Cloud control: voluntary admission control for intranet traffic management

The Internet backbone of many corporations carries two kinds of traffic: urgent and delayable. Shifting some traffic from peak periods to valleys reduces capacity requirements. We consider the case of managing the delayable traffic by an admission control (AC) system. AC gets link utilization feedba...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Information systems and e-business management 2012-09, Vol.10 (3), p.295-308
Hauptverfasser: Langford, John, Li, Lihong, McAfee, Preston, Papineni, Kishore
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 308
container_issue 3
container_start_page 295
container_title Information systems and e-business management
container_volume 10
creator Langford, John
Li, Lihong
McAfee, Preston
Papineni, Kishore
description The Internet backbone of many corporations carries two kinds of traffic: urgent and delayable. Shifting some traffic from peak periods to valleys reduces capacity requirements. We consider the case of managing the delayable traffic by an admission control (AC) system. AC gets link utilization feedback every τ seconds. Delayable opt-in sources obtain permission from AC to transmit for up to τ seconds at a rate not exceeding a limit imposed by AC, renewing permission as needed. Urgent traffic bypasses AC. AC must allocate bandwidth to competing delayable traffic sources. We prove that among all throttling transformations of flows that achieve a desired mean aggregate flow, rate limits on flows minimize the variance of their sum. Furthermore, a single rate limit common to all flows achieves the optimum. Thus, for a single link, AC must decide on a single rate limit for all delayable sources in each τ-second cycle. We evaluate different policies that set the rate limit dynamically in an empirical setting using netflow records on a link on the backbone of Yahoo!. Using historical data, we also derive the best possible reduction in capacity of this link using a closed-form solution to an assignment problem. We show that AC can achieve capacity reduction close to the best possible reduction.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10257-011-0166-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038253039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1038253039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-735afcaef9ec3da95cac3888f42072bd1bd75496e19259db7d5c2b60bdef00963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOF4ewF3AjZtqLk3SuJPBKwNudB3SXIYObTImreDbm6EqIrgI50C-__DzAXCG0SVGSFxljAgTFcK4PM6reg8sMMeikg2r93_2mh-Co5w3CBEhJVmAp2UfJwtNDGOK_TV8j_0URp0-oLZDl3MXw_cn9DHBrqw6uBGW4X1n4KCDXrvBhfEEHHjdZ3f6NY_B693ty_KhWj3fPy5vVpWhnI2VoEx7o52XzlCrJTPa0KZpfE2QIK3FrRWsltxhSZi0rbDMkJaj1jqPkOT0GFzMd7cpvk0uj6oUNa7vS684ZYURbQijiMqCnv9BN3FKobQrVDFAEGVNofBMmRRzTs6rbeqG4qBAamdXzXZVsat2dlVdMmTO5MKGtUu_L_8X-gTUbH1l</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1027920358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cloud control: voluntary admission control for intranet traffic management</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Langford, John ; Li, Lihong ; McAfee, Preston ; Papineni, Kishore</creator><creatorcontrib>Langford, John ; Li, Lihong ; McAfee, Preston ; Papineni, Kishore</creatorcontrib><description>The Internet backbone of many corporations carries two kinds of traffic: urgent and delayable. Shifting some traffic from peak periods to valleys reduces capacity requirements. We consider the case of managing the delayable traffic by an admission control (AC) system. AC gets link utilization feedback every τ seconds. Delayable opt-in sources obtain permission from AC to transmit for up to τ seconds at a rate not exceeding a limit imposed by AC, renewing permission as needed. Urgent traffic bypasses AC. AC must allocate bandwidth to competing delayable traffic sources. We prove that among all throttling transformations of flows that achieve a desired mean aggregate flow, rate limits on flows minimize the variance of their sum. Furthermore, a single rate limit common to all flows achieves the optimum. Thus, for a single link, AC must decide on a single rate limit for all delayable sources in each τ-second cycle. We evaluate different policies that set the rate limit dynamically in an empirical setting using netflow records on a link on the backbone of Yahoo!. Using historical data, we also derive the best possible reduction in capacity of this link using a closed-form solution to an assignment problem. We show that AC can achieve capacity reduction close to the best possible reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1617-9846</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1617-9854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10257-011-0166-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Admission control ; Backbone ; Bandwidths ; Business and Management ; Control systems ; Feedback ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; Internet ; Intranets ; IT in Business ; Links ; Management ; Original Article ; Protocol ; Reduction ; Studies ; Traffic engineering ; Traffic flow ; Wide area networks</subject><ispartof>Information systems and e-business management, 2012-09, Vol.10 (3), p.295-308</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2011</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-735afcaef9ec3da95cac3888f42072bd1bd75496e19259db7d5c2b60bdef00963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10257-011-0166-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10257-011-0166-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langford, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAfee, Preston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papineni, Kishore</creatorcontrib><title>Cloud control: voluntary admission control for intranet traffic management</title><title>Information systems and e-business management</title><addtitle>Inf Syst E-Bus Manage</addtitle><description>The Internet backbone of many corporations carries two kinds of traffic: urgent and delayable. Shifting some traffic from peak periods to valleys reduces capacity requirements. We consider the case of managing the delayable traffic by an admission control (AC) system. AC gets link utilization feedback every τ seconds. Delayable opt-in sources obtain permission from AC to transmit for up to τ seconds at a rate not exceeding a limit imposed by AC, renewing permission as needed. Urgent traffic bypasses AC. AC must allocate bandwidth to competing delayable traffic sources. We prove that among all throttling transformations of flows that achieve a desired mean aggregate flow, rate limits on flows minimize the variance of their sum. Furthermore, a single rate limit common to all flows achieves the optimum. Thus, for a single link, AC must decide on a single rate limit for all delayable sources in each τ-second cycle. We evaluate different policies that set the rate limit dynamically in an empirical setting using netflow records on a link on the backbone of Yahoo!. Using historical data, we also derive the best possible reduction in capacity of this link using a closed-form solution to an assignment problem. We show that AC can achieve capacity reduction close to the best possible reduction.</description><subject>Admission control</subject><subject>Backbone</subject><subject>Bandwidths</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Intranets</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Links</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Protocol</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Traffic engineering</subject><subject>Traffic flow</subject><subject>Wide area networks</subject><issn>1617-9846</issn><issn>1617-9854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOF4ewF3AjZtqLk3SuJPBKwNudB3SXIYObTImreDbm6EqIrgI50C-__DzAXCG0SVGSFxljAgTFcK4PM6reg8sMMeikg2r93_2mh-Co5w3CBEhJVmAp2UfJwtNDGOK_TV8j_0URp0-oLZDl3MXw_cn9DHBrqw6uBGW4X1n4KCDXrvBhfEEHHjdZ3f6NY_B693ty_KhWj3fPy5vVpWhnI2VoEx7o52XzlCrJTPa0KZpfE2QIK3FrRWsltxhSZi0rbDMkJaj1jqPkOT0GFzMd7cpvk0uj6oUNa7vS684ZYURbQijiMqCnv9BN3FKobQrVDFAEGVNofBMmRRzTs6rbeqG4qBAamdXzXZVsat2dlVdMmTO5MKGtUu_L_8X-gTUbH1l</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Langford, John</creator><creator>Li, Lihong</creator><creator>McAfee, Preston</creator><creator>Papineni, Kishore</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Cloud control: voluntary admission control for intranet traffic management</title><author>Langford, John ; Li, Lihong ; McAfee, Preston ; Papineni, Kishore</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-735afcaef9ec3da95cac3888f42072bd1bd75496e19259db7d5c2b60bdef00963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Admission control</topic><topic>Backbone</topic><topic>Bandwidths</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Intranets</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Links</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Protocol</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Traffic engineering</topic><topic>Traffic flow</topic><topic>Wide area networks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langford, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McAfee, Preston</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papineni, Kishore</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Information systems and e-business management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langford, John</au><au>Li, Lihong</au><au>McAfee, Preston</au><au>Papineni, Kishore</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cloud control: voluntary admission control for intranet traffic management</atitle><jtitle>Information systems and e-business management</jtitle><stitle>Inf Syst E-Bus Manage</stitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>295-308</pages><issn>1617-9846</issn><eissn>1617-9854</eissn><abstract>The Internet backbone of many corporations carries two kinds of traffic: urgent and delayable. Shifting some traffic from peak periods to valleys reduces capacity requirements. We consider the case of managing the delayable traffic by an admission control (AC) system. AC gets link utilization feedback every τ seconds. Delayable opt-in sources obtain permission from AC to transmit for up to τ seconds at a rate not exceeding a limit imposed by AC, renewing permission as needed. Urgent traffic bypasses AC. AC must allocate bandwidth to competing delayable traffic sources. We prove that among all throttling transformations of flows that achieve a desired mean aggregate flow, rate limits on flows minimize the variance of their sum. Furthermore, a single rate limit common to all flows achieves the optimum. Thus, for a single link, AC must decide on a single rate limit for all delayable sources in each τ-second cycle. We evaluate different policies that set the rate limit dynamically in an empirical setting using netflow records on a link on the backbone of Yahoo!. Using historical data, we also derive the best possible reduction in capacity of this link using a closed-form solution to an assignment problem. We show that AC can achieve capacity reduction close to the best possible reduction.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s10257-011-0166-4</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1617-9846
ispartof Information systems and e-business management, 2012-09, Vol.10 (3), p.295-308
issn 1617-9846
1617-9854
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038253039
source SpringerNature Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Admission control
Backbone
Bandwidths
Business and Management
Control systems
Feedback
Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)
Internet
Intranets
IT in Business
Links
Management
Original Article
Protocol
Reduction
Studies
Traffic engineering
Traffic flow
Wide area networks
title Cloud control: voluntary admission control for intranet traffic management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A43%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cloud%20control:%20voluntary%20admission%20control%20for%20intranet%20traffic%20management&rft.jtitle=Information%20systems%20and%20e-business%20management&rft.au=Langford,%20John&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=295-308&rft.issn=1617-9846&rft.eissn=1617-9854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10257-011-0166-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1038253039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1027920358&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true