Mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: a systematic review

Summary  The aim of this article is to investigate patient satisfaction, survival rate of implants, and prosthetic complications or maintenance for rehabilitation with removable partial dentures associated with implants in mandibular Kennedy class I and II cases. A systematic literature review was c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral rehabilitation 2012-10, Vol.39 (10), p.791-798
Hauptverfasser: DE FREITAS, R. F. C. P., DE CARVALHO DIAS, K., DA FONTE PORTO CARREIRO, A., BARBOSA, G. A. S., FERREIRA, M. Â. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 798
container_issue 10
container_start_page 791
container_title Journal of oral rehabilitation
container_volume 39
creator DE FREITAS, R. F. C. P.
DE CARVALHO DIAS, K.
DA FONTE PORTO CARREIRO, A.
BARBOSA, G. A. S.
FERREIRA, M. Â. F.
description Summary  The aim of this article is to investigate patient satisfaction, survival rate of implants, and prosthetic complications or maintenance for rehabilitation with removable partial dentures associated with implants in mandibular Kennedy class I and II cases. A systematic literature review was conducted by three independent reviewers including articles published from January 1981 through September 2011. Medline and Cochrane Library electronic databases were used in addition to hand searching to assess clinical outcomes for mandibular implant‐supported removable partial denture with distal extension. This review yielded 1751 records that were narrowed down to 5. The studies revealed implant survival rates ranging from 95% to 100% with one failure reported of 98 implants. The removable partial dentures associated with implant in mandibular free‐end arches showed some complications and need of repair for relining, pitting of the healing abutment, replacement of resilient component of the attachment, damage in framework, screw loosening and damage in acrylic denture base. Patient satisfaction was evaluated through a five‐point questionnaire, and results ranged between 4·12 and 5·0, considering 1 as the least favourable situation. The literature review showed increase in patient satisfaction and high survival rates of implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures with distal extensions. However, some complications and need of prosthetic repair were reported. Although this treatment approach could represent a low‐cost and beneficial rehabilitation for free‐end mandibular ridges, the lack of controlled and randomised well‐designed clinical trials suggests further studies with more representative samples to validate the outcomes of this treatment modality.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02326.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038595330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1038595330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-8c7142bdecf75936a19fab3efc71bd699cabe91fcb87fc7f4bb22fdd6e1cff643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtv1DAUhS0EokPhL6As2ST4kcQOCyRUQQFNGaniUbGx7PhaeMirttOZ-fc4nTLrenOtc885lj-EMoILks7bbUFYXeVUlLSgmNACU0brYv8ErU6Lp2iFGa5yIujNGXoRwhZjLFjFn6MzSoWgVclXSF2pwTg9d8pnrp86NcQ8zNM0-ggm89CPd0p3kE3KR6e6zMAQZw_ZzsU_mXEhJg32EYbgxuFdprJwCBF6FV2b0ncOdi_RM6u6AK8e5jn68enj94vP-Xpz-eXiwzpvSyzqXLSclFQbaC2vGlYr0lilGdika1M3Tas0NMS2WvCk2VJrSq0xNZDW2rpk5-jNsXfy4-0MIcrehRa69CUY5yAJZqJqKsZwsoqjtfVjCB6snLzrlT8kk1wAy61cOMqFo1wAy3vAcp-irx9emXUP5hT8TzQZ3h8NO9fB4dHF8utmc71cU0F-LEhwYX8qUP6vrDnjlfz17VLymvDm5--1vGH_AC-dnIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038595330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>DE FREITAS, R. F. C. P. ; DE CARVALHO DIAS, K. ; DA FONTE PORTO CARREIRO, A. ; BARBOSA, G. A. S. ; FERREIRA, M. Â. F.</creator><creatorcontrib>DE FREITAS, R. F. C. P. ; DE CARVALHO DIAS, K. ; DA FONTE PORTO CARREIRO, A. ; BARBOSA, G. A. S. ; FERREIRA, M. Â. F.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary  The aim of this article is to investigate patient satisfaction, survival rate of implants, and prosthetic complications or maintenance for rehabilitation with removable partial dentures associated with implants in mandibular Kennedy class I and II cases. A systematic literature review was conducted by three independent reviewers including articles published from January 1981 through September 2011. Medline and Cochrane Library electronic databases were used in addition to hand searching to assess clinical outcomes for mandibular implant‐supported removable partial denture with distal extension. This review yielded 1751 records that were narrowed down to 5. The studies revealed implant survival rates ranging from 95% to 100% with one failure reported of 98 implants. The removable partial dentures associated with implant in mandibular free‐end arches showed some complications and need of repair for relining, pitting of the healing abutment, replacement of resilient component of the attachment, damage in framework, screw loosening and damage in acrylic denture base. Patient satisfaction was evaluated through a five‐point questionnaire, and results ranged between 4·12 and 5·0, considering 1 as the least favourable situation. The literature review showed increase in patient satisfaction and high survival rates of implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures with distal extensions. However, some complications and need of prosthetic repair were reported. Although this treatment approach could represent a low‐cost and beneficial rehabilitation for free‐end mandibular ridges, the lack of controlled and randomised well‐designed clinical trials suggests further studies with more representative samples to validate the outcomes of this treatment modality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-182X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02326.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22882547</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Dental Abutments ; dental implant ; Dental Implants ; dental prosthesis ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported - adverse effects ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported - standards ; Dentistry ; Denture Retention ; Denture, Partial, Removable - adverse effects ; Denture, Partial, Removable - standards ; Humans ; implant-supported dental prosthesis ; Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - rehabilitation ; Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery ; Kennedy class I ; Kennedy class II ; Mandible - surgery ; mastication ; Mastication - physiology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prosthesis Failure ; Quality of Life ; removable partial denture ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2012-10, Vol.39 (10), p.791-798</ispartof><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-8c7142bdecf75936a19fab3efc71bd699cabe91fcb87fc7f4bb22fdd6e1cff643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-8c7142bdecf75936a19fab3efc71bd699cabe91fcb87fc7f4bb22fdd6e1cff643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2842.2012.02326.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2842.2012.02326.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22882547$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DE FREITAS, R. F. C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE CARVALHO DIAS, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DA FONTE PORTO CARREIRO, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARBOSA, G. A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FERREIRA, M. Â. F.</creatorcontrib><title>Mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: a systematic review</title><title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><description>Summary  The aim of this article is to investigate patient satisfaction, survival rate of implants, and prosthetic complications or maintenance for rehabilitation with removable partial dentures associated with implants in mandibular Kennedy class I and II cases. A systematic literature review was conducted by three independent reviewers including articles published from January 1981 through September 2011. Medline and Cochrane Library electronic databases were used in addition to hand searching to assess clinical outcomes for mandibular implant‐supported removable partial denture with distal extension. This review yielded 1751 records that were narrowed down to 5. The studies revealed implant survival rates ranging from 95% to 100% with one failure reported of 98 implants. The removable partial dentures associated with implant in mandibular free‐end arches showed some complications and need of repair for relining, pitting of the healing abutment, replacement of resilient component of the attachment, damage in framework, screw loosening and damage in acrylic denture base. Patient satisfaction was evaluated through a five‐point questionnaire, and results ranged between 4·12 and 5·0, considering 1 as the least favourable situation. The literature review showed increase in patient satisfaction and high survival rates of implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures with distal extensions. However, some complications and need of prosthetic repair were reported. Although this treatment approach could represent a low‐cost and beneficial rehabilitation for free‐end mandibular ridges, the lack of controlled and randomised well‐designed clinical trials suggests further studies with more representative samples to validate the outcomes of this treatment modality.</description><subject>Dental Abutments</subject><subject>dental implant</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>dental prosthesis</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported - standards</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Denture Retention</subject><subject>Denture, Partial, Removable - adverse effects</subject><subject>Denture, Partial, Removable - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implant-supported dental prosthesis</subject><subject>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery</subject><subject>Kennedy class I</subject><subject>Kennedy class II</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>mastication</subject><subject>Mastication - physiology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>removable partial denture</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0305-182X</issn><issn>1365-2842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtv1DAUhS0EokPhL6As2ST4kcQOCyRUQQFNGaniUbGx7PhaeMirttOZ-fc4nTLrenOtc885lj-EMoILks7bbUFYXeVUlLSgmNACU0brYv8ErU6Lp2iFGa5yIujNGXoRwhZjLFjFn6MzSoWgVclXSF2pwTg9d8pnrp86NcQ8zNM0-ggm89CPd0p3kE3KR6e6zMAQZw_ZzsU_mXEhJg32EYbgxuFdprJwCBF6FV2b0ncOdi_RM6u6AK8e5jn68enj94vP-Xpz-eXiwzpvSyzqXLSclFQbaC2vGlYr0lilGdika1M3Tas0NMS2WvCk2VJrSq0xNZDW2rpk5-jNsXfy4-0MIcrehRa69CUY5yAJZqJqKsZwsoqjtfVjCB6snLzrlT8kk1wAy61cOMqFo1wAy3vAcp-irx9emXUP5hT8TzQZ3h8NO9fB4dHF8utmc71cU0F-LEhwYX8qUP6vrDnjlfz17VLymvDm5--1vGH_AC-dnIw</recordid><startdate>201210</startdate><enddate>201210</enddate><creator>DE FREITAS, R. F. C. P.</creator><creator>DE CARVALHO DIAS, K.</creator><creator>DA FONTE PORTO CARREIRO, A.</creator><creator>BARBOSA, G. A. S.</creator><creator>FERREIRA, M. Â. F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201210</creationdate><title>Mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: a systematic review</title><author>DE FREITAS, R. F. C. P. ; DE CARVALHO DIAS, K. ; DA FONTE PORTO CARREIRO, A. ; BARBOSA, G. A. S. ; FERREIRA, M. Â. F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4086-8c7142bdecf75936a19fab3efc71bd699cabe91fcb87fc7f4bb22fdd6e1cff643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Dental Abutments</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>dental prosthesis</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported - standards</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Denture Retention</topic><topic>Denture, Partial, Removable - adverse effects</topic><topic>Denture, Partial, Removable - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implant-supported dental prosthesis</topic><topic>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery</topic><topic>Kennedy class I</topic><topic>Kennedy class II</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>mastication</topic><topic>Mastication - physiology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>removable partial denture</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DE FREITAS, R. F. C. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE CARVALHO DIAS, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DA FONTE PORTO CARREIRO, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARBOSA, G. A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FERREIRA, M. Â. F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DE FREITAS, R. F. C. P.</au><au>DE CARVALHO DIAS, K.</au><au>DA FONTE PORTO CARREIRO, A.</au><au>BARBOSA, G. A. S.</au><au>FERREIRA, M. Â. F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><date>2012-10</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>791</spage><epage>798</epage><pages>791-798</pages><issn>0305-182X</issn><eissn>1365-2842</eissn><abstract>Summary  The aim of this article is to investigate patient satisfaction, survival rate of implants, and prosthetic complications or maintenance for rehabilitation with removable partial dentures associated with implants in mandibular Kennedy class I and II cases. A systematic literature review was conducted by three independent reviewers including articles published from January 1981 through September 2011. Medline and Cochrane Library electronic databases were used in addition to hand searching to assess clinical outcomes for mandibular implant‐supported removable partial denture with distal extension. This review yielded 1751 records that were narrowed down to 5. The studies revealed implant survival rates ranging from 95% to 100% with one failure reported of 98 implants. The removable partial dentures associated with implant in mandibular free‐end arches showed some complications and need of repair for relining, pitting of the healing abutment, replacement of resilient component of the attachment, damage in framework, screw loosening and damage in acrylic denture base. Patient satisfaction was evaluated through a five‐point questionnaire, and results ranged between 4·12 and 5·0, considering 1 as the least favourable situation. The literature review showed increase in patient satisfaction and high survival rates of implants associated with mandibular removable partial dentures with distal extensions. However, some complications and need of prosthetic repair were reported. Although this treatment approach could represent a low‐cost and beneficial rehabilitation for free‐end mandibular ridges, the lack of controlled and randomised well‐designed clinical trials suggests further studies with more representative samples to validate the outcomes of this treatment modality.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22882547</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02326.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-182X
ispartof Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2012-10, Vol.39 (10), p.791-798
issn 0305-182X
1365-2842
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038595330
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Dental Abutments
dental implant
Dental Implants
dental prosthesis
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported - adverse effects
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported - standards
Dentistry
Denture Retention
Denture, Partial, Removable - adverse effects
Denture, Partial, Removable - standards
Humans
implant-supported dental prosthesis
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - rehabilitation
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially - surgery
Kennedy class I
Kennedy class II
Mandible - surgery
mastication
Mastication - physiology
Patient Satisfaction
Prosthesis Failure
Quality of Life
removable partial denture
Surveys and Questionnaires
Treatment Outcome
title Mandibular implant-supported removable partial denture with distal extension: a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A54%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mandibular%20implant-supported%20removable%20partial%20denture%20with%20distal%20extension:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20rehabilitation&rft.au=DE%20FREITAS,%20R.%20F.%20C.%20P.&rft.date=2012-10&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=791&rft.epage=798&rft.pages=791-798&rft.issn=0305-182X&rft.eissn=1365-2842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02326.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1038595330%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038595330&rft_id=info:pmid/22882547&rfr_iscdi=true