Iatrogenic dissection during neurointerventional procedures: a retrospective analysis

Introduction Retrospective analysis of patients suffering iatrogenic dissection during neurointervention is reported. The circumstances surrounding the occurrence, early detection, clinical course and management options are discussed. Methods and results 18 iatrogenic dissections over 11 years were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurointerventional surgery 2012-09, Vol.4 (5), p.331-335
Hauptverfasser: Paramasivam, Srinivasan, Leesch, Wolfgang, Fifi, Johanna, Ortiz, Rafael, Niimi, Yasunari, Berenstein, Alejandro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 335
container_issue 5
container_start_page 331
container_title Journal of neurointerventional surgery
container_volume 4
creator Paramasivam, Srinivasan
Leesch, Wolfgang
Fifi, Johanna
Ortiz, Rafael
Niimi, Yasunari
Berenstein, Alejandro
description Introduction Retrospective analysis of patients suffering iatrogenic dissection during neurointervention is reported. The circumstances surrounding the occurrence, early detection, clinical course and management options are discussed. Methods and results 18 iatrogenic dissections over 11 years were retrospectively analyzed. Data were gathered from patient records, run sheets, morbidity records and imaging studies. All procedures were done by operators trained to operate according to institution standards. Total cases were 6981, with 3925 angiograms and 3056 interventions. Incidence was 0.26%, with 0.25% during diagnostic and 0.26% during intervention. 1031 pediatric cases had no dissections. Beyond 35 years, dissection rate increased to 0.35%. There was no difference between men and women. Carotid dissection was more common than vertebral. Most were minimal intimal tear (67%) and others flow limiting (33%). All cases were managed with heparin in the acute stage and later with aspirin and Plavix or Coumadin, except in two cases. Cases having >70% luminal narrowing with poor intracranial cross circulation were stented. None presented with neurologic deficits acutely or on follow-up. 94% of patients were followed for a variable period, with variable imaging modalities, being a retrospective study. Angiogram, MRI brain with MR angiography (MRA), Doppler ultrasonogram and CT angiograms were used for follow-up. There was good outcome in 94% of the followed-up cases. Conclusion Iatrogenic dissection is a random event with a benign clinical course. Early detection and aggressive management result in excellent outcome. Angiography is the best modality to follow-up. Non-invasive imaging like MRI with MRA and duplex ultrasonography are good tools to follow dissections.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010103
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1037661073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1037661073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b488t-816b42ac574f254b771e951c1baebaddb11a2f22983586635495b0fd69844c2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAYhYMobk7_gha88aaapPmqd1J0DkQFP25D0r4dnVs7k3bovzelOsQryUUC5znnfXMQOiH4nJBEXNTQuapufefmMcWExJiEk-ygMZE8jRVTYnf7lmqEDrxfYCwkl3wfjShJU8wTOUYvM9O6Zg51lUdF5T3kbdXUUdHHz6N-TBPmgNtA3QtmGa1dk0PQwV9GJnIQ7H7d2zYQmQB8-sofor3SLD0cfd8T9HJz_ZzdxncP01l2dRdbplQbKyIsoybnkpWUMyslgZSTnFgD1hSFJcTQktJUJVwJkXCWcovLQqSKsZzaZILOhtyw1HsHvtWryuewXJoams7rUIkUgmCZBPT0D7poOhf2DZRUQmHKCA-UHKg8_Mo7KPXaVSvjPkOU7pvXv5rXffN6aD44j7_zO7uCYuv7qToA8QBUvoWPrW7cmxYykVzfv2b68VYwxp-mOgs8HXi7Wvx7iy8gxKNI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1786802415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Iatrogenic dissection during neurointerventional procedures: a retrospective analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Paramasivam, Srinivasan ; Leesch, Wolfgang ; Fifi, Johanna ; Ortiz, Rafael ; Niimi, Yasunari ; Berenstein, Alejandro</creator><creatorcontrib>Paramasivam, Srinivasan ; Leesch, Wolfgang ; Fifi, Johanna ; Ortiz, Rafael ; Niimi, Yasunari ; Berenstein, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Retrospective analysis of patients suffering iatrogenic dissection during neurointervention is reported. The circumstances surrounding the occurrence, early detection, clinical course and management options are discussed. Methods and results 18 iatrogenic dissections over 11 years were retrospectively analyzed. Data were gathered from patient records, run sheets, morbidity records and imaging studies. All procedures were done by operators trained to operate according to institution standards. Total cases were 6981, with 3925 angiograms and 3056 interventions. Incidence was 0.26%, with 0.25% during diagnostic and 0.26% during intervention. 1031 pediatric cases had no dissections. Beyond 35 years, dissection rate increased to 0.35%. There was no difference between men and women. Carotid dissection was more common than vertebral. Most were minimal intimal tear (67%) and others flow limiting (33%). All cases were managed with heparin in the acute stage and later with aspirin and Plavix or Coumadin, except in two cases. Cases having &gt;70% luminal narrowing with poor intracranial cross circulation were stented. None presented with neurologic deficits acutely or on follow-up. 94% of patients were followed for a variable period, with variable imaging modalities, being a retrospective study. Angiogram, MRI brain with MR angiography (MRA), Doppler ultrasonogram and CT angiograms were used for follow-up. There was good outcome in 94% of the followed-up cases. Conclusion Iatrogenic dissection is a random event with a benign clinical course. Early detection and aggressive management result in excellent outcome. Angiography is the best modality to follow-up. Non-invasive imaging like MRI with MRA and duplex ultrasonography are good tools to follow dissections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1759-8478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-8486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010103</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21990537</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Carotid arteries ; Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection - diagnostic imaging ; Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection - etiology ; Catheterization - adverse effects ; Catheters ; Cerebral Angiography - adverse effects ; Dissection ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Iatrogenic Disease - prevention &amp; control ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Retrospective Studies ; Stroke ; Three dimensional imaging ; Thrombolytic Therapy - adverse effects ; Ultrasonography ; Veins &amp; arteries ; Vertebral Artery Dissection - diagnostic imaging ; Vertebral Artery Dissection - etiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2012-09, Vol.4 (5), p.331-335</ispartof><rights>2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2012 (c) 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b488t-816b42ac574f254b771e951c1baebaddb11a2f22983586635495b0fd69844c2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b488t-816b42ac574f254b771e951c1baebaddb11a2f22983586635495b0fd69844c2b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jnis.bmj.com/content/4/5/331.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jnis.bmj.com/content/4/5/331.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21990537$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paramasivam, Srinivasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leesch, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fifi, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niimi, Yasunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berenstein, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><title>Iatrogenic dissection during neurointerventional procedures: a retrospective analysis</title><title>Journal of neurointerventional surgery</title><addtitle>J NeuroIntervent Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction Retrospective analysis of patients suffering iatrogenic dissection during neurointervention is reported. The circumstances surrounding the occurrence, early detection, clinical course and management options are discussed. Methods and results 18 iatrogenic dissections over 11 years were retrospectively analyzed. Data were gathered from patient records, run sheets, morbidity records and imaging studies. All procedures were done by operators trained to operate according to institution standards. Total cases were 6981, with 3925 angiograms and 3056 interventions. Incidence was 0.26%, with 0.25% during diagnostic and 0.26% during intervention. 1031 pediatric cases had no dissections. Beyond 35 years, dissection rate increased to 0.35%. There was no difference between men and women. Carotid dissection was more common than vertebral. Most were minimal intimal tear (67%) and others flow limiting (33%). All cases were managed with heparin in the acute stage and later with aspirin and Plavix or Coumadin, except in two cases. Cases having &gt;70% luminal narrowing with poor intracranial cross circulation were stented. None presented with neurologic deficits acutely or on follow-up. 94% of patients were followed for a variable period, with variable imaging modalities, being a retrospective study. Angiogram, MRI brain with MR angiography (MRA), Doppler ultrasonogram and CT angiograms were used for follow-up. There was good outcome in 94% of the followed-up cases. Conclusion Iatrogenic dissection is a random event with a benign clinical course. Early detection and aggressive management result in excellent outcome. Angiography is the best modality to follow-up. Non-invasive imaging like MRI with MRA and duplex ultrasonography are good tools to follow dissections.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Carotid arteries</subject><subject>Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection - etiology</subject><subject>Catheterization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Cerebral Angiography - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iatrogenic Disease - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Three dimensional imaging</subject><subject>Thrombolytic Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><subject>Vertebral Artery Dissection - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Vertebral Artery Dissection - etiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1759-8478</issn><issn>1759-8486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAYhYMobk7_gha88aaapPmqd1J0DkQFP25D0r4dnVs7k3bovzelOsQryUUC5znnfXMQOiH4nJBEXNTQuapufefmMcWExJiEk-ygMZE8jRVTYnf7lmqEDrxfYCwkl3wfjShJU8wTOUYvM9O6Zg51lUdF5T3kbdXUUdHHz6N-TBPmgNtA3QtmGa1dk0PQwV9GJnIQ7H7d2zYQmQB8-sofor3SLD0cfd8T9HJz_ZzdxncP01l2dRdbplQbKyIsoybnkpWUMyslgZSTnFgD1hSFJcTQktJUJVwJkXCWcovLQqSKsZzaZILOhtyw1HsHvtWryuewXJoams7rUIkUgmCZBPT0D7poOhf2DZRUQmHKCA-UHKg8_Mo7KPXaVSvjPkOU7pvXv5rXffN6aD44j7_zO7uCYuv7qToA8QBUvoWPrW7cmxYykVzfv2b68VYwxp-mOgs8HXi7Wvx7iy8gxKNI</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>Paramasivam, Srinivasan</creator><creator>Leesch, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Fifi, Johanna</creator><creator>Ortiz, Rafael</creator><creator>Niimi, Yasunari</creator><creator>Berenstein, Alejandro</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Iatrogenic dissection during neurointerventional procedures: a retrospective analysis</title><author>Paramasivam, Srinivasan ; Leesch, Wolfgang ; Fifi, Johanna ; Ortiz, Rafael ; Niimi, Yasunari ; Berenstein, Alejandro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b488t-816b42ac574f254b771e951c1baebaddb11a2f22983586635495b0fd69844c2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Carotid arteries</topic><topic>Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection - etiology</topic><topic>Catheterization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Cerebral Angiography - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iatrogenic Disease - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Three dimensional imaging</topic><topic>Thrombolytic Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><topic>Vertebral Artery Dissection - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Vertebral Artery Dissection - etiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paramasivam, Srinivasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leesch, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fifi, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortiz, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niimi, Yasunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berenstein, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurointerventional surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paramasivam, Srinivasan</au><au>Leesch, Wolfgang</au><au>Fifi, Johanna</au><au>Ortiz, Rafael</au><au>Niimi, Yasunari</au><au>Berenstein, Alejandro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Iatrogenic dissection during neurointerventional procedures: a retrospective analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurointerventional surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J NeuroIntervent Surg</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>331</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>331-335</pages><issn>1759-8478</issn><eissn>1759-8486</eissn><abstract>Introduction Retrospective analysis of patients suffering iatrogenic dissection during neurointervention is reported. The circumstances surrounding the occurrence, early detection, clinical course and management options are discussed. Methods and results 18 iatrogenic dissections over 11 years were retrospectively analyzed. Data were gathered from patient records, run sheets, morbidity records and imaging studies. All procedures were done by operators trained to operate according to institution standards. Total cases were 6981, with 3925 angiograms and 3056 interventions. Incidence was 0.26%, with 0.25% during diagnostic and 0.26% during intervention. 1031 pediatric cases had no dissections. Beyond 35 years, dissection rate increased to 0.35%. There was no difference between men and women. Carotid dissection was more common than vertebral. Most were minimal intimal tear (67%) and others flow limiting (33%). All cases were managed with heparin in the acute stage and later with aspirin and Plavix or Coumadin, except in two cases. Cases having &gt;70% luminal narrowing with poor intracranial cross circulation were stented. None presented with neurologic deficits acutely or on follow-up. 94% of patients were followed for a variable period, with variable imaging modalities, being a retrospective study. Angiogram, MRI brain with MR angiography (MRA), Doppler ultrasonogram and CT angiograms were used for follow-up. There was good outcome in 94% of the followed-up cases. Conclusion Iatrogenic dissection is a random event with a benign clinical course. Early detection and aggressive management result in excellent outcome. Angiography is the best modality to follow-up. Non-invasive imaging like MRI with MRA and duplex ultrasonography are good tools to follow dissections.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>21990537</pmid><doi>10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010103</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1759-8478
ispartof Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2012-09, Vol.4 (5), p.331-335
issn 1759-8478
1759-8486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1037661073
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age
Aged
Carotid arteries
Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection - diagnostic imaging
Carotid Artery, Internal, Dissection - etiology
Catheterization - adverse effects
Catheters
Cerebral Angiography - adverse effects
Dissection
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Iatrogenic Disease - prevention & control
Male
Medical imaging
Middle Aged
Mortality
Patients
Pediatrics
Retrospective Studies
Stroke
Three dimensional imaging
Thrombolytic Therapy - adverse effects
Ultrasonography
Veins & arteries
Vertebral Artery Dissection - diagnostic imaging
Vertebral Artery Dissection - etiology
Young Adult
title Iatrogenic dissection during neurointerventional procedures: a retrospective analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T10%3A02%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Iatrogenic%20dissection%20during%20neurointerventional%20procedures:%20a%20retrospective%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurointerventional%20surgery&rft.au=Paramasivam,%20Srinivasan&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=331-335&rft.issn=1759-8478&rft.eissn=1759-8486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1037661073%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1786802415&rft_id=info:pmid/21990537&rfr_iscdi=true