‘Fugitive Mullahs and Outlawed Fanatics’: Indian Muslims in nineteenth century trans-Asiatic Imperial Rivalries
This paper follows the careers of ‘outlawed’ Indian Muslim subjects who moved outside the geographical and political space of British India and located themselves at the intersection of nineteenth century trans-Asiatic politics: Hijaz, Istanbul and the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire, and Burma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Modern Asian studies 2011-11, Vol.45 (6), p.1337-1382 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1382 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1337 |
container_title | Modern Asian studies |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | ALAVI, SEEMA |
description | This paper follows the careers of ‘outlawed’ Indian Muslim subjects who moved outside the geographical and political space of British India and located themselves at the intersection of nineteenth century trans-Asiatic politics: Hijaz, Istanbul and the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire, and Burma and Acheh in the East. These areas were sites where ‘modern’ Empires (British, Dutch, Ottoman and Russian) coalesced to lay out a trans-Asiatic imperial assemblage. The paper shows how Muslim ‘outlaws’ made careers and carved out their transnational networks by moving across the imperial assemblages of the nineteenth century. British colonial rule, being an important spoke in the imperial wheel, enabled much of this transnationalism to weld together. Webs of connections derived from older forms of Islamic connectivity as well: diplomacy, kinship ties, the writing of commentaries on Islam and its sacred texts in unique ways, oral traditions, madrasa and student contacts. These networks were inclusive and impacted by the tanzimat-inspired scriptural reformist thought in the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire. They were not narrowly anti-colonial in tone as they derived from a complex inter-play of imperial rivalries in the region. Rather, they were geared towards the triumph of reformist Islam that would unite the umma (community) and engage with the European world order. The paper shows how this imperially-embedded and individual-driven Muslim transnational network linked with Muslim politics rooted within India. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0026749X11000266 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038901196</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0026749X11000266</cupid><jstor_id>41330642</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>41330642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-c698e7dbbf78810d41e5926717b037f1e71096f2d15220b26c921dcbc3f1d8673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc-KFDEQxhtRcFx9AA9C8OSltSrJJB1vy-LowMqCf8Bbk07Suxm602OSXtmbj6Gvt0-yaWdRUIS9pELV7_uKj6qqpwgvEVC--ghAheTqCyIsX3GvWiEXqm5AqfvVaunVy_xh9SilHQAyRLqq0vX3H5v53Gd_6cj7eRj0RSI6WHI250F_c5ZsdNDZmwL-fE22wXodCpgGPybiAwk-uOxcyBfElHeOVyRHHVJ9nPyiI9tx76LXA_ngL_UQvUuPqwe9HpJ7cluPqs-bN59O3tWnZ2-3J8enteFM5toI1Thpu66XTYNgObq1KiFRdsBkj04iKNFTi2tKoaPCKIrWdIb1aBsh2VH14uC7j9PX2aXcjj4ZVzIGN82pRWCNAkQl7oBSBlRRRu-IcviFPv8L3U1zDCVzq4CvOQjOC4QHyMQppej6dh_9qONVcWqX27b_3LZonh00u5Sn-FvAkbHiuSxmt5567KK35-7P5v-73gC7vLBW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>904540644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘Fugitive Mullahs and Outlawed Fanatics’: Indian Muslims in nineteenth century trans-Asiatic Imperial Rivalries</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>ALAVI, SEEMA</creator><creatorcontrib>ALAVI, SEEMA</creatorcontrib><description>This paper follows the careers of ‘outlawed’ Indian Muslim subjects who moved outside the geographical and political space of British India and located themselves at the intersection of nineteenth century trans-Asiatic politics: Hijaz, Istanbul and the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire, and Burma and Acheh in the East. These areas were sites where ‘modern’ Empires (British, Dutch, Ottoman and Russian) coalesced to lay out a trans-Asiatic imperial assemblage. The paper shows how Muslim ‘outlaws’ made careers and carved out their transnational networks by moving across the imperial assemblages of the nineteenth century. British colonial rule, being an important spoke in the imperial wheel, enabled much of this transnationalism to weld together. Webs of connections derived from older forms of Islamic connectivity as well: diplomacy, kinship ties, the writing of commentaries on Islam and its sacred texts in unique ways, oral traditions, madrasa and student contacts. These networks were inclusive and impacted by the tanzimat-inspired scriptural reformist thought in the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire. They were not narrowly anti-colonial in tone as they derived from a complex inter-play of imperial rivalries in the region. Rather, they were geared towards the triumph of reformist Islam that would unite the umma (community) and engage with the European world order. The paper shows how this imperially-embedded and individual-driven Muslim transnational network linked with Muslim politics rooted within India.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-749X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0026749X11000266</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MOASBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>18th century ; 19th century ; Asia ; Asian history ; Burma ; Caliphs ; Careers ; Colonies & territories ; Communication ; Connectivity ; Culture ; Diaspora ; Empires ; India ; Indian literature ; International relations ; Islam ; Islamism ; Istanbul, Turkey ; Koran ; Mullahs ; Muslims ; Nineteenth Century ; Ottoman Empire ; Outlawry ; Political extremism ; Politics ; Religion ; Russia ; Sufism ; Transnationalism ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Modern Asian studies, 2011-11, Vol.45 (6), p.1337-1382</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011</rights><rights>Cambridge University Press 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-c698e7dbbf78810d41e5926717b037f1e71096f2d15220b26c921dcbc3f1d8673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-c698e7dbbf78810d41e5926717b037f1e71096f2d15220b26c921dcbc3f1d8673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/41330642$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0026749X11000266/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,12824,27901,27902,33752,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>ALAVI, SEEMA</creatorcontrib><title>‘Fugitive Mullahs and Outlawed Fanatics’: Indian Muslims in nineteenth century trans-Asiatic Imperial Rivalries</title><title>Modern Asian studies</title><description>This paper follows the careers of ‘outlawed’ Indian Muslim subjects who moved outside the geographical and political space of British India and located themselves at the intersection of nineteenth century trans-Asiatic politics: Hijaz, Istanbul and the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire, and Burma and Acheh in the East. These areas were sites where ‘modern’ Empires (British, Dutch, Ottoman and Russian) coalesced to lay out a trans-Asiatic imperial assemblage. The paper shows how Muslim ‘outlaws’ made careers and carved out their transnational networks by moving across the imperial assemblages of the nineteenth century. British colonial rule, being an important spoke in the imperial wheel, enabled much of this transnationalism to weld together. Webs of connections derived from older forms of Islamic connectivity as well: diplomacy, kinship ties, the writing of commentaries on Islam and its sacred texts in unique ways, oral traditions, madrasa and student contacts. These networks were inclusive and impacted by the tanzimat-inspired scriptural reformist thought in the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire. They were not narrowly anti-colonial in tone as they derived from a complex inter-play of imperial rivalries in the region. Rather, they were geared towards the triumph of reformist Islam that would unite the umma (community) and engage with the European world order. The paper shows how this imperially-embedded and individual-driven Muslim transnational network linked with Muslim politics rooted within India.</description><subject>18th century</subject><subject>19th century</subject><subject>Asia</subject><subject>Asian history</subject><subject>Burma</subject><subject>Caliphs</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Colonies & territories</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Connectivity</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Diaspora</subject><subject>Empires</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Indian literature</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Islamism</subject><subject>Istanbul, Turkey</subject><subject>Koran</subject><subject>Mullahs</subject><subject>Muslims</subject><subject>Nineteenth Century</subject><subject>Ottoman Empire</subject><subject>Outlawry</subject><subject>Political extremism</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>Sufism</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0026-749X</issn><issn>1469-8099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc-KFDEQxhtRcFx9AA9C8OSltSrJJB1vy-LowMqCf8Bbk07Suxm602OSXtmbj6Gvt0-yaWdRUIS9pELV7_uKj6qqpwgvEVC--ghAheTqCyIsX3GvWiEXqm5AqfvVaunVy_xh9SilHQAyRLqq0vX3H5v53Gd_6cj7eRj0RSI6WHI250F_c5ZsdNDZmwL-fE22wXodCpgGPybiAwk-uOxcyBfElHeOVyRHHVJ9nPyiI9tx76LXA_ngL_UQvUuPqwe9HpJ7cluPqs-bN59O3tWnZ2-3J8enteFM5toI1Thpu66XTYNgObq1KiFRdsBkj04iKNFTi2tKoaPCKIrWdIb1aBsh2VH14uC7j9PX2aXcjj4ZVzIGN82pRWCNAkQl7oBSBlRRRu-IcviFPv8L3U1zDCVzq4CvOQjOC4QHyMQppej6dh_9qONVcWqX27b_3LZonh00u5Sn-FvAkbHiuSxmt5567KK35-7P5v-73gC7vLBW</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>ALAVI, SEEMA</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>‘Fugitive Mullahs and Outlawed Fanatics’: Indian Muslims in nineteenth century trans-Asiatic Imperial Rivalries</title><author>ALAVI, SEEMA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-c698e7dbbf78810d41e5926717b037f1e71096f2d15220b26c921dcbc3f1d8673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>18th century</topic><topic>19th century</topic><topic>Asia</topic><topic>Asian history</topic><topic>Burma</topic><topic>Caliphs</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Colonies & territories</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Connectivity</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Diaspora</topic><topic>Empires</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Indian literature</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Islamism</topic><topic>Istanbul, Turkey</topic><topic>Koran</topic><topic>Mullahs</topic><topic>Muslims</topic><topic>Nineteenth Century</topic><topic>Ottoman Empire</topic><topic>Outlawry</topic><topic>Political extremism</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>Sufism</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ALAVI, SEEMA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Modern Asian studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ALAVI, SEEMA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘Fugitive Mullahs and Outlawed Fanatics’: Indian Muslims in nineteenth century trans-Asiatic Imperial Rivalries</atitle><jtitle>Modern Asian studies</jtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1337</spage><epage>1382</epage><pages>1337-1382</pages><issn>0026-749X</issn><eissn>1469-8099</eissn><coden>MOASBF</coden><abstract>This paper follows the careers of ‘outlawed’ Indian Muslim subjects who moved outside the geographical and political space of British India and located themselves at the intersection of nineteenth century trans-Asiatic politics: Hijaz, Istanbul and the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire, and Burma and Acheh in the East. These areas were sites where ‘modern’ Empires (British, Dutch, Ottoman and Russian) coalesced to lay out a trans-Asiatic imperial assemblage. The paper shows how Muslim ‘outlaws’ made careers and carved out their transnational networks by moving across the imperial assemblages of the nineteenth century. British colonial rule, being an important spoke in the imperial wheel, enabled much of this transnationalism to weld together. Webs of connections derived from older forms of Islamic connectivity as well: diplomacy, kinship ties, the writing of commentaries on Islam and its sacred texts in unique ways, oral traditions, madrasa and student contacts. These networks were inclusive and impacted by the tanzimat-inspired scriptural reformist thought in the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire. They were not narrowly anti-colonial in tone as they derived from a complex inter-play of imperial rivalries in the region. Rather, they were geared towards the triumph of reformist Islam that would unite the umma (community) and engage with the European world order. The paper shows how this imperially-embedded and individual-driven Muslim transnational network linked with Muslim politics rooted within India.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0026749X11000266</doi><tpages>46</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-749X |
ispartof | Modern Asian studies, 2011-11, Vol.45 (6), p.1337-1382 |
issn | 0026-749X 1469-8099 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038901196 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | 18th century 19th century Asia Asian history Burma Caliphs Careers Colonies & territories Communication Connectivity Culture Diaspora Empires India Indian literature International relations Islam Islamism Istanbul, Turkey Koran Mullahs Muslims Nineteenth Century Ottoman Empire Outlawry Political extremism Politics Religion Russia Sufism Transnationalism United Kingdom |
title | ‘Fugitive Mullahs and Outlawed Fanatics’: Indian Muslims in nineteenth century trans-Asiatic Imperial Rivalries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A18%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98Fugitive%20Mullahs%20and%20Outlawed%20Fanatics%E2%80%99:%20Indian%20Muslims%20in%20nineteenth%20century%20trans-Asiatic%20Imperial%20Rivalries&rft.jtitle=Modern%20Asian%20studies&rft.au=ALAVI,%20SEEMA&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1337&rft.epage=1382&rft.pages=1337-1382&rft.issn=0026-749X&rft.eissn=1469-8099&rft.coden=MOASBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0026749X11000266&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E41330642%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=904540644&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0026749X11000266&rft_jstor_id=41330642&rfr_iscdi=true |