Restoration of Movement Patterns of the Hawaiian Goose

We used visual observations of banded individuals and satellite telemetry from 2007 to 2011 on Hawai‘i Island to document movement patterns of the Hawaiian Goose (Branta sandvicensis), commonly known as Nēnē. Visual observations of numbered leg bands identified >19% and ≤10% of 323 geese at one o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Wilson journal of ornithology 2012-09, Vol.124 (3), p.478-486
Hauptverfasser: Hess, Steven C., Leopold, Christina R., Misajon, Kathleen, Hu, Darcy, Jeffrey, John J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 486
container_issue 3
container_start_page 478
container_title The Wilson journal of ornithology
container_volume 124
creator Hess, Steven C.
Leopold, Christina R.
Misajon, Kathleen
Hu, Darcy
Jeffrey, John J.
description We used visual observations of banded individuals and satellite telemetry from 2007 to 2011 on Hawai‘i Island to document movement patterns of the Hawaiian Goose (Branta sandvicensis), commonly known as Nēnē. Visual observations of numbered leg bands identified >19% and ≤10% of 323 geese at one of two breeding sites and one of two distant non-breeding areas during 2007–2011. We used satellite telemetry to document movement patterns of 10 male Nēnē from 2009 to 2011, and log-linear models to quantify the magnitude and individual differences in altitudinal migration. Two subpopulations of Nēnē moved 974.4 m (95% CI ± 22.0) and 226.4 m (95% CI ± 40.7) in elevation between seasons on average, from high-elevation shrublands during the non-breeding season of May–August, to lower-elevation breeding and molting areas in September–April. Traditional movement patterns were thought to be lost until recently, but the movement pattern we documented with satellite telemetry was similar to altitudinal migration described by early naturalists in Hawai‘i prior to the severe population decline of Nēnē in the 20th century.
doi_str_mv 10.1676/12-005.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1093474850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A303011709</galeid><jstor_id>23324554</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A303011709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b610t-40a1c4b50fd4548008ac924af6ab77888e0be6ad4c2414bc4bda48d4e900859e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0m2L1DAQAOAiCp6r4B8QC4Loh65JO-nLx2Px9g5WT-68z2HaTmuWbnOXZPX8907ZRVlZRSmhYfJk8jZR9FyKucyL_J1MEyHUXD6ITmSVlYkCKB5yX6kqAajk4-iJ92shOJypkyi_Ih-sw2DsGNsu_mC_0obGEH_CEMiNfgqGLxSf4zc0Bsd4aa2np9GjDgdPz_b_WXRz9v7z4jxZXS4vFqerpM6lCAkIlA3USnQtKCiFKLGpUsAux7ooyrIkUVOOLTQpSKiZtghlC1QxVRVls-jNLu-ts3db3qreGN_QMOBIduu1FFUGBZRKMH31G13brRt5d6yA0-WyyH-pHgfSZuxscNhMSfVpJjIhZcEpZ1FyRPU0ksPBjtQZDh_4-RHPX0sb0xyd8PZgAptA96HHrff64vrqP-zHf7blcvW3Q-5tY4eBetL8jovLQ79_i8ZZ7x11-taZDbrvfL96qj0tU821pyXTFzu6norrp0uzLAWlgMdf7sY7tBp7Z7y-uU6FzMXUuMPi9U7UxvL9_XmpH4G24R0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1040856176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Restoration of Movement Patterns of the Hawaiian Goose</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hess, Steven C. ; Leopold, Christina R. ; Misajon, Kathleen ; Hu, Darcy ; Jeffrey, John J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hess, Steven C. ; Leopold, Christina R. ; Misajon, Kathleen ; Hu, Darcy ; Jeffrey, John J.</creatorcontrib><description>We used visual observations of banded individuals and satellite telemetry from 2007 to 2011 on Hawai‘i Island to document movement patterns of the Hawaiian Goose (Branta sandvicensis), commonly known as Nēnē. Visual observations of numbered leg bands identified &gt;19% and ≤10% of 323 geese at one of two breeding sites and one of two distant non-breeding areas during 2007–2011. We used satellite telemetry to document movement patterns of 10 male Nēnē from 2009 to 2011, and log-linear models to quantify the magnitude and individual differences in altitudinal migration. Two subpopulations of Nēnē moved 974.4 m (95% CI ± 22.0) and 226.4 m (95% CI ± 40.7) in elevation between seasons on average, from high-elevation shrublands during the non-breeding season of May–August, to lower-elevation breeding and molting areas in September–April. Traditional movement patterns were thought to be lost until recently, but the movement pattern we documented with satellite telemetry was similar to altitudinal migration described by early naturalists in Hawai‘i prior to the severe population decline of Nēnē in the 20th century.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-4491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1676/12-005.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WILBAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fort Collins: The Wilson Ornithological Society</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal territoriality ; Artificial satellites ; Birds ; Branta sandvicensis ; Breeding ; Breeding seasons ; Breeding sites ; Forest management ; Geese ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Grasses ; Hilario, Maybyner (Nene) ; MAJOR ARTICLES ; National parks ; Nene (Bird) ; Seasonal migration ; Territoriality (Zoology) ; Waterfowl</subject><ispartof>The Wilson journal of ornithology, 2012-09, Vol.124 (3), p.478-486</ispartof><rights>2012 by the Wilson Ornithological Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2012 Wilson Ornithological Society</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Wilson Ornithological Society</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 Wilson Ornithological Society</rights><rights>Copyright Wilson Ornithological Society Sep 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b610t-40a1c4b50fd4548008ac924af6ab77888e0be6ad4c2414bc4bda48d4e900859e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b610t-40a1c4b50fd4548008ac924af6ab77888e0be6ad4c2414bc4bda48d4e900859e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23324554$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23324554$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hess, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leopold, Christina R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Misajon, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Darcy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffrey, John J.</creatorcontrib><title>Restoration of Movement Patterns of the Hawaiian Goose</title><title>The Wilson journal of ornithology</title><addtitle>Wilson Journal of Ornithology</addtitle><description>We used visual observations of banded individuals and satellite telemetry from 2007 to 2011 on Hawai‘i Island to document movement patterns of the Hawaiian Goose (Branta sandvicensis), commonly known as Nēnē. Visual observations of numbered leg bands identified &gt;19% and ≤10% of 323 geese at one of two breeding sites and one of two distant non-breeding areas during 2007–2011. We used satellite telemetry to document movement patterns of 10 male Nēnē from 2009 to 2011, and log-linear models to quantify the magnitude and individual differences in altitudinal migration. Two subpopulations of Nēnē moved 974.4 m (95% CI ± 22.0) and 226.4 m (95% CI ± 40.7) in elevation between seasons on average, from high-elevation shrublands during the non-breeding season of May–August, to lower-elevation breeding and molting areas in September–April. Traditional movement patterns were thought to be lost until recently, but the movement pattern we documented with satellite telemetry was similar to altitudinal migration described by early naturalists in Hawai‘i prior to the severe population decline of Nēnē in the 20th century.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal territoriality</subject><subject>Artificial satellites</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Branta sandvicensis</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Breeding sites</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Geese</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Hilario, Maybyner (Nene)</subject><subject>MAJOR ARTICLES</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Nene (Bird)</subject><subject>Seasonal migration</subject><subject>Territoriality (Zoology)</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><issn>1559-4491</issn><issn>1938-5447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqV0m2L1DAQAOAiCp6r4B8QC4Loh65JO-nLx2Px9g5WT-68z2HaTmuWbnOXZPX8907ZRVlZRSmhYfJk8jZR9FyKucyL_J1MEyHUXD6ITmSVlYkCKB5yX6kqAajk4-iJ92shOJypkyi_Ih-sw2DsGNsu_mC_0obGEH_CEMiNfgqGLxSf4zc0Bsd4aa2np9GjDgdPz_b_WXRz9v7z4jxZXS4vFqerpM6lCAkIlA3USnQtKCiFKLGpUsAux7ooyrIkUVOOLTQpSKiZtghlC1QxVRVls-jNLu-ts3db3qreGN_QMOBIduu1FFUGBZRKMH31G13brRt5d6yA0-WyyH-pHgfSZuxscNhMSfVpJjIhZcEpZ1FyRPU0ksPBjtQZDh_4-RHPX0sb0xyd8PZgAptA96HHrff64vrqP-zHf7blcvW3Q-5tY4eBetL8jovLQ79_i8ZZ7x11-taZDbrvfL96qj0tU821pyXTFzu6norrp0uzLAWlgMdf7sY7tBp7Z7y-uU6FzMXUuMPi9U7UxvL9_XmpH4G24R0</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Hess, Steven C.</creator><creator>Leopold, Christina R.</creator><creator>Misajon, Kathleen</creator><creator>Hu, Darcy</creator><creator>Jeffrey, John J.</creator><general>The Wilson Ornithological Society</general><general>Wilson Ornithological Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Restoration of Movement Patterns of the Hawaiian Goose</title><author>Hess, Steven C. ; Leopold, Christina R. ; Misajon, Kathleen ; Hu, Darcy ; Jeffrey, John J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b610t-40a1c4b50fd4548008ac924af6ab77888e0be6ad4c2414bc4bda48d4e900859e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal territoriality</topic><topic>Artificial satellites</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Branta sandvicensis</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Breeding sites</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Geese</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Hilario, Maybyner (Nene)</topic><topic>MAJOR ARTICLES</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Nene (Bird)</topic><topic>Seasonal migration</topic><topic>Territoriality (Zoology)</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hess, Steven C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leopold, Christina R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Misajon, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Darcy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffrey, John J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Wilson journal of ornithology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hess, Steven C.</au><au>Leopold, Christina R.</au><au>Misajon, Kathleen</au><au>Hu, Darcy</au><au>Jeffrey, John J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Restoration of Movement Patterns of the Hawaiian Goose</atitle><jtitle>The Wilson journal of ornithology</jtitle><addtitle>Wilson Journal of Ornithology</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>478</spage><epage>486</epage><pages>478-486</pages><issn>1559-4491</issn><eissn>1938-5447</eissn><coden>WILBAI</coden><abstract>We used visual observations of banded individuals and satellite telemetry from 2007 to 2011 on Hawai‘i Island to document movement patterns of the Hawaiian Goose (Branta sandvicensis), commonly known as Nēnē. Visual observations of numbered leg bands identified &gt;19% and ≤10% of 323 geese at one of two breeding sites and one of two distant non-breeding areas during 2007–2011. We used satellite telemetry to document movement patterns of 10 male Nēnē from 2009 to 2011, and log-linear models to quantify the magnitude and individual differences in altitudinal migration. Two subpopulations of Nēnē moved 974.4 m (95% CI ± 22.0) and 226.4 m (95% CI ± 40.7) in elevation between seasons on average, from high-elevation shrublands during the non-breeding season of May–August, to lower-elevation breeding and molting areas in September–April. Traditional movement patterns were thought to be lost until recently, but the movement pattern we documented with satellite telemetry was similar to altitudinal migration described by early naturalists in Hawai‘i prior to the severe population decline of Nēnē in the 20th century.</abstract><cop>Fort Collins</cop><pub>The Wilson Ornithological Society</pub><doi>10.1676/12-005.1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1559-4491
ispartof The Wilson journal of ornithology, 2012-09, Vol.124 (3), p.478-486
issn 1559-4491
1938-5447
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1093474850
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Animal behavior
Animal territoriality
Artificial satellites
Birds
Branta sandvicensis
Breeding
Breeding seasons
Breeding sites
Forest management
Geese
Global positioning systems
GPS
Grasses
Hilario, Maybyner (Nene)
MAJOR ARTICLES
National parks
Nene (Bird)
Seasonal migration
Territoriality (Zoology)
Waterfowl
title Restoration of Movement Patterns of the Hawaiian Goose
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A15%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Restoration%20of%20Movement%20Patterns%20of%20the%20Hawaiian%20Goose&rft.jtitle=The%20Wilson%20journal%20of%20ornithology&rft.au=Hess,%20Steven%20C.&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=478&rft.epage=486&rft.pages=478-486&rft.issn=1559-4491&rft.eissn=1938-5447&rft.coden=WILBAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1676/12-005.1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA303011709%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1040856176&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A303011709&rft_jstor_id=23324554&rfr_iscdi=true