Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism

The world has now experienced what could be regarded as 20 years of Institutional Liberalism: the dominance of the view that cooperation in world politics can be enhanced through the construction and support of multilateral institutions based on liberal principles. E. H. Carr was famously skeptical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International relations (London) 2012-06, Vol.26 (2), p.125-138
1. Verfasser: Keohane, Robert O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138
container_issue 2
container_start_page 125
container_title International relations (London)
container_volume 26
creator Keohane, Robert O.
description The world has now experienced what could be regarded as 20 years of Institutional Liberalism: the dominance of the view that cooperation in world politics can be enhanced through the construction and support of multilateral institutions based on liberal principles. E. H. Carr was famously skeptical of liberalism as he understood that tradition. This essay, prepared originally as the E. H. Carr Lecture at Aberystwyth University, interrogates Institutional Liberalism through a lens provided by Carr’s most famous book on international relations, The Twenty Years’ Crisis. It points out three trends since the 1990s that may be associated with Institutional Liberalism: increasing legalization; trends toward more legalism and moralism; and a decline in the coherence of some international regimes. Reviewing these trends in light of Realist critiques of liberalism, the essay rejects Realism as a good moral or practical guide to world politics, but reaffirms the value of the Realist view that institutions depend on structures of power and interests. Increases in legalization, legalism and moralism reflect a fusion of the social purpose of liberal democracies with their unprecedented geopolitical power since 1991. But declines in the coherence of international regimes reflect a greater divergence of interests, weighted by power. All international institutions are flawed and in some ways precarious, but strengthening them in ways that reflect legitimate social purposes remains a major challenge for our time.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0047117812438451
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1081861271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0047117812438451</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1033284733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f4762f8cf2b88b335206739ed77e4a74f932a69250a9549cbd5e2be0477181cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AQhhdRMFbvHnPsJbo7u8lsjlL8KAS81IOnsElnJSUfdSdB-u9NqSdB8DQD7_MOwyPErZJ3SiHeS2lwXqwCo61J1ZmIFBqVgM3gXETHODnml-KKeSclAOQYieXmi_rxEL-TCxwPPl73PDbjNDZD79q4aCoKrm24uxYX3rVMNz9zId6eHjerl6R4fV6vHoqkNjIdE28wA29rD5W1ldYpyAx1TltEMg6NzzW4LIdUujw1eV1tU4KK5u9QWVV7vRDL0919GD4n4rHsGq6pbV1Pw8SlklbZTAGqf6BagzWo9YzKE1qHgTmQL_eh6Vw4zFB59Ff-9jdXklOF3QeVu2EKsxD-m_8G6ehszw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1033284733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>Keohane, Robert O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Keohane, Robert O.</creatorcontrib><description>The world has now experienced what could be regarded as 20 years of Institutional Liberalism: the dominance of the view that cooperation in world politics can be enhanced through the construction and support of multilateral institutions based on liberal principles. E. H. Carr was famously skeptical of liberalism as he understood that tradition. This essay, prepared originally as the E. H. Carr Lecture at Aberystwyth University, interrogates Institutional Liberalism through a lens provided by Carr’s most famous book on international relations, The Twenty Years’ Crisis. It points out three trends since the 1990s that may be associated with Institutional Liberalism: increasing legalization; trends toward more legalism and moralism; and a decline in the coherence of some international regimes. Reviewing these trends in light of Realist critiques of liberalism, the essay rejects Realism as a good moral or practical guide to world politics, but reaffirms the value of the Realist view that institutions depend on structures of power and interests. Increases in legalization, legalism and moralism reflect a fusion of the social purpose of liberal democracies with their unprecedented geopolitical power since 1991. But declines in the coherence of international regimes reflect a greater divergence of interests, weighted by power. All international institutions are flawed and in some ways precarious, but strengthening them in ways that reflect legitimate social purposes remains a major challenge for our time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-1178</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0047117812438451</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Ethics ; Geopolitics ; Institutions ; International Cooperation ; International regimes ; International Relations ; Liberalism ; Multilateralism ; Political power ; Power ; Realism ; Universities ; World politics</subject><ispartof>International relations (London), 2012-06, Vol.26 (2), p.125-138</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f4762f8cf2b88b335206739ed77e4a74f932a69250a9549cbd5e2be0477181cf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0047117812438451$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0047117812438451$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keohane, Robert O.</creatorcontrib><title>Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism</title><title>International relations (London)</title><description>The world has now experienced what could be regarded as 20 years of Institutional Liberalism: the dominance of the view that cooperation in world politics can be enhanced through the construction and support of multilateral institutions based on liberal principles. E. H. Carr was famously skeptical of liberalism as he understood that tradition. This essay, prepared originally as the E. H. Carr Lecture at Aberystwyth University, interrogates Institutional Liberalism through a lens provided by Carr’s most famous book on international relations, The Twenty Years’ Crisis. It points out three trends since the 1990s that may be associated with Institutional Liberalism: increasing legalization; trends toward more legalism and moralism; and a decline in the coherence of some international regimes. Reviewing these trends in light of Realist critiques of liberalism, the essay rejects Realism as a good moral or practical guide to world politics, but reaffirms the value of the Realist view that institutions depend on structures of power and interests. Increases in legalization, legalism and moralism reflect a fusion of the social purpose of liberal democracies with their unprecedented geopolitical power since 1991. But declines in the coherence of international regimes reflect a greater divergence of interests, weighted by power. All international institutions are flawed and in some ways precarious, but strengthening them in ways that reflect legitimate social purposes remains a major challenge for our time.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>International regimes</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>Liberalism</subject><subject>Multilateralism</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Realism</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>World politics</subject><issn>0047-1178</issn><issn>1741-2862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AQhhdRMFbvHnPsJbo7u8lsjlL8KAS81IOnsElnJSUfdSdB-u9NqSdB8DQD7_MOwyPErZJ3SiHeS2lwXqwCo61J1ZmIFBqVgM3gXETHODnml-KKeSclAOQYieXmi_rxEL-TCxwPPl73PDbjNDZD79q4aCoKrm24uxYX3rVMNz9zId6eHjerl6R4fV6vHoqkNjIdE28wA29rD5W1ldYpyAx1TltEMg6NzzW4LIdUujw1eV1tU4KK5u9QWVV7vRDL0919GD4n4rHsGq6pbV1Pw8SlklbZTAGqf6BagzWo9YzKE1qHgTmQL_eh6Vw4zFB59Ff-9jdXklOF3QeVu2EKsxD-m_8G6ehszw</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Keohane, Robert O.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism</title><author>Keohane, Robert O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-f4762f8cf2b88b335206739ed77e4a74f932a69250a9549cbd5e2be0477181cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>International regimes</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>Liberalism</topic><topic>Multilateralism</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Realism</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>World politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keohane, Robert O.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International relations (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keohane, Robert O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism</atitle><jtitle>International relations (London)</jtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>125-138</pages><issn>0047-1178</issn><eissn>1741-2862</eissn><abstract>The world has now experienced what could be regarded as 20 years of Institutional Liberalism: the dominance of the view that cooperation in world politics can be enhanced through the construction and support of multilateral institutions based on liberal principles. E. H. Carr was famously skeptical of liberalism as he understood that tradition. This essay, prepared originally as the E. H. Carr Lecture at Aberystwyth University, interrogates Institutional Liberalism through a lens provided by Carr’s most famous book on international relations, The Twenty Years’ Crisis. It points out three trends since the 1990s that may be associated with Institutional Liberalism: increasing legalization; trends toward more legalism and moralism; and a decline in the coherence of some international regimes. Reviewing these trends in light of Realist critiques of liberalism, the essay rejects Realism as a good moral or practical guide to world politics, but reaffirms the value of the Realist view that institutions depend on structures of power and interests. Increases in legalization, legalism and moralism reflect a fusion of the social purpose of liberal democracies with their unprecedented geopolitical power since 1991. But declines in the coherence of international regimes reflect a greater divergence of interests, weighted by power. All international institutions are flawed and in some ways precarious, but strengthening them in ways that reflect legitimate social purposes remains a major challenge for our time.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0047117812438451</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-1178
ispartof International relations (London), 2012-06, Vol.26 (2), p.125-138
issn 0047-1178
1741-2862
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1081861271
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Journals Online
subjects Democracy
Ethics
Geopolitics
Institutions
International Cooperation
International regimes
International Relations
Liberalism
Multilateralism
Political power
Power
Realism
Universities
World politics
title Twenty Years of Institutional Liberalism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T15%3A45%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Twenty%20Years%20of%20Institutional%20Liberalism&rft.jtitle=International%20relations%20(London)&rft.au=Keohane,%20Robert%20O.&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=125-138&rft.issn=0047-1178&rft.eissn=1741-2862&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0047117812438451&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1033284733%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1033284733&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0047117812438451&rfr_iscdi=true