What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use?
Aim: Species attributes, biogeographic features and human factors have all been shown to discriminate between invasive and non-invasive plant species. However, the relative importance of these factors, their generality in determining invasion outcomes across different regions and their ability to di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diversity & distributions 2012-10, Vol.18 (10), p.1013-1023 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1023 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1013 |
container_title | Diversity & distributions |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | McGregor, Kirsty F. Watt, Michael S. Hulme, Philip E. Duncan, Richard P. |
description | Aim: Species attributes, biogeographic features and human factors have all been shown to discriminate between invasive and non-invasive plant species. However, the relative importance of these factors, their generality in determining invasion outcomes across different regions and their ability to discriminate success and failure at different stages of the invasion process have not been established. Location: New Zealand (NZ) and Great Britain (GB). Methods: For species in the genus Pinus, we used boosted regression trees to identify factors associated with success or failure at the introduction and naturalization stages in each region. Results: Human factors, notably the forestry use index, were the strongest determinants of which species from the global pool were introduced to both NZ and GB. Species with a close climate match were also more likely to be introduced to NZ but not to GB. Human factors and climate match were also the strongest determinants of which introduced species became naturalized in both NZ and GB, although the order of importance differed (human factors followed by climate match for NZ and vice versa for GB). Species attributes (life-history traits and the Z-score) had much less ability to discriminate successful and failed species at both the introduction and naturalization stages in these two regions. Main conclusions: We show for the first time that human factors are more important than either species or biogeographic traits in determining the likelihood of a species being introduced or becoming naturalized. The similarity between two different regions in the factors found to be important in success at both these invasions stages points to potentially general mechanisms underlying these processes. The strong human component to introduction and naturalization highlights a potential conflict between future afforestation using alien species with conservation and management aims in the surrounding landscape, given that the factors desirable for forestry species are also those that may promote invasion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00942.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1093460072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23326736</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23326736</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5792-bb005f957f5dfc50beb1aac2c9ab6a6130805863d9b63eb94c2ab892be1850c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkFGL1DAUhYsouK7-BCEggg92vEmatBFh0V1dF8f1RVl8CjeZFFM77ZikOOOvN7XLCD6Zh-TC-c69uacoCIUVzedFt6JVzcpKVmzFgLIVgMrl_k5xchTu5ppLWSpB5f3iQYwdAHAu2Enx9eYbJrJxyYWtH1wku3yTAdMUsPe_MPlxeEnizlmfxRTQp_ic2N5vMTkSJ5_Q-N6nAxkDacfgYgoHMkV39rC412If3aPb97T48u7t5_P35frT5dX563VpRa1YaQyAaJWoW7FprQDjDEW0zCo0EiXl0IBoJN8oI7kzqrIMTaOYcbQRYBk_LZ4tfXdh_DHl-Xrro3V9j4Mbp6gpKF5JgHpGn_yDduMUhvy7TPEGeC2FzFSzUDaMMQbX6l3I64ZDhvScue70HK2eo9Vz5vpP5nqfrU9vB2C02LcBB-vj0c8kpw1UkLlXC_fT9-7w3_31xcVVLrL98WLvYhrD3_acM1nzeYNy0X1Mbn_UMXzXWa-Fvrm-1B_W1_BRqTe65r8BhiGtKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038037656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>McGregor, Kirsty F. ; Watt, Michael S. ; Hulme, Philip E. ; Duncan, Richard P.</creator><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Kirsty F. ; Watt, Michael S. ; Hulme, Philip E. ; Duncan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: Species attributes, biogeographic features and human factors have all been shown to discriminate between invasive and non-invasive plant species. However, the relative importance of these factors, their generality in determining invasion outcomes across different regions and their ability to discriminate success and failure at different stages of the invasion process have not been established. Location: New Zealand (NZ) and Great Britain (GB). Methods: For species in the genus Pinus, we used boosted regression trees to identify factors associated with success or failure at the introduction and naturalization stages in each region. Results: Human factors, notably the forestry use index, were the strongest determinants of which species from the global pool were introduced to both NZ and GB. Species with a close climate match were also more likely to be introduced to NZ but not to GB. Human factors and climate match were also the strongest determinants of which introduced species became naturalized in both NZ and GB, although the order of importance differed (human factors followed by climate match for NZ and vice versa for GB). Species attributes (life-history traits and the Z-score) had much less ability to discriminate successful and failed species at both the introduction and naturalization stages in these two regions. Main conclusions: We show for the first time that human factors are more important than either species or biogeographic traits in determining the likelihood of a species being introduced or becoming naturalized. The similarity between two different regions in the factors found to be important in success at both these invasions stages points to potentially general mechanisms underlying these processes. The strong human component to introduction and naturalization highlights a potential conflict between future afforestation using alien species with conservation and management aims in the surrounding landscape, given that the factors desirable for forestry species are also those that may promote invasion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00942.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alien species ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; Biogeography ; Biological and medical sciences ; biological invasions ; climate match ; Climate science ; Coniferous forests ; Ecological invasion ; Ecological life histories ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Humans ; Invasive species ; Pine trees ; Pinus ; Plantation forestry ; Plants ; propagule pressure ; Species diversity ; traits ; weeds</subject><ispartof>Diversity & distributions, 2012-10, Vol.18 (10), p.1013-1023</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5792-bb005f957f5dfc50beb1aac2c9ab6a6130805863d9b63eb94c2ab892be1850c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5792-bb005f957f5dfc50beb1aac2c9ab6a6130805863d9b63eb94c2ab892be1850c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23326736$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23326736$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1472-4642.2012.00942.x$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26318040$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Kirsty F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watt, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><title>What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use?</title><title>Diversity & distributions</title><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><description>Aim: Species attributes, biogeographic features and human factors have all been shown to discriminate between invasive and non-invasive plant species. However, the relative importance of these factors, their generality in determining invasion outcomes across different regions and their ability to discriminate success and failure at different stages of the invasion process have not been established. Location: New Zealand (NZ) and Great Britain (GB). Methods: For species in the genus Pinus, we used boosted regression trees to identify factors associated with success or failure at the introduction and naturalization stages in each region. Results: Human factors, notably the forestry use index, were the strongest determinants of which species from the global pool were introduced to both NZ and GB. Species with a close climate match were also more likely to be introduced to NZ but not to GB. Human factors and climate match were also the strongest determinants of which introduced species became naturalized in both NZ and GB, although the order of importance differed (human factors followed by climate match for NZ and vice versa for GB). Species attributes (life-history traits and the Z-score) had much less ability to discriminate successful and failed species at both the introduction and naturalization stages in these two regions. Main conclusions: We show for the first time that human factors are more important than either species or biogeographic traits in determining the likelihood of a species being introduced or becoming naturalized. The similarity between two different regions in the factors found to be important in success at both these invasions stages points to potentially general mechanisms underlying these processes. The strong human component to introduction and naturalization highlights a potential conflict between future afforestation using alien species with conservation and management aims in the surrounding landscape, given that the factors desirable for forestry species are also those that may promote invasion.</description><subject>Alien species</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>biological invasions</subject><subject>climate match</subject><subject>Climate science</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Ecological invasion</subject><subject>Ecological life histories</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Pinus</subject><subject>Plantation forestry</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>propagule pressure</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>traits</subject><subject>weeds</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkFGL1DAUhYsouK7-BCEggg92vEmatBFh0V1dF8f1RVl8CjeZFFM77ZikOOOvN7XLCD6Zh-TC-c69uacoCIUVzedFt6JVzcpKVmzFgLIVgMrl_k5xchTu5ppLWSpB5f3iQYwdAHAu2Enx9eYbJrJxyYWtH1wku3yTAdMUsPe_MPlxeEnizlmfxRTQp_ic2N5vMTkSJ5_Q-N6nAxkDacfgYgoHMkV39rC412If3aPb97T48u7t5_P35frT5dX563VpRa1YaQyAaJWoW7FprQDjDEW0zCo0EiXl0IBoJN8oI7kzqrIMTaOYcbQRYBk_LZ4tfXdh_DHl-Xrro3V9j4Mbp6gpKF5JgHpGn_yDduMUhvy7TPEGeC2FzFSzUDaMMQbX6l3I64ZDhvScue70HK2eo9Vz5vpP5nqfrU9vB2C02LcBB-vj0c8kpw1UkLlXC_fT9-7w3_31xcVVLrL98WLvYhrD3_acM1nzeYNy0X1Mbn_UMXzXWa-Fvrm-1B_W1_BRqTe65r8BhiGtKg</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>McGregor, Kirsty F.</creator><creator>Watt, Michael S.</creator><creator>Hulme, Philip E.</creator><creator>Duncan, Richard P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use?</title><author>McGregor, Kirsty F. ; Watt, Michael S. ; Hulme, Philip E. ; Duncan, Richard P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5792-bb005f957f5dfc50beb1aac2c9ab6a6130805863d9b63eb94c2ab892be1850c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Alien species</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>biological invasions</topic><topic>climate match</topic><topic>Climate science</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Ecological invasion</topic><topic>Ecological life histories</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Pinus</topic><topic>Plantation forestry</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>propagule pressure</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>traits</topic><topic>weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Kirsty F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watt, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hulme, Philip E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Diversity & distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGregor, Kirsty F.</au><au>Watt, Michael S.</au><au>Hulme, Philip E.</au><au>Duncan, Richard P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use?</atitle><jtitle>Diversity & distributions</jtitle><addtitle>Diversity Distrib</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1013</spage><epage>1023</epage><pages>1013-1023</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim: Species attributes, biogeographic features and human factors have all been shown to discriminate between invasive and non-invasive plant species. However, the relative importance of these factors, their generality in determining invasion outcomes across different regions and their ability to discriminate success and failure at different stages of the invasion process have not been established. Location: New Zealand (NZ) and Great Britain (GB). Methods: For species in the genus Pinus, we used boosted regression trees to identify factors associated with success or failure at the introduction and naturalization stages in each region. Results: Human factors, notably the forestry use index, were the strongest determinants of which species from the global pool were introduced to both NZ and GB. Species with a close climate match were also more likely to be introduced to NZ but not to GB. Human factors and climate match were also the strongest determinants of which introduced species became naturalized in both NZ and GB, although the order of importance differed (human factors followed by climate match for NZ and vice versa for GB). Species attributes (life-history traits and the Z-score) had much less ability to discriminate successful and failed species at both the introduction and naturalization stages in these two regions. Main conclusions: We show for the first time that human factors are more important than either species or biogeographic traits in determining the likelihood of a species being introduced or becoming naturalized. The similarity between two different regions in the factors found to be important in success at both these invasions stages points to potentially general mechanisms underlying these processes. The strong human component to introduction and naturalization highlights a potential conflict between future afforestation using alien species with conservation and management aims in the surrounding landscape, given that the factors desirable for forestry species are also those that may promote invasion.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00942.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-9516 |
ispartof | Diversity & distributions, 2012-10, Vol.18 (10), p.1013-1023 |
issn | 1366-9516 1472-4642 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1093460072 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access |
subjects | Alien species Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH Biogeography Biological and medical sciences biological invasions climate match Climate science Coniferous forests Ecological invasion Ecological life histories Forestry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Humans Invasive species Pine trees Pinus Plantation forestry Plants propagule pressure Species diversity traits weeds |
title | What determines pine naturalization: species traits, climate suitability or forestry use? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A06%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20determines%20pine%20naturalization:%20species%20traits,%20climate%20suitability%20or%20forestry%20use?&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=McGregor,%20Kirsty%20F.&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1013&rft.epage=1023&rft.pages=1013-1023&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00942.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_24P%3E23326736%3C/jstor_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038037656&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23326736&rfr_iscdi=true |