Biopsy vs. brushing: Comparison of two sampling methods for the detection of HPV-DNA in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity

Summary Background HR HPV infection was proposed as aetiological factor of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC). HPV frequency in OSCC is highly variable, due to the discrepancy in oral sampling procedures, HPV testing methods and inclusion criteria regarding tumour site (strictly oral cavity vs. ne...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral oncology 2012-09, Vol.48 (9), p.870-875
Hauptverfasser: Termine, N, Giovannelli, L, Rodolico, V, Matranga, D, Pannone, G, Campisi, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 875
container_issue 9
container_start_page 870
container_title Oral oncology
container_volume 48
creator Termine, N
Giovannelli, L
Rodolico, V
Matranga, D
Pannone, G
Campisi, G
description Summary Background HR HPV infection was proposed as aetiological factor of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC). HPV frequency in OSCC is highly variable, due to the discrepancy in oral sampling procedures, HPV testing methods and inclusion criteria regarding tumour site (strictly oral cavity vs. nearby structures). Our aim was to compare HPV DNA frequency and type-specific distribution in paired cytological and histological samples of SCC strictly located in oral cavity. The correlation between HPV detection rate by each method of sampling and demographical, behavioural and clinical–pathological variables was also examined. Patients and methods HPV DNA was detected in brushed cells and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies obtained from 83 consecutive unselected immunocompetent adults with OSCC. HPV DNA detection was performed in all samples by nPCR followed by direct DNA sequencing and the assay INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used, including Cohen κ index to evaluate agreement between two methods and association between HPV infection and demographical, behavioural and clinical–pathological variables for each method of sampling ( p < 0.05 statistically significant). Results HPV DNA was detected in 15.7% (13/83) of brushings and 12.1% (10/83) of biopsies ( p > 0.05). High risk HPV 51, 16 and 39 were genotypes more frequently detected, especially among biopsies; no concordance between two methods was found (Cohen κ index = 0.04, p = 0.34). Conclusion A fraction of OSCC could be linked to HR HPV infection in the Mediterranean area. Although without a statistical significance, biopsy specimen demonstrated more accurate for HR HPV detection than brushing in OSCC.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.03.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038612369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1368837512000784</els_id><sourcerecordid>1038612369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-ff55d41385fd33e38f66696f88e17378a32749eabc89c105934c0d29b22d96d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhSMEoqXwF5CFhMQmwY_EsbtAaqdAkSpA4rG1PLbT8ZDEqW8yKNv-8jrM8BCrrmzZ37n32Odm2QuCC4IJf70tQtRt6E1ow_VcUExogVmBMX2QHRNRyxxXkj1Me8ZFLlhdHWVPALYY44pU-HF2RGkpRSnkcXZ77sMAM9pBgdZxgo3vr0_RKnSDjh5Cj0KDxp8Bge6GNt2hzo2bYAE1IaJx45B1ozOj35OXn7_nFx_PkO8R3Ey6CxMg49oWGR2N70Onf9VLsuUF6XTnx_lp9qjRLbhnh_Uk-_bu7dfVZX716f2H1dlVbpLZMW-aqrIlYaJqLGOOiYZzLnkjhCM1q4VmtC6l02sjpCHLD5QGWyrXlFrJbcVOslf7ukMMN5ODUXUeFne6d8moIpgJTijj8j5oSTHDlCf0dI-aGACia9QQfafjnCC1xKW26t-41BKXwkyluJL4-aHPtO6c_SP9nU8CXh4ADUa3TdS98fCX44yRmi7cxZ5z6QN33kUFxrveOOtjikfZ4O_n581_ZUwK3afOP9zsYBum2KeIFFGQNOrLMmDLfBGaZqsWJbsD2vrPEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034203026</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biopsy vs. brushing: Comparison of two sampling methods for the detection of HPV-DNA in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Termine, N ; Giovannelli, L ; Rodolico, V ; Matranga, D ; Pannone, G ; Campisi, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Termine, N ; Giovannelli, L ; Rodolico, V ; Matranga, D ; Pannone, G ; Campisi, G</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background HR HPV infection was proposed as aetiological factor of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC). HPV frequency in OSCC is highly variable, due to the discrepancy in oral sampling procedures, HPV testing methods and inclusion criteria regarding tumour site (strictly oral cavity vs. nearby structures). Our aim was to compare HPV DNA frequency and type-specific distribution in paired cytological and histological samples of SCC strictly located in oral cavity. The correlation between HPV detection rate by each method of sampling and demographical, behavioural and clinical–pathological variables was also examined. Patients and methods HPV DNA was detected in brushed cells and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies obtained from 83 consecutive unselected immunocompetent adults with OSCC. HPV DNA detection was performed in all samples by nPCR followed by direct DNA sequencing and the assay INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used, including Cohen κ index to evaluate agreement between two methods and association between HPV infection and demographical, behavioural and clinical–pathological variables for each method of sampling ( p &lt; 0.05 statistically significant). Results HPV DNA was detected in 15.7% (13/83) of brushings and 12.1% (10/83) of biopsies ( p &gt; 0.05). High risk HPV 51, 16 and 39 were genotypes more frequently detected, especially among biopsies; no concordance between two methods was found (Cohen κ index = 0.04, p = 0.34). Conclusion A fraction of OSCC could be linked to HR HPV infection in the Mediterranean area. Although without a statistical significance, biopsy specimen demonstrated more accurate for HR HPV detection than brushing in OSCC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-8375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.03.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22498489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Biopsy - methods ; Brushing ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - virology ; Dermatology ; DNA sequencing ; DNA, Viral - analysis ; Female ; Genotypes ; Genotyping ; Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection ; Human papillomavirus ; Humans ; Infection ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methods of sampling ; Middle Aged ; Mouth Neoplasms - pathology ; Mouth Neoplasms - virology ; Multivariate analysis ; Oral cavity ; oral squamous cell carcinoma ; Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) ; Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) ; Otolaryngology ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Papillomaviridae - genetics ; Papillomaviridae - isolation &amp; purification ; Risk factors ; Sampling ; squamous cell carcinoma ; Statistics ; Tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) ; Tumors ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions ; Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology</subject><ispartof>Oral oncology, 2012-09, Vol.48 (9), p.870-875</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-ff55d41385fd33e38f66696f88e17378a32749eabc89c105934c0d29b22d96d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-ff55d41385fd33e38f66696f88e17378a32749eabc89c105934c0d29b22d96d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.03.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26331729$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22498489$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Termine, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovannelli, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodolico, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matranga, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pannone, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campisi, G</creatorcontrib><title>Biopsy vs. brushing: Comparison of two sampling methods for the detection of HPV-DNA in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity</title><title>Oral oncology</title><addtitle>Oral Oncol</addtitle><description>Summary Background HR HPV infection was proposed as aetiological factor of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC). HPV frequency in OSCC is highly variable, due to the discrepancy in oral sampling procedures, HPV testing methods and inclusion criteria regarding tumour site (strictly oral cavity vs. nearby structures). Our aim was to compare HPV DNA frequency and type-specific distribution in paired cytological and histological samples of SCC strictly located in oral cavity. The correlation between HPV detection rate by each method of sampling and demographical, behavioural and clinical–pathological variables was also examined. Patients and methods HPV DNA was detected in brushed cells and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies obtained from 83 consecutive unselected immunocompetent adults with OSCC. HPV DNA detection was performed in all samples by nPCR followed by direct DNA sequencing and the assay INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used, including Cohen κ index to evaluate agreement between two methods and association between HPV infection and demographical, behavioural and clinical–pathological variables for each method of sampling ( p &lt; 0.05 statistically significant). Results HPV DNA was detected in 15.7% (13/83) of brushings and 12.1% (10/83) of biopsies ( p &gt; 0.05). High risk HPV 51, 16 and 39 were genotypes more frequently detected, especially among biopsies; no concordance between two methods was found (Cohen κ index = 0.04, p = 0.34). Conclusion A fraction of OSCC could be linked to HR HPV infection in the Mediterranean area. Although without a statistical significance, biopsy specimen demonstrated more accurate for HR HPV detection than brushing in OSCC.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Brushing</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - virology</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>DNA sequencing</subject><subject>DNA, Viral - analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Genotyping</subject><subject>Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methods of sampling</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - virology</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Oral cavity</subject><subject>oral squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)</subject><subject>Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC)</subject><subject>Otolaryngology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Papillomaviridae - genetics</subject><subject>Papillomaviridae - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC)</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><subject>Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology</subject><issn>1368-8375</issn><issn>1879-0593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktv1DAUhSMEoqXwF5CFhMQmwY_EsbtAaqdAkSpA4rG1PLbT8ZDEqW8yKNv-8jrM8BCrrmzZ37n32Odm2QuCC4IJf70tQtRt6E1ow_VcUExogVmBMX2QHRNRyxxXkj1Me8ZFLlhdHWVPALYY44pU-HF2RGkpRSnkcXZ77sMAM9pBgdZxgo3vr0_RKnSDjh5Cj0KDxp8Bge6GNt2hzo2bYAE1IaJx45B1ozOj35OXn7_nFx_PkO8R3Ey6CxMg49oWGR2N70Onf9VLsuUF6XTnx_lp9qjRLbhnh_Uk-_bu7dfVZX716f2H1dlVbpLZMW-aqrIlYaJqLGOOiYZzLnkjhCM1q4VmtC6l02sjpCHLD5QGWyrXlFrJbcVOslf7ukMMN5ODUXUeFne6d8moIpgJTijj8j5oSTHDlCf0dI-aGACia9QQfafjnCC1xKW26t-41BKXwkyluJL4-aHPtO6c_SP9nU8CXh4ADUa3TdS98fCX44yRmi7cxZ5z6QN33kUFxrveOOtjikfZ4O_n581_ZUwK3afOP9zsYBum2KeIFFGQNOrLMmDLfBGaZqsWJbsD2vrPEQ</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Termine, N</creator><creator>Giovannelli, L</creator><creator>Rodolico, V</creator><creator>Matranga, D</creator><creator>Pannone, G</creator><creator>Campisi, G</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Biopsy vs. brushing: Comparison of two sampling methods for the detection of HPV-DNA in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity</title><author>Termine, N ; Giovannelli, L ; Rodolico, V ; Matranga, D ; Pannone, G ; Campisi, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-ff55d41385fd33e38f66696f88e17378a32749eabc89c105934c0d29b22d96d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Brushing</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - virology</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>DNA sequencing</topic><topic>DNA, Viral - analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Genotyping</topic><topic>Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methods of sampling</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - virology</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Oral cavity</topic><topic>oral squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)</topic><topic>Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC)</topic><topic>Otolaryngology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Papillomaviridae - genetics</topic><topic>Papillomaviridae - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC)</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><topic>Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Termine, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovannelli, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodolico, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matranga, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pannone, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campisi, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Oral oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Termine, N</au><au>Giovannelli, L</au><au>Rodolico, V</au><au>Matranga, D</au><au>Pannone, G</au><au>Campisi, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biopsy vs. brushing: Comparison of two sampling methods for the detection of HPV-DNA in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity</atitle><jtitle>Oral oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Oral Oncol</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>870</spage><epage>875</epage><pages>870-875</pages><issn>1368-8375</issn><eissn>1879-0593</eissn><abstract>Summary Background HR HPV infection was proposed as aetiological factor of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC). HPV frequency in OSCC is highly variable, due to the discrepancy in oral sampling procedures, HPV testing methods and inclusion criteria regarding tumour site (strictly oral cavity vs. nearby structures). Our aim was to compare HPV DNA frequency and type-specific distribution in paired cytological and histological samples of SCC strictly located in oral cavity. The correlation between HPV detection rate by each method of sampling and demographical, behavioural and clinical–pathological variables was also examined. Patients and methods HPV DNA was detected in brushed cells and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies obtained from 83 consecutive unselected immunocompetent adults with OSCC. HPV DNA detection was performed in all samples by nPCR followed by direct DNA sequencing and the assay INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used, including Cohen κ index to evaluate agreement between two methods and association between HPV infection and demographical, behavioural and clinical–pathological variables for each method of sampling ( p &lt; 0.05 statistically significant). Results HPV DNA was detected in 15.7% (13/83) of brushings and 12.1% (10/83) of biopsies ( p &gt; 0.05). High risk HPV 51, 16 and 39 were genotypes more frequently detected, especially among biopsies; no concordance between two methods was found (Cohen κ index = 0.04, p = 0.34). Conclusion A fraction of OSCC could be linked to HR HPV infection in the Mediterranean area. Although without a statistical significance, biopsy specimen demonstrated more accurate for HR HPV detection than brushing in OSCC.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22498489</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.03.002</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-8375
ispartof Oral oncology, 2012-09, Vol.48 (9), p.870-875
issn 1368-8375
1879-0593
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038612369
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Biopsy - methods
Brushing
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - virology
Dermatology
DNA sequencing
DNA, Viral - analysis
Female
Genotypes
Genotyping
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection
Human papillomavirus
Humans
Infection
Male
Medical sciences
Methods of sampling
Middle Aged
Mouth Neoplasms - pathology
Mouth Neoplasms - virology
Multivariate analysis
Oral cavity
oral squamous cell carcinoma
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)
Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC)
Otolaryngology
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Papillomaviridae - genetics
Papillomaviridae - isolation & purification
Risk factors
Sampling
squamous cell carcinoma
Statistics
Tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC)
Tumors
Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions
Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology
title Biopsy vs. brushing: Comparison of two sampling methods for the detection of HPV-DNA in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A29%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biopsy%20vs.%20brushing:%20Comparison%20of%20two%20sampling%20methods%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20HPV-DNA%20in%20squamous%20cell%20carcinoma%20of%20the%20oral%20cavity&rft.jtitle=Oral%20oncology&rft.au=Termine,%20N&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=870&rft.epage=875&rft.pages=870-875&rft.issn=1368-8375&rft.eissn=1879-0593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.03.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1038612369%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034203026&rft_id=info:pmid/22498489&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1368837512000784&rfr_iscdi=true