What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use?

Aim: Species attributes, biogeographic features and human factors have all been shown to discriminate between invasive and non-invasive plant species. However, the relative importance of these factors, their generality in determining invasion outcomes across different regions and their ability to di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diversity & distributions 2012-10, Vol.18 (10), p.1013-1023
Hauptverfasser: McGregor, Kirsty F., Watt, Michael S., Hulme, Philip E., Duncan, Richard P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1023
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1013
container_title Diversity & distributions
container_volume 18
creator McGregor, Kirsty F.
Watt, Michael S.
Hulme, Philip E.
Duncan, Richard P.
description Aim: Species attributes, biogeographic features and human factors have all been shown to discriminate between invasive and non-invasive plant species. However, the relative importance of these factors, their generality in determining invasion outcomes across different regions and their ability to discriminate success and failure at different stages of the invasion process have not been established. Location: New Zealand (NZ) and Great Britain (GB). Methods: For species in the genus Pinus, we used boosted regression trees to identify factors associated with success or failure at the introduction and naturalization stages in each region. Results: Human factors, notably the forestry use index, were the strongest determinants of which species from the global pool were introduced to both NZ and GB. Species with a close climate match were also more likely to be introduced to NZ but not to GB. Human factors and climate match were also the strongest determinants of which introduced species became naturalized in both NZ and GB, although the order of importance differed (human factors followed by climate match for NZ and vice versa for GB). Species attributes (life-history traits and the Z-score) had much less ability to discriminate successful and failed species at both the introduction and naturalization stages in these two regions. Main conclusions: We show for the first time that human factors are more important than either species or biogeographic traits in determining the likelihood of a species being introduced or becoming naturalized. The similarity between two different regions in the factors found to be important in success at both these invasions stages points to potentially general mechanisms underlying these processes. The strong human component to introduction and naturalization highlights a potential conflict between future afforestation using alien species with conservation and management aims in the surrounding landscape, given that the factors desirable for forestry species are also those that may promote invasion.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00942.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1093460072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23326736</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23326736</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5792-bb005f957f5dfc50beb1aac2c9ab6a6130805863d9b63eb94c2ab892be1850c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFGL1DAUhYsouK7-BCEggg92vEmatBFh0V1dF8f1RVl8CjeZFFM77ZikOOOvN7XLCD6Zh-TC-c69uacoCIUVzedFt6JVzcpKVmzFgLIVgMrl_k5xchTu5ppLWSpB5f3iQYwdAHAu2Enx9eYbJrJxyYWtH1wku3yTAdMUsPe_MPlxeEnizlmfxRTQp_ic2N5vMTkSJ5_Q-N6nAxkDacfgYgoHMkV39rC412If3aPb97T48u7t5_P35frT5dX563VpRa1YaQyAaJWoW7FprQDjDEW0zCo0EiXl0IBoJN8oI7kzqrIMTaOYcbQRYBk_LZ4tfXdh_DHl-Xrro3V9j4Mbp6gpKF5JgHpGn_yDduMUhvy7TPEGeC2FzFSzUDaMMQbX6l3I64ZDhvScue70HK2eo9Vz5vpP5nqfrU9vB2C02LcBB-vj0c8kpw1UkLlXC_fT9-7w3_31xcVVLrL98WLvYhrD3_acM1nzeYNy0X1Mbn_UMXzXWa-Fvrm-1B_W1_BRqTe65r8BhiGtKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038037656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>McGregor, Kirsty F. ; Watt, Michael S. ; Hulme, Philip E. ; Duncan, Richard P.</creator><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Kirsty F. ; Watt, Michael S. ; Hulme, Philip E. ; Duncan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: Species attributes, biogeographic features and human factors have all been shown to discriminate between invasive and non-invasive plant species. However, the relative importance of these factors, their generality in determining invasion outcomes across different regions and their ability to discriminate success and failure at different stages of the invasion process have not been established. Location: New Zealand (NZ) and Great Britain (GB). Methods: For species in the genus Pinus, we used boosted regression trees to identify factors associated with success or failure at the introduction and naturalization stages in each region. Results: Human factors, notably the forestry use index, were the strongest determinants of which species from the global pool were introduced to both NZ and GB. Species with a close climate match were also more likely to be introduced to NZ but not to GB. Human factors and climate match were also the strongest determinants of which introduced species became naturalized in both NZ and GB, although the order of importance differed (human factors followed by climate match for NZ and vice versa for GB). Species attributes (life-history traits and the Z-score) had much less ability to discriminate successful and failed species at both the introduction and naturalization stages in these two regions. Main conclusions: We show for the first time that human factors are more important than either species or biogeographic traits in determining the likelihood of a species being introduced or becoming naturalized. The similarity between two different regions in the factors found to be important in success at both these invasions stages points to potentially general mechanisms underlying these processes. The strong human component to introduction and naturalization highlights a potential conflict between future afforestation using alien species with conservation and management aims in the surrounding landscape, given that the factors desirable for forestry species are also those that may promote invasion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00942.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alien species ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Biogeography ; Biological and medical sciences ; biological invasions ; climate match ; Climate science ; Coniferous forests ; Ecological invasion ; Ecological life histories ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Humans ; Invasive species ; Pine trees ; Pinus ; Plantation forestry ; Plants ; propagule pressure ; Species diversity ; traits ; weeds</subject><ispartof>Diversity &amp; distributions, 2012-10, Vol.18 (10), p.1013-1023</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5792-bb005f957f5dfc50beb1aac2c9ab6a6130805863d9b63eb94c2ab892be1850c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5792-bb005f957f5dfc50beb1aac2c9ab6a6130805863d9b63eb94c2ab892be1850c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23326736$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23326736$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1472-4642.2012.00942.x$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26318040$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Kirsty F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watt, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><title>What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use?</title><title>Diversity &amp; distributions</title><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><description>Aim: Species attributes, biogeographic features and human factors have all been shown to discriminate between invasive and non-invasive plant species. However, the relative importance of these factors, their generality in determining invasion outcomes across different regions and their ability to discriminate success and failure at different stages of the invasion process have not been established. Location: New Zealand (NZ) and Great Britain (GB). Methods: For species in the genus Pinus, we used boosted regression trees to identify factors associated with success or failure at the introduction and naturalization stages in each region. Results: Human factors, notably the forestry use index, were the strongest determinants of which species from the global pool were introduced to both NZ and GB. Species with a close climate match were also more likely to be introduced to NZ but not to GB. Human factors and climate match were also the strongest determinants of which introduced species became naturalized in both NZ and GB, although the order of importance differed (human factors followed by climate match for NZ and vice versa for GB). Species attributes (life-history traits and the Z-score) had much less ability to discriminate successful and failed species at both the introduction and naturalization stages in these two regions. Main conclusions: We show for the first time that human factors are more important than either species or biogeographic traits in determining the likelihood of a species being introduced or becoming naturalized. The similarity between two different regions in the factors found to be important in success at both these invasions stages points to potentially general mechanisms underlying these processes. The strong human component to introduction and naturalization highlights a potential conflict between future afforestation using alien species with conservation and management aims in the surrounding landscape, given that the factors desirable for forestry species are also those that may promote invasion.</description><subject>Alien species</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biological invasions</subject><subject>climate match</subject><subject>Climate science</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Ecological invasion</subject><subject>Ecological life histories</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus</subject><subject>Plantation forestry</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>propagule pressure</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>traits</subject><subject>weeds</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkFGL1DAUhYsouK7-BCEggg92vEmatBFh0V1dF8f1RVl8CjeZFFM77ZikOOOvN7XLCD6Zh-TC-c69uacoCIUVzedFt6JVzcpKVmzFgLIVgMrl_k5xchTu5ppLWSpB5f3iQYwdAHAu2Enx9eYbJrJxyYWtH1wku3yTAdMUsPe_MPlxeEnizlmfxRTQp_ic2N5vMTkSJ5_Q-N6nAxkDacfgYgoHMkV39rC412If3aPb97T48u7t5_P35frT5dX563VpRa1YaQyAaJWoW7FprQDjDEW0zCo0EiXl0IBoJN8oI7kzqrIMTaOYcbQRYBk_LZ4tfXdh_DHl-Xrro3V9j4Mbp6gpKF5JgHpGn_yDduMUhvy7TPEGeC2FzFSzUDaMMQbX6l3I64ZDhvScue70HK2eo9Vz5vpP5nqfrU9vB2C02LcBB-vj0c8kpw1UkLlXC_fT9-7w3_31xcVVLrL98WLvYhrD3_acM1nzeYNy0X1Mbn_UMXzXWa-Fvrm-1B_W1_BRqTe65r8BhiGtKg</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>McGregor, Kirsty F.</creator><creator>Watt, Michael S.</creator><creator>Hulme, Philip E.</creator><creator>Duncan, Richard P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use?</title><author>McGregor, Kirsty F. ; Watt, Michael S. ; Hulme, Philip E. ; Duncan, Richard P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5792-bb005f957f5dfc50beb1aac2c9ab6a6130805863d9b63eb94c2ab892be1850c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Alien species</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biological invasions</topic><topic>climate match</topic><topic>Climate science</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Ecological invasion</topic><topic>Ecological life histories</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus</topic><topic>Plantation forestry</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>propagule pressure</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>traits</topic><topic>weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Kirsty F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watt, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGregor, Kirsty F.</au><au>Watt, Michael S.</au><au>Hulme, Philip E.</au><au>Duncan, Richard P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use?</atitle><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1013</spage><epage>1023</epage><pages>1013-1023</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim: Species attributes, biogeographic features and human factors have all been shown to discriminate between invasive and non-invasive plant species. However, the relative importance of these factors, their generality in determining invasion outcomes across different regions and their ability to discriminate success and failure at different stages of the invasion process have not been established. Location: New Zealand (NZ) and Great Britain (GB). Methods: For species in the genus Pinus, we used boosted regression trees to identify factors associated with success or failure at the introduction and naturalization stages in each region. Results: Human factors, notably the forestry use index, were the strongest determinants of which species from the global pool were introduced to both NZ and GB. Species with a close climate match were also more likely to be introduced to NZ but not to GB. Human factors and climate match were also the strongest determinants of which introduced species became naturalized in both NZ and GB, although the order of importance differed (human factors followed by climate match for NZ and vice versa for GB). Species attributes (life-history traits and the Z-score) had much less ability to discriminate successful and failed species at both the introduction and naturalization stages in these two regions. Main conclusions: We show for the first time that human factors are more important than either species or biogeographic traits in determining the likelihood of a species being introduced or becoming naturalized. The similarity between two different regions in the factors found to be important in success at both these invasions stages points to potentially general mechanisms underlying these processes. The strong human component to introduction and naturalization highlights a potential conflict between future afforestation using alien species with conservation and management aims in the surrounding landscape, given that the factors desirable for forestry species are also those that may promote invasion.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00942.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1366-9516
ispartof Diversity & distributions, 2012-10, Vol.18 (10), p.1013-1023
issn 1366-9516
1472-4642
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1093460072
source Wiley Online Library Open Access
subjects Alien species
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH
Biogeography
Biological and medical sciences
biological invasions
climate match
Climate science
Coniferous forests
Ecological invasion
Ecological life histories
Forestry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Humans
Invasive species
Pine trees
Pinus
Plantation forestry
Plants
propagule pressure
Species diversity
traits
weeds
title What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A06%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20determines%20pine%20naturalization:%20species%20traits,%20climate%20suitability%20or%20forestry%20use?&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=McGregor,%20Kirsty%20F.&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1013&rft.epage=1023&rft.pages=1013-1023&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00942.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_24P%3E23326736%3C/jstor_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038037656&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23326736&rfr_iscdi=true