An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy

Purpose Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) decrease morbidity and duration of stay after colorectal surgery. There is little information about their role in complex procedures, such as esophagectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an ERP on duration of stay, complications, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 2012-10, Vol.152 (4), p.606-616
Hauptverfasser: Li, Chao, MD, Ferri, Lorenzo E., MD, PhD, Mulder, David S., MD, Ncuti, Annie, BSc, Neville, Amy, MD, Lee, Lawrence, MD, Kaneva, Pepa, MSc, Watson, Debbie, RN, Vassiliou, Melina, MD, Carli, Franco, MD, MPhil, Feldman, Liane S., MD, FRCSC, FACS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 616
container_issue 4
container_start_page 606
container_title Surgery
container_volume 152
creator Li, Chao, MD
Ferri, Lorenzo E., MD, PhD
Mulder, David S., MD
Ncuti, Annie, BSc
Neville, Amy, MD
Lee, Lawrence, MD
Kaneva, Pepa, MSc
Watson, Debbie, RN
Vassiliou, Melina, MD
Carli, Franco, MD, MPhil
Feldman, Liane S., MD, FRCSC, FACS
description Purpose Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) decrease morbidity and duration of stay after colorectal surgery. There is little information about their role in complex procedures, such as esophagectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an ERP on duration of stay, complications, and readmissions after esophagectomy. Methods Patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer or high-grade dysplasia from June 2009 to December 2011 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Beginning in June 2010, all patients were enrolled in a 7-day multidisciplinary ERP including written patient education with daily treatment plan, indications for intensive care admission, early structured mobilization, and diet and drain management. Short-term (30-day) outcomes were compared for patients undergoing esophagectomy pre- and post-pathway. Data are expressed as median values [interquartile range]. Results We identified 106 patients; 47 underwent esophagectomy before ERP implementation and 59 after. Patients were similar with respect to age, gender, diagnosis, and operative time. Hospital stay was shorter in the ERP group (8 [7–17] vs 10 [9–17] days; P = .01). There were no differences in rates of complications (59% vs 62%) or readmissions (6% vs 5%). Conclusion Implementation of a multidisciplinary ERP for esophagectomy was associated with decreased duration of stay, without an increase in complications or readmissions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1081874945</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0039606012003728</els_id><sourcerecordid>1081874945</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-32521094fd7ea861032dfcfe05b001ab3acc9c0fb85074d4a5a9371d9b21864d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAuSD1kjD-iJNICKmq-BKVOLScLcced71k48VOWuXf42gXkDj0NJbmecejZwh5TaGiQOW7XZXmeFcxoKyCpgJGn5ANrTkrGy7pU7IB4F0pQcIZeZHSDgA6Qdvn5IyxTvBWiA35djkWOG71aNAWEU24x7gUBz1tH_RSWDQRdcJU2DnqyYexCK5IU25pN2EsMIXDVt-hmcJ-eUmeOT0kfHWq5-THp4-3V1_K6--fv15dXpemhmYqOasZzZs426BuJQXOrDMOoe4BqO65NqYz4Po248IKXeuON9R2PaOtFJafk4vj3EMMv2ZMk9r7ZHAY9IhhTopCS9tGdKLOKDuiJoaUIjp1iH6v45IhtUpUO7VKVKtEBY3KEnPozWn-3O_R_o38sZaBtydAJ6MHF7M-n_5xUkjeSZa590cOs417j1El43FV7bPqSdngH9_jw39xM_jR5x9_4oJpF-Y4Zs-KqpQz6mY993ptyvKrYS3_DRl_pNE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1081874945</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Li, Chao, MD ; Ferri, Lorenzo E., MD, PhD ; Mulder, David S., MD ; Ncuti, Annie, BSc ; Neville, Amy, MD ; Lee, Lawrence, MD ; Kaneva, Pepa, MSc ; Watson, Debbie, RN ; Vassiliou, Melina, MD ; Carli, Franco, MD, MPhil ; Feldman, Liane S., MD, FRCSC, FACS</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Chao, MD ; Ferri, Lorenzo E., MD, PhD ; Mulder, David S., MD ; Ncuti, Annie, BSc ; Neville, Amy, MD ; Lee, Lawrence, MD ; Kaneva, Pepa, MSc ; Watson, Debbie, RN ; Vassiliou, Melina, MD ; Carli, Franco, MD, MPhil ; Feldman, Liane S., MD, FRCSC, FACS</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) decrease morbidity and duration of stay after colorectal surgery. There is little information about their role in complex procedures, such as esophagectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an ERP on duration of stay, complications, and readmissions after esophagectomy. Methods Patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer or high-grade dysplasia from June 2009 to December 2011 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Beginning in June 2010, all patients were enrolled in a 7-day multidisciplinary ERP including written patient education with daily treatment plan, indications for intensive care admission, early structured mobilization, and diet and drain management. Short-term (30-day) outcomes were compared for patients undergoing esophagectomy pre- and post-pathway. Data are expressed as median values [interquartile range]. Results We identified 106 patients; 47 underwent esophagectomy before ERP implementation and 59 after. Patients were similar with respect to age, gender, diagnosis, and operative time. Hospital stay was shorter in the ERP group (8 [7–17] vs 10 [9–17] days; P = .01). There were no differences in rates of complications (59% vs 62%) or readmissions (6% vs 5%). Conclusion Implementation of a multidisciplinary ERP for esophagectomy was associated with decreased duration of stay, without an increase in complications or readmissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22943844</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SURGAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Esophageal Diseases - surgery ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Esophagectomy - adverse effects ; Esophagectomy - methods ; Esophagus ; Female ; General aspects ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Patient Education as Topic ; Patient Readmission ; Perioperative Care ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Prospective Studies ; Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 2012-10, Vol.152 (4), p.606-616</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2012 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-32521094fd7ea861032dfcfe05b001ab3acc9c0fb85074d4a5a9371d9b21864d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-32521094fd7ea861032dfcfe05b001ab3acc9c0fb85074d4a5a9371d9b21864d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26463962$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22943844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Chao, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferri, Lorenzo E., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulder, David S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ncuti, Annie, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neville, Amy, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Lawrence, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaneva, Pepa, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Debbie, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassiliou, Melina, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carli, Franco, MD, MPhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Liane S., MD, FRCSC, FACS</creatorcontrib><title>An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>Purpose Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) decrease morbidity and duration of stay after colorectal surgery. There is little information about their role in complex procedures, such as esophagectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an ERP on duration of stay, complications, and readmissions after esophagectomy. Methods Patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer or high-grade dysplasia from June 2009 to December 2011 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Beginning in June 2010, all patients were enrolled in a 7-day multidisciplinary ERP including written patient education with daily treatment plan, indications for intensive care admission, early structured mobilization, and diet and drain management. Short-term (30-day) outcomes were compared for patients undergoing esophagectomy pre- and post-pathway. Data are expressed as median values [interquartile range]. Results We identified 106 patients; 47 underwent esophagectomy before ERP implementation and 59 after. Patients were similar with respect to age, gender, diagnosis, and operative time. Hospital stay was shorter in the ERP group (8 [7–17] vs 10 [9–17] days; P = .01). There were no differences in rates of complications (59% vs 62%) or readmissions (6% vs 5%). Conclusion Implementation of a multidisciplinary ERP for esophagectomy was associated with decreased duration of stay, without an increase in complications or readmissions.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - methods</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Patient Readmission</subject><subject>Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhD3BAuSD1kjD-iJNICKmq-BKVOLScLcced71k48VOWuXf42gXkDj0NJbmecejZwh5TaGiQOW7XZXmeFcxoKyCpgJGn5ANrTkrGy7pU7IB4F0pQcIZeZHSDgA6Qdvn5IyxTvBWiA35djkWOG71aNAWEU24x7gUBz1tH_RSWDQRdcJU2DnqyYexCK5IU25pN2EsMIXDVt-hmcJ-eUmeOT0kfHWq5-THp4-3V1_K6--fv15dXpemhmYqOasZzZs426BuJQXOrDMOoe4BqO65NqYz4Po248IKXeuON9R2PaOtFJafk4vj3EMMv2ZMk9r7ZHAY9IhhTopCS9tGdKLOKDuiJoaUIjp1iH6v45IhtUpUO7VKVKtEBY3KEnPozWn-3O_R_o38sZaBtydAJ6MHF7M-n_5xUkjeSZa590cOs417j1El43FV7bPqSdngH9_jw39xM_jR5x9_4oJpF-Y4Zs-KqpQz6mY993ptyvKrYS3_DRl_pNE</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Li, Chao, MD</creator><creator>Ferri, Lorenzo E., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Mulder, David S., MD</creator><creator>Ncuti, Annie, BSc</creator><creator>Neville, Amy, MD</creator><creator>Lee, Lawrence, MD</creator><creator>Kaneva, Pepa, MSc</creator><creator>Watson, Debbie, RN</creator><creator>Vassiliou, Melina, MD</creator><creator>Carli, Franco, MD, MPhil</creator><creator>Feldman, Liane S., MD, FRCSC, FACS</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy</title><author>Li, Chao, MD ; Ferri, Lorenzo E., MD, PhD ; Mulder, David S., MD ; Ncuti, Annie, BSc ; Neville, Amy, MD ; Lee, Lawrence, MD ; Kaneva, Pepa, MSc ; Watson, Debbie, RN ; Vassiliou, Melina, MD ; Carli, Franco, MD, MPhil ; Feldman, Liane S., MD, FRCSC, FACS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-32521094fd7ea861032dfcfe05b001ab3acc9c0fb85074d4a5a9371d9b21864d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - methods</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Patient Readmission</topic><topic>Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Chao, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferri, Lorenzo E., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulder, David S., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ncuti, Annie, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neville, Amy, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Lawrence, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaneva, Pepa, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Debbie, RN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vassiliou, Melina, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carli, Franco, MD, MPhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Liane S., MD, FRCSC, FACS</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Chao, MD</au><au>Ferri, Lorenzo E., MD, PhD</au><au>Mulder, David S., MD</au><au>Ncuti, Annie, BSc</au><au>Neville, Amy, MD</au><au>Lee, Lawrence, MD</au><au>Kaneva, Pepa, MSc</au><au>Watson, Debbie, RN</au><au>Vassiliou, Melina, MD</au><au>Carli, Franco, MD, MPhil</au><au>Feldman, Liane S., MD, FRCSC, FACS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>606</spage><epage>616</epage><pages>606-616</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><coden>SURGAZ</coden><abstract>Purpose Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) decrease morbidity and duration of stay after colorectal surgery. There is little information about their role in complex procedures, such as esophagectomy. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an ERP on duration of stay, complications, and readmissions after esophagectomy. Methods Patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer or high-grade dysplasia from June 2009 to December 2011 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Beginning in June 2010, all patients were enrolled in a 7-day multidisciplinary ERP including written patient education with daily treatment plan, indications for intensive care admission, early structured mobilization, and diet and drain management. Short-term (30-day) outcomes were compared for patients undergoing esophagectomy pre- and post-pathway. Data are expressed as median values [interquartile range]. Results We identified 106 patients; 47 underwent esophagectomy before ERP implementation and 59 after. Patients were similar with respect to age, gender, diagnosis, and operative time. Hospital stay was shorter in the ERP group (8 [7–17] vs 10 [9–17] days; P = .01). There were no differences in rates of complications (59% vs 62%) or readmissions (6% vs 5%). Conclusion Implementation of a multidisciplinary ERP for esophagectomy was associated with decreased duration of stay, without an increase in complications or readmissions.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>22943844</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.021</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 2012-10, Vol.152 (4), p.606-616
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1081874945
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Esophageal Diseases - surgery
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophagectomy - adverse effects
Esophagectomy - methods
Esophagus
Female
General aspects
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Patient Education as Topic
Patient Readmission
Perioperative Care
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Prospective Studies
Stomach, duodenum, intestine, rectum, anus
Surgery
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
Treatment Outcome
title An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T17%3A13%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20enhanced%20recovery%20pathway%20decreases%20duration%20of%20stay%20after%20esophagectomy&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Li,%20Chao,%20MD&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=606&rft.epage=616&rft.pages=606-616&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft.coden=SURGAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1081874945%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1081874945&rft_id=info:pmid/22943844&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0039606012003728&rfr_iscdi=true