Are there pitfalls to pitfalls? Dung beetle sampling in French Guiana
Dung beetles have widely been accepted as cost-effective indicator taxa for biodiversity assessment; thus, standard protocols have been created to examine their species richness and diversity in many habitats. However, the vast majority of studies adopt short-term sampling protocols; few studies hav...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organisms diversity & evolution 2012-09, Vol.12 (3), p.325-331 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 331 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 325 |
container_title | Organisms diversity & evolution |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Price, Dana L. Feer, Francois |
description | Dung beetles have widely been accepted as cost-effective indicator taxa for biodiversity assessment; thus, standard protocols have been created to examine their species richness and diversity in many habitats. However, the vast majority of studies adopt short-term sampling protocols; few studies have quantified sampling efficiency at longer time scales or tested the efficacy of species richness estimates. Here we present long- and short-term sampling data from two regions of French Guiana: the Nouragues Tropical Forest Research Station and Kaw Mountain. We examine species richness and diversity, and use these data to make suggestions for future biodiversity assessments of dung beetles using dung baited pitfall transects. Species richness estimates based on short-term samples strongly underestimate the actual species richness by approximately 40 %. Duration of trapping was found to be more important than the number of traps and length of transects; by setting a second transect (4-day sample period) in the same habitat of Nouragues, thereby increasing the sample duration, the number of species increased by 14 %. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13127-012-0106-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1093461044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1093461044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-94944461fed361ba8fc14d07d902abab8c78ecc3b70abcefca3136303b74e98e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wNuCFy-rM0nYbE5SaluFghc9h2w6227Z7q7J7sF_b8pKEcFDJjPD9x7DY-wW4QEB1GNAgVylgDw-yFJ-xiaYYZ4iKHUeeyl0moHml-wqhD0A54hqwhYzT0m_o1i7qi9tXYekb0_9U_I8NNukIOprSoI9dHUV56pJlp4at0tWQ2Ube80uIh7o5uefso_l4n3-kq7fVq_z2Tp1Quo-1VJLKTMsaSMyLGxeOpQbUBsN3Ba2yJ3KyTlRKLCFo9JZgSITEBeSdE5iyu5H3863nwOF3hyq4KiubUPtEAyCFtEfpIzo3R903w6-iddFSmjAXOc8UjhSzrcheCpN56uD9V8RMsdgzRisicGaY7DmqOGjJkS22ZL_7fyf6BuQnXmr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1039018982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are there pitfalls to pitfalls? Dung beetle sampling in French Guiana</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Price, Dana L. ; Feer, Francois</creator><creatorcontrib>Price, Dana L. ; Feer, Francois</creatorcontrib><description>Dung beetles have widely been accepted as cost-effective indicator taxa for biodiversity assessment; thus, standard protocols have been created to examine their species richness and diversity in many habitats. However, the vast majority of studies adopt short-term sampling protocols; few studies have quantified sampling efficiency at longer time scales or tested the efficacy of species richness estimates. Here we present long- and short-term sampling data from two regions of French Guiana: the Nouragues Tropical Forest Research Station and Kaw Mountain. We examine species richness and diversity, and use these data to make suggestions for future biodiversity assessments of dung beetles using dung baited pitfall transects. Species richness estimates based on short-term samples strongly underestimate the actual species richness by approximately 40 %. Duration of trapping was found to be more important than the number of traps and length of transects; by setting a second transect (4-day sample period) in the same habitat of Nouragues, thereby increasing the sample duration, the number of species increased by 14 %.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-6092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-1077</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13127-012-0106-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Beetles ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Coleoptera ; Developmental Biology ; Dung ; Estimates ; Evolutionary Biology ; Forestry research ; Forests ; Habitats ; Life Sciences ; Original Article ; Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Protocols ; Rainforests ; Research centers ; Sampling ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Tropical forests</subject><ispartof>Organisms diversity & evolution, 2012-09, Vol.12 (3), p.325-331</ispartof><rights>Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-94944461fed361ba8fc14d07d902abab8c78ecc3b70abcefca3136303b74e98e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-94944461fed361ba8fc14d07d902abab8c78ecc3b70abcefca3136303b74e98e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13127-012-0106-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13127-012-0106-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Price, Dana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feer, Francois</creatorcontrib><title>Are there pitfalls to pitfalls? Dung beetle sampling in French Guiana</title><title>Organisms diversity & evolution</title><addtitle>Org Divers Evol</addtitle><description>Dung beetles have widely been accepted as cost-effective indicator taxa for biodiversity assessment; thus, standard protocols have been created to examine their species richness and diversity in many habitats. However, the vast majority of studies adopt short-term sampling protocols; few studies have quantified sampling efficiency at longer time scales or tested the efficacy of species richness estimates. Here we present long- and short-term sampling data from two regions of French Guiana: the Nouragues Tropical Forest Research Station and Kaw Mountain. We examine species richness and diversity, and use these data to make suggestions for future biodiversity assessments of dung beetles using dung baited pitfall transects. Species richness estimates based on short-term samples strongly underestimate the actual species richness by approximately 40 %. Duration of trapping was found to be more important than the number of traps and length of transects; by setting a second transect (4-day sample period) in the same habitat of Nouragues, thereby increasing the sample duration, the number of species increased by 14 %.</description><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Dung</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Evolutionary Biology</subject><subject>Forestry research</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Research centers</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><issn>1439-6092</issn><issn>1618-1077</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wNuCFy-rM0nYbE5SaluFghc9h2w6227Z7q7J7sF_b8pKEcFDJjPD9x7DY-wW4QEB1GNAgVylgDw-yFJ-xiaYYZ4iKHUeeyl0moHml-wqhD0A54hqwhYzT0m_o1i7qi9tXYekb0_9U_I8NNukIOprSoI9dHUV56pJlp4at0tWQ2Ube80uIh7o5uefso_l4n3-kq7fVq_z2Tp1Quo-1VJLKTMsaSMyLGxeOpQbUBsN3Ba2yJ3KyTlRKLCFo9JZgSITEBeSdE5iyu5H3863nwOF3hyq4KiubUPtEAyCFtEfpIzo3R903w6-iddFSmjAXOc8UjhSzrcheCpN56uD9V8RMsdgzRisicGaY7DmqOGjJkS22ZL_7fyf6BuQnXmr</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Price, Dana L.</creator><creator>Feer, Francois</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Are there pitfalls to pitfalls? Dung beetle sampling in French Guiana</title><author>Price, Dana L. ; Feer, Francois</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-94944461fed361ba8fc14d07d902abab8c78ecc3b70abcefca3136303b74e98e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Dung</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Evolutionary Biology</topic><topic>Forestry research</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Research centers</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Price, Dana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feer, Francois</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Organisms diversity & evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Price, Dana L.</au><au>Feer, Francois</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are there pitfalls to pitfalls? Dung beetle sampling in French Guiana</atitle><jtitle>Organisms diversity & evolution</jtitle><stitle>Org Divers Evol</stitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>331</epage><pages>325-331</pages><issn>1439-6092</issn><eissn>1618-1077</eissn><abstract>Dung beetles have widely been accepted as cost-effective indicator taxa for biodiversity assessment; thus, standard protocols have been created to examine their species richness and diversity in many habitats. However, the vast majority of studies adopt short-term sampling protocols; few studies have quantified sampling efficiency at longer time scales or tested the efficacy of species richness estimates. Here we present long- and short-term sampling data from two regions of French Guiana: the Nouragues Tropical Forest Research Station and Kaw Mountain. We examine species richness and diversity, and use these data to make suggestions for future biodiversity assessments of dung beetles using dung baited pitfall transects. Species richness estimates based on short-term samples strongly underestimate the actual species richness by approximately 40 %. Duration of trapping was found to be more important than the number of traps and length of transects; by setting a second transect (4-day sample period) in the same habitat of Nouragues, thereby increasing the sample duration, the number of species increased by 14 %.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s13127-012-0106-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1439-6092 |
ispartof | Organisms diversity & evolution, 2012-09, Vol.12 (3), p.325-331 |
issn | 1439-6092 1618-1077 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1093461044 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Beetles Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Coleoptera Developmental Biology Dung Estimates Evolutionary Biology Forestry research Forests Habitats Life Sciences Original Article Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Protocols Rainforests Research centers Sampling Species diversity Species richness Tropical forests |
title | Are there pitfalls to pitfalls? Dung beetle sampling in French Guiana |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T18%3A57%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20there%20pitfalls%20to%20pitfalls?%20Dung%20beetle%20sampling%20in%20French%20Guiana&rft.jtitle=Organisms%20diversity%20&%20evolution&rft.au=Price,%20Dana%20L.&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=331&rft.pages=325-331&rft.issn=1439-6092&rft.eissn=1618-1077&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13127-012-0106-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1093461044%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1039018982&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |