Glenoid Bone Loss in Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management
Glenohumeral osteoarthritis is the most common reason for shoulder replacement. Total shoulder arthroplasty provides reliable pain relief and restoration of function, with implant survivorship reported at 85% at 15 years. Glenoid component wear and aseptic loosening are among the most common reasons...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2012-09, Vol.20 (9), p.604-613 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 613 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 604 |
container_title | Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Sears, Benjamin W Johnston, Peter S Ramsey, Matthew L Williams, Gerald R |
description | Glenohumeral osteoarthritis is the most common reason for shoulder replacement. Total shoulder arthroplasty provides reliable pain relief and restoration of function, with implant survivorship reported at 85% at 15 years. Glenoid component wear and aseptic loosening are among the most common reasons for revision. Glenoid wear characteristics have been correlated with, among other things, the degree of anatomic glenoid version correction. Anatomic glenoid reconstruction is particularly challenging in the presence of glenoid bone deficiency. Walch classified glenoid morphology into five types: type A, centered, without posterior subluxation but with minor erosion (A1) or major erosion (A2); type B, posteriorly subluxated (B1) or posteriorly subluxated with posterior glenoid erosion (B2); and type C, excessive glenoid retroversion. The type A glenoid represents only 59% of patients; thus, the need to address glenoid deformity is common. Methods of correction include asymmetric reaming of the anterior glenoid, bone grafting of the posterior glenoid, and implanting a specialized glenoid component with posterior augmentation. In many cases of type C or hypoplastic glenoid, the humerus is concentrically reduced in the deficient glenoid and glenoid deformity may not need to be corrected. Severely hypoplastic glenoid may require the use of bone-sparing glenoid components or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5435/JAAOS-20-09-604 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038068853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A308599876</galeid><sourcerecordid>A308599876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e45239a21cbc739b4755a23c356fb71cb1240a1afa53a3ef4b04e62e36dcf8eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUtr3DAUhU1paB7tursiKIVunOhpW925IU0bJqQwKXQnru3rGRXZmkh2h_z7KHVaKAQtJC7fOVeck2VvGT1VUqizq7q-Weec5lTnBZUvsiOmJc2VrOjL9KZFmTPFfh5mxzH-opQVstCvskPOtWQVFUfZ-tLh6G1HPvsRycrHSOxIvgc7QLgnt34CR9ZbP7sOA6nDtA1-5yBO95_IxW9wM0zWjwTGjlzDCBsccJxeZwc9uIhvnu6T7MeXi9vzr_nq5vLbeb3KW6HllKNUXGjgrG3aUuhGlkoBF61QRd-Uacq4pMCgByVAYC8bKrHgKIqu7StsxEn2cfHdBX83Y5zMYGOLzsGIfo6GUVHRoqqUSOj7Bd2AQ2PH3k8B2kfc1IJWSuuqLBJ1-gyVToeDbVNAvU3z_wRni6ANKbmAvdktyaXd5rEg86cgw6mh2qSCkuLd05_nZsDuH_-3kQR8WICt3Wz3NqCJAziXcG72-31yWoweAPwGl28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1038068853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glenoid Bone Loss in Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Sears, Benjamin W ; Johnston, Peter S ; Ramsey, Matthew L ; Williams, Gerald R</creator><creatorcontrib>Sears, Benjamin W ; Johnston, Peter S ; Ramsey, Matthew L ; Williams, Gerald R</creatorcontrib><description>Glenohumeral osteoarthritis is the most common reason for shoulder replacement. Total shoulder arthroplasty provides reliable pain relief and restoration of function, with implant survivorship reported at 85% at 15 years. Glenoid component wear and aseptic loosening are among the most common reasons for revision. Glenoid wear characteristics have been correlated with, among other things, the degree of anatomic glenoid version correction. Anatomic glenoid reconstruction is particularly challenging in the presence of glenoid bone deficiency. Walch classified glenoid morphology into five types: type A, centered, without posterior subluxation but with minor erosion (A1) or major erosion (A2); type B, posteriorly subluxated (B1) or posteriorly subluxated with posterior glenoid erosion (B2); and type C, excessive glenoid retroversion. The type A glenoid represents only 59% of patients; thus, the need to address glenoid deformity is common. Methods of correction include asymmetric reaming of the anterior glenoid, bone grafting of the posterior glenoid, and implanting a specialized glenoid component with posterior augmentation. In many cases of type C or hypoplastic glenoid, the humerus is concentrically reduced in the deficient glenoid and glenoid deformity may not need to be corrected. Severely hypoplastic glenoid may require the use of bone-sparing glenoid components or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-151X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-5480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-09-604</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22941803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Transplantation ; Glenoid Cavity - pathology ; Humans ; Joint Instability - surgery ; Osteoarthritis - pathology ; Osteoarthritis - physiopathology ; Osteoarthritis - surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Shoulder Joint - pathology ; Shoulder Joint - physiopathology ; Shoulder Joint - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2012-09, Vol.20 (9), p.604-613</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e45239a21cbc739b4755a23c356fb71cb1240a1afa53a3ef4b04e62e36dcf8eb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22941803$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sears, Benjamin W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Peter S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Matthew L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Gerald R</creatorcontrib><title>Glenoid Bone Loss in Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Orthop Surg</addtitle><description>Glenohumeral osteoarthritis is the most common reason for shoulder replacement. Total shoulder arthroplasty provides reliable pain relief and restoration of function, with implant survivorship reported at 85% at 15 years. Glenoid component wear and aseptic loosening are among the most common reasons for revision. Glenoid wear characteristics have been correlated with, among other things, the degree of anatomic glenoid version correction. Anatomic glenoid reconstruction is particularly challenging in the presence of glenoid bone deficiency. Walch classified glenoid morphology into five types: type A, centered, without posterior subluxation but with minor erosion (A1) or major erosion (A2); type B, posteriorly subluxated (B1) or posteriorly subluxated with posterior glenoid erosion (B2); and type C, excessive glenoid retroversion. The type A glenoid represents only 59% of patients; thus, the need to address glenoid deformity is common. Methods of correction include asymmetric reaming of the anterior glenoid, bone grafting of the posterior glenoid, and implanting a specialized glenoid component with posterior augmentation. In many cases of type C or hypoplastic glenoid, the humerus is concentrically reduced in the deficient glenoid and glenoid deformity may not need to be corrected. Severely hypoplastic glenoid may require the use of bone-sparing glenoid components or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation</subject><subject>Glenoid Cavity - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Instability - surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - pathology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - pathology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1067-151X</issn><issn>1940-5480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUtr3DAUhU1paB7tursiKIVunOhpW925IU0bJqQwKXQnru3rGRXZmkh2h_z7KHVaKAQtJC7fOVeck2VvGT1VUqizq7q-Weec5lTnBZUvsiOmJc2VrOjL9KZFmTPFfh5mxzH-opQVstCvskPOtWQVFUfZ-tLh6G1HPvsRycrHSOxIvgc7QLgnt34CR9ZbP7sOA6nDtA1-5yBO95_IxW9wM0zWjwTGjlzDCBsccJxeZwc9uIhvnu6T7MeXi9vzr_nq5vLbeb3KW6HllKNUXGjgrG3aUuhGlkoBF61QRd-Uacq4pMCgByVAYC8bKrHgKIqu7StsxEn2cfHdBX83Y5zMYGOLzsGIfo6GUVHRoqqUSOj7Bd2AQ2PH3k8B2kfc1IJWSuuqLBJ1-gyVToeDbVNAvU3z_wRni6ANKbmAvdktyaXd5rEg86cgw6mh2qSCkuLd05_nZsDuH_-3kQR8WICt3Wz3NqCJAziXcG72-31yWoweAPwGl28</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Sears, Benjamin W</creator><creator>Johnston, Peter S</creator><creator>Ramsey, Matthew L</creator><creator>Williams, Gerald R</creator><general>American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Glenoid Bone Loss in Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management</title><author>Sears, Benjamin W ; Johnston, Peter S ; Ramsey, Matthew L ; Williams, Gerald R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-e45239a21cbc739b4755a23c356fb71cb1240a1afa53a3ef4b04e62e36dcf8eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation</topic><topic>Glenoid Cavity - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Instability - surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - pathology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - pathology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sears, Benjamin W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Peter S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Matthew L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Gerald R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sears, Benjamin W</au><au>Johnston, Peter S</au><au>Ramsey, Matthew L</au><au>Williams, Gerald R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glenoid Bone Loss in Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Orthop Surg</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>613</epage><pages>604-613</pages><issn>1067-151X</issn><eissn>1940-5480</eissn><abstract>Glenohumeral osteoarthritis is the most common reason for shoulder replacement. Total shoulder arthroplasty provides reliable pain relief and restoration of function, with implant survivorship reported at 85% at 15 years. Glenoid component wear and aseptic loosening are among the most common reasons for revision. Glenoid wear characteristics have been correlated with, among other things, the degree of anatomic glenoid version correction. Anatomic glenoid reconstruction is particularly challenging in the presence of glenoid bone deficiency. Walch classified glenoid morphology into five types: type A, centered, without posterior subluxation but with minor erosion (A1) or major erosion (A2); type B, posteriorly subluxated (B1) or posteriorly subluxated with posterior glenoid erosion (B2); and type C, excessive glenoid retroversion. The type A glenoid represents only 59% of patients; thus, the need to address glenoid deformity is common. Methods of correction include asymmetric reaming of the anterior glenoid, bone grafting of the posterior glenoid, and implanting a specialized glenoid component with posterior augmentation. In many cases of type C or hypoplastic glenoid, the humerus is concentrically reduced in the deficient glenoid and glenoid deformity may not need to be corrected. Severely hypoplastic glenoid may require the use of bone-sparing glenoid components or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons</pub><pmid>22941803</pmid><doi>10.5435/JAAOS-20-09-604</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1067-151X |
ispartof | Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2012-09, Vol.20 (9), p.604-613 |
issn | 1067-151X 1940-5480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1038068853 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement Biomechanical Phenomena Bone Transplantation Glenoid Cavity - pathology Humans Joint Instability - surgery Osteoarthritis - pathology Osteoarthritis - physiopathology Osteoarthritis - surgery Reconstructive Surgical Procedures Shoulder Joint - pathology Shoulder Joint - physiopathology Shoulder Joint - surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Glenoid Bone Loss in Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T05%3A52%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glenoid%20Bone%20Loss%20in%20Primary%20Total%20Shoulder%20Arthroplasty:%20Evaluation%20and%20Management&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Orthopaedic%20Surgeons&rft.au=Sears,%20Benjamin%20W&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=613&rft.pages=604-613&rft.issn=1067-151X&rft.eissn=1940-5480&rft_id=info:doi/10.5435/JAAOS-20-09-604&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA308599876%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1038068853&rft_id=info:pmid/22941803&rft_galeid=A308599876&rfr_iscdi=true |