The Importance of Being in School: A Report on Absenteeism in the Nation's Public Schools

America's education system is based on the assumption that barring illness or an extraordinary event, students are in class every weekday. So strong is this assumption that it is not even measured. It is the rare state education department, school district, or principal that can tell one how ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Education digest 2012-10, Vol.78 (2), p.4
Hauptverfasser: Balfanz, Robert, Byrnes, Vaughan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 4
container_title The Education digest
container_volume 78
creator Balfanz, Robert
Byrnes, Vaughan
description America's education system is based on the assumption that barring illness or an extraordinary event, students are in class every weekday. So strong is this assumption that it is not even measured. It is the rare state education department, school district, or principal that can tell one how many students have missed 10% or more of the school year or in the previous year missed a month or more--two common definitions of chronic absence. Because it is not measured, chronic absenteeism is not acted upon. Chronic absenteeism can wreak havoc long before it is discovered. That havoc may have undermined school reform efforts of the past quarter century and negated the positive impact of future efforts. Chronic absenteeism is not the same as truancy or average daily attendance. Chronic absenteeism means missing 10% of a school year for any reason. A school can have average daily attendance of 90% and still have 40% of its students chronically absent, because on different days, different students make up that 90%. Data from only six states address this issue: Georgia, Florida, Maryland, Nebraska, Oregon, and Rhode Island. How these states measure chronic absenteeism, however, differs by number of days and by whether or not data include transfer students. Such limited data produce only an educated guess at the size of the nation's attendance challenge: A national rate of 10% chronic absenteeism seems conservative and it could be as high as 15%, meaning that 5 million to 7.5 million students are chronically absent. Ideas to help improve attendance are offered.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1081805093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1002822</ericid><sourcerecordid>2776572871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e553-19f1ccf93036279ca047a49db9224f6b521ac2d08d5cb16e86e26f9ec785bbab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjjFPwzAYRC0EEqHwE5C8wRLJduLEZgtVgaIKEGSAKbKdz9QosUucDPx7UrW33PLe6U5QQmUuU8JKfooSQmiWUlZ-nqOLGH_IHMrzBH3VW8DrfheGUXkDOFh8D85_Y-fxh9mG0N3hCr_DHsDB40pH8COAi_0eGWf7RY0u-JuI3ybdOXPU4iU6s6qLcHXsBaofVvXyKd28Pq6X1SYFzudL0lJjrMxIVrBSGkXyUuWy1ZKx3BaaM6oMa4loudG0AFEAK6wEUwqutdLZAt0eZndD-J0gjk3vooGuUx7CFBtKBBWEE5nN6PUBhcGZZje4Xg1_zeqZEsIEY9k_HtlZCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1081805093</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Importance of Being in School: A Report on Absenteeism in the Nation's Public Schools</title><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>Balfanz, Robert ; Byrnes, Vaughan</creator><creatorcontrib>Balfanz, Robert ; Byrnes, Vaughan</creatorcontrib><description>America's education system is based on the assumption that barring illness or an extraordinary event, students are in class every weekday. So strong is this assumption that it is not even measured. It is the rare state education department, school district, or principal that can tell one how many students have missed 10% or more of the school year or in the previous year missed a month or more--two common definitions of chronic absence. Because it is not measured, chronic absenteeism is not acted upon. Chronic absenteeism can wreak havoc long before it is discovered. That havoc may have undermined school reform efforts of the past quarter century and negated the positive impact of future efforts. Chronic absenteeism is not the same as truancy or average daily attendance. Chronic absenteeism means missing 10% of a school year for any reason. A school can have average daily attendance of 90% and still have 40% of its students chronically absent, because on different days, different students make up that 90%. Data from only six states address this issue: Georgia, Florida, Maryland, Nebraska, Oregon, and Rhode Island. How these states measure chronic absenteeism, however, differs by number of days and by whether or not data include transfer students. Such limited data produce only an educated guess at the size of the nation's attendance challenge: A national rate of 10% chronic absenteeism seems conservative and it could be as high as 15%, meaning that 5 million to 7.5 million students are chronically absent. Ideas to help improve attendance are offered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-127X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-0275</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EDUDA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ann Arbor: Prakken Publications</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Academic Achievement ; Achievement tests ; Attendance ; Attendance Patterns ; Average Daily Attendance ; Education ; Educational Change ; Educational Indicators ; Evaluation Methods ; Florida ; Georgia ; Grade 1 ; Incentives ; Incidence ; Juvenile justice ; Low income groups ; Maryland ; Measurement Objectives ; Measurement Techniques ; Nebraska ; Oregon ; Poverty ; Rhode Island ; School attendance ; School Restructuring ; Secondary schools ; Standardized Tests ; Truancy</subject><ispartof>The Education digest, 2012-10, Vol.78 (2), p.4</ispartof><rights>Copyright Prakken Publications, Inc. Oct 2012</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1002822$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balfanz, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrnes, Vaughan</creatorcontrib><title>The Importance of Being in School: A Report on Absenteeism in the Nation's Public Schools</title><title>The Education digest</title><description>America's education system is based on the assumption that barring illness or an extraordinary event, students are in class every weekday. So strong is this assumption that it is not even measured. It is the rare state education department, school district, or principal that can tell one how many students have missed 10% or more of the school year or in the previous year missed a month or more--two common definitions of chronic absence. Because it is not measured, chronic absenteeism is not acted upon. Chronic absenteeism can wreak havoc long before it is discovered. That havoc may have undermined school reform efforts of the past quarter century and negated the positive impact of future efforts. Chronic absenteeism is not the same as truancy or average daily attendance. Chronic absenteeism means missing 10% of a school year for any reason. A school can have average daily attendance of 90% and still have 40% of its students chronically absent, because on different days, different students make up that 90%. Data from only six states address this issue: Georgia, Florida, Maryland, Nebraska, Oregon, and Rhode Island. How these states measure chronic absenteeism, however, differs by number of days and by whether or not data include transfer students. Such limited data produce only an educated guess at the size of the nation's attendance challenge: A national rate of 10% chronic absenteeism seems conservative and it could be as high as 15%, meaning that 5 million to 7.5 million students are chronically absent. Ideas to help improve attendance are offered.</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Achievement tests</subject><subject>Attendance</subject><subject>Attendance Patterns</subject><subject>Average Daily Attendance</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Indicators</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Florida</subject><subject>Georgia</subject><subject>Grade 1</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Juvenile justice</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Maryland</subject><subject>Measurement Objectives</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Nebraska</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Rhode Island</subject><subject>School attendance</subject><subject>School Restructuring</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Truancy</subject><issn>0013-127X</issn><issn>1949-0275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjjFPwzAYRC0EEqHwE5C8wRLJduLEZgtVgaIKEGSAKbKdz9QosUucDPx7UrW33PLe6U5QQmUuU8JKfooSQmiWUlZ-nqOLGH_IHMrzBH3VW8DrfheGUXkDOFh8D85_Y-fxh9mG0N3hCr_DHsDB40pH8COAi_0eGWf7RY0u-JuI3ybdOXPU4iU6s6qLcHXsBaofVvXyKd28Pq6X1SYFzudL0lJjrMxIVrBSGkXyUuWy1ZKx3BaaM6oMa4loudG0AFEAK6wEUwqutdLZAt0eZndD-J0gjk3vooGuUx7CFBtKBBWEE5nN6PUBhcGZZje4Xg1_zeqZEsIEY9k_HtlZCw</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Balfanz, Robert</creator><creator>Byrnes, Vaughan</creator><general>Prakken Publications</general><general>Prakken Publications, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>7XI</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>The Importance of Being in School: A Report on Absenteeism in the Nation's Public Schools</title><author>Balfanz, Robert ; Byrnes, Vaughan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e553-19f1ccf93036279ca047a49db9224f6b521ac2d08d5cb16e86e26f9ec785bbab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Achievement tests</topic><topic>Attendance</topic><topic>Attendance Patterns</topic><topic>Average Daily Attendance</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Indicators</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Florida</topic><topic>Georgia</topic><topic>Grade 1</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Juvenile justice</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Maryland</topic><topic>Measurement Objectives</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Nebraska</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Rhode Island</topic><topic>School attendance</topic><topic>School Restructuring</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Truancy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balfanz, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrnes, Vaughan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Teacher Journals</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Education digest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balfanz, Robert</au><au>Byrnes, Vaughan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1002822</ericid><atitle>The Importance of Being in School: A Report on Absenteeism in the Nation's Public Schools</atitle><jtitle>The Education digest</jtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>4</spage><pages>4-</pages><issn>0013-127X</issn><eissn>1949-0275</eissn><coden>EDUDA6</coden><abstract>America's education system is based on the assumption that barring illness or an extraordinary event, students are in class every weekday. So strong is this assumption that it is not even measured. It is the rare state education department, school district, or principal that can tell one how many students have missed 10% or more of the school year or in the previous year missed a month or more--two common definitions of chronic absence. Because it is not measured, chronic absenteeism is not acted upon. Chronic absenteeism can wreak havoc long before it is discovered. That havoc may have undermined school reform efforts of the past quarter century and negated the positive impact of future efforts. Chronic absenteeism is not the same as truancy or average daily attendance. Chronic absenteeism means missing 10% of a school year for any reason. A school can have average daily attendance of 90% and still have 40% of its students chronically absent, because on different days, different students make up that 90%. Data from only six states address this issue: Georgia, Florida, Maryland, Nebraska, Oregon, and Rhode Island. How these states measure chronic absenteeism, however, differs by number of days and by whether or not data include transfer students. Such limited data produce only an educated guess at the size of the nation's attendance challenge: A national rate of 10% chronic absenteeism seems conservative and it could be as high as 15%, meaning that 5 million to 7.5 million students are chronically absent. Ideas to help improve attendance are offered.</abstract><cop>Ann Arbor</cop><pub>Prakken Publications</pub><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-127X
ispartof The Education digest, 2012-10, Vol.78 (2), p.4
issn 0013-127X
1949-0275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1081805093
source Education Source (EBSCOhost)
subjects Absenteeism
Academic Achievement
Achievement tests
Attendance
Attendance Patterns
Average Daily Attendance
Education
Educational Change
Educational Indicators
Evaluation Methods
Florida
Georgia
Grade 1
Incentives
Incidence
Juvenile justice
Low income groups
Maryland
Measurement Objectives
Measurement Techniques
Nebraska
Oregon
Poverty
Rhode Island
School attendance
School Restructuring
Secondary schools
Standardized Tests
Truancy
title The Importance of Being in School: A Report on Absenteeism in the Nation's Public Schools
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T19%3A56%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Importance%20of%20Being%20in%20School:%20A%20Report%20on%20Absenteeism%20in%20the%20Nation's%20Public%20Schools&rft.jtitle=The%20Education%20digest&rft.au=Balfanz,%20Robert&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=4&rft.pages=4-&rft.issn=0013-127X&rft.eissn=1949-0275&rft.coden=EDUDA6&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2776572871%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1081805093&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1002822&rfr_iscdi=true