The Function Acquisition Speed Test (FAST): A Behavior Analytic Implicit Test for Assessing Stimulus Relations
Subjects completed a baseline stimulus matching procedure designed to produce two symmetrical stimulus relations; A1–B1 and A2–B2. Using A1, B1, and two novel stimuli, subjects were then trained to produce a common key-press response for two stimuli and a second key-press response for two further st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Psychological record 2012-07, Vol.62 (3), p.507-528 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 528 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 507 |
container_title | The Psychological record |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | O’Reilly, Anthony Roche, Bryan Ruiz, Maria Tyndall, Ian Gavin, Amanda |
description | Subjects completed a baseline stimulus matching procedure designed to produce two symmetrical stimulus relations; A1–B1 and A2–B2. Using A1, B1, and two novel stimuli, subjects were then trained to produce a common key-press response for two stimuli and a second key-press response for two further stimuli across two blocks of response training. During one block, the reinforcement contingencies were consistent with baseline relations (i.e., A1 and B1 shared a response function), whereas during the other block they were not. Thirteen of 18 subjects who completed the procedure showed a response class acquisition rate differential across the two test blocks in the predicted direction. It is suggested that this procedure may serve as a behavior analytic alternative to popular implicit tests. It provides a nonrelative measure of stimulus association strength and may display superior procedural implicitness over other tests. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF03395817 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038110713</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A298058822</galeid><ericid>EJ1002518</ericid><sourcerecordid>A298058822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-79967dae03c4046a29db6fb2ab7e810f4bc70a3592e329798d76473cf917b7a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1r3DAQhkVpods0l94Lgl7SBif6smXl5oRsmhIodLdnI8vjjYIsbyS7kH9fbVyaNllGMGLeZ15mYBD6QMkJJUSeni8J5yovqXyFFowWPOMiZ6_RgqR6xhTnb9G7GO8IIVQQuUB-fQt4OXkz2sHjytxPNtrH_2oL0OI1xBEfLavV-vMZrvA53Opfdgi48to9jNbg637rrLHjTHY7KUaI0foNXo22n9wU8Q9wemca36M3nXYRDv_kA_Rzebm--JrdfL-6vqhuMiMUHTOpVCFbDYQbQUShmWqbomuYbiSUlHSiMZJonisGnCmpylYWQnLTKSobqQk_QEez7zYM91OarO5tNOCc9jBMsaaEl5QSSXlCPz1D74YppPUeKSKYSO-J2mgHtfXdMAZtdqZ1xVRJ8rJkLFHZHmoDHoJ2g4fOpvJ__MkePkULvTV7G77MDSYMMQbo6m2wvQ4PadZ6dwH10wUk-OMMQ7DmL3j5LXEsp2XSj2c9Js1vIPy7-Qu33w_rtc4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1030424424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Function Acquisition Speed Test (FAST): A Behavior Analytic Implicit Test for Assessing Stimulus Relations</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>O’Reilly, Anthony ; Roche, Bryan ; Ruiz, Maria ; Tyndall, Ian ; Gavin, Amanda</creator><creatorcontrib>O’Reilly, Anthony ; Roche, Bryan ; Ruiz, Maria ; Tyndall, Ian ; Gavin, Amanda</creatorcontrib><description>Subjects completed a baseline stimulus matching procedure designed to produce two symmetrical stimulus relations; A1–B1 and A2–B2. Using A1, B1, and two novel stimuli, subjects were then trained to produce a common key-press response for two stimuli and a second key-press response for two further stimuli across two blocks of response training. During one block, the reinforcement contingencies were consistent with baseline relations (i.e., A1 and B1 shared a response function), whereas during the other block they were not. Thirteen of 18 subjects who completed the procedure showed a response class acquisition rate differential across the two test blocks in the predicted direction. It is suggested that this procedure may serve as a behavior analytic alternative to popular implicit tests. It provides a nonrelative measure of stimulus association strength and may display superior procedural implicitness over other tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-2933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-3452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF03395817</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PYRCAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Association Measures ; Behavior ; Behavioral assessment ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Behavioral Science Research ; Child Abuse ; Cognitive Processes ; Contingencies ; Correlation ; Discrimination ; Equivalency Tests ; Laboratories ; Matching ; Memory ; Methods ; Phonology ; Physiological aspects ; Psychoanalysis ; Psychology ; Psychophysiology ; R&D ; Reaction Time ; Reinforcement ; Research & development ; Researchers ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Social Desirability ; Social History ; Stimuli ; Stimuli (Psychology) ; Stimulus ; Studies ; Syllables ; Test Format ; Timed Tests</subject><ispartof>The Psychological record, 2012-07, Vol.62 (3), p.507-528</ispartof><rights>Association of Behavior Analysis International 2012</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 The Association for Behavior Analysis International</rights><rights>Copyright The Psychological Record Summer 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-79967dae03c4046a29db6fb2ab7e810f4bc70a3592e329798d76473cf917b7a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-79967dae03c4046a29db6fb2ab7e810f4bc70a3592e329798d76473cf917b7a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF03395817$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03395817$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27901,27902,30976,30977,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1002518$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O’Reilly, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyndall, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavin, Amanda</creatorcontrib><title>The Function Acquisition Speed Test (FAST): A Behavior Analytic Implicit Test for Assessing Stimulus Relations</title><title>The Psychological record</title><addtitle>Psychol Rec</addtitle><description>Subjects completed a baseline stimulus matching procedure designed to produce two symmetrical stimulus relations; A1–B1 and A2–B2. Using A1, B1, and two novel stimuli, subjects were then trained to produce a common key-press response for two stimuli and a second key-press response for two further stimuli across two blocks of response training. During one block, the reinforcement contingencies were consistent with baseline relations (i.e., A1 and B1 shared a response function), whereas during the other block they were not. Thirteen of 18 subjects who completed the procedure showed a response class acquisition rate differential across the two test blocks in the predicted direction. It is suggested that this procedure may serve as a behavior analytic alternative to popular implicit tests. It provides a nonrelative measure of stimulus association strength and may display superior procedural implicitness over other tests.</description><subject>Association Measures</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral assessment</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Behavioral Science Research</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Contingencies</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Equivalency Tests</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Matching</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Psychoanalysis</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychophysiology</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social Desirability</subject><subject>Social History</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Stimuli (Psychology)</subject><subject>Stimulus</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Syllables</subject><subject>Test Format</subject><subject>Timed Tests</subject><issn>0033-2933</issn><issn>2163-3452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1r3DAQhkVpods0l94Lgl7SBif6smXl5oRsmhIodLdnI8vjjYIsbyS7kH9fbVyaNllGMGLeZ15mYBD6QMkJJUSeni8J5yovqXyFFowWPOMiZ6_RgqR6xhTnb9G7GO8IIVQQuUB-fQt4OXkz2sHjytxPNtrH_2oL0OI1xBEfLavV-vMZrvA53Opfdgi48to9jNbg637rrLHjTHY7KUaI0foNXo22n9wU8Q9wemca36M3nXYRDv_kA_Rzebm--JrdfL-6vqhuMiMUHTOpVCFbDYQbQUShmWqbomuYbiSUlHSiMZJonisGnCmpylYWQnLTKSobqQk_QEez7zYM91OarO5tNOCc9jBMsaaEl5QSSXlCPz1D74YppPUeKSKYSO-J2mgHtfXdMAZtdqZ1xVRJ8rJkLFHZHmoDHoJ2g4fOpvJ__MkePkULvTV7G77MDSYMMQbo6m2wvQ4PadZ6dwH10wUk-OMMQ7DmL3j5LXEsp2XSj2c9Js1vIPy7-Qu33w_rtc4</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>O’Reilly, Anthony</creator><creator>Roche, Bryan</creator><creator>Ruiz, Maria</creator><creator>Tyndall, Ian</creator><creator>Gavin, Amanda</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Southern Illinois University Carbondale</general><general>The Association for Behavior Analysis International</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>The Function Acquisition Speed Test (FAST): A Behavior Analytic Implicit Test for Assessing Stimulus Relations</title><author>O’Reilly, Anthony ; Roche, Bryan ; Ruiz, Maria ; Tyndall, Ian ; Gavin, Amanda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-79967dae03c4046a29db6fb2ab7e810f4bc70a3592e329798d76473cf917b7a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Association Measures</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral assessment</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Behavioral Science Research</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Contingencies</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Equivalency Tests</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Matching</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Psychoanalysis</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychophysiology</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social Desirability</topic><topic>Social History</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Stimuli (Psychology)</topic><topic>Stimulus</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Syllables</topic><topic>Test Format</topic><topic>Timed Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’Reilly, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyndall, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavin, Amanda</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Psychological record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’Reilly, Anthony</au><au>Roche, Bryan</au><au>Ruiz, Maria</au><au>Tyndall, Ian</au><au>Gavin, Amanda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1002518</ericid><atitle>The Function Acquisition Speed Test (FAST): A Behavior Analytic Implicit Test for Assessing Stimulus Relations</atitle><jtitle>The Psychological record</jtitle><stitle>Psychol Rec</stitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>507-528</pages><issn>0033-2933</issn><eissn>2163-3452</eissn><coden>PYRCAI</coden><abstract>Subjects completed a baseline stimulus matching procedure designed to produce two symmetrical stimulus relations; A1–B1 and A2–B2. Using A1, B1, and two novel stimuli, subjects were then trained to produce a common key-press response for two stimuli and a second key-press response for two further stimuli across two blocks of response training. During one block, the reinforcement contingencies were consistent with baseline relations (i.e., A1 and B1 shared a response function), whereas during the other block they were not. Thirteen of 18 subjects who completed the procedure showed a response class acquisition rate differential across the two test blocks in the predicted direction. It is suggested that this procedure may serve as a behavior analytic alternative to popular implicit tests. It provides a nonrelative measure of stimulus association strength and may display superior procedural implicitness over other tests.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/BF03395817</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-2933 |
ispartof | The Psychological record, 2012-07, Vol.62 (3), p.507-528 |
issn | 0033-2933 2163-3452 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038110713 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Association Measures Behavior Behavioral assessment Behavioral Science and Psychology Behavioral Science Research Child Abuse Cognitive Processes Contingencies Correlation Discrimination Equivalency Tests Laboratories Matching Memory Methods Phonology Physiological aspects Psychoanalysis Psychology Psychophysiology R&D Reaction Time Reinforcement Research & development Researchers Resistance (Psychology) Social Desirability Social History Stimuli Stimuli (Psychology) Stimulus Studies Syllables Test Format Timed Tests |
title | The Function Acquisition Speed Test (FAST): A Behavior Analytic Implicit Test for Assessing Stimulus Relations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A54%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Function%20Acquisition%20Speed%20Test%20(FAST):%20A%20Behavior%20Analytic%20Implicit%20Test%20for%20Assessing%20Stimulus%20Relations&rft.jtitle=The%20Psychological%20record&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Reilly,%20Anthony&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=507-528&rft.issn=0033-2933&rft.eissn=2163-3452&rft.coden=PYRCAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF03395817&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA298058822%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1030424424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A298058822&rft_ericid=EJ1002518&rfr_iscdi=true |