Are marginal bone levels and implant stability/mobility affected by single-stage platform switched dental implants? A comparative clinical study
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate short‐term bone level and stability/mobility measurement alterations at platform switched (PS) and standard platform (SP) implants placed in mandibular premolar/molar regions using a single‐stage protocol. Materials and methods Sixteen PS and 16 SP im...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2012-10, Vol.23 (10), p.1161-1167 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1167 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1161 |
container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Dursun, Erhan Tulunoglu, Ibrahim Canpınar, Pınar Uysal, Serdar Akalın, Ferda Alev Tözüm, Tolga F. |
description | Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate short‐term bone level and stability/mobility measurement alterations at platform switched (PS) and standard platform (SP) implants placed in mandibular premolar/molar regions using a single‐stage protocol.
Materials and methods
Sixteen PS and 16 SP implants restorated with fixed prosthesis were included. Standard implant dimensions were used for both implant systems. After 3 months of osseointegration, implants were connected to abutments and final restorations were performed. Marginal bone loss was measured by standardized periapical radiographs. Implant stability/mobility was determined by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and mobility measuring (MM) device values. Peri‐implant parameters were evaluated with clinical periodontal indices and all parameters were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery.
Results
After 6 months, all implants showed uneventful healing. Radiographic evaluation showed a mean bone loss of 0.72 mm for PS and 0.56 mm for SP implants, and there were no significant differences between implant types. At 6 months, mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were 73.38 and 77 for PS and SP implants, respectively. Mean MM values were −4.75 for PS and −6.38 for SP implants. Mean MM values were lower for SP implants compared to PS implants at all time points. No significant differences were detected between implant types according to clinical peri‐implant parameters.
Conclusions
The micro‐gap at crestal level which immediately exposed to the oral cavity in non‐submerged two part implants seems to have adverse influence on the marginal bone level. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02277.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1093463400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1041143463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-5dc7752c48ec22dda51186f659abba192e838507cf4ed711bc7cb06fd276465e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2O0zAURi0EYsrAKyAv2SRjO4mdLBCqOlCQKpD4UaXZWI59U1ycpMTuTPMWPDIOKV2PN76Sz_fZ8kEIU5LSuG72KeWEJKQgNGWE0pQwJkR6eoIWl4OnaEEqUiSCcnqFXni_J4TwqqyeoyvGSMXKUizQn-UAuFXDznbK4brvADu4B-ex6gy27cGpLmAfVG2dDeNN288DVk0DOoDB9Yi97XYOkkjtAMdEaPqhxf7BBv0zEga6EMvPZf4dXmLdtwc1qGDvAWtnO6sj4MPRjC_Rs0Y5D6_O-zX68eH999XHZPNl_Wm13CQ6z4lICqOFKJjOS9CMGaMKSkve8KJSda1oxaDMyoII3eRgBKW1FromvDFM8JwXkF2jN3PvYeh_H8EH2VqvwcUnQn_0kpIqy3mWE_IINKc0n-iIljOqh977ARp5GGz83jFCclIn93IyJCdDclIn_6mTpxh9fb7lWLdgLsH_riLwdgYerIPx0cVytfk6TTGfzHnrA5wueTX8klxkopDbz2tZbu-2t7frb_Iu-wtXLLkq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1041143463</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are marginal bone levels and implant stability/mobility affected by single-stage platform switched dental implants? A comparative clinical study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Dursun, Erhan ; Tulunoglu, Ibrahim ; Canpınar, Pınar ; Uysal, Serdar ; Akalın, Ferda Alev ; Tözüm, Tolga F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dursun, Erhan ; Tulunoglu, Ibrahim ; Canpınar, Pınar ; Uysal, Serdar ; Akalın, Ferda Alev ; Tözüm, Tolga F.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate short‐term bone level and stability/mobility measurement alterations at platform switched (PS) and standard platform (SP) implants placed in mandibular premolar/molar regions using a single‐stage protocol.
Materials and methods
Sixteen PS and 16 SP implants restorated with fixed prosthesis were included. Standard implant dimensions were used for both implant systems. After 3 months of osseointegration, implants were connected to abutments and final restorations were performed. Marginal bone loss was measured by standardized periapical radiographs. Implant stability/mobility was determined by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and mobility measuring (MM) device values. Peri‐implant parameters were evaluated with clinical periodontal indices and all parameters were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery.
Results
After 6 months, all implants showed uneventful healing. Radiographic evaluation showed a mean bone loss of 0.72 mm for PS and 0.56 mm for SP implants, and there were no significant differences between implant types. At 6 months, mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were 73.38 and 77 for PS and SP implants, respectively. Mean MM values were −4.75 for PS and −6.38 for SP implants. Mean MM values were lower for SP implants compared to PS implants at all time points. No significant differences were detected between implant types according to clinical peri‐implant parameters.
Conclusions
The micro‐gap at crestal level which immediately exposed to the oral cavity in non‐submerged two part implants seems to have adverse influence on the marginal bone level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02277.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22092887</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging ; Bone implants ; bone level ; bone loss ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Prosthesis Retention ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - rehabilitation ; Male ; micro-gap ; Middle Aged ; primary stability ; Radiography ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2012-10, Vol.23 (10), p.1161-1167</ispartof><rights>2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><rights>2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-5dc7752c48ec22dda51186f659abba192e838507cf4ed711bc7cb06fd276465e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-5dc7752c48ec22dda51186f659abba192e838507cf4ed711bc7cb06fd276465e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0501.2011.02277.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1600-0501.2011.02277.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22092887$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dursun, Erhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulunoglu, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canpınar, Pınar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uysal, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akalın, Ferda Alev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tözüm, Tolga F.</creatorcontrib><title>Are marginal bone levels and implant stability/mobility affected by single-stage platform switched dental implants? A comparative clinical study</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</addtitle><description>Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate short‐term bone level and stability/mobility measurement alterations at platform switched (PS) and standard platform (SP) implants placed in mandibular premolar/molar regions using a single‐stage protocol.
Materials and methods
Sixteen PS and 16 SP implants restorated with fixed prosthesis were included. Standard implant dimensions were used for both implant systems. After 3 months of osseointegration, implants were connected to abutments and final restorations were performed. Marginal bone loss was measured by standardized periapical radiographs. Implant stability/mobility was determined by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and mobility measuring (MM) device values. Peri‐implant parameters were evaluated with clinical periodontal indices and all parameters were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery.
Results
After 6 months, all implants showed uneventful healing. Radiographic evaluation showed a mean bone loss of 0.72 mm for PS and 0.56 mm for SP implants, and there were no significant differences between implant types. At 6 months, mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were 73.38 and 77 for PS and SP implants, respectively. Mean MM values were −4.75 for PS and −6.38 for SP implants. Mean MM values were lower for SP implants compared to PS implants at all time points. No significant differences were detected between implant types according to clinical peri‐implant parameters.
Conclusions
The micro‐gap at crestal level which immediately exposed to the oral cavity in non‐submerged two part implants seems to have adverse influence on the marginal bone level.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Bone implants</subject><subject>bone level</subject><subject>bone loss</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Retention</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>micro-gap</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>primary stability</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc2O0zAURi0EYsrAKyAv2SRjO4mdLBCqOlCQKpD4UaXZWI59U1ycpMTuTPMWPDIOKV2PN76Sz_fZ8kEIU5LSuG72KeWEJKQgNGWE0pQwJkR6eoIWl4OnaEEqUiSCcnqFXni_J4TwqqyeoyvGSMXKUizQn-UAuFXDznbK4brvADu4B-ex6gy27cGpLmAfVG2dDeNN288DVk0DOoDB9Yi97XYOkkjtAMdEaPqhxf7BBv0zEga6EMvPZf4dXmLdtwc1qGDvAWtnO6sj4MPRjC_Rs0Y5D6_O-zX68eH999XHZPNl_Wm13CQ6z4lICqOFKJjOS9CMGaMKSkve8KJSda1oxaDMyoII3eRgBKW1FromvDFM8JwXkF2jN3PvYeh_H8EH2VqvwcUnQn_0kpIqy3mWE_IINKc0n-iIljOqh977ARp5GGz83jFCclIn93IyJCdDclIn_6mTpxh9fb7lWLdgLsH_riLwdgYerIPx0cVytfk6TTGfzHnrA5wueTX8klxkopDbz2tZbu-2t7frb_Iu-wtXLLkq</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Dursun, Erhan</creator><creator>Tulunoglu, Ibrahim</creator><creator>Canpınar, Pınar</creator><creator>Uysal, Serdar</creator><creator>Akalın, Ferda Alev</creator><creator>Tözüm, Tolga F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Are marginal bone levels and implant stability/mobility affected by single-stage platform switched dental implants? A comparative clinical study</title><author>Dursun, Erhan ; Tulunoglu, Ibrahim ; Canpınar, Pınar ; Uysal, Serdar ; Akalın, Ferda Alev ; Tözüm, Tolga F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4407-5dc7752c48ec22dda51186f659abba192e838507cf4ed711bc7cb06fd276465e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Bone implants</topic><topic>bone level</topic><topic>bone loss</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Retention</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>micro-gap</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>primary stability</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dursun, Erhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulunoglu, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canpınar, Pınar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uysal, Serdar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akalın, Ferda Alev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tözüm, Tolga F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dursun, Erhan</au><au>Tulunoglu, Ibrahim</au><au>Canpınar, Pınar</au><au>Uysal, Serdar</au><au>Akalın, Ferda Alev</au><au>Tözüm, Tolga F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are marginal bone levels and implant stability/mobility affected by single-stage platform switched dental implants? A comparative clinical study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1161</spage><epage>1167</epage><pages>1161-1167</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate short‐term bone level and stability/mobility measurement alterations at platform switched (PS) and standard platform (SP) implants placed in mandibular premolar/molar regions using a single‐stage protocol.
Materials and methods
Sixteen PS and 16 SP implants restorated with fixed prosthesis were included. Standard implant dimensions were used for both implant systems. After 3 months of osseointegration, implants were connected to abutments and final restorations were performed. Marginal bone loss was measured by standardized periapical radiographs. Implant stability/mobility was determined by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and mobility measuring (MM) device values. Peri‐implant parameters were evaluated with clinical periodontal indices and all parameters were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery.
Results
After 6 months, all implants showed uneventful healing. Radiographic evaluation showed a mean bone loss of 0.72 mm for PS and 0.56 mm for SP implants, and there were no significant differences between implant types. At 6 months, mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were 73.38 and 77 for PS and SP implants, respectively. Mean MM values were −4.75 for PS and −6.38 for SP implants. Mean MM values were lower for SP implants compared to PS implants at all time points. No significant differences were detected between implant types according to clinical peri‐implant parameters.
Conclusions
The micro‐gap at crestal level which immediately exposed to the oral cavity in non‐submerged two part implants seems to have adverse influence on the marginal bone level.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22092887</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02277.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2012-10, Vol.23 (10), p.1161-1167 |
issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1093463400 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adult Alveolar Bone Loss - diagnostic imaging Bone implants bone level bone loss Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods Dental Implants Dental Prosthesis Design Dental Prosthesis Retention Dentistry Female Humans Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - rehabilitation Male micro-gap Middle Aged primary stability Radiography Risk Factors |
title | Are marginal bone levels and implant stability/mobility affected by single-stage platform switched dental implants? A comparative clinical study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T10%3A14%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20marginal%20bone%20levels%20and%20implant%20stability/mobility%20affected%20by%20single-stage%20platform%20switched%20dental%20implants?%20A%20comparative%20clinical%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Dursun,%20Erhan&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1161&rft.epage=1167&rft.pages=1161-1167&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02277.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1041143463%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1041143463&rft_id=info:pmid/22092887&rfr_iscdi=true |