Mammographic changes resulting from benign breast surgery impair breast cancer detection at screening mammography

Abstract Purpose To study possible explanations for lower screening performance after previous benign breast surgery. Patients and methods We included a consecutive series of 351,009 screening examinations in 85,274 women, obtained between January 1, 1997 and January 1, 2009. The examinations of wom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 2012-09, Vol.48 (14), p.2097-2103
Hauptverfasser: van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian, Duijm, Lucien E.M, Voogd, Adri C, Jansen, Frits H, Louwman, Marieke W.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2103
container_issue 14
container_start_page 2097
container_title European journal of cancer (1990)
container_volume 48
creator van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian
Duijm, Lucien E.M
Voogd, Adri C
Jansen, Frits H
Louwman, Marieke W.J
description Abstract Purpose To study possible explanations for lower screening performance after previous benign breast surgery. Patients and methods We included a consecutive series of 351,009 screening examinations in 85,274 women, obtained between January 1, 1997 and January 1, 2009. The examinations of women with screen detected cancers (SDC) or interval cancers (IC), diagnosed after previous benign breast surgery, were reviewed by two screening radiologists. They determined the presence and degree of post surgical changes, classified breast density and determined whether mammographic interpretation was hampered by tissue characteristics. They also assessed whether the cancer had already been visible at a previous screen. Results Screening sensitivity was lower in women with prior benign breast surgery than without (63.5% (115/181) versus 73.5% (1643/2236), p = 0.004). A total of 115 SDCs and 66 ICs were diagnosed in breasts after previous benign breast surgery. Post surgical mammographic alterations in the breast segment where cancer was diagnosed were more distinct in ICs than in SDCs ( p = 0.001). Women with post surgical mammographic changes at the location of the breast cancer had an increased interval cancer risk (OR = 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05–4.26). Limited mammographic interpretation due to tissue characteristics was mentioned, only in three SDCs and one IC. The proportions of SDCs and ICS that were already visible at a previous screen were comparable for women with and without prior surgery (SDC: 47.5% versus 43.8%, p = 0.3, IC: 50.0% versus 48.4%, p = 0.8). Conclusion Previous benign breast surgery decreases screening sensitivity and this is likely due to postoperative mammographic changes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1036880939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959804912002663</els_id><sourcerecordid>1036880939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-f0dd3540c165f13b3650cb880aad59911ce69d66961db79e1f2be6fe103820e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2L1TAUhoMoznX0D7iQbgQ3rSdJm9uACMPgF4y4UNchTU87qW16J2mF--895d4ZwYWrQHje9yQPh7GXHAoOXL0dChycLQRwUYAsgPNHbMfrvc6hrsRjtgNd6byGUl-wZykNALCvS3jKLoSouBRC79jdVztNcx_t4da7zN3a0GPKIqZ1XHzosy7OU9Zg8H3Imog2LVlaY4_xmPnpYH28v3U2OIxZiwu6xc8hs0S6iBSlmulhyvE5e9LZMeGL83nJfn788OP6c37z7dOX66ub3JUlX_IO2lZWJTiuqo7LRqoKXFPXYG1bac25Q6VbpbTibbPXyDvRoOqQg6wFoJCX7M2p9xDnuxXTYiafHI6jDTivyRCoqE5LTag4oS7OKUXszCH6ycYjQWZTbQazqTabagPSkGoKvTr3r82E7UPk3i0Br8-ATc6OXSRDPv3lFH1P14q4dycOycZvj9Ek55Fstj6SS9PO_v_veP9P3I0-eJr4C4-YhnmNgTwbbhJlzPdtKbad4AJAKCXlH0IvswA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1036880939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mammographic changes resulting from benign breast surgery impair breast cancer detection at screening mammography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian ; Duijm, Lucien E.M ; Voogd, Adri C ; Jansen, Frits H ; Louwman, Marieke W.J</creator><creatorcontrib>van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian ; Duijm, Lucien E.M ; Voogd, Adri C ; Jansen, Frits H ; Louwman, Marieke W.J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose To study possible explanations for lower screening performance after previous benign breast surgery. Patients and methods We included a consecutive series of 351,009 screening examinations in 85,274 women, obtained between January 1, 1997 and January 1, 2009. The examinations of women with screen detected cancers (SDC) or interval cancers (IC), diagnosed after previous benign breast surgery, were reviewed by two screening radiologists. They determined the presence and degree of post surgical changes, classified breast density and determined whether mammographic interpretation was hampered by tissue characteristics. They also assessed whether the cancer had already been visible at a previous screen. Results Screening sensitivity was lower in women with prior benign breast surgery than without (63.5% (115/181) versus 73.5% (1643/2236), p = 0.004). A total of 115 SDCs and 66 ICs were diagnosed in breasts after previous benign breast surgery. Post surgical mammographic alterations in the breast segment where cancer was diagnosed were more distinct in ICs than in SDCs ( p = 0.001). Women with post surgical mammographic changes at the location of the breast cancer had an increased interval cancer risk (OR = 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05–4.26). Limited mammographic interpretation due to tissue characteristics was mentioned, only in three SDCs and one IC. The proportions of SDCs and ICS that were already visible at a previous screen were comparable for women with and without prior surgery (SDC: 47.5% versus 43.8%, p = 0.3, IC: 50.0% versus 48.4%, p = 0.8). Conclusion Previous benign breast surgery decreases screening sensitivity and this is likely due to postoperative mammographic changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22513229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Breast - pathology ; Breast - surgery ; Breast cancer ; Breast density ; Breast Diseases - surgery ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Mammography ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Odds Ratio ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - pathology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Regression Analysis ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Screening mammography ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 2012-09, Vol.48 (14), p.2097-2103</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-f0dd3540c165f13b3650cb880aad59911ce69d66961db79e1f2be6fe103820e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-f0dd3540c165f13b3650cb880aad59911ce69d66961db79e1f2be6fe103820e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804912002663$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=26354986$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22513229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duijm, Lucien E.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voogd, Adri C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Frits H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louwman, Marieke W.J</creatorcontrib><title>Mammographic changes resulting from benign breast surgery impair breast cancer detection at screening mammography</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose To study possible explanations for lower screening performance after previous benign breast surgery. Patients and methods We included a consecutive series of 351,009 screening examinations in 85,274 women, obtained between January 1, 1997 and January 1, 2009. The examinations of women with screen detected cancers (SDC) or interval cancers (IC), diagnosed after previous benign breast surgery, were reviewed by two screening radiologists. They determined the presence and degree of post surgical changes, classified breast density and determined whether mammographic interpretation was hampered by tissue characteristics. They also assessed whether the cancer had already been visible at a previous screen. Results Screening sensitivity was lower in women with prior benign breast surgery than without (63.5% (115/181) versus 73.5% (1643/2236), p = 0.004). A total of 115 SDCs and 66 ICs were diagnosed in breasts after previous benign breast surgery. Post surgical mammographic alterations in the breast segment where cancer was diagnosed were more distinct in ICs than in SDCs ( p = 0.001). Women with post surgical mammographic changes at the location of the breast cancer had an increased interval cancer risk (OR = 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05–4.26). Limited mammographic interpretation due to tissue characteristics was mentioned, only in three SDCs and one IC. The proportions of SDCs and ICS that were already visible at a previous screen were comparable for women with and without prior surgery (SDC: 47.5% versus 43.8%, p = 0.3, IC: 50.0% versus 48.4%, p = 0.8). Conclusion Previous benign breast surgery decreases screening sensitivity and this is likely due to postoperative mammographic changes.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast - surgery</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast density</subject><subject>Breast Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - pathology</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Screening mammography</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2L1TAUhoMoznX0D7iQbgQ3rSdJm9uACMPgF4y4UNchTU87qW16J2mF--895d4ZwYWrQHje9yQPh7GXHAoOXL0dChycLQRwUYAsgPNHbMfrvc6hrsRjtgNd6byGUl-wZykNALCvS3jKLoSouBRC79jdVztNcx_t4da7zN3a0GPKIqZ1XHzosy7OU9Zg8H3Imog2LVlaY4_xmPnpYH28v3U2OIxZiwu6xc8hs0S6iBSlmulhyvE5e9LZMeGL83nJfn788OP6c37z7dOX66ub3JUlX_IO2lZWJTiuqo7LRqoKXFPXYG1bac25Q6VbpbTibbPXyDvRoOqQg6wFoJCX7M2p9xDnuxXTYiafHI6jDTivyRCoqE5LTag4oS7OKUXszCH6ycYjQWZTbQazqTabagPSkGoKvTr3r82E7UPk3i0Br8-ATc6OXSRDPv3lFH1P14q4dycOycZvj9Ek55Fstj6SS9PO_v_veP9P3I0-eJr4C4-YhnmNgTwbbhJlzPdtKbad4AJAKCXlH0IvswA</recordid><startdate>20120901</startdate><enddate>20120901</enddate><creator>van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian</creator><creator>Duijm, Lucien E.M</creator><creator>Voogd, Adri C</creator><creator>Jansen, Frits H</creator><creator>Louwman, Marieke W.J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120901</creationdate><title>Mammographic changes resulting from benign breast surgery impair breast cancer detection at screening mammography</title><author>van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian ; Duijm, Lucien E.M ; Voogd, Adri C ; Jansen, Frits H ; Louwman, Marieke W.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-f0dd3540c165f13b3650cb880aad59911ce69d66961db79e1f2be6fe103820e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast - surgery</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast density</topic><topic>Breast Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - pathology</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Screening mammography</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duijm, Lucien E.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voogd, Adri C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Frits H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Louwman, Marieke W.J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Breest Smallenburg, Vivian</au><au>Duijm, Lucien E.M</au><au>Voogd, Adri C</au><au>Jansen, Frits H</au><au>Louwman, Marieke W.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mammographic changes resulting from benign breast surgery impair breast cancer detection at screening mammography</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><date>2012-09-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>2097</spage><epage>2103</epage><pages>2097-2103</pages><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose To study possible explanations for lower screening performance after previous benign breast surgery. Patients and methods We included a consecutive series of 351,009 screening examinations in 85,274 women, obtained between January 1, 1997 and January 1, 2009. The examinations of women with screen detected cancers (SDC) or interval cancers (IC), diagnosed after previous benign breast surgery, were reviewed by two screening radiologists. They determined the presence and degree of post surgical changes, classified breast density and determined whether mammographic interpretation was hampered by tissue characteristics. They also assessed whether the cancer had already been visible at a previous screen. Results Screening sensitivity was lower in women with prior benign breast surgery than without (63.5% (115/181) versus 73.5% (1643/2236), p = 0.004). A total of 115 SDCs and 66 ICs were diagnosed in breasts after previous benign breast surgery. Post surgical mammographic alterations in the breast segment where cancer was diagnosed were more distinct in ICs than in SDCs ( p = 0.001). Women with post surgical mammographic changes at the location of the breast cancer had an increased interval cancer risk (OR = 2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05–4.26). Limited mammographic interpretation due to tissue characteristics was mentioned, only in three SDCs and one IC. The proportions of SDCs and ICS that were already visible at a previous screen were comparable for women with and without prior surgery (SDC: 47.5% versus 43.8%, p = 0.3, IC: 50.0% versus 48.4%, p = 0.8). Conclusion Previous benign breast surgery decreases screening sensitivity and this is likely due to postoperative mammographic changes.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22513229</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8049
ispartof European journal of cancer (1990), 2012-09, Vol.48 (14), p.2097-2103
issn 0959-8049
1879-0852
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1036880939
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Breast - pathology
Breast - surgery
Breast cancer
Breast density
Breast Diseases - surgery
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Chi-Square Distribution
Female
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Mammography
Mass Screening - methods
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Odds Ratio
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - pathology
Predictive Value of Tests
Regression Analysis
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Screening mammography
Sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tumors
title Mammographic changes resulting from benign breast surgery impair breast cancer detection at screening mammography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T00%3A22%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mammographic%20changes%20resulting%20from%20benign%20breast%20surgery%20impair%20breast%20cancer%20detection%20at%20screening%20mammography&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=van%20Breest%20Smallenburg,%20Vivian&rft.date=2012-09-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=2097&rft.epage=2103&rft.pages=2097-2103&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1036880939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1036880939&rft_id=info:pmid/22513229&rft_els_id=S0959804912002663&rfr_iscdi=true