Tumor Stem Cell Antigens as Consolidative Active Specific Immunotherapy: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Dendritic Cells Versus Tumor Cells in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
Only 10% of metastatic melanoma patients survive 5 years, even though many can achieve substantial tumor reduction by surgical resection and/or radiation therapy and/or systemic therapy. An effective, nontoxic, consolidation immunotherapy could benefit such patients. We initiated a randomized trial...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of immunotherapy (1997) 2012-10, Vol.35 (8), p.641-649 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 649 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 641 |
container_title | Journal of immunotherapy (1997) |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | DILLMAN, Robert O CORNFORTH, Andrew N DEPRIEST, Carol MCCLAY, Edward F AMATRUDA, Thomas T DE LEON, Cristina ELLIS, Robin E MAYORGA, Cheryl CARBONELL, Denysha CUBELLIS, James M |
description | Only 10% of metastatic melanoma patients survive 5 years, even though many can achieve substantial tumor reduction by surgical resection and/or radiation therapy and/or systemic therapy. An effective, nontoxic, consolidation immunotherapy could benefit such patients. We initiated a randomized trial to compare 2 promising patient-specific immunotherapy cell products. Patients had to have a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma and availability of an autologous melanoma cell line. Patients were stratified by whether their most advanced stage had been regional or distant metastases, and by whether they had measurable disease at the time of treatment, then they were randomized to receive irradiated autologous proliferating tumor cells or autologous dendritic cells (DC) loaded with antigens from such cells. Both products were injected subcutaneously in 500 µg of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, weekly for 3 weeks and then monthly for 5 months. Patients in the 2 arms did not differ in baseline characteristics. All patients received prescribed therapy. Treatment was well tolerated. At the time of initial analysis, with no patients lost to follow-up, 50% of patients deceased, and all surviving patients followed for at least 6 months after randomization, survival is superior in the DC arm (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.098-0.729) with median survival not reached versus 15.9 months, and 2-year survival rates of 72% versus 31% (P=0.007). This trial provides evidence that a DC vaccine is associated with longer survival compared with a tumor cell vaccine, and is consistent with previous data suggesting a survival benefit from this patient-specific immunotherapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/CJI.0b013e31826f79c8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1069205743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1069205743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-efbbb625f1fb29048119960213b641236ff22c17a4ccebb78cc066e1b0da2e693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd1u1DAQhSMEoj_wBgj5Bqk3Kf5JnIS7VSglqBUVXeAysp0xa5TYi8dBKi_FK5Jlt0Xiakaj78yZ0cmyF4yeM9pUr9sP3TnVlAkQrObSVo2pH2XHrBRVXpRMPN71vMibsqyOshPE75RyyQv-NDvivGmkqOhx9ns9TyGS2wQTaWEcycon9w08EoWkDR7D6AaV3E8gK_O33G7BOOsM6aZp9iFtIKrt3RuyIp-UH8LkfsFAbjYKgXQdWUenRhIseQt-iC4tup0Nki8QcUayt9-PnCc3ixX4hOSrSxtyDUlhUjvRNYzKh0k9y55YNSI8P9TT7PO7i3X7Pr_6eNm1q6vc8FqmHKzWWvLSMqt5Q4uaseVjypnQsmBcSGs5N6xShTGgdVUbQ6UEpumgOMhGnGZn-73bGH7MgKmfHJrlTOUhzNgzKhtOy6oQC1rsURMDYgTbb6ObVLxboH4XVb9E1f8f1SJ7eXCY9QTDg-g-mwV4dQAUGjXaqLxx-I-TRUmrhoo_vmOfbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1069205743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tumor Stem Cell Antigens as Consolidative Active Specific Immunotherapy: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Dendritic Cells Versus Tumor Cells in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>DILLMAN, Robert O ; CORNFORTH, Andrew N ; DEPRIEST, Carol ; MCCLAY, Edward F ; AMATRUDA, Thomas T ; DE LEON, Cristina ; ELLIS, Robin E ; MAYORGA, Cheryl ; CARBONELL, Denysha ; CUBELLIS, James M</creator><creatorcontrib>DILLMAN, Robert O ; CORNFORTH, Andrew N ; DEPRIEST, Carol ; MCCLAY, Edward F ; AMATRUDA, Thomas T ; DE LEON, Cristina ; ELLIS, Robin E ; MAYORGA, Cheryl ; CARBONELL, Denysha ; CUBELLIS, James M</creatorcontrib><description>Only 10% of metastatic melanoma patients survive 5 years, even though many can achieve substantial tumor reduction by surgical resection and/or radiation therapy and/or systemic therapy. An effective, nontoxic, consolidation immunotherapy could benefit such patients. We initiated a randomized trial to compare 2 promising patient-specific immunotherapy cell products. Patients had to have a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma and availability of an autologous melanoma cell line. Patients were stratified by whether their most advanced stage had been regional or distant metastases, and by whether they had measurable disease at the time of treatment, then they were randomized to receive irradiated autologous proliferating tumor cells or autologous dendritic cells (DC) loaded with antigens from such cells. Both products were injected subcutaneously in 500 µg of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, weekly for 3 weeks and then monthly for 5 months. Patients in the 2 arms did not differ in baseline characteristics. All patients received prescribed therapy. Treatment was well tolerated. At the time of initial analysis, with no patients lost to follow-up, 50% of patients deceased, and all surviving patients followed for at least 6 months after randomization, survival is superior in the DC arm (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.098-0.729) with median survival not reached versus 15.9 months, and 2-year survival rates of 72% versus 31% (P=0.007). This trial provides evidence that a DC vaccine is associated with longer survival compared with a tumor cell vaccine, and is consistent with previous data suggesting a survival benefit from this patient-specific immunotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-9557</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-4513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e31826f79c8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22996370</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOIMF8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - immunology ; Antigens, Neoplasm - metabolism ; Antineoplastic agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Dendritic Cells - immunology ; Dendritic Cells - metabolism ; Dendritic Cells - transplantation ; Dermatology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Immunotherapy ; Immunotherapy - methods ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Melanoma - immunology ; Melanoma - secondary ; Melanoma - therapy ; Middle Aged ; Neoplastic Stem Cells - immunology ; Neoplastic Stem Cells - transplantation ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Skin Neoplasms - immunology ; Skin Neoplasms - pathology ; Skin Neoplasms - therapy ; Survival Analysis ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><ispartof>Journal of immunotherapy (1997), 2012-10, Vol.35 (8), p.641-649</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=26450790$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22996370$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DILLMAN, Robert O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORNFORTH, Andrew N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEPRIEST, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCLAY, Edward F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMATRUDA, Thomas T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE LEON, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELLIS, Robin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAYORGA, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARBONELL, Denysha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CUBELLIS, James M</creatorcontrib><title>Tumor Stem Cell Antigens as Consolidative Active Specific Immunotherapy: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Dendritic Cells Versus Tumor Cells in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma</title><title>Journal of immunotherapy (1997)</title><addtitle>J Immunother</addtitle><description>Only 10% of metastatic melanoma patients survive 5 years, even though many can achieve substantial tumor reduction by surgical resection and/or radiation therapy and/or systemic therapy. An effective, nontoxic, consolidation immunotherapy could benefit such patients. We initiated a randomized trial to compare 2 promising patient-specific immunotherapy cell products. Patients had to have a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma and availability of an autologous melanoma cell line. Patients were stratified by whether their most advanced stage had been regional or distant metastases, and by whether they had measurable disease at the time of treatment, then they were randomized to receive irradiated autologous proliferating tumor cells or autologous dendritic cells (DC) loaded with antigens from such cells. Both products were injected subcutaneously in 500 µg of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, weekly for 3 weeks and then monthly for 5 months. Patients in the 2 arms did not differ in baseline characteristics. All patients received prescribed therapy. Treatment was well tolerated. At the time of initial analysis, with no patients lost to follow-up, 50% of patients deceased, and all surviving patients followed for at least 6 months after randomization, survival is superior in the DC arm (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.098-0.729) with median survival not reached versus 15.9 months, and 2-year survival rates of 72% versus 31% (P=0.007). This trial provides evidence that a DC vaccine is associated with longer survival compared with a tumor cell vaccine, and is consistent with previous data suggesting a survival benefit from this patient-specific immunotherapy.</description><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - immunology</subject><subject>Antigens, Neoplasm - metabolism</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Dendritic Cells - immunology</subject><subject>Dendritic Cells - metabolism</subject><subject>Dendritic Cells - transplantation</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Immunotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Melanoma - immunology</subject><subject>Melanoma - secondary</subject><subject>Melanoma - therapy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplastic Stem Cells - immunology</subject><subject>Neoplastic Stem Cells - transplantation</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><issn>1524-9557</issn><issn>1537-4513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd1u1DAQhSMEoj_wBgj5Bqk3Kf5JnIS7VSglqBUVXeAysp0xa5TYi8dBKi_FK5Jlt0Xiakaj78yZ0cmyF4yeM9pUr9sP3TnVlAkQrObSVo2pH2XHrBRVXpRMPN71vMibsqyOshPE75RyyQv-NDvivGmkqOhx9ns9TyGS2wQTaWEcycon9w08EoWkDR7D6AaV3E8gK_O33G7BOOsM6aZp9iFtIKrt3RuyIp-UH8LkfsFAbjYKgXQdWUenRhIseQt-iC4tup0Nki8QcUayt9-PnCc3ixX4hOSrSxtyDUlhUjvRNYzKh0k9y55YNSI8P9TT7PO7i3X7Pr_6eNm1q6vc8FqmHKzWWvLSMqt5Q4uaseVjypnQsmBcSGs5N6xShTGgdVUbQ6UEpumgOMhGnGZn-73bGH7MgKmfHJrlTOUhzNgzKhtOy6oQC1rsURMDYgTbb6ObVLxboH4XVb9E1f8f1SJ7eXCY9QTDg-g-mwV4dQAUGjXaqLxx-I-TRUmrhoo_vmOfbw</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>DILLMAN, Robert O</creator><creator>CORNFORTH, Andrew N</creator><creator>DEPRIEST, Carol</creator><creator>MCCLAY, Edward F</creator><creator>AMATRUDA, Thomas T</creator><creator>DE LEON, Cristina</creator><creator>ELLIS, Robin E</creator><creator>MAYORGA, Cheryl</creator><creator>CARBONELL, Denysha</creator><creator>CUBELLIS, James M</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Tumor Stem Cell Antigens as Consolidative Active Specific Immunotherapy: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Dendritic Cells Versus Tumor Cells in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma</title><author>DILLMAN, Robert O ; CORNFORTH, Andrew N ; DEPRIEST, Carol ; MCCLAY, Edward F ; AMATRUDA, Thomas T ; DE LEON, Cristina ; ELLIS, Robin E ; MAYORGA, Cheryl ; CARBONELL, Denysha ; CUBELLIS, James M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-efbbb625f1fb29048119960213b641236ff22c17a4ccebb78cc066e1b0da2e693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - immunology</topic><topic>Antigens, Neoplasm - metabolism</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Dendritic Cells - immunology</topic><topic>Dendritic Cells - metabolism</topic><topic>Dendritic Cells - transplantation</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Immunotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Melanoma - immunology</topic><topic>Melanoma - secondary</topic><topic>Melanoma - therapy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplastic Stem Cells - immunology</topic><topic>Neoplastic Stem Cells - transplantation</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DILLMAN, Robert O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORNFORTH, Andrew N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEPRIEST, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCCLAY, Edward F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AMATRUDA, Thomas T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE LEON, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELLIS, Robin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MAYORGA, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARBONELL, Denysha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CUBELLIS, James M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of immunotherapy (1997)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DILLMAN, Robert O</au><au>CORNFORTH, Andrew N</au><au>DEPRIEST, Carol</au><au>MCCLAY, Edward F</au><au>AMATRUDA, Thomas T</au><au>DE LEON, Cristina</au><au>ELLIS, Robin E</au><au>MAYORGA, Cheryl</au><au>CARBONELL, Denysha</au><au>CUBELLIS, James M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tumor Stem Cell Antigens as Consolidative Active Specific Immunotherapy: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Dendritic Cells Versus Tumor Cells in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of immunotherapy (1997)</jtitle><addtitle>J Immunother</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>641</spage><epage>649</epage><pages>641-649</pages><issn>1524-9557</issn><eissn>1537-4513</eissn><coden>JOIMF8</coden><abstract>Only 10% of metastatic melanoma patients survive 5 years, even though many can achieve substantial tumor reduction by surgical resection and/or radiation therapy and/or systemic therapy. An effective, nontoxic, consolidation immunotherapy could benefit such patients. We initiated a randomized trial to compare 2 promising patient-specific immunotherapy cell products. Patients had to have a diagnosis of metastatic melanoma and availability of an autologous melanoma cell line. Patients were stratified by whether their most advanced stage had been regional or distant metastases, and by whether they had measurable disease at the time of treatment, then they were randomized to receive irradiated autologous proliferating tumor cells or autologous dendritic cells (DC) loaded with antigens from such cells. Both products were injected subcutaneously in 500 µg of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, weekly for 3 weeks and then monthly for 5 months. Patients in the 2 arms did not differ in baseline characteristics. All patients received prescribed therapy. Treatment was well tolerated. At the time of initial analysis, with no patients lost to follow-up, 50% of patients deceased, and all surviving patients followed for at least 6 months after randomization, survival is superior in the DC arm (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.098-0.729) with median survival not reached versus 15.9 months, and 2-year survival rates of 72% versus 31% (P=0.007). This trial provides evidence that a DC vaccine is associated with longer survival compared with a tumor cell vaccine, and is consistent with previous data suggesting a survival benefit from this patient-specific immunotherapy.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>22996370</pmid><doi>10.1097/CJI.0b013e31826f79c8</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1524-9557 |
ispartof | Journal of immunotherapy (1997), 2012-10, Vol.35 (8), p.641-649 |
issn | 1524-9557 1537-4513 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1069205743 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Antigens, Neoplasm - immunology Antigens, Neoplasm - metabolism Antineoplastic agents Biological and medical sciences Cancer Vaccines - therapeutic use Dendritic Cells - immunology Dendritic Cells - metabolism Dendritic Cells - transplantation Dermatology Female Follow-Up Studies Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor - administration & dosage Humans Immunotherapy Immunotherapy - methods Male Medical sciences Melanoma - immunology Melanoma - secondary Melanoma - therapy Middle Aged Neoplastic Stem Cells - immunology Neoplastic Stem Cells - transplantation Pharmacology. Drug treatments Skin Neoplasms - immunology Skin Neoplasms - pathology Skin Neoplasms - therapy Survival Analysis Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions |
title | Tumor Stem Cell Antigens as Consolidative Active Specific Immunotherapy: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Dendritic Cells Versus Tumor Cells in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A40%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tumor%20Stem%20Cell%20Antigens%20as%20Consolidative%20Active%20Specific%20Immunotherapy:%20A%20Randomized%20Phase%20II%20Trial%20of%20Dendritic%20Cells%20Versus%20Tumor%20Cells%20in%20Patients%20With%20Metastatic%20Melanoma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20immunotherapy%20(1997)&rft.au=DILLMAN,%20Robert%20O&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=641&rft.epage=649&rft.pages=641-649&rft.issn=1524-9557&rft.eissn=1537-4513&rft.coden=JOIMF8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/CJI.0b013e31826f79c8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1069205743%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1069205743&rft_id=info:pmid/22996370&rfr_iscdi=true |