Capture of kinesthesis by a competing cutaneous input
In four experiments, blindfolded participants were presented with pairs of stimuli simultaneously, one to each index finger. Participants moved one index finger, which was presented with cutaneous and/or kinesthetic stimuli, and this movement caused a raised line to move underneath the other, statio...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2012-10, Vol.74 (7), p.1539-1551 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1551 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1539 |
| container_title | Attention, perception & psychophysics |
| container_volume | 74 |
| creator | Van Doorn, George H. Hohwy, Jakob Symmons, Mark A. |
| description | In four experiments, blindfolded participants were presented with pairs of stimuli simultaneously, one to each index finger. Participants moved one index finger, which was presented with cutaneous and/or kinesthetic stimuli, and this movement caused a raised line to move underneath the other, stationary index finger in a yoked manner. The stimuli were 180º rotations of each other (e.g., < and >), and thus when a < was traced with the moving finger, it caused a > to be felt at the stationary finger. When asked to report the experience, participants predominantly reported the cutaneous stimulus, seemingly being ignorant of the kinesthetic stimulus. This appears to be an intrahaptic capture phenomenon, which is of interest because it suggests that conflict between intrahaptic sensory stimuli can go unnoticed; sometimes we are unaware of how we moved, and sometimes we do not know what we touched. The results are interpreted in light of optimal integration, perceptual suppression, reafference suppression, and inattentional blindness. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13414-012-0327-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1069208691</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2778672351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-322d91acdc968d3a8179c775bbfd63633d91eb2bfa9a5c25c7b3168a4fca906f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgijOOPoAbKYjgppr7ZSmDNxhwo-AupGkyduy0NWkX8_Zm6HhBcJVAvnPy8wNwiuAVEUxeR0QoojlEOIcEi1zsgSlSlOREkdf97ztGE3AU4wpCTriAh2CCMecISzQFbG66fggua332XjUu9m8uVjErNpnJbLvuXF81y8wOvWlcO8SsarqhPwYH3tTRnezOGXi5u32eP-SLp_vH-c0it5SyPicYlwoZW1rFZUmMREJZIVhR-DJFISS9ugIX3ijDLGZWFARxaai3RkHuyQxcjnu70H4MKZxeV9G6uh7DaAS5wlByhRI9_0NX7RCalC4piQmmjOOk0KhsaGMMzusuVGsTNgnpbad67FSnTvW2Uy3SzNlu81CsXfk98VViAhc7YKI1tQ-msVX8cZxixiRMDo8upqdm6cLviP_9_gknGo0x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1082324562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Capture of kinesthesis by a competing cutaneous input</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Van Doorn, George H. ; Hohwy, Jakob ; Symmons, Mark A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Doorn, George H. ; Hohwy, Jakob ; Symmons, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><description>In four experiments, blindfolded participants were presented with pairs of stimuli simultaneously, one to each index finger. Participants moved one index finger, which was presented with cutaneous and/or kinesthetic stimuli, and this movement caused a raised line to move underneath the other, stationary index finger in a yoked manner. The stimuli were 180º rotations of each other (e.g., < and >), and thus when a < was traced with the moving finger, it caused a > to be felt at the stationary finger. When asked to report the experience, participants predominantly reported the cutaneous stimulus, seemingly being ignorant of the kinesthetic stimulus. This appears to be an intrahaptic capture phenomenon, which is of interest because it suggests that conflict between intrahaptic sensory stimuli can go unnoticed; sometimes we are unaware of how we moved, and sometimes we do not know what we touched. The results are interpreted in light of optimal integration, perceptual suppression, reafference suppression, and inattentional blindness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0327-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22661281</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention ; Auditory Stimuli ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blindness ; Cognitive Psychology ; Cues ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Experiments ; Female ; Functional Laterality ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Kinesthesis ; Kinesthetic Perception ; Male ; Maximum Likelihood Statistics ; Motor Activity ; Orientation ; Perception ; Proprioception ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychophysics ; Sensory Deprivation ; Sensory Integration ; Stereognosis ; Stimuli ; Studies ; Tactile perception ; Touch ; Visual Stimuli ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2012-10, Vol.74 (7), p.1539-1551</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2012</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Oct 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-322d91acdc968d3a8179c775bbfd63633d91eb2bfa9a5c25c7b3168a4fca906f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-322d91acdc968d3a8179c775bbfd63633d91eb2bfa9a5c25c7b3168a4fca906f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-012-0327-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13414-012-0327-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26425580$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22661281$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Doorn, George H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hohwy, Jakob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Symmons, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><title>Capture of kinesthesis by a competing cutaneous input</title><title>Attention, perception & psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>In four experiments, blindfolded participants were presented with pairs of stimuli simultaneously, one to each index finger. Participants moved one index finger, which was presented with cutaneous and/or kinesthetic stimuli, and this movement caused a raised line to move underneath the other, stationary index finger in a yoked manner. The stimuli were 180º rotations of each other (e.g., < and >), and thus when a < was traced with the moving finger, it caused a > to be felt at the stationary finger. When asked to report the experience, participants predominantly reported the cutaneous stimulus, seemingly being ignorant of the kinesthetic stimulus. This appears to be an intrahaptic capture phenomenon, which is of interest because it suggests that conflict between intrahaptic sensory stimuli can go unnoticed; sometimes we are unaware of how we moved, and sometimes we do not know what we touched. The results are interpreted in light of optimal integration, perceptual suppression, reafference suppression, and inattentional blindness.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Auditory Stimuli</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blindness</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kinesthesis</subject><subject>Kinesthetic Perception</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maximum Likelihood Statistics</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Proprioception</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Sensory Deprivation</subject><subject>Sensory Integration</subject><subject>Stereognosis</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tactile perception</subject><subject>Touch</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgijOOPoAbKYjgppr7ZSmDNxhwo-AupGkyduy0NWkX8_Zm6HhBcJVAvnPy8wNwiuAVEUxeR0QoojlEOIcEi1zsgSlSlOREkdf97ztGE3AU4wpCTriAh2CCMecISzQFbG66fggua332XjUu9m8uVjErNpnJbLvuXF81y8wOvWlcO8SsarqhPwYH3tTRnezOGXi5u32eP-SLp_vH-c0it5SyPicYlwoZW1rFZUmMREJZIVhR-DJFISS9ugIX3ijDLGZWFARxaai3RkHuyQxcjnu70H4MKZxeV9G6uh7DaAS5wlByhRI9_0NX7RCalC4piQmmjOOk0KhsaGMMzusuVGsTNgnpbad67FSnTvW2Uy3SzNlu81CsXfk98VViAhc7YKI1tQ-msVX8cZxixiRMDo8upqdm6cLviP_9_gknGo0x</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Van Doorn, George H.</creator><creator>Hohwy, Jakob</creator><creator>Symmons, Mark A.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Capture of kinesthesis by a competing cutaneous input</title><author>Van Doorn, George H. ; Hohwy, Jakob ; Symmons, Mark A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-322d91acdc968d3a8179c775bbfd63633d91eb2bfa9a5c25c7b3168a4fca906f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Auditory Stimuli</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blindness</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kinesthesis</topic><topic>Kinesthetic Perception</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maximum Likelihood Statistics</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Proprioception</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Sensory Deprivation</topic><topic>Sensory Integration</topic><topic>Stereognosis</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tactile perception</topic><topic>Touch</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Doorn, George H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hohwy, Jakob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Symmons, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Doorn, George H.</au><au>Hohwy, Jakob</au><au>Symmons, Mark A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Capture of kinesthesis by a competing cutaneous input</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1539</spage><epage>1551</epage><pages>1539-1551</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>In four experiments, blindfolded participants were presented with pairs of stimuli simultaneously, one to each index finger. Participants moved one index finger, which was presented with cutaneous and/or kinesthetic stimuli, and this movement caused a raised line to move underneath the other, stationary index finger in a yoked manner. The stimuli were 180º rotations of each other (e.g., < and >), and thus when a < was traced with the moving finger, it caused a > to be felt at the stationary finger. When asked to report the experience, participants predominantly reported the cutaneous stimulus, seemingly being ignorant of the kinesthetic stimulus. This appears to be an intrahaptic capture phenomenon, which is of interest because it suggests that conflict between intrahaptic sensory stimuli can go unnoticed; sometimes we are unaware of how we moved, and sometimes we do not know what we touched. The results are interpreted in light of optimal integration, perceptual suppression, reafference suppression, and inattentional blindness.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22661281</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13414-012-0327-7</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1943-3921 |
| ispartof | Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2012-10, Vol.74 (7), p.1539-1551 |
| issn | 1943-3921 1943-393X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1069208691 |
| source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Attention Auditory Stimuli Behavioral Science and Psychology Biological and medical sciences Blindness Cognitive Psychology Cues Discrimination (Psychology) Experiments Female Functional Laterality Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Kinesthesis Kinesthetic Perception Male Maximum Likelihood Statistics Motor Activity Orientation Perception Proprioception Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychophysics Sensory Deprivation Sensory Integration Stereognosis Stimuli Studies Tactile perception Touch Visual Stimuli Young Adult |
| title | Capture of kinesthesis by a competing cutaneous input |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A33%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capture%20of%20kinesthesis%20by%20a%20competing%20cutaneous%20input&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Van%20Doorn,%20George%20H.&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1539&rft.epage=1551&rft.pages=1539-1551&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-012-0327-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2778672351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1082324562&rft_id=info:pmid/22661281&rfr_iscdi=true |