Regularization techniques for PSF-matching kernels - I. Choice of kernel basis
Abstract We review current methods for building point spread function (PSF)-matching kernels for the purposes of image subtraction or co-addition. Such methods use a linear decomposition of the kernel on a series of basis functions. The correct choice of these basis functions is fundamental to the e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2012-09, Vol.425 (2), p.1341-1349 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1349 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1341 |
container_title | Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |
container_volume | 425 |
creator | Becker, A. C. Homrighausen, D. Connolly, A. J. Genovese, C. R. Owen, R. Bickerton, S. J. Lupton, R. H. |
description | Abstract
We review current methods for building point spread function (PSF)-matching kernels for the purposes of image subtraction or co-addition. Such methods use a linear decomposition of the kernel on a series of basis functions. The correct choice of these basis functions is fundamental to the efficiency and effectiveness of the matching - the chosen bases should represent the underlying signal using a reasonably small number of shapes, and/or have a minimum number of user-adjustable tuning parameters. We examine methods whose bases comprise multiple Gauss-Hermite polynomials, as well as a form-free basis composed of delta-functions. Kernels derived from delta-functions are unsurprisingly shown to be more expressive; they are able to take more general shapes and perform better in situations where sum-of-Gaussian methods are known to fail. However, due to its many degrees of freedom (the maximum number allowed by the kernel size) this basis tends to overfit the problem and yields noisy kernels having large variance. We introduce a new technique to regularize these delta-function kernel solutions, which bridges the gap between the generality of delta-function kernels and the compactness of sum-of-Gaussian kernels. Through this regularization we are able to create general kernel solutions that represent the intrinsic shape of the PSF-matching kernel with only one degree of freedom, the strength of the regularization λ. The role of λ is effectively to exchange variance in the resulting difference image with variance in the kernel itself. We examine considerations in choosing the value of λ, including statistical risk estimators and the ability of the solution to predict solutions for adjacent areas. Both of these suggest moderate strengths of λ between 0.1 and 1.0, although this optimization is likely data set dependent. This model allows for flexible representations of the convolution kernel that have significant predictive ability and will prove useful in implementing robust image subtraction pipelines that must address hundreds to thousands of images per night. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21542.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038600763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21542.x</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2741442261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-o2452-6ef1378bc13f2c69e54b898ddd17e00eed8d04fb897e1d53a0046f5284bf4d1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LwzAYh4MoOKffIeDFS2r-t7sIMpwO5pSp55C26ZbaNbNZcfPTm27Dg2IuCW-e98ePBwBIcETCuS4jwqRAdCBlRDGhESWC02hzBHo_H8eghzETKIkJOQVn3pcYY86o7IHpzMzbSjf2S6-tq-HaZIvafrTGw8I18PllhJZ6nS1sPYfvpqlN5SGC4wgOF85mBrriMIap9tafg5NCV95cHO4-eBvdvQ4f0OTpfjy8nSBHuaBImoKwOEkzwgqayYERPE0GSZ7nJDYYG5MnOeZFmMWG5ILpUFcWgiY8LXhOctYHV_vcVeO6smu1tD4zVaVr41qvCGaJxDiWLKCXv9DStU0d2nUUD7KEkIG62VOftjJbtWrsUjfbQKjOsipVJ1N1MlVnWe0sq416nM52zxDA9gGuXf2zjv6ss2-iVYBj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034542556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regularization techniques for PSF-matching kernels - I. Choice of kernel basis</title><source>Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Becker, A. C. ; Homrighausen, D. ; Connolly, A. J. ; Genovese, C. R. ; Owen, R. ; Bickerton, S. J. ; Lupton, R. H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, A. C. ; Homrighausen, D. ; Connolly, A. J. ; Genovese, C. R. ; Owen, R. ; Bickerton, S. J. ; Lupton, R. H.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
We review current methods for building point spread function (PSF)-matching kernels for the purposes of image subtraction or co-addition. Such methods use a linear decomposition of the kernel on a series of basis functions. The correct choice of these basis functions is fundamental to the efficiency and effectiveness of the matching - the chosen bases should represent the underlying signal using a reasonably small number of shapes, and/or have a minimum number of user-adjustable tuning parameters. We examine methods whose bases comprise multiple Gauss-Hermite polynomials, as well as a form-free basis composed of delta-functions. Kernels derived from delta-functions are unsurprisingly shown to be more expressive; they are able to take more general shapes and perform better in situations where sum-of-Gaussian methods are known to fail. However, due to its many degrees of freedom (the maximum number allowed by the kernel size) this basis tends to overfit the problem and yields noisy kernels having large variance. We introduce a new technique to regularize these delta-function kernel solutions, which bridges the gap between the generality of delta-function kernels and the compactness of sum-of-Gaussian kernels. Through this regularization we are able to create general kernel solutions that represent the intrinsic shape of the PSF-matching kernel with only one degree of freedom, the strength of the regularization λ. The role of λ is effectively to exchange variance in the resulting difference image with variance in the kernel itself. We examine considerations in choosing the value of λ, including statistical risk estimators and the ability of the solution to predict solutions for adjacent areas. Both of these suggest moderate strengths of λ between 0.1 and 1.0, although this optimization is likely data set dependent. This model allows for flexible representations of the convolution kernel that have significant predictive ability and will prove useful in implementing robust image subtraction pipelines that must address hundreds to thousands of images per night.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2966</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21542.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Astronomy ; methods: data analysis ; Normal distribution ; Polynomials ; Scientific imaging ; Signal processing ; techniques: image processing ; techniques: photometric</subject><ispartof>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2012-09, Vol.425 (2), p.1341-1349</ispartof><rights>2012 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2012 RAS 2012</rights><rights>2012 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2012 RAS</rights><rights>Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2012 RAS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2966.2012.21542.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2966.2012.21542.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homrighausen, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genovese, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickerton, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupton, R. H.</creatorcontrib><title>Regularization techniques for PSF-matching kernels - I. Choice of kernel basis</title><title>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</title><addtitle>Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc</addtitle><description>Abstract
We review current methods for building point spread function (PSF)-matching kernels for the purposes of image subtraction or co-addition. Such methods use a linear decomposition of the kernel on a series of basis functions. The correct choice of these basis functions is fundamental to the efficiency and effectiveness of the matching - the chosen bases should represent the underlying signal using a reasonably small number of shapes, and/or have a minimum number of user-adjustable tuning parameters. We examine methods whose bases comprise multiple Gauss-Hermite polynomials, as well as a form-free basis composed of delta-functions. Kernels derived from delta-functions are unsurprisingly shown to be more expressive; they are able to take more general shapes and perform better in situations where sum-of-Gaussian methods are known to fail. However, due to its many degrees of freedom (the maximum number allowed by the kernel size) this basis tends to overfit the problem and yields noisy kernels having large variance. We introduce a new technique to regularize these delta-function kernel solutions, which bridges the gap between the generality of delta-function kernels and the compactness of sum-of-Gaussian kernels. Through this regularization we are able to create general kernel solutions that represent the intrinsic shape of the PSF-matching kernel with only one degree of freedom, the strength of the regularization λ. The role of λ is effectively to exchange variance in the resulting difference image with variance in the kernel itself. We examine considerations in choosing the value of λ, including statistical risk estimators and the ability of the solution to predict solutions for adjacent areas. Both of these suggest moderate strengths of λ between 0.1 and 1.0, although this optimization is likely data set dependent. This model allows for flexible representations of the convolution kernel that have significant predictive ability and will prove useful in implementing robust image subtraction pipelines that must address hundreds to thousands of images per night.</description><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>methods: data analysis</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Polynomials</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>techniques: image processing</subject><subject>techniques: photometric</subject><issn>0035-8711</issn><issn>1365-2966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LwzAYh4MoOKffIeDFS2r-t7sIMpwO5pSp55C26ZbaNbNZcfPTm27Dg2IuCW-e98ePBwBIcETCuS4jwqRAdCBlRDGhESWC02hzBHo_H8eghzETKIkJOQVn3pcYY86o7IHpzMzbSjf2S6-tq-HaZIvafrTGw8I18PllhJZ6nS1sPYfvpqlN5SGC4wgOF85mBrriMIap9tafg5NCV95cHO4-eBvdvQ4f0OTpfjy8nSBHuaBImoKwOEkzwgqayYERPE0GSZ7nJDYYG5MnOeZFmMWG5ILpUFcWgiY8LXhOctYHV_vcVeO6smu1tD4zVaVr41qvCGaJxDiWLKCXv9DStU0d2nUUD7KEkIG62VOftjJbtWrsUjfbQKjOsipVJ1N1MlVnWe0sq416nM52zxDA9gGuXf2zjv6ss2-iVYBj</recordid><startdate>20120911</startdate><enddate>20120911</enddate><creator>Becker, A. C.</creator><creator>Homrighausen, D.</creator><creator>Connolly, A. J.</creator><creator>Genovese, C. R.</creator><creator>Owen, R.</creator><creator>Bickerton, S. J.</creator><creator>Lupton, R. H.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120911</creationdate><title>Regularization techniques for PSF-matching kernels - I. Choice of kernel basis</title><author>Becker, A. C. ; Homrighausen, D. ; Connolly, A. J. ; Genovese, C. R. ; Owen, R. ; Bickerton, S. J. ; Lupton, R. H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-o2452-6ef1378bc13f2c69e54b898ddd17e00eed8d04fb897e1d53a0046f5284bf4d1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>methods: data analysis</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Polynomials</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>techniques: image processing</topic><topic>techniques: photometric</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Homrighausen, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connolly, A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genovese, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickerton, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupton, R. H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, A. C.</au><au>Homrighausen, D.</au><au>Connolly, A. J.</au><au>Genovese, C. R.</au><au>Owen, R.</au><au>Bickerton, S. J.</au><au>Lupton, R. H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regularization techniques for PSF-matching kernels - I. Choice of kernel basis</atitle><jtitle>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</jtitle><stitle>Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc</stitle><date>2012-09-11</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>425</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1341</spage><epage>1349</epage><pages>1341-1349</pages><issn>0035-8711</issn><eissn>1365-2966</eissn><abstract>Abstract
We review current methods for building point spread function (PSF)-matching kernels for the purposes of image subtraction or co-addition. Such methods use a linear decomposition of the kernel on a series of basis functions. The correct choice of these basis functions is fundamental to the efficiency and effectiveness of the matching - the chosen bases should represent the underlying signal using a reasonably small number of shapes, and/or have a minimum number of user-adjustable tuning parameters. We examine methods whose bases comprise multiple Gauss-Hermite polynomials, as well as a form-free basis composed of delta-functions. Kernels derived from delta-functions are unsurprisingly shown to be more expressive; they are able to take more general shapes and perform better in situations where sum-of-Gaussian methods are known to fail. However, due to its many degrees of freedom (the maximum number allowed by the kernel size) this basis tends to overfit the problem and yields noisy kernels having large variance. We introduce a new technique to regularize these delta-function kernel solutions, which bridges the gap between the generality of delta-function kernels and the compactness of sum-of-Gaussian kernels. Through this regularization we are able to create general kernel solutions that represent the intrinsic shape of the PSF-matching kernel with only one degree of freedom, the strength of the regularization λ. The role of λ is effectively to exchange variance in the resulting difference image with variance in the kernel itself. We examine considerations in choosing the value of λ, including statistical risk estimators and the ability of the solution to predict solutions for adjacent areas. Both of these suggest moderate strengths of λ between 0.1 and 1.0, although this optimization is likely data set dependent. This model allows for flexible representations of the convolution kernel that have significant predictive ability and will prove useful in implementing robust image subtraction pipelines that must address hundreds to thousands of images per night.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21542.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0035-8711 |
ispartof | Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2012-09, Vol.425 (2), p.1341-1349 |
issn | 0035-8711 1365-2966 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038600763 |
source | Access via Oxford University Press (Open Access Collection); Access via Wiley Online Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Astronomy methods: data analysis Normal distribution Polynomials Scientific imaging Signal processing techniques: image processing techniques: photometric |
title | Regularization techniques for PSF-matching kernels - I. Choice of kernel basis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T05%3A53%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regularization%20techniques%20for%20PSF-matching%20kernels%20-%20I.%20Choice%20of%20kernel%20basis&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20notices%20of%20the%20Royal%20Astronomical%20Society&rft.au=Becker,%20A.%20C.&rft.date=2012-09-11&rft.volume=425&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1341&rft.epage=1349&rft.pages=1341-1349&rft.issn=0035-8711&rft.eissn=1365-2966&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21542.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2741442261%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034542556&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21542.x&rfr_iscdi=true |