Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students’ achievement goals

► We examine the goal patterns of Singapore secondary students. ► Four clusters emerged: Diffuse, Moderate Mastery, Success Oriented, and Approach. ► The Approach goal profile is most beneficial for learning. ► The Diffuse and Success Oriented profiles are related to negative affective outcomes. Thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contemporary educational psychology 2011-04, Vol.36 (2), p.165-176
Hauptverfasser: Luo, Wenshu, Paris, Scott G., Hogan, David, Luo, Zhiqiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 176
container_issue 2
container_start_page 165
container_title Contemporary educational psychology
container_volume 36
creator Luo, Wenshu
Paris, Scott G.
Hogan, David
Luo, Zhiqiang
description ► We examine the goal patterns of Singapore secondary students. ► Four clusters emerged: Diffuse, Moderate Mastery, Success Oriented, and Approach. ► The Approach goal profile is most beneficial for learning. ► The Diffuse and Success Oriented profiles are related to negative affective outcomes. This study investigated how achievement goals are combined to affect students’ learning. We used a multiple goals perspective, based on mastery (i.e., mastery approach) and performance (including both approach and avoidance components) goals, to examine the achievement goal patterns of 1697 Singapore Secondary 3 students in their math study. Four types of goal clusters emerged from latent class cluster analyses: Diffuse (moderate multiple), Moderate Mastery (moderate mastery/low performance approach and avoidance), Success Oriented (moderate mastery/high performance approach and avoidance), and Approach (high mastery and performance approach/low performance avoidance). Analyses of covariance were conducted to compare these four clusters on eleven cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes. In general, students in the Success Oriented and Approach groups were higher on self-efficacy, subjective task values, class engagement, homework engagement, time management, and meta-cognitive self-regulation than those in the other two groups. In addition, students in the Approach and Moderate Mastery groups were more likely to make effort when encountering difficulties in learning math, showed lower test anxiety, lower negative affect, and achieved higher scores in math than students in the other two groups. These findings suggest that the goal profile with high mastery and performance approach goals combined with low performance avoidance goals is most beneficial for learning, whereas high performance approach goals, when associated with performance avoidance goals, have some negative effects on affective outcomes. The patterns help to refine distinctions in performance goals, and are discussed in the context of academic achievement in Singapore.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.02.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038110956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ920788</ericid><els_id>S0361476X11000063</els_id><sourcerecordid>1038110956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-ebea20c1ef0b969f9efa0d0f43e33b3372641b69e0915e10c46f4253bbd191bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctq3DAUhkVoIdO0bxCCCBS6sXt0GY21akOa3gh0kRayE7J8lGiwLVfyBGbX1-jr5UmqYaZZdNPVQfzf-ZE-EXLGoGbA1Nt17bCb8tbd1xwYq4HXAOKILBhoqLho5DOyAKFYJVfq9pi8yHkNBZRaLEj3IdIJk49psKNDehdtn-mU4hBnpD3aNIbx7h29oJOdZ0wjtaPttzlkGj29KZmdYkKa502H45wff_2m1t0HfMChnPd9L8lzXwa-OswT8uPj1ffLz9X1t09fLi-uKye5mCts0XJwDD20Wmmv0VvowEuBQrRCrLiSrFUaQbMlMnBSecmXom07plnrxAl5s-8t9_-5wTybIWSHfW9HjJtsGIiGFStLVdDzf9B13KTytGyapV4pKfQOUnvIpZhzQm-mFAabtqXJ7Nybtfnr3uzcG-CmuC-Lrw_tNjvb-1Tchvy0zSXjWjVQuNM9hym4p_jqq-awapoSvz_ERdpDwGSyC1i-qQsJ3Wy6GP53kz9G8KiX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>859764396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students’ achievement goals</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Luo, Wenshu ; Paris, Scott G. ; Hogan, David ; Luo, Zhiqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Luo, Wenshu ; Paris, Scott G. ; Hogan, David ; Luo, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><description>► We examine the goal patterns of Singapore secondary students. ► Four clusters emerged: Diffuse, Moderate Mastery, Success Oriented, and Approach. ► The Approach goal profile is most beneficial for learning. ► The Diffuse and Success Oriented profiles are related to negative affective outcomes. This study investigated how achievement goals are combined to affect students’ learning. We used a multiple goals perspective, based on mastery (i.e., mastery approach) and performance (including both approach and avoidance components) goals, to examine the achievement goal patterns of 1697 Singapore Secondary 3 students in their math study. Four types of goal clusters emerged from latent class cluster analyses: Diffuse (moderate multiple), Moderate Mastery (moderate mastery/low performance approach and avoidance), Success Oriented (moderate mastery/high performance approach and avoidance), and Approach (high mastery and performance approach/low performance avoidance). Analyses of covariance were conducted to compare these four clusters on eleven cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes. In general, students in the Success Oriented and Approach groups were higher on self-efficacy, subjective task values, class engagement, homework engagement, time management, and meta-cognitive self-regulation than those in the other two groups. In addition, students in the Approach and Moderate Mastery groups were more likely to make effort when encountering difficulties in learning math, showed lower test anxiety, lower negative affect, and achieved higher scores in math than students in the other two groups. These findings suggest that the goal profile with high mastery and performance approach goals combined with low performance avoidance goals is most beneficial for learning, whereas high performance approach goals, when associated with performance avoidance goals, have some negative effects on affective outcomes. The patterns help to refine distinctions in performance goals, and are discussed in the context of academic achievement in Singapore.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-476X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2384</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.02.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Academic achievement gaps ; Achievement motivation ; Achievement Need ; Affective Behavior ; Approach-Avoidance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognitive style ; Educational psychology ; Foreign Countries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Goal Orientation ; Goals ; Homework ; Learner Engagement ; Learning ; Mastery Learning ; Mathematics Education ; Metacognition ; Multiple goals ; Pattern analysis ; Performance goals ; Profiles ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure ; Scores ; Secondary School Students ; Self Efficacy ; Self Management ; Singapore ; Student Motivation ; Students ; Success ; Test Anxiety ; Time Management</subject><ispartof>Contemporary educational psychology, 2011-04, Vol.36 (2), p.165-176</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-ebea20c1ef0b969f9efa0d0f43e33b3372641b69e0915e10c46f4253bbd191bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-ebea20c1ef0b969f9efa0d0f43e33b3372641b69e0915e10c46f4253bbd191bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X11000063$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,30976,30977,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ920788$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24129680$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luo, Wenshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paris, Scott G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><title>Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students’ achievement goals</title><title>Contemporary educational psychology</title><description>► We examine the goal patterns of Singapore secondary students. ► Four clusters emerged: Diffuse, Moderate Mastery, Success Oriented, and Approach. ► The Approach goal profile is most beneficial for learning. ► The Diffuse and Success Oriented profiles are related to negative affective outcomes. This study investigated how achievement goals are combined to affect students’ learning. We used a multiple goals perspective, based on mastery (i.e., mastery approach) and performance (including both approach and avoidance components) goals, to examine the achievement goal patterns of 1697 Singapore Secondary 3 students in their math study. Four types of goal clusters emerged from latent class cluster analyses: Diffuse (moderate multiple), Moderate Mastery (moderate mastery/low performance approach and avoidance), Success Oriented (moderate mastery/high performance approach and avoidance), and Approach (high mastery and performance approach/low performance avoidance). Analyses of covariance were conducted to compare these four clusters on eleven cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes. In general, students in the Success Oriented and Approach groups were higher on self-efficacy, subjective task values, class engagement, homework engagement, time management, and meta-cognitive self-regulation than those in the other two groups. In addition, students in the Approach and Moderate Mastery groups were more likely to make effort when encountering difficulties in learning math, showed lower test anxiety, lower negative affect, and achieved higher scores in math than students in the other two groups. These findings suggest that the goal profile with high mastery and performance approach goals combined with low performance avoidance goals is most beneficial for learning, whereas high performance approach goals, when associated with performance avoidance goals, have some negative effects on affective outcomes. The patterns help to refine distinctions in performance goals, and are discussed in the context of academic achievement in Singapore.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Academic achievement gaps</subject><subject>Achievement motivation</subject><subject>Achievement Need</subject><subject>Affective Behavior</subject><subject>Approach-Avoidance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Goal Orientation</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Homework</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Mastery Learning</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Multiple goals</subject><subject>Pattern analysis</subject><subject>Performance goals</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Secondary School Students</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Self Management</subject><subject>Singapore</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Test Anxiety</subject><subject>Time Management</subject><issn>0361-476X</issn><issn>1090-2384</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctq3DAUhkVoIdO0bxCCCBS6sXt0GY21akOa3gh0kRayE7J8lGiwLVfyBGbX1-jr5UmqYaZZdNPVQfzf-ZE-EXLGoGbA1Nt17bCb8tbd1xwYq4HXAOKILBhoqLho5DOyAKFYJVfq9pi8yHkNBZRaLEj3IdIJk49psKNDehdtn-mU4hBnpD3aNIbx7h29oJOdZ0wjtaPttzlkGj29KZmdYkKa502H45wff_2m1t0HfMChnPd9L8lzXwa-OswT8uPj1ffLz9X1t09fLi-uKye5mCts0XJwDD20Wmmv0VvowEuBQrRCrLiSrFUaQbMlMnBSecmXom07plnrxAl5s-8t9_-5wTybIWSHfW9HjJtsGIiGFStLVdDzf9B13KTytGyapV4pKfQOUnvIpZhzQm-mFAabtqXJ7Nybtfnr3uzcG-CmuC-Lrw_tNjvb-1Tchvy0zSXjWjVQuNM9hym4p_jqq-awapoSvz_ERdpDwGSyC1i-qQsJ3Wy6GP53kz9G8KiX</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Luo, Wenshu</creator><creator>Paris, Scott G.</creator><creator>Hogan, David</creator><creator>Luo, Zhiqiang</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students’ achievement goals</title><author>Luo, Wenshu ; Paris, Scott G. ; Hogan, David ; Luo, Zhiqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-ebea20c1ef0b969f9efa0d0f43e33b3372641b69e0915e10c46f4253bbd191bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Academic achievement gaps</topic><topic>Achievement motivation</topic><topic>Achievement Need</topic><topic>Affective Behavior</topic><topic>Approach-Avoidance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Goal Orientation</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Homework</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Mastery Learning</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Multiple goals</topic><topic>Pattern analysis</topic><topic>Performance goals</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Secondary School Students</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Self Management</topic><topic>Singapore</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Test Anxiety</topic><topic>Time Management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luo, Wenshu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paris, Scott G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Contemporary educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luo, Wenshu</au><au>Paris, Scott G.</au><au>Hogan, David</au><au>Luo, Zhiqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ920788</ericid><atitle>Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students’ achievement goals</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary educational psychology</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>165-176</pages><issn>0361-476X</issn><eissn>1090-2384</eissn><abstract>► We examine the goal patterns of Singapore secondary students. ► Four clusters emerged: Diffuse, Moderate Mastery, Success Oriented, and Approach. ► The Approach goal profile is most beneficial for learning. ► The Diffuse and Success Oriented profiles are related to negative affective outcomes. This study investigated how achievement goals are combined to affect students’ learning. We used a multiple goals perspective, based on mastery (i.e., mastery approach) and performance (including both approach and avoidance components) goals, to examine the achievement goal patterns of 1697 Singapore Secondary 3 students in their math study. Four types of goal clusters emerged from latent class cluster analyses: Diffuse (moderate multiple), Moderate Mastery (moderate mastery/low performance approach and avoidance), Success Oriented (moderate mastery/high performance approach and avoidance), and Approach (high mastery and performance approach/low performance avoidance). Analyses of covariance were conducted to compare these four clusters on eleven cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes. In general, students in the Success Oriented and Approach groups were higher on self-efficacy, subjective task values, class engagement, homework engagement, time management, and meta-cognitive self-regulation than those in the other two groups. In addition, students in the Approach and Moderate Mastery groups were more likely to make effort when encountering difficulties in learning math, showed lower test anxiety, lower negative affect, and achieved higher scores in math than students in the other two groups. These findings suggest that the goal profile with high mastery and performance approach goals combined with low performance avoidance goals is most beneficial for learning, whereas high performance approach goals, when associated with performance avoidance goals, have some negative effects on affective outcomes. The patterns help to refine distinctions in performance goals, and are discussed in the context of academic achievement in Singapore.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.02.003</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-476X
ispartof Contemporary educational psychology, 2011-04, Vol.36 (2), p.165-176
issn 0361-476X
1090-2384
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038110956
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Academic Achievement
Academic achievement gaps
Achievement motivation
Achievement Need
Affective Behavior
Approach-Avoidance
Biological and medical sciences
Cognitive style
Educational psychology
Foreign Countries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Goal Orientation
Goals
Homework
Learner Engagement
Learning
Mastery Learning
Mathematics Education
Metacognition
Multiple goals
Pattern analysis
Performance goals
Profiles
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Pupil and student. Academic achievement and failure
Scores
Secondary School Students
Self Efficacy
Self Management
Singapore
Student Motivation
Students
Success
Test Anxiety
Time Management
title Do performance goals promote learning? A pattern analysis of Singapore students’ achievement goals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A52%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20performance%20goals%20promote%20learning?%20A%20pattern%20analysis%20of%20Singapore%20students%E2%80%99%20achievement%20goals&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Luo,%20Wenshu&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=165-176&rft.issn=0361-476X&rft.eissn=1090-2384&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.02.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1038110956%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=859764396&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ920788&rft_els_id=S0361476X11000063&rfr_iscdi=true