The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy
International political economy (IPE) should transition to “third-wave” scholarship because Open Economy Politics (OEP), which dominates current American IPE scholarship, can generate inaccurate knowledge. OEP can produce inaccurate knowledge because it studies domestic politics in isolation from in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International organization 2011-04, Vol.65 (2), p.311-341 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 341 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 311 |
container_title | International organization |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Oatley, Thomas |
description | International political economy (IPE) should transition to “third-wave” scholarship because Open Economy Politics (OEP), which dominates current American IPE scholarship, can generate inaccurate knowledge. OEP can produce inaccurate knowledge because it studies domestic politics in isolation from international or macro processes. This methodological reductionism is often inappropriate for the phenomena IPE studies because governments inhabit a complex social system. As a result, the political choices that OEP strives to explain are typically a product of the interplay between domestic politics and macro processes. When OEP omits causally significant macro processes from empirical models, the models yield biased inferences about the domestic political relationships under investigation. Although scholars tolerated such errors when the gains from OEP were large, these errors are less tolerable now that OEP has matured. Consequently, the field should transition toward research that is nonreductionist, problem-driven, and pluralistic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S002081831100004X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038899818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S002081831100004X</cupid><jstor_id>23016814</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23016814</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-e66a1cc0ddb12a9dd3ac352a9397175b17c6c4ffd71fa4a8a08ca0c3e39a12013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9LwzAYh4MoOKcfwINQ8OKlmjfpn8SbzDkFYaITvJU0TTWjbWaSHvbtTdkUUcRcEvg9vye8CULHgM8BQ37xhDHBDBgFwGElLztoBCmFOMWM7aLREMdDvo8OnFsGBBLgI3S9eFPRo6p66bXptPPRTLRloy6j-Up10VSazrTr6ME02mvpIt1FPjRmjSlF8xkfor1aNE4dbfcxer6ZLia38f18dje5uo9lCrmPVZYJkBJXVQlE8KqiQtI0nCjPIU9LyGUmk7qucqhFIpjATAosqaJcAMFAx-hs411Z894r54tWO6maRnTK9K4ATBnjfBjzfxRwRgkhPKCnP9Cl6W0XBikg45iklLM0ULChpDXOWVUXK6tbYddBNdjy4tcXhM7JprN03tivAqEYMgZJyOnWGd7c6upVfbv6T-sH2mGPmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1690253985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Oatley, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Oatley, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>International political economy (IPE) should transition to “third-wave” scholarship because Open Economy Politics (OEP), which dominates current American IPE scholarship, can generate inaccurate knowledge. OEP can produce inaccurate knowledge because it studies domestic politics in isolation from international or macro processes. This methodological reductionism is often inappropriate for the phenomena IPE studies because governments inhabit a complex social system. As a result, the political choices that OEP strives to explain are typically a product of the interplay between domestic politics and macro processes. When OEP omits causally significant macro processes from empirical models, the models yield biased inferences about the domestic political relationships under investigation. Although scholars tolerated such errors when the gains from OEP were large, these errors are less tolerable now that OEP has matured. Consequently, the field should transition toward research that is nonreductionist, problem-driven, and pluralistic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-8183</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S002081831100004X</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOCMFZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Domestic Politics ; Economic models ; Economics and politics ; Empirical research ; Errors ; Fixed exchange rates ; Foreign exchange rates ; Global economy ; Government ; Institutionalism ; International ; International organizations ; International political economy ; International political organizations ; International politics ; International studies ; Macroanalysis ; Multinational corporations ; Open economies ; Political Economy ; Political institutions ; Politics ; Reductionism ; Scholarship ; Social Systems ; Speculative attacks ; Statistical methods ; Studies ; Tariffs ; Trade policy ; World Economy</subject><ispartof>International organization, 2011-04, Vol.65 (2), p.311-341</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The IO Foundation 2011</rights><rights>2011 The IO Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-e66a1cc0ddb12a9dd3ac352a9397175b17c6c4ffd71fa4a8a08ca0c3e39a12013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-e66a1cc0ddb12a9dd3ac352a9397175b17c6c4ffd71fa4a8a08ca0c3e39a12013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23016814$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002081831100004X/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,12826,27903,27904,55606,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oatley, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy</title><title>International organization</title><description>International political economy (IPE) should transition to “third-wave” scholarship because Open Economy Politics (OEP), which dominates current American IPE scholarship, can generate inaccurate knowledge. OEP can produce inaccurate knowledge because it studies domestic politics in isolation from international or macro processes. This methodological reductionism is often inappropriate for the phenomena IPE studies because governments inhabit a complex social system. As a result, the political choices that OEP strives to explain are typically a product of the interplay between domestic politics and macro processes. When OEP omits causally significant macro processes from empirical models, the models yield biased inferences about the domestic political relationships under investigation. Although scholars tolerated such errors when the gains from OEP were large, these errors are less tolerable now that OEP has matured. Consequently, the field should transition toward research that is nonreductionist, problem-driven, and pluralistic.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Domestic Politics</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics and politics</subject><subject>Empirical research</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Fixed exchange rates</subject><subject>Foreign exchange rates</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Institutionalism</subject><subject>International</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>International political economy</subject><subject>International political organizations</subject><subject>International politics</subject><subject>International studies</subject><subject>Macroanalysis</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>Open economies</subject><subject>Political Economy</subject><subject>Political institutions</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Reductionism</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Social Systems</subject><subject>Speculative attacks</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>World Economy</subject><issn>0020-8183</issn><issn>1531-5088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9LwzAYh4MoOKcfwINQ8OKlmjfpn8SbzDkFYaITvJU0TTWjbWaSHvbtTdkUUcRcEvg9vye8CULHgM8BQ37xhDHBDBgFwGElLztoBCmFOMWM7aLREMdDvo8OnFsGBBLgI3S9eFPRo6p66bXptPPRTLRloy6j-Up10VSazrTr6ME02mvpIt1FPjRmjSlF8xkfor1aNE4dbfcxer6ZLia38f18dje5uo9lCrmPVZYJkBJXVQlE8KqiQtI0nCjPIU9LyGUmk7qucqhFIpjATAosqaJcAMFAx-hs411Z894r54tWO6maRnTK9K4ATBnjfBjzfxRwRgkhPKCnP9Cl6W0XBikg45iklLM0ULChpDXOWVUXK6tbYddBNdjy4tcXhM7JprN03tivAqEYMgZJyOnWGd7c6upVfbv6T-sH2mGPmw</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Oatley, Thomas</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy</title><author>Oatley, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-e66a1cc0ddb12a9dd3ac352a9397175b17c6c4ffd71fa4a8a08ca0c3e39a12013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Domestic Politics</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics and politics</topic><topic>Empirical research</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Fixed exchange rates</topic><topic>Foreign exchange rates</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Institutionalism</topic><topic>International</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>International political economy</topic><topic>International political organizations</topic><topic>International politics</topic><topic>International studies</topic><topic>Macroanalysis</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>Open economies</topic><topic>Political Economy</topic><topic>Political institutions</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Reductionism</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Social Systems</topic><topic>Speculative attacks</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>World Economy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oatley, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oatley, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy</atitle><jtitle>International organization</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>341</epage><pages>311-341</pages><issn>0020-8183</issn><eissn>1531-5088</eissn><coden>IOCMFZ</coden><abstract>International political economy (IPE) should transition to “third-wave” scholarship because Open Economy Politics (OEP), which dominates current American IPE scholarship, can generate inaccurate knowledge. OEP can produce inaccurate knowledge because it studies domestic politics in isolation from international or macro processes. This methodological reductionism is often inappropriate for the phenomena IPE studies because governments inhabit a complex social system. As a result, the political choices that OEP strives to explain are typically a product of the interplay between domestic politics and macro processes. When OEP omits causally significant macro processes from empirical models, the models yield biased inferences about the domestic political relationships under investigation. Although scholars tolerated such errors when the gains from OEP were large, these errors are less tolerable now that OEP has matured. Consequently, the field should transition toward research that is nonreductionist, problem-driven, and pluralistic.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S002081831100004X</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-8183 |
ispartof | International organization, 2011-04, Vol.65 (2), p.311-341 |
issn | 0020-8183 1531-5088 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038899818 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Analysis Domestic Politics Economic models Economics and politics Empirical research Errors Fixed exchange rates Foreign exchange rates Global economy Government Institutionalism International International organizations International political economy International political organizations International politics International studies Macroanalysis Multinational corporations Open economies Political Economy Political institutions Politics Reductionism Scholarship Social Systems Speculative attacks Statistical methods Studies Tariffs Trade policy World Economy |
title | The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T13%3A29%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Reductionist%20Gamble:%20Open%20Economy%20Politics%20in%20the%20Global%20Economy&rft.jtitle=International%20organization&rft.au=Oatley,%20Thomas&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=341&rft.pages=311-341&rft.issn=0020-8183&rft.eissn=1531-5088&rft.coden=IOCMFZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S002081831100004X&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23016814%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1690253985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S002081831100004X&rft_jstor_id=23016814&rfr_iscdi=true |