Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation

This paper reports on the design, implementation, and results of a structured public deliberation on human tissue biobanking conducted in Vancouver, Canada, in 2009. This study builds on previous work on the use of deliberative democratic principles and methods to engage publics on the social and et...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science & medicine (1982) 2012-11, Vol.75 (9), p.1604-1611
Hauptverfasser: O'Doherty, Kieran C., Hawkins, Alice K., Burgess, Michael M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1611
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1604
container_title Social science & medicine (1982)
container_volume 75
creator O'Doherty, Kieran C.
Hawkins, Alice K.
Burgess, Michael M.
description This paper reports on the design, implementation, and results of a structured public deliberation on human tissue biobanking conducted in Vancouver, Canada, in 2009. This study builds on previous work on the use of deliberative democratic principles and methods to engage publics on the social and ethical implications of human tissue biobanking. In a significant refinement of methods, we focus on providing public input to institutional practice and governance of biobanks using a tailored workbook structure to guide participants' discussion. Our focus is on the local context and practices of a particular institution, the BC BioLibrary. However, elements of both the methodological innovations and the ethical guidance implied by our findings are generalisable for biobanking internationally. Recommendations from the deliberative forum include issues of informed consent, privacy protections, collection of biospecimens, governance of biobanks, and how to manage the process of introduction between biobanks and potential donors. Notable findings include public support for research use of anonymised un-consented tissue samples when these come from archived collections, but lack of support when they are collected prospectively. ► There are considerable social and ethical challenges associated with human tissue biobanks. ► Public deliberation offers an important avenue for appropriate social norms to be developed and communicated to policy makers. ► This study demonstrates a structured approach to public deliberation that allows for greater facility in translating public values into policy. ► Conducted in March of 2009 in Vancouver, Canada, the study focuses on local institutional biobanking practices of the BC BioLibrary. ► Implications of the study have broader relevance for international debates on the ethics and governance of biobanks.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1112141458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953612005369</els_id><sourcerecordid>1112141458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1f29e8817333a2d9a9654897c8237d9a4b99f2d26c6904674933ae186f6af71e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9rFDEUB_Agit2u_gsaEMHLjPkxk2S8laJ1oeBFzyGTedPNOpusSWah9Z83w24VvPQUQj7v5fG-CL2lpKaEio-7OgWbrNvDUDNCWU1ETZh4hlZUSV61vJHP0YowKauu5eICXaa0I4RQovhLdMGYElKJdoV-b_wxTEfn77B12T2AT9h5nLeAIW-dTTiMuHehN_4njpDARLv9hDd-DHG_VDmfsstzdsGbCR_C5Ox9KY9hvtvilONs8xxhwIe5L094gMn1EM3iX6EXo5kSvD6fa_Tjy-fv11-r2283m-ur28o2guWKjqwDpajknBs2dKYTbaM6aRXjslybvutGNjBhRUcaIZuuOKBKjMKMkgJfow-nvocYfs2Qst67ZGGajIcwJ00pZbShTauepoRLpXhLF_ruP7oLcyxLOKmuacswRcmTsjGkFGHUh-j2Jt4XpJco9U7_jVIvUWoidImyVL4595_75e2x7jG7At6fgUnWTGM03rr0zwkuiSy7WKOrk4Oy46ODqMtv4C0MLoLNegjuyWH-AJz8waY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1037945046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>O'Doherty, Kieran C. ; Hawkins, Alice K. ; Burgess, Michael M.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Doherty, Kieran C. ; Hawkins, Alice K. ; Burgess, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports on the design, implementation, and results of a structured public deliberation on human tissue biobanking conducted in Vancouver, Canada, in 2009. This study builds on previous work on the use of deliberative democratic principles and methods to engage publics on the social and ethical implications of human tissue biobanking. In a significant refinement of methods, we focus on providing public input to institutional practice and governance of biobanks using a tailored workbook structure to guide participants' discussion. Our focus is on the local context and practices of a particular institution, the BC BioLibrary. However, elements of both the methodological innovations and the ethical guidance implied by our findings are generalisable for biobanking internationally. Recommendations from the deliberative forum include issues of informed consent, privacy protections, collection of biospecimens, governance of biobanks, and how to manage the process of introduction between biobanks and potential donors. Notable findings include public support for research use of anonymised un-consented tissue samples when these come from archived collections, but lack of support when they are collected prospectively. ► There are considerable social and ethical challenges associated with human tissue biobanks. ► Public deliberation offers an important avenue for appropriate social norms to be developed and communicated to policy makers. ► This study demonstrates a structured approach to public deliberation that allows for greater facility in translating public values into policy. ► Conducted in March of 2009 in Vancouver, Canada, the study focuses on local institutional biobanking practices of the BC BioLibrary. ► Implications of the study have broader relevance for international debates on the ethics and governance of biobanks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22867865</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SSMDEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biobanks ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical Research - ethics ; Biospecimen ; Blood &amp; organ donations ; British Columbia ; Canada ; Citizens ; Community Participation ; Consent ; Deliberative democracy ; Ethics ; Humans ; Institutional change ; Medical ethics ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Organizational Policy ; Privacy ; Public deliberation ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Social support ; Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation ; Tissue Banks - ethics ; Tissue Banks - organization &amp; administration ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>Social science &amp; medicine (1982), 2012-11, Vol.75 (9), p.1604-1611</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Nov 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1f29e8817333a2d9a9654897c8237d9a4b99f2d26c6904674933ae186f6af71e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1f29e8817333a2d9a9654897c8237d9a4b99f2d26c6904674933ae186f6af71e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,33772,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26370793$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22867865$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Doherty, Kieran C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Alice K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><title>Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation</title><title>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>This paper reports on the design, implementation, and results of a structured public deliberation on human tissue biobanking conducted in Vancouver, Canada, in 2009. This study builds on previous work on the use of deliberative democratic principles and methods to engage publics on the social and ethical implications of human tissue biobanking. In a significant refinement of methods, we focus on providing public input to institutional practice and governance of biobanks using a tailored workbook structure to guide participants' discussion. Our focus is on the local context and practices of a particular institution, the BC BioLibrary. However, elements of both the methodological innovations and the ethical guidance implied by our findings are generalisable for biobanking internationally. Recommendations from the deliberative forum include issues of informed consent, privacy protections, collection of biospecimens, governance of biobanks, and how to manage the process of introduction between biobanks and potential donors. Notable findings include public support for research use of anonymised un-consented tissue samples when these come from archived collections, but lack of support when they are collected prospectively. ► There are considerable social and ethical challenges associated with human tissue biobanks. ► Public deliberation offers an important avenue for appropriate social norms to be developed and communicated to policy makers. ► This study demonstrates a structured approach to public deliberation that allows for greater facility in translating public values into policy. ► Conducted in March of 2009 in Vancouver, Canada, the study focuses on local institutional biobanking practices of the BC BioLibrary. ► Implications of the study have broader relevance for international debates on the ethics and governance of biobanks.</description><subject>Biobanks</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - ethics</subject><subject>Biospecimen</subject><subject>Blood &amp; organ donations</subject><subject>British Columbia</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Community Participation</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Deliberative democracy</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Institutional change</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Organizational Policy</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Public deliberation</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</subject><subject>Tissue Banks - ethics</subject><subject>Tissue Banks - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c9rFDEUB_Agit2u_gsaEMHLjPkxk2S8laJ1oeBFzyGTedPNOpusSWah9Z83w24VvPQUQj7v5fG-CL2lpKaEio-7OgWbrNvDUDNCWU1ETZh4hlZUSV61vJHP0YowKauu5eICXaa0I4RQovhLdMGYElKJdoV-b_wxTEfn77B12T2AT9h5nLeAIW-dTTiMuHehN_4njpDARLv9hDd-DHG_VDmfsstzdsGbCR_C5Ox9KY9hvtvilONs8xxhwIe5L094gMn1EM3iX6EXo5kSvD6fa_Tjy-fv11-r2283m-ur28o2guWKjqwDpajknBs2dKYTbaM6aRXjslybvutGNjBhRUcaIZuuOKBKjMKMkgJfow-nvocYfs2Qst67ZGGajIcwJ00pZbShTauepoRLpXhLF_ruP7oLcyxLOKmuacswRcmTsjGkFGHUh-j2Jt4XpJco9U7_jVIvUWoidImyVL4595_75e2x7jG7At6fgUnWTGM03rr0zwkuiSy7WKOrk4Oy46ODqMtv4C0MLoLNegjuyWH-AJz8waY</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>O'Doherty, Kieran C.</creator><creator>Hawkins, Alice K.</creator><creator>Burgess, Michael M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation</title><author>O'Doherty, Kieran C. ; Hawkins, Alice K. ; Burgess, Michael M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-1f29e8817333a2d9a9654897c8237d9a4b99f2d26c6904674933ae186f6af71e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biobanks</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - ethics</topic><topic>Biospecimen</topic><topic>Blood &amp; organ donations</topic><topic>British Columbia</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Community Participation</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Deliberative democracy</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Institutional change</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Organizational Policy</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Public deliberation</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation</topic><topic>Tissue Banks - ethics</topic><topic>Tissue Banks - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Doherty, Kieran C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Alice K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgess, Michael M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Doherty, Kieran C.</au><au>Hawkins, Alice K.</au><au>Burgess, Michael M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation</atitle><jtitle>Social science &amp; medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1604</spage><epage>1611</epage><pages>1604-1611</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><coden>SSMDEP</coden><abstract>This paper reports on the design, implementation, and results of a structured public deliberation on human tissue biobanking conducted in Vancouver, Canada, in 2009. This study builds on previous work on the use of deliberative democratic principles and methods to engage publics on the social and ethical implications of human tissue biobanking. In a significant refinement of methods, we focus on providing public input to institutional practice and governance of biobanks using a tailored workbook structure to guide participants' discussion. Our focus is on the local context and practices of a particular institution, the BC BioLibrary. However, elements of both the methodological innovations and the ethical guidance implied by our findings are generalisable for biobanking internationally. Recommendations from the deliberative forum include issues of informed consent, privacy protections, collection of biospecimens, governance of biobanks, and how to manage the process of introduction between biobanks and potential donors. Notable findings include public support for research use of anonymised un-consented tissue samples when these come from archived collections, but lack of support when they are collected prospectively. ► There are considerable social and ethical challenges associated with human tissue biobanks. ► Public deliberation offers an important avenue for appropriate social norms to be developed and communicated to policy makers. ► This study demonstrates a structured approach to public deliberation that allows for greater facility in translating public values into policy. ► Conducted in March of 2009 in Vancouver, Canada, the study focuses on local institutional biobanking practices of the BC BioLibrary. ► Implications of the study have broader relevance for international debates on the ethics and governance of biobanks.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22867865</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-9536
ispartof Social science & medicine (1982), 2012-11, Vol.75 (9), p.1604-1611
issn 0277-9536
1873-5347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1112141458
source MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Biobanks
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical Research - ethics
Biospecimen
Blood & organ donations
British Columbia
Canada
Citizens
Community Participation
Consent
Deliberative democracy
Ethics
Humans
Institutional change
Medical ethics
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Organizational Policy
Privacy
Public deliberation
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Social support
Teaching. Deontology. Ethics. Legislation
Tissue Banks - ethics
Tissue Banks - organization & administration
Tissues
title Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A38%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Involving%20citizens%20in%20the%20ethics%20of%20biobank%20research:%20Informing%20institutional%20policy%20through%20structured%20public%20deliberation&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=O'Doherty,%20Kieran%20C.&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1604&rft.epage=1611&rft.pages=1604-1611&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft.coden=SSMDEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.06.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1112141458%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1037945046&rft_id=info:pmid/22867865&rft_els_id=S0277953612005369&rfr_iscdi=true