Preference for biological motion in domestic chicks: sex-dependent effect of early visual experience
To examine the effects of early visual experience on preference for biological motion (BM), newly hatched chicks were exposed to a point-light animation (a visual stimulus composed of identical light points) depicting the following features of a hen: a walking hen (a BM stimulus), a rotating hen (a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal cognition 2012-09, Vol.15 (5), p.871-879 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 879 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 871 |
container_title | Animal cognition |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Miura, Momoko Matsushima, Toshiya |
description | To examine the effects of early visual experience on preference for biological motion (BM), newly hatched chicks were exposed to a point-light animation (a visual stimulus composed of identical light points) depicting the following features of a hen: a walking hen (a BM stimulus), a rotating hen (a non-BM stimulus), a pendulum stimulus, a random motion stimulus and a stationary pattern. Chicks were then tested in a binary choice task, choosing between walking-hen and rotating-hen stimuli. Males exhibited a preference for BM if they had been trained with any animation except the stationary pattern stimulus, suggesting that the BM preference was not learned, but induced by motion stimuli. We found a significant positive correlation between the number of approaches in training and the preference in the test, but locomotion alone did not cause preference for BM. In contrast, females exhibited a particularly strong preference for walking-hen stimuli, but only when they had been trained with it. Furthermore, females (but not males) trained with random motion showed a preference for walking hen over walking cat (a biological motion animation depicting a cat), possibly suggesting that females are choosier than males. Chicks trained with a stationary pattern and untrained controls did not show a significant preference. The induction of BM preference is discussed in terms of possible ecological background of the sex differences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10071-012-0514-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1069193607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1034808544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-47857f86b7219adc51d806ba3f0b3a4a78c3126f1ede57a94f590a5ac9e681073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LHTEUhkNRqrX9Ad1IwE030-ZkkknSXRFbBaEudD1kMic2dmZyTWbk-u-b4VoRodBNEsjzvvl4CPkI7DMwpr7kdYSKAa-YBFFt35BDELWsjJDN3vNa6APyLuc7xpgWBt6SA84bzjXUh6S_Sugx4eSQ-phoF-IQb4OzAx3jHOJEw0T7OGKeg6PuV3C_81eacVv1uMGpx2mm6D26mUZP0abhkT6EvJQ8bjeYwtr8nux7O2T88DQfkZvvZ9en59Xlzx8Xp98uKyelniuhtFReN53iYGzvJPSaNZ2tPetqK6zSrgbeeMAepbJGeGmYldYZbDQwVR-RT7veTYr3S7lyO4bscBjshHHJLbDGgKmb_0JroZmWQhT05BV6F5c0lYeslOKKGw6Fgh3lUsy5fGq7SWG06bFA7eqp3dlqi612tdVuS-b4qXnpRuyfE3_1FIDvgFy2pltML4_-V-sfo8-fbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1037272921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preference for biological motion in domestic chicks: sex-dependent effect of early visual experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Miura, Momoko ; Matsushima, Toshiya</creator><creatorcontrib>Miura, Momoko ; Matsushima, Toshiya</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the effects of early visual experience on preference for biological motion (BM), newly hatched chicks were exposed to a point-light animation (a visual stimulus composed of identical light points) depicting the following features of a hen: a walking hen (a BM stimulus), a rotating hen (a non-BM stimulus), a pendulum stimulus, a random motion stimulus and a stationary pattern. Chicks were then tested in a binary choice task, choosing between walking-hen and rotating-hen stimuli. Males exhibited a preference for BM if they had been trained with any animation except the stationary pattern stimulus, suggesting that the BM preference was not learned, but induced by motion stimuli. We found a significant positive correlation between the number of approaches in training and the preference in the test, but locomotion alone did not cause preference for BM. In contrast, females exhibited a particularly strong preference for walking-hen stimuli, but only when they had been trained with it. Furthermore, females (but not males) trained with random motion showed a preference for walking hen over walking cat (a biological motion animation depicting a cat), possibly suggesting that females are choosier than males. Chicks trained with a stationary pattern and untrained controls did not show a significant preference. The induction of BM preference is discussed in terms of possible ecological background of the sex differences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-9448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-9456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10071-012-0514-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22622813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal cognition ; Animals ; Animals, Newborn - psychology ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chickens ; Evolutionary biology ; Eyes & eyesight ; Female ; Imprinting (Psychology) ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Motion Perception ; Original Paper ; Photic Stimulation ; Poultry ; Psychology Research ; Sex Factors ; Visual Perception ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Animal cognition, 2012-09, Vol.15 (5), p.871-879</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-47857f86b7219adc51d806ba3f0b3a4a78c3126f1ede57a94f590a5ac9e681073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-47857f86b7219adc51d806ba3f0b3a4a78c3126f1ede57a94f590a5ac9e681073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10071-012-0514-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10071-012-0514-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22622813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miura, Momoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsushima, Toshiya</creatorcontrib><title>Preference for biological motion in domestic chicks: sex-dependent effect of early visual experience</title><title>Animal cognition</title><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><description>To examine the effects of early visual experience on preference for biological motion (BM), newly hatched chicks were exposed to a point-light animation (a visual stimulus composed of identical light points) depicting the following features of a hen: a walking hen (a BM stimulus), a rotating hen (a non-BM stimulus), a pendulum stimulus, a random motion stimulus and a stationary pattern. Chicks were then tested in a binary choice task, choosing between walking-hen and rotating-hen stimuli. Males exhibited a preference for BM if they had been trained with any animation except the stationary pattern stimulus, suggesting that the BM preference was not learned, but induced by motion stimuli. We found a significant positive correlation between the number of approaches in training and the preference in the test, but locomotion alone did not cause preference for BM. In contrast, females exhibited a particularly strong preference for walking-hen stimuli, but only when they had been trained with it. Furthermore, females (but not males) trained with random motion showed a preference for walking hen over walking cat (a biological motion animation depicting a cat), possibly suggesting that females are choosier than males. Chicks trained with a stationary pattern and untrained controls did not show a significant preference. The induction of BM preference is discussed in terms of possible ecological background of the sex differences.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Newborn - psychology</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Evolutionary biology</subject><subject>Eyes & eyesight</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Imprinting (Psychology)</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion Perception</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1435-9448</issn><issn>1435-9456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LHTEUhkNRqrX9Ad1IwE030-ZkkknSXRFbBaEudD1kMic2dmZyTWbk-u-b4VoRodBNEsjzvvl4CPkI7DMwpr7kdYSKAa-YBFFt35BDELWsjJDN3vNa6APyLuc7xpgWBt6SA84bzjXUh6S_Sugx4eSQ-phoF-IQb4OzAx3jHOJEw0T7OGKeg6PuV3C_81eacVv1uMGpx2mm6D26mUZP0abhkT6EvJQ8bjeYwtr8nux7O2T88DQfkZvvZ9en59Xlzx8Xp98uKyelniuhtFReN53iYGzvJPSaNZ2tPetqK6zSrgbeeMAepbJGeGmYldYZbDQwVR-RT7veTYr3S7lyO4bscBjshHHJLbDGgKmb_0JroZmWQhT05BV6F5c0lYeslOKKGw6Fgh3lUsy5fGq7SWG06bFA7eqp3dlqi612tdVuS-b4qXnpRuyfE3_1FIDvgFy2pltML4_-V-sfo8-fbg</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Miura, Momoko</creator><creator>Matsushima, Toshiya</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Preference for biological motion in domestic chicks: sex-dependent effect of early visual experience</title><author>Miura, Momoko ; Matsushima, Toshiya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-47857f86b7219adc51d806ba3f0b3a4a78c3126f1ede57a94f590a5ac9e681073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Newborn - psychology</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Evolutionary biology</topic><topic>Eyes & eyesight</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Imprinting (Psychology)</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion Perception</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miura, Momoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsushima, Toshiya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miura, Momoko</au><au>Matsushima, Toshiya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preference for biological motion in domestic chicks: sex-dependent effect of early visual experience</atitle><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle><stitle>Anim Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>871</spage><epage>879</epage><pages>871-879</pages><issn>1435-9448</issn><eissn>1435-9456</eissn><abstract>To examine the effects of early visual experience on preference for biological motion (BM), newly hatched chicks were exposed to a point-light animation (a visual stimulus composed of identical light points) depicting the following features of a hen: a walking hen (a BM stimulus), a rotating hen (a non-BM stimulus), a pendulum stimulus, a random motion stimulus and a stationary pattern. Chicks were then tested in a binary choice task, choosing between walking-hen and rotating-hen stimuli. Males exhibited a preference for BM if they had been trained with any animation except the stationary pattern stimulus, suggesting that the BM preference was not learned, but induced by motion stimuli. We found a significant positive correlation between the number of approaches in training and the preference in the test, but locomotion alone did not cause preference for BM. In contrast, females exhibited a particularly strong preference for walking-hen stimuli, but only when they had been trained with it. Furthermore, females (but not males) trained with random motion showed a preference for walking hen over walking cat (a biological motion animation depicting a cat), possibly suggesting that females are choosier than males. Chicks trained with a stationary pattern and untrained controls did not show a significant preference. The induction of BM preference is discussed in terms of possible ecological background of the sex differences.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>22622813</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10071-012-0514-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1435-9448 |
ispartof | Animal cognition, 2012-09, Vol.15 (5), p.871-879 |
issn | 1435-9448 1435-9456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1069193607 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal cognition Animals Animals, Newborn - psychology Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Chickens Evolutionary biology Eyes & eyesight Female Imprinting (Psychology) Life Sciences Male Motion Perception Original Paper Photic Stimulation Poultry Psychology Research Sex Factors Visual Perception Zoology |
title | Preference for biological motion in domestic chicks: sex-dependent effect of early visual experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T13%3A08%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preference%20for%20biological%20motion%20in%20domestic%20chicks:%20sex-dependent%20effect%20of%20early%20visual%20experience&rft.jtitle=Animal%20cognition&rft.au=Miura,%20Momoko&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=871&rft.epage=879&rft.pages=871-879&rft.issn=1435-9448&rft.eissn=1435-9456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10071-012-0514-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1034808544%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1037272921&rft_id=info:pmid/22622813&rfr_iscdi=true |