Serotype-dependent expression patterns of stabilized lipopolysaccharide aggregates in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans strains

ABSTRACT Above a critical concentration, amphiphilic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecules in an aqueous environment form aggregate structures, probably because of interactions involving hydrophobic bonds. Ionic bonds involving divalent cations stabilize these aggregate structures, making them resistan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microbiology and immunology 2012-10, Vol.56 (10), p.680-691
Hauptverfasser: Kikuchi, Haruko, Fujise, Osamu, Miura, Mayumi, Tanaka, Ayako, Hisano, Kyoko, Haraguchi, Akira, Hamachi, Takafumi, Maeda, Katsumasa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 691
container_issue 10
container_start_page 680
container_title Microbiology and immunology
container_volume 56
creator Kikuchi, Haruko
Fujise, Osamu
Miura, Mayumi
Tanaka, Ayako
Hisano, Kyoko
Haraguchi, Akira
Hamachi, Takafumi
Maeda, Katsumasa
description ABSTRACT Above a critical concentration, amphiphilic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecules in an aqueous environment form aggregate structures, probably because of interactions involving hydrophobic bonds. Ionic bonds involving divalent cations stabilize these aggregate structures, making them resistant to breakdown by detergents. The aim of this study was to examine expression patterns of stabilized LPS aggregates in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, a microorganism that causes periodontitis. A. actinomycetemcomitans strains of various serotypes and truncated LPS mutants were prepared for this study. Following treatment with a two‐phase separation system using the detergent Triton X‐114, crude LPS extracts of the study strains were separated into detergent‐phase LPS (DP‐LPS) and aqueous‐phase LPS (AP‐LPS). Repeated treatment of the aqueous phase with the two‐phase separation system produced only a slight decrease in AP‐LPS, suggesting that AP‐LPS was resistant to the detergent and thus distinguishable from DP‐LPS. The presence of divalent cations increased the yield of AP‐LPS. AP‐LPS expression patterns were serotype‐dependent; serotypes b and f showing early expression, and serotypes a and c late expression. In addition, highly truncated LPS from a waaD (rfaD) mutant were unable to generate AP‐LPS, suggesting involvement of the LPS structure in the generation of AP‐LPS. The two‐phase separation was able to distinguish two types of LPS with different physical states at the supramolecular structure level. Hence, AP‐LPS likely represents stabilized LPS aggregates, whereas DP‐LPS might be derived from non‐stabilized aggregates. Furthermore, time‐dependent expression of stabilized LPS aggregates was found to be serotype‐dependent in A. actinomycetemcomitans.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2012.00492.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1080882840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1080882840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4572-3cd3e0ecc6c2b4f1d903edd9f286c46e9a3a9bce4add18f00997a058f2cb3d673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9v0zAcxS3ExMrgX0A-cklwbCdxJC5jgjGt24QY42g59jfFJYkz2xUNV_5xXFp6ng_-Ib_Ps_weQrggeZHGu3VeMC4ywmmRU1LQnBDe0Hz7DC2OF8_RgjBRZmVFyCl6GcKaEFpTwV-gU0pFQUtWL9Cfr-BdnCfIDEwwGhgjhu3kIQTrRjypGMGPAbsOh6ha29vfYHBvJze5fg5K6x_KWwNYrVYeVipCwHbE54eTbZVOBjjNdnTDrCHCoN1go0qmIXplx_AKnXSqD_D6sJ6hb58-3l98zpZ3l1cX58tM87KmGdOGAQGtK01b3hWmIQyMaToqKs0raBRTTauBK2MK0RHSNLUipeiobpmpanaG3u59J-8eNxCiHGzQ0PdqBLcJsiCCCJESIkkq9lLtXQgeOjl5Oyg_J5HcVSDXcpe03CUtdxXIfxXIbULfHF7ZtAOYI_g_8yR4vxf8sj3MTzaWN1c3aZPwbI_bEGF7xJX_KdMf61J-v72U1_cf-MOX66V8YH8BTUqpXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1080882840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Serotype-dependent expression patterns of stabilized lipopolysaccharide aggregates in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans strains</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Freely Accessible Japanese Titles</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kikuchi, Haruko ; Fujise, Osamu ; Miura, Mayumi ; Tanaka, Ayako ; Hisano, Kyoko ; Haraguchi, Akira ; Hamachi, Takafumi ; Maeda, Katsumasa</creator><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Haruko ; Fujise, Osamu ; Miura, Mayumi ; Tanaka, Ayako ; Hisano, Kyoko ; Haraguchi, Akira ; Hamachi, Takafumi ; Maeda, Katsumasa</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Above a critical concentration, amphiphilic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecules in an aqueous environment form aggregate structures, probably because of interactions involving hydrophobic bonds. Ionic bonds involving divalent cations stabilize these aggregate structures, making them resistant to breakdown by detergents. The aim of this study was to examine expression patterns of stabilized LPS aggregates in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, a microorganism that causes periodontitis. A. actinomycetemcomitans strains of various serotypes and truncated LPS mutants were prepared for this study. Following treatment with a two‐phase separation system using the detergent Triton X‐114, crude LPS extracts of the study strains were separated into detergent‐phase LPS (DP‐LPS) and aqueous‐phase LPS (AP‐LPS). Repeated treatment of the aqueous phase with the two‐phase separation system produced only a slight decrease in AP‐LPS, suggesting that AP‐LPS was resistant to the detergent and thus distinguishable from DP‐LPS. The presence of divalent cations increased the yield of AP‐LPS. AP‐LPS expression patterns were serotype‐dependent; serotypes b and f showing early expression, and serotypes a and c late expression. In addition, highly truncated LPS from a waaD (rfaD) mutant were unable to generate AP‐LPS, suggesting involvement of the LPS structure in the generation of AP‐LPS. The two‐phase separation was able to distinguish two types of LPS with different physical states at the supramolecular structure level. Hence, AP‐LPS likely represents stabilized LPS aggregates, whereas DP‐LPS might be derived from non‐stabilized aggregates. Furthermore, time‐dependent expression of stabilized LPS aggregates was found to be serotype‐dependent in A. actinomycetemcomitans.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0385-5600</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1348-0421</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2012.00492.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22812537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Asia</publisher><subject>Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans ; Chemical Fractionation ; Detergents ; divalent cations ; Gene Expression Profiling ; Humans ; lipopolysaccharide ; Lipopolysaccharides - chemistry ; Lipopolysaccharides - isolation &amp; purification ; Lipopolysaccharides - metabolism ; Pasteurellaceae - genetics ; serotype</subject><ispartof>Microbiology and immunology, 2012-10, Vol.56 (10), p.680-691</ispartof><rights>2012 The Societies and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</rights><rights>2012 The Societies and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4572-3cd3e0ecc6c2b4f1d903edd9f286c46e9a3a9bce4add18f00997a058f2cb3d673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4572-3cd3e0ecc6c2b4f1d903edd9f286c46e9a3a9bce4add18f00997a058f2cb3d673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1348-0421.2012.00492.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1348-0421.2012.00492.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22812537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Haruko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujise, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Mayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hisano, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haraguchi, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamachi, Takafumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Katsumasa</creatorcontrib><title>Serotype-dependent expression patterns of stabilized lipopolysaccharide aggregates in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans strains</title><title>Microbiology and immunology</title><addtitle>Microbiol Immunol</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Above a critical concentration, amphiphilic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecules in an aqueous environment form aggregate structures, probably because of interactions involving hydrophobic bonds. Ionic bonds involving divalent cations stabilize these aggregate structures, making them resistant to breakdown by detergents. The aim of this study was to examine expression patterns of stabilized LPS aggregates in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, a microorganism that causes periodontitis. A. actinomycetemcomitans strains of various serotypes and truncated LPS mutants were prepared for this study. Following treatment with a two‐phase separation system using the detergent Triton X‐114, crude LPS extracts of the study strains were separated into detergent‐phase LPS (DP‐LPS) and aqueous‐phase LPS (AP‐LPS). Repeated treatment of the aqueous phase with the two‐phase separation system produced only a slight decrease in AP‐LPS, suggesting that AP‐LPS was resistant to the detergent and thus distinguishable from DP‐LPS. The presence of divalent cations increased the yield of AP‐LPS. AP‐LPS expression patterns were serotype‐dependent; serotypes b and f showing early expression, and serotypes a and c late expression. In addition, highly truncated LPS from a waaD (rfaD) mutant were unable to generate AP‐LPS, suggesting involvement of the LPS structure in the generation of AP‐LPS. The two‐phase separation was able to distinguish two types of LPS with different physical states at the supramolecular structure level. Hence, AP‐LPS likely represents stabilized LPS aggregates, whereas DP‐LPS might be derived from non‐stabilized aggregates. Furthermore, time‐dependent expression of stabilized LPS aggregates was found to be serotype‐dependent in A. actinomycetemcomitans.</description><subject>Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans</subject><subject>Chemical Fractionation</subject><subject>Detergents</subject><subject>divalent cations</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>lipopolysaccharide</subject><subject>Lipopolysaccharides - chemistry</subject><subject>Lipopolysaccharides - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Lipopolysaccharides - metabolism</subject><subject>Pasteurellaceae - genetics</subject><subject>serotype</subject><issn>0385-5600</issn><issn>1348-0421</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9v0zAcxS3ExMrgX0A-cklwbCdxJC5jgjGt24QY42g59jfFJYkz2xUNV_5xXFp6ng_-Ib_Ps_weQrggeZHGu3VeMC4ywmmRU1LQnBDe0Hz7DC2OF8_RgjBRZmVFyCl6GcKaEFpTwV-gU0pFQUtWL9Cfr-BdnCfIDEwwGhgjhu3kIQTrRjypGMGPAbsOh6ha29vfYHBvJze5fg5K6x_KWwNYrVYeVipCwHbE54eTbZVOBjjNdnTDrCHCoN1go0qmIXplx_AKnXSqD_D6sJ6hb58-3l98zpZ3l1cX58tM87KmGdOGAQGtK01b3hWmIQyMaToqKs0raBRTTauBK2MK0RHSNLUipeiobpmpanaG3u59J-8eNxCiHGzQ0PdqBLcJsiCCCJESIkkq9lLtXQgeOjl5Oyg_J5HcVSDXcpe03CUtdxXIfxXIbULfHF7ZtAOYI_g_8yR4vxf8sj3MTzaWN1c3aZPwbI_bEGF7xJX_KdMf61J-v72U1_cf-MOX66V8YH8BTUqpXw</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>Kikuchi, Haruko</creator><creator>Fujise, Osamu</creator><creator>Miura, Mayumi</creator><creator>Tanaka, Ayako</creator><creator>Hisano, Kyoko</creator><creator>Haraguchi, Akira</creator><creator>Hamachi, Takafumi</creator><creator>Maeda, Katsumasa</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Asia</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Serotype-dependent expression patterns of stabilized lipopolysaccharide aggregates in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans strains</title><author>Kikuchi, Haruko ; Fujise, Osamu ; Miura, Mayumi ; Tanaka, Ayako ; Hisano, Kyoko ; Haraguchi, Akira ; Hamachi, Takafumi ; Maeda, Katsumasa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4572-3cd3e0ecc6c2b4f1d903edd9f286c46e9a3a9bce4add18f00997a058f2cb3d673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans</topic><topic>Chemical Fractionation</topic><topic>Detergents</topic><topic>divalent cations</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>lipopolysaccharide</topic><topic>Lipopolysaccharides - chemistry</topic><topic>Lipopolysaccharides - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Lipopolysaccharides - metabolism</topic><topic>Pasteurellaceae - genetics</topic><topic>serotype</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kikuchi, Haruko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujise, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miura, Mayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Ayako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hisano, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haraguchi, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamachi, Takafumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Katsumasa</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microbiology and immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kikuchi, Haruko</au><au>Fujise, Osamu</au><au>Miura, Mayumi</au><au>Tanaka, Ayako</au><au>Hisano, Kyoko</au><au>Haraguchi, Akira</au><au>Hamachi, Takafumi</au><au>Maeda, Katsumasa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Serotype-dependent expression patterns of stabilized lipopolysaccharide aggregates in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans strains</atitle><jtitle>Microbiology and immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Microbiol Immunol</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>680</spage><epage>691</epage><pages>680-691</pages><issn>0385-5600</issn><eissn>1348-0421</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Above a critical concentration, amphiphilic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecules in an aqueous environment form aggregate structures, probably because of interactions involving hydrophobic bonds. Ionic bonds involving divalent cations stabilize these aggregate structures, making them resistant to breakdown by detergents. The aim of this study was to examine expression patterns of stabilized LPS aggregates in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, a microorganism that causes periodontitis. A. actinomycetemcomitans strains of various serotypes and truncated LPS mutants were prepared for this study. Following treatment with a two‐phase separation system using the detergent Triton X‐114, crude LPS extracts of the study strains were separated into detergent‐phase LPS (DP‐LPS) and aqueous‐phase LPS (AP‐LPS). Repeated treatment of the aqueous phase with the two‐phase separation system produced only a slight decrease in AP‐LPS, suggesting that AP‐LPS was resistant to the detergent and thus distinguishable from DP‐LPS. The presence of divalent cations increased the yield of AP‐LPS. AP‐LPS expression patterns were serotype‐dependent; serotypes b and f showing early expression, and serotypes a and c late expression. In addition, highly truncated LPS from a waaD (rfaD) mutant were unable to generate AP‐LPS, suggesting involvement of the LPS structure in the generation of AP‐LPS. The two‐phase separation was able to distinguish two types of LPS with different physical states at the supramolecular structure level. Hence, AP‐LPS likely represents stabilized LPS aggregates, whereas DP‐LPS might be derived from non‐stabilized aggregates. Furthermore, time‐dependent expression of stabilized LPS aggregates was found to be serotype‐dependent in A. actinomycetemcomitans.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Asia</pub><pmid>22812537</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1348-0421.2012.00492.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0385-5600
ispartof Microbiology and immunology, 2012-10, Vol.56 (10), p.680-691
issn 0385-5600
1348-0421
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1080882840
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Wiley Free Content; Freely Accessible Japanese Titles; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans
Chemical Fractionation
Detergents
divalent cations
Gene Expression Profiling
Humans
lipopolysaccharide
Lipopolysaccharides - chemistry
Lipopolysaccharides - isolation & purification
Lipopolysaccharides - metabolism
Pasteurellaceae - genetics
serotype
title Serotype-dependent expression patterns of stabilized lipopolysaccharide aggregates in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans strains
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A46%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Serotype-dependent%20expression%20patterns%20of%20stabilized%20lipopolysaccharide%20aggregates%20in%20Aggregatibacter%20actinomycetemcomitans%20strains&rft.jtitle=Microbiology%20and%20immunology&rft.au=Kikuchi,%20Haruko&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=680&rft.epage=691&rft.pages=680-691&rft.issn=0385-5600&rft.eissn=1348-0421&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1348-0421.2012.00492.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1080882840%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1080882840&rft_id=info:pmid/22812537&rfr_iscdi=true