Underneath the cerclage: an ex vivo study on the cerclage-bone interface mechanics

Introduction Cerclages regain interest due to a rising number of periprosthetic fractures. The contact distribution at the circumferential cerclage-bone interface is still unknown. Local interface pressure depends on the amount of contact area. Cortical damage at the interface would provoke cerclage...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2012-10, Vol.132 (10), p.1467-1472
Hauptverfasser: Lenz, Mark, Perren, Stephan Marcel, Gueorguiev, Boyko, Richards, Robert Geoff, Krause, Fabian, Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto, Höntzsch, Dankward, Windolf, Markus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1472
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1467
container_title Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
container_volume 132
creator Lenz, Mark
Perren, Stephan Marcel
Gueorguiev, Boyko
Richards, Robert Geoff
Krause, Fabian
Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto
Höntzsch, Dankward
Windolf, Markus
description Introduction Cerclages regain interest due to a rising number of periprosthetic fractures. The contact distribution at the circumferential cerclage-bone interface is still unknown. Local interface pressure depends on the amount of contact area. Cortical damage at the interface would provoke cerclage loosening. Therefore, the contact area, the bone pressure along the interface and the cortical resistance underneath loaded cerclages were determined in an ex vivo model. Materials and methods Human diaphyseal femoral bone was used with differing cross-sectional geometry. Bone contact points of fixed 1.5 mm wire and 1.7 mm cable cerclages were identified from axial radiographs. Pressure distribution at the cerclage-bone interface was recorded with a pressure-measuring film using a distraction setup with two cortical half shells. Bone shells with installed cerclages were separated with up to 400 N force and were subsequently analyzed histologically to detect cortical damage. Results Both cerclage types exhibited a point contact fixation with non-loaded spanned zones in-between. Cables cover larger contact areas. Both cerclages exhibited an inhomogeneous interface pressure distribution depending on the bone surface geometry. Histology revealed intact cortical bone without cortical affection after loading of both cerclage types. Conclusion Point contact fixation of the cerclages installs non-loaded, spanned zones where the periosteum is not compressed, rendering a strangulation of the blood supply unlikely. Cortical bone withstands static concentric pressure produced by the cerclage. Cortical groove formation is attributed to instability under functional load and not to weakness of the cortex itself.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00402-012-1572-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1069207466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1069207466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-42e88355dd73defff684be4245768f79ee4c4fe7efd9740c668f9925ce950b3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWj9-gBcJePESnWSzycabFL9AEMSewzY7sSttVpNdaf-9kfqBgqeBmWfeGR5CDjmccgB9lgAkCAZcMF5qwZYbZMRlIVlhuNokIzCFYhWUfIfspvQMGawMbJMdIbQEUGJEHiahwRiw7me0nyF1GN28fsJzWgeKS_rWvnU09UOzol34RbBpF5C2ocfoa4d0gW5Wh9alfbLl63nCg8-6RyZXl4_jG3Z3f307vrhjTvKyZ1JgVRVl2TS6aNB7ryo5RSlkqVXltUGUTnrU6BuTv3Uqd40RpUNTwrRwxR45Wee-xO51wNTbRZsczud1wG5IloMyArRUKqPHf9Dnboghf2eFUEKBVNpkiq8pF7uUInr7EttFHVc5yn4It2vhNnu0H8LtMu8cfSYP0wU23xtfhjMg1kDKo_CE8ef0_6nvAqGK2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262604679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Underneath the cerclage: an ex vivo study on the cerclage-bone interface mechanics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lenz, Mark ; Perren, Stephan Marcel ; Gueorguiev, Boyko ; Richards, Robert Geoff ; Krause, Fabian ; Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto ; Höntzsch, Dankward ; Windolf, Markus</creator><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Mark ; Perren, Stephan Marcel ; Gueorguiev, Boyko ; Richards, Robert Geoff ; Krause, Fabian ; Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto ; Höntzsch, Dankward ; Windolf, Markus</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Cerclages regain interest due to a rising number of periprosthetic fractures. The contact distribution at the circumferential cerclage-bone interface is still unknown. Local interface pressure depends on the amount of contact area. Cortical damage at the interface would provoke cerclage loosening. Therefore, the contact area, the bone pressure along the interface and the cortical resistance underneath loaded cerclages were determined in an ex vivo model. Materials and methods Human diaphyseal femoral bone was used with differing cross-sectional geometry. Bone contact points of fixed 1.5 mm wire and 1.7 mm cable cerclages were identified from axial radiographs. Pressure distribution at the cerclage-bone interface was recorded with a pressure-measuring film using a distraction setup with two cortical half shells. Bone shells with installed cerclages were separated with up to 400 N force and were subsequently analyzed histologically to detect cortical damage. Results Both cerclage types exhibited a point contact fixation with non-loaded spanned zones in-between. Cables cover larger contact areas. Both cerclages exhibited an inhomogeneous interface pressure distribution depending on the bone surface geometry. Histology revealed intact cortical bone without cortical affection after loading of both cerclage types. Conclusion Point contact fixation of the cerclages installs non-loaded, spanned zones where the periosteum is not compressed, rendering a strangulation of the blood supply unlikely. Cortical bone withstands static concentric pressure produced by the cerclage. Cortical groove formation is attributed to instability under functional load and not to weakness of the cortex itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1572-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22740062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Wires ; Cadaver ; Femur - blood supply ; Femur - pathology ; Femur - physiopathology ; Femur - surgery ; Fracture Healing ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Orthopedic Fixation Devices ; Orthopedics ; Periprosthetic Fractures - pathology ; Periprosthetic Fractures - physiopathology ; Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery ; Premature birth ; Pressure ; Pressure distribution ; Sutures ; Trauma Surgery</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2012-10, Vol.132 (10), p.1467-1472</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2012). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-42e88355dd73defff684be4245768f79ee4c4fe7efd9740c668f9925ce950b3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-42e88355dd73defff684be4245768f79ee4c4fe7efd9740c668f9925ce950b3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-012-1572-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00402-012-1572-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22740062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perren, Stephan Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueorguiev, Boyko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Robert Geoff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höntzsch, Dankward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windolf, Markus</creatorcontrib><title>Underneath the cerclage: an ex vivo study on the cerclage-bone interface mechanics</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction Cerclages regain interest due to a rising number of periprosthetic fractures. The contact distribution at the circumferential cerclage-bone interface is still unknown. Local interface pressure depends on the amount of contact area. Cortical damage at the interface would provoke cerclage loosening. Therefore, the contact area, the bone pressure along the interface and the cortical resistance underneath loaded cerclages were determined in an ex vivo model. Materials and methods Human diaphyseal femoral bone was used with differing cross-sectional geometry. Bone contact points of fixed 1.5 mm wire and 1.7 mm cable cerclages were identified from axial radiographs. Pressure distribution at the cerclage-bone interface was recorded with a pressure-measuring film using a distraction setup with two cortical half shells. Bone shells with installed cerclages were separated with up to 400 N force and were subsequently analyzed histologically to detect cortical damage. Results Both cerclage types exhibited a point contact fixation with non-loaded spanned zones in-between. Cables cover larger contact areas. Both cerclages exhibited an inhomogeneous interface pressure distribution depending on the bone surface geometry. Histology revealed intact cortical bone without cortical affection after loading of both cerclage types. Conclusion Point contact fixation of the cerclages installs non-loaded, spanned zones where the periosteum is not compressed, rendering a strangulation of the blood supply unlikely. Cortical bone withstands static concentric pressure produced by the cerclage. Cortical groove formation is attributed to instability under functional load and not to weakness of the cortex itself.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Wires</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Femur - blood supply</subject><subject>Femur - pathology</subject><subject>Femur - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Healing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Orthopedic Fixation Devices</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - pathology</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Premature birth</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Pressure distribution</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Trauma Surgery</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWj9-gBcJePESnWSzycabFL9AEMSewzY7sSttVpNdaf-9kfqBgqeBmWfeGR5CDjmccgB9lgAkCAZcMF5qwZYbZMRlIVlhuNokIzCFYhWUfIfspvQMGawMbJMdIbQEUGJEHiahwRiw7me0nyF1GN28fsJzWgeKS_rWvnU09UOzol34RbBpF5C2ocfoa4d0gW5Wh9alfbLl63nCg8-6RyZXl4_jG3Z3f307vrhjTvKyZ1JgVRVl2TS6aNB7ryo5RSlkqVXltUGUTnrU6BuTv3Uqd40RpUNTwrRwxR45Wee-xO51wNTbRZsczud1wG5IloMyArRUKqPHf9Dnboghf2eFUEKBVNpkiq8pF7uUInr7EttFHVc5yn4It2vhNnu0H8LtMu8cfSYP0wU23xtfhjMg1kDKo_CE8ef0_6nvAqGK2w</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Lenz, Mark</creator><creator>Perren, Stephan Marcel</creator><creator>Gueorguiev, Boyko</creator><creator>Richards, Robert Geoff</creator><creator>Krause, Fabian</creator><creator>Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto</creator><creator>Höntzsch, Dankward</creator><creator>Windolf, Markus</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Underneath the cerclage: an ex vivo study on the cerclage-bone interface mechanics</title><author>Lenz, Mark ; Perren, Stephan Marcel ; Gueorguiev, Boyko ; Richards, Robert Geoff ; Krause, Fabian ; Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto ; Höntzsch, Dankward ; Windolf, Markus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-42e88355dd73defff684be4245768f79ee4c4fe7efd9740c668f9925ce950b3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Wires</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Femur - blood supply</topic><topic>Femur - pathology</topic><topic>Femur - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Healing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Orthopedic Fixation Devices</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - pathology</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Premature birth</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Pressure distribution</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Trauma Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perren, Stephan Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueorguiev, Boyko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Robert Geoff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höntzsch, Dankward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windolf, Markus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lenz, Mark</au><au>Perren, Stephan Marcel</au><au>Gueorguiev, Boyko</au><au>Richards, Robert Geoff</au><au>Krause, Fabian</au><au>Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto</au><au>Höntzsch, Dankward</au><au>Windolf, Markus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Underneath the cerclage: an ex vivo study on the cerclage-bone interface mechanics</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1467</spage><epage>1472</epage><pages>1467-1472</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>Introduction Cerclages regain interest due to a rising number of periprosthetic fractures. The contact distribution at the circumferential cerclage-bone interface is still unknown. Local interface pressure depends on the amount of contact area. Cortical damage at the interface would provoke cerclage loosening. Therefore, the contact area, the bone pressure along the interface and the cortical resistance underneath loaded cerclages were determined in an ex vivo model. Materials and methods Human diaphyseal femoral bone was used with differing cross-sectional geometry. Bone contact points of fixed 1.5 mm wire and 1.7 mm cable cerclages were identified from axial radiographs. Pressure distribution at the cerclage-bone interface was recorded with a pressure-measuring film using a distraction setup with two cortical half shells. Bone shells with installed cerclages were separated with up to 400 N force and were subsequently analyzed histologically to detect cortical damage. Results Both cerclage types exhibited a point contact fixation with non-loaded spanned zones in-between. Cables cover larger contact areas. Both cerclages exhibited an inhomogeneous interface pressure distribution depending on the bone surface geometry. Histology revealed intact cortical bone without cortical affection after loading of both cerclage types. Conclusion Point contact fixation of the cerclages installs non-loaded, spanned zones where the periosteum is not compressed, rendering a strangulation of the blood supply unlikely. Cortical bone withstands static concentric pressure produced by the cerclage. Cortical groove formation is attributed to instability under functional load and not to weakness of the cortex itself.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22740062</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-012-1572-x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-8051
ispartof Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2012-10, Vol.132 (10), p.1467-1472
issn 0936-8051
1434-3916
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1069207466
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biomechanical Phenomena
Bone Wires
Cadaver
Femur - blood supply
Femur - pathology
Femur - physiopathology
Femur - surgery
Fracture Healing
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Orthopedic Fixation Devices
Orthopedics
Periprosthetic Fractures - pathology
Periprosthetic Fractures - physiopathology
Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery
Premature birth
Pressure
Pressure distribution
Sutures
Trauma Surgery
title Underneath the cerclage: an ex vivo study on the cerclage-bone interface mechanics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A41%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Underneath%20the%20cerclage:%20an%20ex%20vivo%20study%20on%20the%20cerclage-bone%20interface%20mechanics&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Lenz,%20Mark&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1467&rft.epage=1472&rft.pages=1467-1472&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-012-1572-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1069207466%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262604679&rft_id=info:pmid/22740062&rfr_iscdi=true