tested this proposal by comparing the efficacy of a new coping flexibility intervention with that of a commonly adopted cognitive-behavioural intervention in reducing depression. We randomly assigned 161 healthy Chinese working adults (55 men, 106 women, M
age
=32 years) to (1) attend a coping flexibility intervention for acquiring both coping skills and coping flexibility, (2) attend a cognitive-behavioural intervention for acquiring coping skills only, or (3) a waiting list to receive an intervention after the study had been completed. Participants were followed up four months later. Those who had attended the coping flexibility intervention reported the largest increase in levels of coping flexibility, and such an increase corresponded to a reduction in depression immediately and four months after the intervention. These results indicate the value of teaching individuals to adapt their coping strategies to specific requirements of stressful situations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02678373.2012.710369 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1113218233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1113218233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e0d1abf9f3e59535b58035a1b1054594d1fc8f2dca590ab2538614211e0d32bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1qGzEUhYfSQt00b9CFoBS66Dj6HY9WpYT-QSCbZC3uaCRbqUZyJTmOHyFvHQ1OCu2iZKXN953D1WmadwQvCe7xGabdqmcrtqSY0OWKYNbJF82C8I63gjHxslnMSDszr5s3Od9gjDmXZNHcX20MMtYaXdytCSZnFC0CFMz-E9Jx68IaWW_u3OC8KwfkQjGpgsXFgCBXZNpCMiPau7Kpno7r4OaodjAbuHVxl8D_bbmAJgiwnqP3Mf1CuaTa-7Z5ZcFnc_r4njTX375enf9oLy6__zz_ctHqek5pDR4JDFZaZoQUTAyix0wAGQgWXEg-Eqt7S0cNQmIYqGB9RzglpIqMDpadNB-PudsUf-9MLmpyWRvvIZi4y4rQrgqC0tUzUIZFL6R8BkoIo6SnjFX0_T_oTf2lUG9Wdbme1WpBK8WPlE4x52Ss2iY3QTpUSM2rq6fV1by6Oq5etQ-P4ZA1eJsgaJf_uLRjAkvMK_f5yLlgY5qgDuFHVeDgY3qS2H-bHgBJXMD5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038352252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effectiveness of a new, coping flexibility intervention as compared with a cognitive-behavioural intervention in managing work stress</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Cheng, Cecilia ; Kogan, Aleksandr ; Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Cecilia ; Kogan, Aleksandr ; Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</creatorcontrib><description>In typical stress management programmes, working adults acquire various coping skills for managing work stress. In addition to building coping skills, we propose the inclusion of a "meta skill" of coping flexibility, which helps individuals to recognize the distinctions among the coping requirements of diverse stressful events and to facilitate employment of appropriate skills for handling the specific demands of those events. Our study tested this proposal by comparing the efficacy of a new coping flexibility intervention with that of a commonly adopted cognitive-behavioural intervention in reducing depression. We randomly assigned 161 healthy Chinese working adults (55 men, 106 women, M
age
=32 years) to (1) attend a coping flexibility intervention for acquiring both coping skills and coping flexibility, (2) attend a cognitive-behavioural intervention for acquiring coping skills only, or (3) a waiting list to receive an intervention after the study had been completed. Participants were followed up four months later. Those who had attended the coping flexibility intervention reported the largest increase in levels of coping flexibility, and such an increase corresponded to a reduction in depression immediately and four months after the intervention. These results indicate the value of teaching individuals to adapt their coping strategies to specific requirements of stressful situations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-8373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5335</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02678373.2012.710369</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WOSTEH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Adjustment ; Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy ; Behavioural psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; China ; Cognitive psychology ; Cognitive therapy ; cognitive-behavioural ; Comparative analysis ; Coping ; Coping flexibility ; Depression ; Depression (Psychology) ; Employment ; Flexibility ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Intervention ; Interventionism ; Management ; Medical sciences ; Mental stress ; Occupational health ; Occupational psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Skills ; Stress ; Stress management ; Survival strategy ; Treatments ; Values ; Work condition. Job performance. Stress ; Work environment ; Work Skills ; work-related stress ; Working conditions ; Working Women</subject><ispartof>Work and stress, 2012-07, Vol.26 (3), p.272-288</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e0d1abf9f3e59535b58035a1b1054594d1fc8f2dca590ab2538614211e0d32bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e0d1abf9f3e59535b58035a1b1054594d1fc8f2dca590ab2538614211e0d32bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26350904$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogan, Aleksandr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</creatorcontrib><title>The effectiveness of a new, coping flexibility intervention as compared with a cognitive-behavioural intervention in managing work stress</title><title>Work and stress</title><description>In typical stress management programmes, working adults acquire various coping skills for managing work stress. In addition to building coping skills, we propose the inclusion of a "meta skill" of coping flexibility, which helps individuals to recognize the distinctions among the coping requirements of diverse stressful events and to facilitate employment of appropriate skills for handling the specific demands of those events. Our study tested this proposal by comparing the efficacy of a new coping flexibility intervention with that of a commonly adopted cognitive-behavioural intervention in reducing depression. We randomly assigned 161 healthy Chinese working adults (55 men, 106 women, M
age
=32 years) to (1) attend a coping flexibility intervention for acquiring both coping skills and coping flexibility, (2) attend a cognitive-behavioural intervention for acquiring coping skills only, or (3) a waiting list to receive an intervention after the study had been completed. Participants were followed up four months later. Those who had attended the coping flexibility intervention reported the largest increase in levels of coping flexibility, and such an increase corresponded to a reduction in depression immediately and four months after the intervention. These results indicate the value of teaching individuals to adapt their coping strategies to specific requirements of stressful situations.</description><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>Behavioural psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive therapy</subject><subject>cognitive-behavioural</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Coping flexibility</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depression (Psychology)</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interventionism</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental stress</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress management</subject><subject>Survival strategy</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Work condition. Job performance. Stress</subject><subject>Work environment</subject><subject>Work Skills</subject><subject>work-related stress</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><subject>Working Women</subject><issn>0267-8373</issn><issn>1464-5335</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1qGzEUhYfSQt00b9CFoBS66Dj6HY9WpYT-QSCbZC3uaCRbqUZyJTmOHyFvHQ1OCu2iZKXN953D1WmadwQvCe7xGabdqmcrtqSY0OWKYNbJF82C8I63gjHxslnMSDszr5s3Od9gjDmXZNHcX20MMtYaXdytCSZnFC0CFMz-E9Jx68IaWW_u3OC8KwfkQjGpgsXFgCBXZNpCMiPau7Kpno7r4OaodjAbuHVxl8D_bbmAJgiwnqP3Mf1CuaTa-7Z5ZcFnc_r4njTX375enf9oLy6__zz_ctHqek5pDR4JDFZaZoQUTAyix0wAGQgWXEg-Eqt7S0cNQmIYqGB9RzglpIqMDpadNB-PudsUf-9MLmpyWRvvIZi4y4rQrgqC0tUzUIZFL6R8BkoIo6SnjFX0_T_oTf2lUG9Wdbme1WpBK8WPlE4x52Ss2iY3QTpUSM2rq6fV1by6Oq5etQ-P4ZA1eJsgaJf_uLRjAkvMK_f5yLlgY5qgDuFHVeDgY3qS2H-bHgBJXMD5</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Cheng, Cecilia</creator><creator>Kogan, Aleksandr</creator><creator>Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>The effectiveness of a new, coping flexibility intervention as compared with a cognitive-behavioural intervention in managing work stress</title><author>Cheng, Cecilia ; Kogan, Aleksandr ; Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-e0d1abf9f3e59535b58035a1b1054594d1fc8f2dca590ab2538614211e0d32bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>Behavioural psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive therapy</topic><topic>cognitive-behavioural</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Coping flexibility</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depression (Psychology)</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interventionism</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental stress</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress management</topic><topic>Survival strategy</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Work condition. Job performance. Stress</topic><topic>Work environment</topic><topic>Work Skills</topic><topic>work-related stress</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><topic>Working Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogan, Aleksandr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Work and stress</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Cecilia</au><au>Kogan, Aleksandr</au><au>Chio, Jasmine Hin-man</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effectiveness of a new, coping flexibility intervention as compared with a cognitive-behavioural intervention in managing work stress</atitle><jtitle>Work and stress</jtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>272</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>272-288</pages><issn>0267-8373</issn><eissn>1464-5335</eissn><coden>WOSTEH</coden><abstract>In typical stress management programmes, working adults acquire various coping skills for managing work stress. In addition to building coping skills, we propose the inclusion of a "meta skill" of coping flexibility, which helps individuals to recognize the distinctions among the coping requirements of diverse stressful events and to facilitate employment of appropriate skills for handling the specific demands of those events. Our study tested this proposal by comparing the efficacy of a new coping flexibility intervention with that of a commonly adopted cognitive-behavioural intervention in reducing depression. We randomly assigned 161 healthy Chinese working adults (55 men, 106 women, M
age
=32 years) to (1) attend a coping flexibility intervention for acquiring both coping skills and coping flexibility, (2) attend a cognitive-behavioural intervention for acquiring coping skills only, or (3) a waiting list to receive an intervention after the study had been completed. Participants were followed up four months later. Those who had attended the coping flexibility intervention reported the largest increase in levels of coping flexibility, and such an increase corresponded to a reduction in depression immediately and four months after the intervention. These results indicate the value of teaching individuals to adapt their coping strategies to specific requirements of stressful situations.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/02678373.2012.710369</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0267-8373 |
ispartof | Work and stress, 2012-07, Vol.26 (3), p.272-288 |
issn | 0267-8373 1464-5335 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1113218233 |
source | Business Source Complete; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adjustment Behavior therapy. Cognitive therapy Behavioural psychology Biological and medical sciences China Cognitive psychology Cognitive therapy cognitive-behavioural Comparative analysis Coping Coping flexibility Depression Depression (Psychology) Employment Flexibility Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Intervention Interventionism Management Medical sciences Mental stress Occupational health Occupational psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychopathology. Psychiatry Skills Stress Stress management Survival strategy Treatments Values Work condition. Job performance. Stress Work environment Work Skills work-related stress Working conditions Working Women |
title | The effectiveness of a new, coping flexibility intervention as compared with a cognitive-behavioural intervention in managing work stress |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A20%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effectiveness%20of%20a%20new,%20coping%20flexibility%20intervention%20as%20compared%20with%20a%20cognitive-behavioural%20intervention%20in%20managing%20work%20stress&rft.jtitle=Work%20and%20stress&rft.au=Cheng,%20Cecilia&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=272&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=272-288&rft.issn=0267-8373&rft.eissn=1464-5335&rft.coden=WOSTEH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02678373.2012.710369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1113218233%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038352252&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |