Five-year clinical outcomes after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse clinical outcomes; however, the long-term efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in diabetic patients remains uncertain. We evaluated 5-year clinical outcomes after SES implantation in 197 consecutive patients (85 in the DM group and 112 in the non-DM group), and 246 lesions (106 and 140, respectively). The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis or admission for congestive heart failure. Diabetic patient characteristics included 32 % who used insulin. The risk of congestive heart failure was significantly higher [20.0 vs. 5.4 %, odds ratio (OR) 4.417, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.659 to 11.759, p = 0.003] in the DM group compared with the non-DM group; however, MACE did not occur significantly more often (27.1 vs. 16.1 %, p = 0.060). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes was associated with congestive heart failure (OR 4.715, 95 % CI 1.743 to 12.759, p = 0.002) and multivessel disease was associated with major adverse cardiac events (OR 2.709, 95 % CI 1.053 to 6.965, p = 0.039). The cumulative rates (%) of TLR were as follows: after 1 year; 5.9 versus 5.4, 2 years; 7.1 versus 5.4, 3 years; 9.4 versus 7.1, 4 years; 9.4 versus 8.9, 5 years; 9.4 versus 8.9 (p = 0.652) in the DM group and the non-DM group, respectively. Diabetic patients had worse long-term prognosis in terms of congestive heart failure than non-diabetic patients undergoing PCI, even with SES. TLR was performed steadily for up to 5 years of follow-up following the late catch-up phenomenon both in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.