Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation
This paper reports on the design, implementation, and results of a structured public deliberation on human tissue biobanking conducted in Vancouver, Canada, in 2009. This study builds on previous work on the use of deliberative democratic principles and methods to engage publics on the social and et...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2012-11, Vol.75 (9), p.1604-1611 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1611 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1604 |
container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | O'Doherty, Kieran C. Hawkins, Alice K. Burgess, Michael M. |
description | This paper reports on the design, implementation, and results of a structured public deliberation on human tissue biobanking conducted in Vancouver, Canada, in 2009. This study builds on previous work on the use of deliberative democratic principles and methods to engage publics on the social and ethical implications of human tissue biobanking. In a significant refinement of methods, we focus on providing public input to institutional practice and governance of biobanks using a tailored workbook structure to guide participants' discussion. Our focus is on the local context and practices of a particular institution, the BC BioLibrary. However, elements of both the methodological innovations and the ethical guidance implied by our findings are generalisable for biobanking internationally. Recommendations from the deliberative forum include issues of informed consent, privacy protections, collection of biospecimens, governance of biobanks, and how to manage the process of introduction between biobanks and potential donors. Notable findings include public support for research use of anonymised un-consented tissue samples when these come from archived collections, but lack of support when they are collected prospectively.
► There are considerable social and ethical challenges associated with human tissue biobanks. ► Public deliberation offers an important avenue for appropriate social norms to be developed and communicated to policy makers. ► This study demonstrates a structured approach to public deliberation that allows for greater facility in translating public values into policy. ► Conducted in March of 2009 in Vancouver, Canada, the study focuses on local institutional biobanking practices of the BC BioLibrary. ► Implications of the study have broader relevance for international debates on the ethics and governance of biobanks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1112141458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953612005369</els_id><sourcerecordid>1112141458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1f29e8817333a2d9a9654897c8237d9a4b99f2d26c6904674933ae186f6af71e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9rFDEUB_Agit2u_gsaEMHLjPkxk2S8laJ1oeBFzyGTedPNOpusSWah9Z83w24VvPQUQj7v5fG-CL2lpKaEio-7OgWbrNvDUDNCWU1ETZh4hlZUSV61vJHP0YowKauu5eICXaa0I4RQovhLdMGYElKJdoV-b_wxTEfn77B12T2AT9h5nLeAIW-dTTiMuHehN_4njpDARLv9hDd-DHG_VDmfsstzdsGbCR_C5Ox9KY9hvtvilONs8xxhwIe5L094gMn1EM3iX6EXo5kSvD6fa_Tjy-fv11-r2283m-ur28o2guWKjqwDpajknBs2dKYTbaM6aRXjslybvutGNjBhRUcaIZuuOKBKjMKMkgJfow-nvocYfs2Qst67ZGGajIcwJ00pZbShTauepoRLpXhLF_ruP7oLcyxLOKmuacswRcmTsjGkFGHUh-j2Jt4XpJco9U7_jVIvUWoidImyVL4595_75e2x7jG7At6fgUnWTGM03rr0zwkuiSy7WKOrk4Oy46ODqMtv4C0MLoLNegjuyWH-AJz8waY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1037945046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>O'Doherty, Kieran C. ; Hawkins, Alice K. ; Burgess, Michael M.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Doherty, Kieran C. ; Hawkins, Alice K. ; Burgess, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports on the design, implementation, and results of a structured public deliberation on human tissue biobanking conducted in Vancouver, Canada, in 2009. This study builds on previous work on the use of deliberative democratic principles and methods to engage publics on the social and ethical implications of human tissue biobanking. In a significant refinement of methods, we focus on providing public input to institutional practice and governance of biobanks using a tailored workbook structure to guide participants' discussion. Our focus is on the local context and practices of a particular institution, the BC BioLibrary. However, elements of both the methodological innovations and the ethical guidance implied by our findings are generalisable for biobanking internationally. Recommendations from the deliberative forum include issues of informed consent, privacy protections, collection of biospecimens, governance of biobanks, and how to manage the process of introduction between biobanks and potential donors. Notable findings include public support for research use of anonymised un-consented tissue samples when these come from archived collections, but lack of support when they are collected prospectively.
► There are considerable social and ethical challenges associated with human tissue biobanks. ► Public deliberation offers an important avenue for appropriate social norms to be developed and communicated to policy makers. ► This study demonstrates a structured approach to public deliberation that allows for greater facility in translating public values into policy. ► Conducted in March of 2009 in Vancouver, Canada, the study focuses on local institutional biobanking practices of the BC BioLibrary. ► Implications of the study have broader relevance for international debates on the ethics and governance of biobanks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22867865</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biobanks ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical Research - ethics ; Biospecimen ; Blood & organ donations ; British Columbia ; Canada ; Citizens ; Community Participation ; Consent ; Deliberative democracy ; Ethics ; Humans ; Institutional change ; Medical ethics ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Organizational Policy ; Privacy ; Public deliberation ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Social support ; Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation ; Tissue Banks - ethics ; Tissue Banks - organization & administration ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2012-11, Vol.75 (9), p.1604-1611</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Nov 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1f29e8817333a2d9a9654897c8237d9a4b99f2d26c6904674933ae186f6af71e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1f29e8817333a2d9a9654897c8237d9a4b99f2d26c6904674933ae186f6af71e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,33772,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26370793$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22867865$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Doherty, Kieran C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Alice K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><title>Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>This paper reports on the design, implementation, and results of a structured public deliberation on human tissue biobanking conducted in Vancouver, Canada, in 2009. This study builds on previous work on the use of deliberative democratic principles and methods to engage publics on the social and ethical implications of human tissue biobanking. In a significant refinement of methods, we focus on providing public input to institutional practice and governance of biobanks using a tailored workbook structure to guide participants' discussion. Our focus is on the local context and practices of a particular institution, the BC BioLibrary. However, elements of both the methodological innovations and the ethical guidance implied by our findings are generalisable for biobanking internationally. Recommendations from the deliberative forum include issues of informed consent, privacy protections, collection of biospecimens, governance of biobanks, and how to manage the process of introduction between biobanks and potential donors. Notable findings include public support for research use of anonymised un-consented tissue samples when these come from archived collections, but lack of support when they are collected prospectively.
► There are considerable social and ethical challenges associated with human tissue biobanks. ► Public deliberation offers an important avenue for appropriate social norms to be developed and communicated to policy makers. ► This study demonstrates a structured approach to public deliberation that allows for greater facility in translating public values into policy. ► Conducted in March of 2009 in Vancouver, Canada, the study focuses on local institutional biobanking practices of the BC BioLibrary. ► Implications of the study have broader relevance for international debates on the ethics and governance of biobanks.</description><subject>Biobanks</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - ethics</subject><subject>Biospecimen</subject><subject>Blood & organ donations</subject><subject>British Columbia</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Community Participation</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Deliberative democracy</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Institutional change</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Organizational Policy</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Public deliberation</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</subject><subject>Tissue Banks - ethics</subject><subject>Tissue Banks - organization & administration</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9rFDEUB_Agit2u_gsaEMHLjPkxk2S8laJ1oeBFzyGTedPNOpusSWah9Z83w24VvPQUQj7v5fG-CL2lpKaEio-7OgWbrNvDUDNCWU1ETZh4hlZUSV61vJHP0YowKauu5eICXaa0I4RQovhLdMGYElKJdoV-b_wxTEfn77B12T2AT9h5nLeAIW-dTTiMuHehN_4njpDARLv9hDd-DHG_VDmfsstzdsGbCR_C5Ox9KY9hvtvilONs8xxhwIe5L094gMn1EM3iX6EXo5kSvD6fa_Tjy-fv11-r2283m-ur28o2guWKjqwDpajknBs2dKYTbaM6aRXjslybvutGNjBhRUcaIZuuOKBKjMKMkgJfow-nvocYfs2Qst67ZGGajIcwJ00pZbShTauepoRLpXhLF_ruP7oLcyxLOKmuacswRcmTsjGkFGHUh-j2Jt4XpJco9U7_jVIvUWoidImyVL4595_75e2x7jG7At6fgUnWTGM03rr0zwkuiSy7WKOrk4Oy46ODqMtv4C0MLoLNegjuyWH-AJz8waY</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>O'Doherty, Kieran C.</creator><creator>Hawkins, Alice K.</creator><creator>Burgess, Michael M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation</title><author>O'Doherty, Kieran C. ; Hawkins, Alice K. ; Burgess, Michael M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1f29e8817333a2d9a9654897c8237d9a4b99f2d26c6904674933ae186f6af71e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biobanks</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - ethics</topic><topic>Biospecimen</topic><topic>Blood & organ donations</topic><topic>British Columbia</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Community Participation</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Deliberative democracy</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Institutional change</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Organizational Policy</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Public deliberation</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</topic><topic>Tissue Banks - ethics</topic><topic>Tissue Banks - organization & administration</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Doherty, Kieran C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Alice K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Doherty, Kieran C.</au><au>Hawkins, Alice K.</au><au>Burgess, Michael M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1604</spage><epage>1611</epage><pages>1604-1611</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>This paper reports on the design, implementation, and results of a structured public deliberation on human tissue biobanking conducted in Vancouver, Canada, in 2009. This study builds on previous work on the use of deliberative democratic principles and methods to engage publics on the social and ethical implications of human tissue biobanking. In a significant refinement of methods, we focus on providing public input to institutional practice and governance of biobanks using a tailored workbook structure to guide participants' discussion. Our focus is on the local context and practices of a particular institution, the BC BioLibrary. However, elements of both the methodological innovations and the ethical guidance implied by our findings are generalisable for biobanking internationally. Recommendations from the deliberative forum include issues of informed consent, privacy protections, collection of biospecimens, governance of biobanks, and how to manage the process of introduction between biobanks and potential donors. Notable findings include public support for research use of anonymised un-consented tissue samples when these come from archived collections, but lack of support when they are collected prospectively.
► There are considerable social and ethical challenges associated with human tissue biobanks. ► Public deliberation offers an important avenue for appropriate social norms to be developed and communicated to policy makers. ► This study demonstrates a structured approach to public deliberation that allows for greater facility in translating public values into policy. ► Conducted in March of 2009 in Vancouver, Canada, the study focuses on local institutional biobanking practices of the BC BioLibrary. ► Implications of the study have broader relevance for international debates on the ethics and governance of biobanks.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22867865</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2012-11, Vol.75 (9), p.1604-1611 |
issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1112141458 |
source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Biobanks Biological and medical sciences Biomedical Research - ethics Biospecimen Blood & organ donations British Columbia Canada Citizens Community Participation Consent Deliberative democracy Ethics Humans Institutional change Medical ethics Medical sciences Miscellaneous Organizational Policy Privacy Public deliberation Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Social support Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation Tissue Banks - ethics Tissue Banks - organization & administration Tissues |
title | Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A38%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Involving%20citizens%20in%20the%20ethics%20of%20biobank%20research:%20Informing%20institutional%20policy%20through%20structured%20public%20deliberation&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=O'Doherty,%20Kieran%20C.&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1604&rft.epage=1611&rft.pages=1604-1611&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1112141458%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1037945046&rft_id=info:pmid/22867865&rft_els_id=S0277953612005369&rfr_iscdi=true |