Underneath the cerclage: an ex vivo study on the cerclage-bone interface mechanics
Introduction Cerclages regain interest due to a rising number of periprosthetic fractures. The contact distribution at the circumferential cerclage-bone interface is still unknown. Local interface pressure depends on the amount of contact area. Cortical damage at the interface would provoke cerclage...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2012-10, Vol.132 (10), p.1467-1472 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1472 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1467 |
container_title | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery |
container_volume | 132 |
creator | Lenz, Mark Perren, Stephan Marcel Gueorguiev, Boyko Richards, Robert Geoff Krause, Fabian Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto Höntzsch, Dankward Windolf, Markus |
description | Introduction
Cerclages regain interest due to a rising number of periprosthetic fractures. The contact distribution at the circumferential cerclage-bone interface is still unknown. Local interface pressure depends on the amount of contact area. Cortical damage at the interface would provoke cerclage loosening. Therefore, the contact area, the bone pressure along the interface and the cortical resistance underneath loaded cerclages were determined in an ex vivo model.
Materials and methods
Human diaphyseal femoral bone was used with differing cross-sectional geometry. Bone contact points of fixed 1.5 mm wire and 1.7 mm cable cerclages were identified from axial radiographs. Pressure distribution at the cerclage-bone interface was recorded with a pressure-measuring film using a distraction setup with two cortical half shells. Bone shells with installed cerclages were separated with up to 400 N force and were subsequently analyzed histologically to detect cortical damage.
Results
Both cerclage types exhibited a point contact fixation with non-loaded spanned zones in-between. Cables cover larger contact areas. Both cerclages exhibited an inhomogeneous interface pressure distribution depending on the bone surface geometry. Histology revealed intact cortical bone without cortical affection after loading of both cerclage types.
Conclusion
Point contact fixation of the cerclages installs non-loaded, spanned zones where the periosteum is not compressed, rendering a strangulation of the blood supply unlikely. Cortical bone withstands static concentric pressure produced by the cerclage. Cortical groove formation is attributed to instability under functional load and not to weakness of the cortex itself. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00402-012-1572-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1069207466</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1069207466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-42e88355dd73defff684be4245768f79ee4c4fe7efd9740c668f9925ce950b3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWj9-gBcJePESnWSzycabFL9AEMSewzY7sSttVpNdaf-9kfqBgqeBmWfeGR5CDjmccgB9lgAkCAZcMF5qwZYbZMRlIVlhuNokIzCFYhWUfIfspvQMGawMbJMdIbQEUGJEHiahwRiw7me0nyF1GN28fsJzWgeKS_rWvnU09UOzol34RbBpF5C2ocfoa4d0gW5Wh9alfbLl63nCg8-6RyZXl4_jG3Z3f307vrhjTvKyZ1JgVRVl2TS6aNB7ryo5RSlkqVXltUGUTnrU6BuTv3Uqd40RpUNTwrRwxR45Wee-xO51wNTbRZsczud1wG5IloMyArRUKqPHf9Dnboghf2eFUEKBVNpkiq8pF7uUInr7EttFHVc5yn4It2vhNnu0H8LtMu8cfSYP0wU23xtfhjMg1kDKo_CE8ef0_6nvAqGK2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2262604679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Underneath the cerclage: an ex vivo study on the cerclage-bone interface mechanics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Lenz, Mark ; Perren, Stephan Marcel ; Gueorguiev, Boyko ; Richards, Robert Geoff ; Krause, Fabian ; Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto ; Höntzsch, Dankward ; Windolf, Markus</creator><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Mark ; Perren, Stephan Marcel ; Gueorguiev, Boyko ; Richards, Robert Geoff ; Krause, Fabian ; Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto ; Höntzsch, Dankward ; Windolf, Markus</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Cerclages regain interest due to a rising number of periprosthetic fractures. The contact distribution at the circumferential cerclage-bone interface is still unknown. Local interface pressure depends on the amount of contact area. Cortical damage at the interface would provoke cerclage loosening. Therefore, the contact area, the bone pressure along the interface and the cortical resistance underneath loaded cerclages were determined in an ex vivo model.
Materials and methods
Human diaphyseal femoral bone was used with differing cross-sectional geometry. Bone contact points of fixed 1.5 mm wire and 1.7 mm cable cerclages were identified from axial radiographs. Pressure distribution at the cerclage-bone interface was recorded with a pressure-measuring film using a distraction setup with two cortical half shells. Bone shells with installed cerclages were separated with up to 400 N force and were subsequently analyzed histologically to detect cortical damage.
Results
Both cerclage types exhibited a point contact fixation with non-loaded spanned zones in-between. Cables cover larger contact areas. Both cerclages exhibited an inhomogeneous interface pressure distribution depending on the bone surface geometry. Histology revealed intact cortical bone without cortical affection after loading of both cerclage types.
Conclusion
Point contact fixation of the cerclages installs non-loaded, spanned zones where the periosteum is not compressed, rendering a strangulation of the blood supply unlikely. Cortical bone withstands static concentric pressure produced by the cerclage. Cortical groove formation is attributed to instability under functional load and not to weakness of the cortex itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1572-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22740062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Wires ; Cadaver ; Femur - blood supply ; Femur - pathology ; Femur - physiopathology ; Femur - surgery ; Fracture Healing ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Orthopedic Fixation Devices ; Orthopedics ; Periprosthetic Fractures - pathology ; Periprosthetic Fractures - physiopathology ; Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery ; Premature birth ; Pressure ; Pressure distribution ; Sutures ; Trauma Surgery</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2012-10, Vol.132 (10), p.1467-1472</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><rights>Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2012). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-42e88355dd73defff684be4245768f79ee4c4fe7efd9740c668f9925ce950b3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-42e88355dd73defff684be4245768f79ee4c4fe7efd9740c668f9925ce950b3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-012-1572-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00402-012-1572-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22740062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perren, Stephan Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueorguiev, Boyko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Robert Geoff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höntzsch, Dankward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windolf, Markus</creatorcontrib><title>Underneath the cerclage: an ex vivo study on the cerclage-bone interface mechanics</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction
Cerclages regain interest due to a rising number of periprosthetic fractures. The contact distribution at the circumferential cerclage-bone interface is still unknown. Local interface pressure depends on the amount of contact area. Cortical damage at the interface would provoke cerclage loosening. Therefore, the contact area, the bone pressure along the interface and the cortical resistance underneath loaded cerclages were determined in an ex vivo model.
Materials and methods
Human diaphyseal femoral bone was used with differing cross-sectional geometry. Bone contact points of fixed 1.5 mm wire and 1.7 mm cable cerclages were identified from axial radiographs. Pressure distribution at the cerclage-bone interface was recorded with a pressure-measuring film using a distraction setup with two cortical half shells. Bone shells with installed cerclages were separated with up to 400 N force and were subsequently analyzed histologically to detect cortical damage.
Results
Both cerclage types exhibited a point contact fixation with non-loaded spanned zones in-between. Cables cover larger contact areas. Both cerclages exhibited an inhomogeneous interface pressure distribution depending on the bone surface geometry. Histology revealed intact cortical bone without cortical affection after loading of both cerclage types.
Conclusion
Point contact fixation of the cerclages installs non-loaded, spanned zones where the periosteum is not compressed, rendering a strangulation of the blood supply unlikely. Cortical bone withstands static concentric pressure produced by the cerclage. Cortical groove formation is attributed to instability under functional load and not to weakness of the cortex itself.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Wires</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Femur - blood supply</subject><subject>Femur - pathology</subject><subject>Femur - physiopathology</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Healing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Orthopedic Fixation Devices</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - pathology</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Premature birth</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Pressure distribution</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Trauma Surgery</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWj9-gBcJePESnWSzycabFL9AEMSewzY7sSttVpNdaf-9kfqBgqeBmWfeGR5CDjmccgB9lgAkCAZcMF5qwZYbZMRlIVlhuNokIzCFYhWUfIfspvQMGawMbJMdIbQEUGJEHiahwRiw7me0nyF1GN28fsJzWgeKS_rWvnU09UOzol34RbBpF5C2ocfoa4d0gW5Wh9alfbLl63nCg8-6RyZXl4_jG3Z3f307vrhjTvKyZ1JgVRVl2TS6aNB7ryo5RSlkqVXltUGUTnrU6BuTv3Uqd40RpUNTwrRwxR45Wee-xO51wNTbRZsczud1wG5IloMyArRUKqPHf9Dnboghf2eFUEKBVNpkiq8pF7uUInr7EttFHVc5yn4It2vhNnu0H8LtMu8cfSYP0wU23xtfhjMg1kDKo_CE8ef0_6nvAqGK2w</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Lenz, Mark</creator><creator>Perren, Stephan Marcel</creator><creator>Gueorguiev, Boyko</creator><creator>Richards, Robert Geoff</creator><creator>Krause, Fabian</creator><creator>Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto</creator><creator>Höntzsch, Dankward</creator><creator>Windolf, Markus</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Underneath the cerclage: an ex vivo study on the cerclage-bone interface mechanics</title><author>Lenz, Mark ; Perren, Stephan Marcel ; Gueorguiev, Boyko ; Richards, Robert Geoff ; Krause, Fabian ; Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto ; Höntzsch, Dankward ; Windolf, Markus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-42e88355dd73defff684be4245768f79ee4c4fe7efd9740c668f9925ce950b3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Wires</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Femur - blood supply</topic><topic>Femur - pathology</topic><topic>Femur - physiopathology</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Healing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Orthopedic Fixation Devices</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - pathology</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Premature birth</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Pressure distribution</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Trauma Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lenz, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perren, Stephan Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueorguiev, Boyko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Robert Geoff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krause, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Höntzsch, Dankward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windolf, Markus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lenz, Mark</au><au>Perren, Stephan Marcel</au><au>Gueorguiev, Boyko</au><au>Richards, Robert Geoff</au><au>Krause, Fabian</au><au>Fernandez dell’Oca, Alberto</au><au>Höntzsch, Dankward</au><au>Windolf, Markus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Underneath the cerclage: an ex vivo study on the cerclage-bone interface mechanics</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1467</spage><epage>1472</epage><pages>1467-1472</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Cerclages regain interest due to a rising number of periprosthetic fractures. The contact distribution at the circumferential cerclage-bone interface is still unknown. Local interface pressure depends on the amount of contact area. Cortical damage at the interface would provoke cerclage loosening. Therefore, the contact area, the bone pressure along the interface and the cortical resistance underneath loaded cerclages were determined in an ex vivo model.
Materials and methods
Human diaphyseal femoral bone was used with differing cross-sectional geometry. Bone contact points of fixed 1.5 mm wire and 1.7 mm cable cerclages were identified from axial radiographs. Pressure distribution at the cerclage-bone interface was recorded with a pressure-measuring film using a distraction setup with two cortical half shells. Bone shells with installed cerclages were separated with up to 400 N force and were subsequently analyzed histologically to detect cortical damage.
Results
Both cerclage types exhibited a point contact fixation with non-loaded spanned zones in-between. Cables cover larger contact areas. Both cerclages exhibited an inhomogeneous interface pressure distribution depending on the bone surface geometry. Histology revealed intact cortical bone without cortical affection after loading of both cerclage types.
Conclusion
Point contact fixation of the cerclages installs non-loaded, spanned zones where the periosteum is not compressed, rendering a strangulation of the blood supply unlikely. Cortical bone withstands static concentric pressure produced by the cerclage. Cortical groove formation is attributed to instability under functional load and not to weakness of the cortex itself.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22740062</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-012-1572-x</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0936-8051 |
ispartof | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2012-10, Vol.132 (10), p.1467-1472 |
issn | 0936-8051 1434-3916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1069207466 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Biomechanical Phenomena Bone Wires Cadaver Femur - blood supply Femur - pathology Femur - physiopathology Femur - surgery Fracture Healing Humans Medicine Medicine & Public Health Orthopedic Fixation Devices Orthopedics Periprosthetic Fractures - pathology Periprosthetic Fractures - physiopathology Periprosthetic Fractures - surgery Premature birth Pressure Pressure distribution Sutures Trauma Surgery |
title | Underneath the cerclage: an ex vivo study on the cerclage-bone interface mechanics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T17%3A41%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Underneath%20the%20cerclage:%20an%20ex%20vivo%20study%20on%20the%20cerclage-bone%20interface%20mechanics&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Lenz,%20Mark&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1467&rft.epage=1472&rft.pages=1467-1472&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-012-1572-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1069207466%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2262604679&rft_id=info:pmid/22740062&rfr_iscdi=true |